Laboratory Evidence on the Effects of Sponsorship on the Competitive Preferences of Men and Women

References

• AICPA (2015) 4 Steps to developing professionals through sponsorship. AICPA Insights (blog) (September 21), http://blog.aicpa.org/2015/09/4-steps-to-developing-professionals-through-sponsorship.html#sthash.Sb59VwYP.dpbs.Google Scholar
• AICPA Students, Academics & Inclusion (2015) 2015 Trends—In the supply of accounting graduates and the demand for public accounting recruits. Report, American Institute of CPAs, Durham, NC.Google Scholar
• Balafoutas L, Sutter M (2012) Affirmative action policies promote women and do not harm efficiency in the laboratory. Science 335(6068):579–582.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baldiga N (2004) Promoting Your Talent: A Guidebook for Women and Their Firms (American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, New York).Google Scholar
• Bertrand M, Goldin C, Katz LF (2010) Dynamics of the gender gap for young professionals in the financial and corporate sectors. Amer. Econom. J.: Appl. Econom. 2(3):228–255.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Buser T, Niederle M, Oosterbeek H (2014) Gender, competitiveness and career choices. Quart. J. Econom. 129(3):1409–1447.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carter C, Spence C, Dambrin C (2014) The qualities of a Big Four partner. Economia (July 16), http://economia.icaew.com/en/features/july-2014/essay-the-qualities-of-a-big-four-partner.Google Scholar
• Cason TN, Masters WA, Sheremeta RM (2010) Entry into winner-take-all and proportional-prize contests: An experimental study. J. Public Econom. 94(9–10):604–611.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cooper D, Kagel J (2015) Other-regarding preferences: A selective survey of experimental results. Kagel J, Roth A, eds. Handbook of Experimental Ecnomics, Vol. 2 (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
• Croson R, Gneezy U (2009) Gender differences in preferences. J. Econom. Literature 47(2):1–27.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dreber A, von Essen E, Ranehill E (2014) Gender and competition in adolescence: Task matters. Experiment. Econom. 17(1):154–172.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ertac S, Szentes B (2011) The effect of information on gender differences in competitiveness: Experimental evidence. Working paper, Koç University, Istanbul, Turkey.Google Scholar
• Feintzeig R (2015) More companies say targets are the key to diversity. Wall Street Journal (September 30). ( http://www.wsj.com/articles/more-companies-say-targets-are-the-key-to-diversity-1443600464).Google Scholar
• Foust-Cummings H, Dinolfo S, Kohler J (2011) Sponsoring Women to Success (Catalyst, New York).Google Scholar
• Gneezy U, Pietrasz A (2013) On the size of the gender difference in competitiveness. Working paper, Rady School of Management, University of California, San Diego, San Diego.Google Scholar
• Gneezy U, Rustichini A (2004) Gender and competition at a young age. Amer. Econom. Rev. 94(2):377–381.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gneezy U, Niederle M, Rustichini A (2003) Performance in competitive environments: Gender differences. Quart. J. Econom. 118(3):1049–1074.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goldin C (2014) A grand gender convergence: Its last chapter. Amer. Econom. Rev. 104(4):1091–1119.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grosse N, Riender G (2010) Explaining gender differences in competitiveness: Gender-task stereotypes. Working paper, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Jena, Germany.Google Scholar
• Hewlett SA (2013) Forget a Mentor, Find a Sponsor (Harvard Business Review Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Hewlett SA (2014) As you start your career, focus on your people skills. Harvard Bus. Rev. (blog) (April 29), https://hbr.org/2014/04/as-you-start-your-career-focus-on-people-skills.Google Scholar
• Hewlett SA, Peraino K, Sherbin L (2010) The sponsor effect: Breaking through the last glass ceiling. Harvard Business Review Research Report, Harvard Business School Publishing, Boston.Google Scholar
• Ifcher J, Zarghamee H (2016) Pricing competition: A new laboratory measure of gender differences in the willingness to compete. Experiment. Econom. 19(3):642–662.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kamas L, Preston A (2010) Are women really less competitive than men? Working paper.Google Scholar
• LeanIn.Org and McKinsey & Company (2015) Women in the workplace–2015. Accessed November 30, 2016, http://wit.berkeley.edu/docs/Women-in-the-Workplace-2015.pdf.Google Scholar
• Niederle M, Vesterlund L (2007) Do women shy away from competition? Do men compete too much? Quart. J. Econom. 122(3):1067–1101.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Niederle M, Segal C, Vesterlund L (2013) How costly is diversity? Affirmative action in light of gender differences in competitiveness. Management Sci. 59(1):1–16.Link, Google Scholar
• Petrie R, Segal C (2014) Gender differences in competitiveness: The role of prizes. Working paper, Texas A&M University, College Station.Google Scholar
• Shurchkov O (2012) Under pressure: Gender differences in output quality and quantity under competition and time constraints. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 10(5):1189–1213.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tonin M, Vlassopoulos M (2010) Disentangling the sources of pro-socially motivated effort: A field experiment. J. Public Econom. 94(11–12):1086–1092.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tonin M, Vlassopoulos M (2013) Do social incentives matter? Evidence from an online real effort experiment. Rev. Environment, Energy and Econom. (January 17), http://re3.feem.it/getpage.aspx?id=5269.Google Scholar
• Wozniak D, Harbaugh WT, Mayr U (2014) The menstrual cycle and performance Feedback alter gender differences in competitive choices. J. Labor Econom. 32(1):161–198.Crossref, Google Scholar