Known Unknowns: A Critical Determinant of Confidence and Calibration

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2016.2580

References

  • Alpert M, Raiffa H (1982) A progress report on the training of probability assessors. Kahneman D, Slovic P, Tversky A, eds. Judgement Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (Cambridge University Press, New York).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Alter AL, Oppenheimer DM, Zemla JC (2010) Missing the trees for the forest: A construal level account of the illusion of explanatory depth. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 99(3):436–451.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Babad E (1987) Wishful thinking and objectivity among sports fans. Soc. Behaviour 2(4):231–240.Google Scholar
  • Baumann AO, Deber RB, Thompson GG (1991) Overconfidence among physicians and nurses: The “micro-certainty, macro-uncertainty” phenomenon. Soc. Sci. Medicine 32(2):167–174.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ben-David I, Graham JR, Harvey CR (2007) Managerial overconfidence and corporate policies. NBER Working Paper 13711, National Bureau Economonic Research, Cambridge, MA.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brenner L, Griffin D, Koehler DJ (2005) Modeling patterns of probability calibration with random support theory: Diagnosing case-based judgment. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 97(1):64–81.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Buehler R, Griffin D, Ross M (1994) Exploring the “planning fallacy”: Why people underestimate their task completion times. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 67(3):366–381.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Camerer C, Lovallo D (1999) Overconfidence and excess entry: An experimental approach. Amer. Econom. Rev. 89(1)306–318.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Erev I, Wallsten TS, Budescu DV (1994) Simultaneous over- and underconfidence: The role of error in judgment processes. Psych. Rev. 101(3):519–527.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Feiler DC, Tong JD, Larrick RP (2013) Biased judgment in censored environments. Management Sci. 59(3):573–591.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Fernbach PM, Rogers T, Fox CR, Sloman SA (2013) Political extremism is supported by an illusion of understanding. Psych. Sci. 24(6):939–946.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ferrell WR, McGoey PJ (1980) A model of calibration for subjective probabilities. Organ. Behav. Human Performance 26(1):32–53.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fischhoff B, Slovic P, Lichtenstein S (1978) Fault trees: Sensitivity of estimated failure probabilities to problem representation. J. Experiment. Psych.: Human Perception Performance 4(2):330–344.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fox CR (1999) Strength of evidence, judged probability, and choice under uncertainty. Cognitive Psych. 38(1):167–189.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fox CR, Clemen RT (2005) Subjective probability assessment in decision analysis: Partition dependence and bias toward the ignorance prior. Management Sci. 51(9):1417–1432.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gigerenzer G, Hoffrage U, Kleinbölting H (1991) Probabilistic mental models: A Brunswikian theory of confidence. Psych. Rev. 98(4):506–528.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gordon MR, Trainor BE (2006) Cobra II: The Inside Story of the Invasion and Occupation of Iraq (Vintage, New York).Google Scholar
  • Griffin D, Brenner L (2004) Perspectives on probability judgment calibration. Blackwell Handbook of Judgment and Decision Making, 177–199.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Griffin D, Tversky A (1992) The weighing of evidence and the determinants of confidence. Cognitive Psych. 24(3):411–435.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hoch SJ (1985) Counterfactual reasoning and accuracy in predicting personal events. J. Experiment. Psych.: Learn., Memory, Cognition 11(4):719–731.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Johnson DD (2004) Overconfidence and War (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Johnson EJ, Häubl G, Keinan A (2007) Aspects of endowment: A query theory of value construction. J. Experiment. Psych. Learn., Memory, Cognition 33(3):461–474.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kahneman D (2011) Thinking, Fast and Slow (Macmillan, New York).Google Scholar
