Identity in Charitable Giving

References

• Ai C, Norton EC (2003) Interaction terms in logit and probit models. Econom. lett. 80(1):123–129.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Akerlof GA, Kranton RE (2000) Economics and identity. Quart. J. Econom. 115(3):715–753.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Andreoni J (1989) Giving with impure altruism: Applications to charity and Ricardian equivalence. J. Political Econom. 97(6):1447–1458.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Andreoni J (1990) Impure altruism and donations to public goods: A theory of warm-glow giving? Econom. J. 100(401):464–477.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Andreoni J (2006) Philanthropy. Kolm SC, Mercier JM, eds. Handbook of the Economics of Giving, Altruism and Reciprocity (Elsevier Press, North-Holland), 1201–1269.Google Scholar
• Andreoni J, Rao JM, Trachtman H (2017) Avoiding the ask: A field experiment on altruism, empathy, and charitable giving. J. Political Econom. 125(3):625–653.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bargh JA (2006) What have we been priming all these years? On the development, mechanisms, and ecology of nonconscious social behavior. Eur. J. Soc. Psych. 36(2):147–168.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Batson CD (1991) The Altruism Question: Toward a Social-Psychological Answer (Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ).Google Scholar
• Becker GS (1974) A theory of social interactions. J. Political Econom. 82(6):1063–1093.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bendapudi N, Singh SN, Bendapudi V (1996) Enhancing helping behavior: An integrative framework for promotion planning. J. Marketing. 60(3):33–49.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benjamin DT, Choi JJ, Fisher G (2013) Social identity and preferences. Mimeo, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
• Benjamin DT, Choi JJ, Strickland AJ (2010) Social identity and preferences. Amer. Econom. Rev. 100(4):1913–1928.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berger J, Fitzsimons GM (2008) Dogs on the street, Pumas on your feet: How cues in the environment influence product evaluation and choice. J. Marketing Res. 45(1):1–14.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cialdini RB, Ascani K (1976) Test of a concession procedure for inducing verbal, behavioral, and further compliance with a request to give blood. J. Appl. Psych. 61(3):295–300.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cialdini RB, Kendrick DT (1976) Altruism as hedonism: A social development perspective on the relationship of negative mood state and helping. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 34(5):907–914.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cialdini RB, Schroeder DA (1976) Increasing compliance by legitimizing paltry contributions: When even a penny helps. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 34(4):599–604.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohn A, Fehr E, Maréchal MA (2014) Business culture and dishonesty in the banking industry. Nature 516:86–89.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DellaVigna S, List JA, Malmendier U (2012) Testing for altruism and social pressure in charitable giving. Quart. J. Econom. 127(1):1–56.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deshpande’ R, Hoyer WD, Donthu N (1986) The intensity of ethnic affiliation: A study of the sociology of Hispanic consumption. J. Consumer Res. 13(2):214–220.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Elfenbein DW, Fisman R, Mcmanus B (2012) Charity as a substitute for reputation: Evidence from an online marketplace. Rev. Econom. Stud. 79(4):1441–1468.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Encyclopædia Britannica (2015) s.v. “Occam’s razor.” Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc., last updated June 4, 2015. Web. 4. http://www.britannica.com/topic/Occams-razor.Google Scholar
• Falk A (2007) Gift-exchange in the field. Econometrica 75(5):1501–1511.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frey BS, Meier S (2004) Social comparisons and pro-social behavior: Testing “conditional cooperation” in a field experiment. Amer. Econom. Rev. 94(5):1717–1722.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gilboa I, Schmeidler D (1995) Case-based decision theory. Quart. J. Econom. 110(3):605–639.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Giving USA Foundation (2012) Giving USA 2012: The annual report on philanthropy for the year 2011. Report, Giving USA Foundation, Indianapolis. Accessed April 2, 2013, https://givingusa.org/product/giving-usa-2012-the-annual-report-on-philanthropy-for-the-year-2011-executive-summary/.Google Scholar
• Gneezy A, Gneezy U, Nelson LD, Brown A (2010) Shared social responsibility: A field experiment in pay-what-you-want pricing and charitable giving. Science 329(5989):325–327.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gneezy A, Gneezy U, Riener G, Nelson LD (2012) Pay-what-you-want, identity, and self-signaling in markets. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109(19):7236–7240.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goldstein NJ, Cialdini RB, Griskevicius V (2008) A room with a viewpoint: Using social norms to motivate environmental conservation in hotels. J. Consumer Res. 35(3):472–482.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hedges LV, Nowell A (1995) Sex differences in mental test scores, variability, and numbers of high-scoring individuals. Science 269(5220):41–45.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hogg MA (2003) Social identity. Leary MR, Tangney JP, eds. Handbook of Self and Identity (Guilford Press, New York), 462–479.Google Scholar
