Minimizing Risk Exposure When the Choice of a Risk Measure Is Ambiguous

References

• Acerbi C (2002) Spectral measures of risk: A coherent representation of subjective risk aversion. J. Banking Finance 26(7):1505–1518.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Armbruster B, Delage E (2015) Decision making under uncertainty when preference information is incomplete. Management Sci. 61(1):111–128.Link, Google Scholar
• Artzner P, Delbaen F, Eber JM, Heath D (1999) Coherent measures of risk. Math. Finance 9(3):203–228.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Babazadeh R, Razmi J, Pishvaee MS (2011) Robust facility location in supply chain network design under risk. Internat. J. Mechanic Systems Engrg. 1(1):35–47.Google Scholar
• Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (2012) Consultative document: Fundamental review of the trading book. Accessed October 1, 2016, http://www.bis.org/bcbs/publ/d305.pdf.Google Scholar
• Boutilier C, Patrascu R, Poupart P, Schuurmans D (2006) Constraint-based optimization and utility elicitation using the minimax decision criterion. Artificial Intelligence 170(8–9):686–713.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown DB, De Giorgi E, Sim M (2012) Aspirational preferences and their representation by risk measures. Management Sci. 58(11): 2095–2113.Link, Google Scholar
• Carneiro MC, Ribas GP, Hamacher S (2010) Risk management in the oil supply chain: A CVar approach. Indust. Engrg. Chemistry Res. 49(7):3286–3294.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chajewska U, Koller D, Parr R (2000) Making rational decisions using adaptive utility elicitation. Proc. 17th National Conf. Artificial Intelligence (AAAI) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA), 363–369.Google Scholar
• Chan TCY, Mahmoudzadeh H, Purdie TG (2014) A robust-CVaR optimization approach with application to breast cancer therapy. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 238(3):876–885.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clemen RT, Reilly T (2014) Making Hard Decisions with DecisionTools Suite, 3rd ed. (South-Western, Mason, OH).Google Scholar
• Cont R, Deguest R, Scandolo G (2010) Robustness and sensitivity analysis of risk measurement procedures. Quant. Finance 10(6): 593–606.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Debreu G (1954) Representation of a preference ordering by a numerical function. Thrall RM, Davis RL, Coombs CH, eds. Decision Processes (John Wiley & Sons, New York), 159–165.Google Scholar
• Einhorn D (2008) Private profits and socialized risk. Global Assoc. Risk Professionals Risk Rev. (42):10–18.Google Scholar
• Ellsberg D (1961) Risk, ambiguity, and the savage axioms. Quart. J. Econom. 75(4):643–669.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Föllmer H, Schied A (2002) Convex measures of risk and trading constraints. Finance Stochastics 6(4):429–447.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grable J, Lytton RH (1999) Financial risk tolerance revisited: The development of a risk assessment instrument. Financial Services Rev. 8(3):163–181.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hu J, Mehrotra S (2015) Robust decision making over a set of random targets or risk-averse utilities with an application to portfolio optimization. IIE Trans. 47(4):358–372.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jabr RA (2005) Robust self-scheduling under price uncertainty using conditional value-at-risk. IEEE Trans. Power Systems 20(4): 1852–1858.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kusuoka S (2001) On law invariant coherent risk measures. Kusuoka S, Maruyama T, eds. Advances in Mathematical Economics, Vol. 3 (Springer Japan, Tokyo), 83–95.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rockafellar RT, Uryasev S (2000) Optimization of conditional value-at-risk. J. Risk 2(3):21–41.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Toumazis T, Kwon C (2013) Routing hazardous materials on time-dependent networks using conditional value-at-risk. Transportation Res. Part C: Emerging Tech. 37(0):73–92.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A, Kahneman D (1974) Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science 185(4157):1124–1131.Crossref, Google Scholar