  • Kahneman D, Tversky A (1973) On the psychology of prediction. Psych. Rev. 80(4):237–251.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Klayman J (1995) Varieties of confirmation bias. Psych. Learn. Motivation 32:385–418.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Klayman J, Ha YW (1987) Confirmation, disconfirmation, and information in hypothesis testing. Psych. Rev. 94(2):211–228.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Klayman J, Soll JB, Gonzalez-Vallejo C, Barlas S (1999) Overconfidence: It depends on how, what, and whom you ask. Organ. Behavior Human Decision Processes 79(3):216–247.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Koehler DJ, Brenner L, Griffin D (2002) The calibration of expert judgment: Heuristics and biases beyond the laboratory. Gilovich T, Griffin D, Kahneman D, eds. Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 686–715.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Koriat A (2012) The self-consistency model of subjective confidence. Psych. Review 119(1):80–113.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Koriat A, Lichtenstein S, Fischhoff B (1980) Reasons for confidence. J. Experiment. Psych.: Human Learn. Memory 6(2):107–118.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kunda Z (1990) The case for motivated reasoning. Psych. Bull. 108(3):480–498.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Larrick RP (1993) Motivational factors in decision theories: The role of self-protection. Psych. Bull. 113(3):440–450.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mahajan J (1992) The overconfidence effect in marketing management predictions. J. Marketing Res. 29(3):329–342.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Malmendier U, Tate G (2005) CEO overconfidence and corporate investment. J. Finance 60(6):2661–2700.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McClelland AG, Bolger F (1994) The calibration of subjective probability: Theories and models 1980–94. Wright G, Ayton P, eds. Subjective Probability (John Wiley & Sons, Oxford, UK), 453–482.Google Scholar
  • Moore DA, Healy PJ (2008) The trouble with overconfidence. Psych. Rev. 115(2):502–517.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mynatt CR, Doherty ME, Tweney RD (1977) Confirmation bias in a simulated research environment: An experimental study of scientific inference. Quart. J. Experiment. Psych. 29(1):85–95.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nickerson RS (1998) Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Rev. General Psych. 2(2):175–220.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Oskamp S (1965) Overconfidence in case-study judgments. J. Consulting Psych. 29(3):261–318.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rottenstreich Y, Tversky A (1997) Unpacking, repacking, and anchoring: Advances in support theory. Psych. Rev. 104(2):406–318.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rozenblit L, Keil F (2002) The misunderstood limits of folk science: An illusion of explanatory depth. Cognitive Sci. 26(5):521–562.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sanbonmatsu DM, Kardes FR, Herr PM (1992) The role of prior knowledge and missing information in multiattribute evaluation. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 51(1):76–91.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sanbonmatsu DM, Kardes FR, Sansone C (1991) Remembering less and inferring more: Effects of time of judgment on inferences about unknown attributes. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 61(4):546–554.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schwenk CR, Cosier RA (1980) Effects of the expert, devil’s advocate, and dialectical inquiry methods on prediction performance. Organ. Behav. Human Performance 26(3):409–424.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • See KE, Fox CR, Rottenstreich YS (2006) Between ignorance and truth: Partition dependence and learning in judgment under uncertainty. J. Experiment. Psych.: Learn., Memory, Cognition 32(6):1385–1402.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Soll JB (1996) Determinants of overconfidence and miscalibration: The roles of random error and ecological structure. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 65(2):117–137.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Soll JB, Klayman J (2004) Overconfidence in interval estimates. J. Experiment. Psych.: Learn., Memory, Cognition 30(2):299–314.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Spiller SA, Fitzsimons GJ, Lynch JG Jr, McClelland GH (2013) Spotlights, floodlights, and the magic number zero: Simple effects tests in moderated regression. J. Marketing Res. 50(2):277–288.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tannenbaum D, Fox CR, Ülkümen G (2017) Judgment extremity and accuracy under epistemic vs. aleatory uncertainty. Management Sci. 63(2):497–518.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Tversky A, Kahneman D (1971) Belief in the law of small numbers. Psych. Bull. 76(2):105–110.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tversky A, Kahneman D (1974) Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science 185(4157):1124–1131.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tversky A, Koehler DJ (1994) Support theory: A nonextensional representation of subjective probability. Psych. Rev. 101(4):547–567.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.