• James W (1890) The Principles of Psychology (Henry Holt, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Karlan D, List JA (2007) Does price matter in charitable giving? Evidence from a large-scale natural field experiment. Amer. Econom. Rev. 97(5):1774–1793.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kay AC, Wheeler SC, Bargh JA, Ross L (2004) Material priming: The influence of mundane physical objects on situational construal and competitive behavioral choice. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 95(1):83–96.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kessler JB (2013) Announcements of support and public good provision. Working paper, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
• Kleine RE, Kleine SS, Kernan JB (1993) Mundane consumption and the self: A social identity perspective. J. Consumer Psych. 2(3):209–235.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Landry CE, Lange A, List JA, Price MK, Rupp NG (2006) Toward an understanding of the economics of charity: Evidence from a field experiment. Quart. J. Econom. 121(2):747–782.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Landry CE, Lange A, List JA, Price MK, Rupp NG (2010) Is a donor in hand better than two in the bush? Evidence from a natural field experiment. Amer. Econom. Rev. 100(3):958–983.Crossref, Google Scholar
• LeBoeuf RA, Shafir E, Bayuk JB (2010) The conflicting choices of alternating selves. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 111(1):48–61.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li SX, De Oliveira ACM, Eckel C (2014) Common identity and the voluntary provision of public goods: An experimental investigation. Working paper, University of Texas, Dallas.Google Scholar
• Liberman V, Samuels SM, Ross L (2004) The name of the game: Predictive power of reputations versus situational labels in determining prisoner’s dilemma game moves. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 30(9):1175–1185.Crossref, Google Scholar
• List JA, Lucking-Reiley D (2002) The effects of seed money and refunds on charitable giving: Experimental evidence from a university capital campaign. J. Political Econom. 110(8):215–233.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meer J (2011) Brother, can you spare a dime: Peer pressure in charitable solicitation. J. Public Econom. 95(7-8):926–941.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meer J (2013) The habit of giving. Econom. Inquiry 51(4):2002–2017.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meer J, Rosen HS (2011) The ABCs of charitable solicitation. J. Public Econom. 95(5-6):363–371.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reed II A (2004) Activating the self-importance of consumer selves: Exploring identity salience effects on judgments. J. Consumer Res. 31(2):286–295.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reicher S, Levine M (1994) Deindividuation, power relations between groups and the expression of social identity: The effects of visibility to the out-group. British J. Soc. Psych. 33(2):145–163.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shariff AF, Norenzayan A (2007) God is watching you: Priming God concepts increases prosocial behavior in an anonymous economic game. Psych. Sci. 18(9):803–809.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shang J, Croson R (2009) A field experiment in charitable contribution: The impact of social information on the voluntary provision of public goods. Econom. J. 119(540):1422–1439.Google Scholar
• Shang J, Reed A, Croson R (2008) Identity congruency effects on donations. J. Marketing Res. 45(3):351–361.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shih M, Pittinsky TL, Ambady N (1999) Stereotype susceptibility: Identity salience and shifts in quantitative performance. Psych. Sci. 10(1):80–83.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Small DA (2011) Sympathy biases and sympathy appeals: Reducing social distance to boost charitable contributions. Oppenheimer DM, Olivola CY, eds. Experimental Approaches to the Study of Charity. (Taylor & Francis Group, New York), 149–160.Google Scholar
• Small DA, Loewenstein G (2003) Helping “A” victim or helping “THE” victim: Altruism and identifiability. J. Risk Uncertainty. 26(1):5–16.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Small DA, Simonsohn U (2008) Friends of victims: Personal experience and prosocial behavior. J. Consumer Res. (Special Issue on Transformative Consumer Research) 35(3):532–542.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Srull TK, Wyer RS (1979) The role of category accessibility in the interpretation of information about persons: Some determinants and implications. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 37(10):1660–1672.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stayman DM, Deshpande R (1989) Situational ethnicity and consumer behavior. J. Consumer Res. 16(3):361–371.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Steele CM (1997) A threat is in the air: How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance. Amer. Psych. 52(6):613–629.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Steele CM, Aronson J (1995) Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of african americans. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 69(5):797–811.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Steen LA (1987) Mathematics education: A predictor of scientific competitiveness. Science 237(4812):251–302.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Terry DJ, Hogg MA (1996) Group norms and the attitude-behaviour relationship: A role for group identification. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 22(8):776–793.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Terry DJ, Hogg MA, White KM (1999) The theory of planned behaviour: Self-identity, social identity, and group norms. British J. Soc. Psych. 38(3):225–244.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Turner JC (1985) Social categorization and the self-concept: A social cognitive theory of group behavior. Lawler EJ, ed. Advances in Group Processes, Vol. 2 (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT),77–121.Google Scholar
• Vesterlund L (2006) Why do people give? Steinberg R, Powell WW, eds. The Nonprofit Sector, 2nd ed. (Yale Press, New Haven, CT), 568–587.Google Scholar