Target-Adjusted Utility Functions and Expected-Utility Paradoxes

References

• Ali MM (1977) Probability and utility estimates for racetrack bettors. J. Political Econom. 85(4):803–815.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Allais M (1953) Le comportement de l’homme rationnel devant le risque: critiques des postulats et axioms de l’ecole americaine. Econometrica. 21(4):503–546.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arkes HR, Hirshleifer D, Jiang D, Lim S (2008) Reference point adaptation: Tests in the domain of security trading. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 105(1):67–81.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barberis N (2013) The psychology of tail events: Progress and challenges. Amer. Econom. Rev. Papers Proc. 103(3):611–616.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bateman I, Day B, Loomes G, Sugden R (2006) Ranking versus choice in the elicitation of preferences. Working paper, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.Google Scholar
• Baucells M, Heukamp FH (2012) Probability and time trade-off. Management Sci. 58(4):831–842.Link, Google Scholar
• Baucells M, Villasís A (2010) Stability of risk preferences and the reflection effect of prospect theory. Theory Decision 68(1):193–211.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bell DE (1982) Regret in decision making under uncertainty. Oper. Res. 30(5):961–981.Link, Google Scholar
• Bell DE (1985) Disappointment in decision making under uncertainty. Oper. Res. 33(1):1–27.Link, Google Scholar
• Blavatskyy PR (2010a) Reverse common ratio effect. J. Risk Uncertainty 40(3):219–241.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blavatskyy PR (2010b) Modifying the mean-variance approach to avoid violations of stochastic dominance. Management Sci. 56(11):2050–2057.Link, Google Scholar
• Bordalo P, Gennaioli N, Shleifer A (2012) Salience theory of choice under risk. Quart. J. Econom. 127(3):1243–1285.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bordley R, LiCalzi M (2000) Decision analysis using targets instead of utility functions. Decisions Econom. Finance 23(1):53–74.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown DB, De Giorgi E, Sim M (2012) Aspirational preferences and their representation by risk measures. Management Sci. 58(11):2095–2113.Link, Google Scholar
• Diecidue E, van de Ven J (2008) Aspiration level, probability of success and failure, and expected utility. Internat. Econom. Rev. 49(2):683–700.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ellsberg D (1961) Risk, ambiguity, and the Savage axioms. Quart. J. Econom. 75(4):643–669.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Erev I, Roth AE, Slonim RK, Barron G (2002) Combining a theoretical prediction with experimental evidence to yield a new prediction: An experimental design with a random sample of tasks. Working paper, Technion, Haifa, Israel.Google Scholar
• Fan C-P (2002) Allais paradox in the small. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 49(3):411–421.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fishburn P (1977) Mean-risk analysis associated with below-target returns. Amer. Econom. Rev. 67(2):116–126.Google Scholar
• Fox CR, Poldrack RA (2009) Prospect theory and the brain. Glimcher PW, Fehr E, Camerer C, Poldrack RA, eds. Neuroeconomics: Decision Making and the Brain (Academic Press, San Diego), 145–174.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fox CR, Erner C, Walters DJ (2016) Decision under risk: From the field to the laboratory and back. Keren G, Wu G, eds. The Wiley Blackwell Handbook of Judgment and Decision Making (John Wiley & Sons, Malden, MA), 43–88.Google Scholar
• Friedman M, Savage LJ (1948) The utility analysis of choices involving risk. J. Political Econom. 56(4):279–304.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Garrett TA, Sobel RS (1999) Gamblers favor skewness, not risk: Further evidence from United States’ lottery games. Econom. Lett. 63(1):85–90.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gilboa I, Schmeidler D (1989) Maxmin expected utility with non-unique prior. J. Math. Econom. 18(2):141–153.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Golec J, Tamarkin M (1998) Bettors love skewness, not risk, at the horse track. J. Political Econom. 106(1):205–225.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hershey J, Schoemaker P (1980) Prospect theory’s reflection hypothesis: A critical examination. Organ. Behav. Human Performance 25(3):395–418.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holthausen DM (1981) A risk-return model with risk and return measured as deviations from a target return. Amer. Econom. Rev. 71(1):182–188.Google Scholar
