Multiattribute Loss Aversion and Reference Dependence: Evidence from the Performing Arts Industry

References

• Aflaki S, Popescu I (2014) Managing retention in service relationships. Management Sci. 60(2):415–433.Link, Google Scholar
• Akşin Z, Ata B, Emadi SM, Su C-L (2013) Structural estimation of callers’ delay sensitivity in call centers. Management Sci. 59(12):2727–2746.Link, Google Scholar
• Akşin Z, Ata B, Emadi SM, Su C-L (2017) Impact of delay announcements in call centers: An empirical approach. Oper. Res. 65(1):242–265.Link, Google Scholar
• Allenby G, Rossi PE (1991) Quality perceptions and asymmetric switching between brands. Marketing Sci. 10(3):185–204.Link, Google Scholar
• Barseghyan L, Prince J, Teitelbaum JC (2011) Are risk preference stable across contexts? Evidence from insurance data. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(2):591–631.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Becker G (1991) A note on restaurant pricing and other examples of social influence on price. J. Political Econom. 99(5):1109–1116.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bell DR, Lattin JM (2000) Looking for loss aversion in scanner panel data: The confounding effect of price response heterogeneity. Marketing Sci. 19(2):185–200.Link, Google Scholar
• Belsley DA, Kuh E, Welsch RE (1980) Regression Diagnostics: Identifying Influential Data and Sources of Collinearity (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bikhchandani S, Hirshleifer D, Welch I (1992) A theory of fads, fashion, customer, and cultural change as informational cascades. J. Political Econom. 100(5):992–1026.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cialdini RB (2007) Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion (Collins, New York).Google Scholar
• Cialdini RB, Goldstein NJ (2004) Social influence: Compliance and conformity. Annual Rev. Psych. 55:591–621.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Debo LG, Parlour C, Rajan U (2012) Signaling quality via queues. Management Sci. 58(5):876–891.Link, Google Scholar
• DeGraba P (1995) Buying frenzies and seller-induced excess demand. RAND J. Econom. 26(2):331–342.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fibich G, Gavious A, Lowengart O (2003) Explicit solutions of optimization models and differential games with nonsmooth (asymmetric) reference-price effects. Oper. Res. 51(5):721–734.Link, Google Scholar
• Genesove D, Mayer C (2001) Loss aversion and seller behavior: Evidence from the housing market. Quart. J. Econom. 116(4):1233–1260.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greene WH (2011) Systems of equations. Econometric Analysis, 7th ed. (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ).Google Scholar
• Guadagni PM, Little JDC (1983) A logit model of brand choice calibrated on scanner data. Marketing Sci. 2(3):203–238.Link, Google Scholar
• Hardie BGS, Johnson EJ, Fader PS (1993) Modeling loss aversion and reference dependence effects on brand choice. Marketing Sci. 12(4):378–394.Link, Google Scholar
• Hossain T, List JA (2012) The behavioralist visits the factory: Increasing productivity using simple framing manipulations. Management Sci. 58(12):2151–2167.Link, Google Scholar
• Johnson MD, Herrmann A, Huber F (2006) The evolution of loyalty intentions. J. Marketing 70(2):122–132.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Tversky A (1979) Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47(2):263–291.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kalwani MU, Yim CH, Rinne HJ, Sugita Y (1990) A price expectation model of customer brand choice. J. Marketing Res. 27(3):251–262.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kalyanaram G, Little JDC (1994) An empirical analysis of latitude of price acceptance in consumer packaged goods. J. Consumer Res. 21(3):408–418.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kalyanaram G, Winer RS (1995) Empirical generalizations from reference price research. Marketing Sci. 14(3, Suppl.):G161–G169.Link, Google Scholar
• Katz M, Shapiro C (1985) Network externalities, competition, and compatibility. Amer. Econom. Rev. 75(3):424–440.Google Scholar
• Kohavi R (1995) A study of cross-validation and bootstrap for accuracy estimation and model selection. Mellish CS, ed. IJCAI’95 Proc. 14th Internat. Joint Conf. Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 2 (Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco), 1137–1143.Google Scholar
• Kopalle PK, Rao AG, Assuncao JL (1996) Asymmetric reference price effects and dynamic pricing policies. Marketing Sci. 15(1):60–85.Link, Google Scholar
• Krishnamurthi L, Mazumdar T, Raj SP (1992) Asymmetric response to price in consumer brand choice and purchase quantity decisions. J. Consumer Res. 19(3):387–400.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lattin JM, Bucklin RE (1989) Reference effects of price and promotion on brand choice behavior. J. Marketing Res. 26(3):299–310.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leslie P (2004) Price discrimination in Broadway theater. RAND J. Econom. 35(3):520–541.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McFadden D (1974) Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. Zarembka P, ed. Frontiers in Econometrics (Academic Press, New York), 105–142.Google Scholar
• Nasiry J, Popescu I (2011) Dynamic pricing with loss-averse consumers and peak-end anchoring. Oper. Res. 59(6):1361–1368.Link, Google Scholar
• Nodder C (2013) Pride. Evil by Design: Interaction Design to Lead Us Into Temptation (John Wiley & Sons, Indianapolis).Google Scholar
• Pope DG, Schweitzer ME (2011) Is Tiger Woods loss averse? Persistent bias in the face of experience, competition, and high stakes. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(1):129–157.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Popescu I, Wu Y (2007) Dynamic pricing strategies with reference effects. Oper. Res. 55(3):413–429.Link, Google Scholar
• Post T, van den Assem MJ, Baltussen G, Thaler RH (2008) Deal or no deal? Decision making under risk in a large-payoff game show. Amer. Econom. Rev. 98(1):38–71.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roels G, Su X (2014) Optimal design of social comparison effects: Setting reference groups and reference points. Management Sci. 60(3):606–627.Link, Google Scholar
• Rosen S, Rosenfield AM (1997) Ticket pricing. J. Law Econom. 40(2):351–376.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Talluri KT, van Ryzin GJ (2004) The Theory and Practice of Revenue Management (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tanner R (2014) Seeking safety in numbers: Do consumers think and choose differently in crowded stores? Forbes (February 4), http://www.forbes.com/sites/onmarketing/2014/02/04/seeking-safety-in-numbers-do-consumers-think-and-choose-differently-in-crowded-stores/.Google Scholar
• Tversky A, Kahneman D (1991) Loss aversion in riskless choice: A reference dependent model. Quart. J. Econom. 106(4):1039–1061.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Veeraraghavan S, Debo L (2009) Joining longer queues: Information externalities in queue choice. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 11(4):543–562.Link, Google Scholar
• Veeraraghavan S, Vaidyanathan R (2012) Measuring seat value in stadiums and theaters. Production Oper. Management 21(1):49–68.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Winer RS (1986) A reference price model of brand choice for frequently purchased products. J. Consumer Res. 13(2):250–256.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yang L, de Vericourt F, Sun P (2014) Time-based competition with benchmark effects. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 16(1):119–132.Link, Google Scholar
• Zaki J (2013) Crowds versus company: When are we drawn to groups? The Moral Universe (blog) (November 21), http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/moral-universe/2013/11/21/crowds-versus-company/.Google Scholar