• Huck S, Muller W (2012) Allais for all: Revisiting the paradox in a large representative sample. J. Risk Uncertainty 44(3):261–293.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Tversky A (1979) Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47(2):263–292.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kőszegi B, Rabin M (2006) A model of reference-dependent preferences. Quart J. Econom. 121(4):1133–1165.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kőszegi B, Rabin M (2007) Reference-dependent risk attitudes. Amer. Econom. Rev. 97(4):1047–1073.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kőszegi B, Szeidl A (2013) A model of focusing in economic choice. Quart. J. Econom. 128(1):53–104.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Loewenstein G, Prelec D (1991) Decision making over time and under uncertainty: A common approach. Management Sci. 37(7):770–786.Link, Google Scholar
• Loomes G, Sugden R (1982) Regret theory: An alternative theory of rational choice under uncertainty. Econom. J. 92(368):805–824.Google Scholar
• Loomes G, Sugden R (1986) Disappointment and dynamic consistency in choice under uncertainty. Rev. Econom. Stud. 53(2):271–282.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Markowitz H (1952) The utility of wealth. J. Political Econom. 60(2):151–158.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Neilson W, Stowe J (2002) A further examination of cumulative prospect theory parameterizations. J. Risk Uncertainty 24(1):31–46.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ottaviani M, Sørensen PN (2008) The favorite-longshot bias: An overview of the main explanations. Hausch DB, Ziemba WT, eds. Handbook of Sports and Lottery Markets (North-Holland, Boston), 83–101.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Post T, Levy H (2005) Does risk seeking drive stock prices? A stochastic dominance analysis of aggregate investor preferences and beliefs. Rev. Financial Stud. 18(3):925–953.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Post T, van Vliet P, Levy H (2008) Risk aversion and skewness preference. J. Banking Finance 32(7):1178–1187.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Prelec D (1998) The probability weighting function. Econometrica 66(3):497–527.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Quiggin J (1990) Stochastic dominance in regret theory. Rev. Econom. Stud. 57(3):503–511.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rabin M (2000) Risk aversion and expected utility theory: A calibration theorem. Econometrica 68(5):1281–1292.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rawls J (1971) A Theory of Justice (Belknap, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Samuelson P (1963) Risk and uncertainty: A fallacy of large numbers. Scientia 98:108–113.Google Scholar
• Savage L (1951) The theory of statistical decision. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 46(253):55–67.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schmidt U, Zank H (2005) What is loss aversion? J. Risk Uncertainty 30(2):157–167.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Scholten M, Read D (2014) Prospect theory and the “forgotten” fourfold pattern of risk preferences. J. Risk Uncertainty 48(1):67–83.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simonson I (1989) Choice based on reasons: The case for the attraction and compromise effects. J. Consumer Res. 16(2):158–174.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stewart N, Reimers S, Harris AJL (2015) On the origin of utility, weighting, and discounting functions: How they get their shapes and how to change their shapes. Management Sci. 61(3):687–705.Link, Google Scholar
• Tversky A, Kahneman D (1992) Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. J. Risk Uncertainty 5(4):297–323.Crossref, Google Scholar
• von Neumann J (1928) Zur Theorie der Gesellschaftsspiele. Math. Annalen 100:295–320.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wakker PP, Zank H (2002) A simple preference foundation of cumulative prospect theory with power utility. Eur. Econom. Rev. 46(7):1253–1271.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wald A (1945) Statistical decision functions which minimize the maximum risk. Ann. Math. 46(2):265–280.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weitzman M (1965) Utility analysis and group behavior: An empirical study. J. Political Econom. 73(1):18–26.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zeckhauser R, Keeler E (1970) Another type of risk aversion. Econometrica 38(5):661–665.Crossref, Google Scholar