Time Matters Less When Outcomes Differ: Unimodal vs. Cross-Modal Comparisons in Intertemporal Choice

References

• Amemiya T (1984) Tobit models: A survey. J. Econometrics 24(1–2):3–61.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Andersen S, Harrison GW, Lau MI, Rutström EE (2006) Elicitation using multiple price list formats. Experiment. Econom. 9(4):383–405.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Andersen S, Harrison GW, Lau MI, Rutström EE (2008) Eliciting risk and time preferences. Econometrica 76(3):583–618.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Andreoni J, Sprenger C (2012) Estimating time preferences from convex budget sets. Amer. Econom. Rev. 102(7):3333–3356.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bell DE (1982) Regret in decision making under uncertainty. Oper. Res. 30(5):961–981.Link, Google Scholar
• Bickel WK, Landes RD, Christensen DR, Jackson L, Jones BA, Kurth-Nelson Z, Redish AD (2011) Single-and cross-commodity discounting among cocaine addicts: The commodity and its temporal location determine discounting rate. Psychopharmacology 217(2):177–187.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bordalo P, Gennaioli N, Shleifer A (2012) Salience theory of choice under risk. Quart. J. Econom. 127(3):1243–1285.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bordalo P, Gennaioli N, Shleifer A (2013) Salience and consumer choice. J. Political Econom. 121(5):803–843.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chapman GB (1996) Temporal discounting and utility for health and money. J. Experiment. Psych.: Learning, Memory, Cognition 22(3):771–791.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen HX, He GB (2011) The effect of construal level on intertemporal choice and risky choice. Acta Psych. Sinica 43(4):442–454.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cubitt RP, Read D (2007) Can intertemporal choice experiments elicit time preferences for consumption? Experiment. Econom. 10(4):369–389.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dai J, Busemeyer JR (2014) A probabilistic, dynamic, and attribute-wise model of intertemporal choice. J. Experiment. Psych.: General 143(4):1489–1514.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ericson KMM, White JM, Laibson D, Cohen JD (2015) Money earlier or later? Simple heuristics explain intertemporal choices better than delay discounting does. Psych. Sci. 26(6):826–833.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fisher I (1930) The Theory of Interest (Macmillan, New York).Google Scholar
• Frederick S (2003) Measuring intergenerational time preference: Are future lives valued less? J. Risk Uncertainty 26(1):39–53.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frederick S (2006) Valuing future life and future lives: A framework for understanding discounting. J. Economic Psych. 27(5):667–680.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frederick S, Loewenstein G, O’Donoghue T (2002) Time discounting and time preference: A critical review. J. Econom. Literature 40(2):351–401.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Galanter E (1962) The direct measurement of utility and subjective probability. Amer. J. Psych. 75(2):208–220.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hardisty DJ, Weber EU (2009) Discounting future green: Money versus the environment. J. Experiment. Psych.: General 138(3):329–340.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Houston DA, Sherman SJ (1995) Cancellation and focus: The role of shared and unique features in the choice process. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 31(4):357–378.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Houston DA, Sherman SJ, Baker SM (1989) The influence of unique features and direction of comparison on preferences. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 25(2):121–141.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Tversky A (1979) Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47(2):263–291.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim H, Schnall S, White MP (2013) Similar psychological distance reduces temporal discounting. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 39(8):1005–1016.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kirby KN, Petry NM, Bickel WK (1999) Heroin addicts have higher discount rates for delayed rewards than non-drug-using controls. J. Experiment. Psych.: General 128(1):78–87.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kőszegi B, Szeidl A (2013) A model of focusing in economic choice. Quart. J. Econom. 128(1):53–104.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leland JW (2002) Similarity judgments and anomalies in intertemporal choice. Econom. Inquiry 40(4):574–581.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liberman N, Trope Y (1998) The role of feasibility and desirability considerations in near and distant future decisions. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 75(1):5–18.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liberman N, Sagristano MD, Trope Y (2002) The effect of temporal distance on level of mental construal. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 38(6):523–534.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Loomes G, Sugden R (1982) Regret theory: An alternative theory of rational choice. Econom. J. 92(368):805–824.Google Scholar
• Loomes G, Sugden R (1987) Some implications of a more general form of regret theory. J. Econom. Theory 41(2):270–287.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Malkoc SA, Zauberman G, Bettman JR (2010) Unstuck from the concrete: Carryover effects of abstract mindsets in intertemporal preferences. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 113(2):112–126.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Manzini P, Mariotti M (2009) Choice over time. Anand P, Pattanaik P, Puppe C, eds. Oxford Handbook of Rational and Social Choice (Oxford University Press, New York), 239–270.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McClure SM, Ericson KM, Laibson DI, Loewenstein G, Cohen JD (2007) Time discounting for primary rewards. J. Neuroscience 27(21):5796–5804.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Myerson J, Green L, Warusawitharana M (2001) Area under the curve as a measure of discounting. J. Experiment. Anal. Behav. 76(2):235–243.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nisbett R, Ross L (1991) The Person and the Situation (McGraw Hill, New York).Google Scholar
• Read D, Frederick S, Scholten M (2013) DRIFT: An analysis of outcome framing in intertemporal choice. J. Experiment. Psych.: Learning, Memory, Cognition 39:573–589.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Read D, Frederick S, Orsel B, Rahman J (2005) Four score and seven years from now: The date/delay effect in temporal discounting. Management Sci. 51(9):1326–1335.Link, Google Scholar
• Reuben E, Sapienza P, Zingales L (2010) Time discounting for primary and monetary rewards. Econom. Lett. 106(2):125–127.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rubinstein A (2003) “Economics and psychology”? The case of hyperbolic discounting. Internat. Econom. Rev. 44(4):1207–1216.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Samuelson P (1937) A note on measurement of utility. Rev. Econom. Stud. 4(2):155–161.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Scholten M, Read D (2010) The psychology of intertemporal tradeoffs. Psych. Rev. 117(3):925–944.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Trope Y, Liberman N (2003) Temporal construal. Psych. Rev. 110(3):403–421.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A (1969) Intransitivity of preferences. Psych. Rev. 76(1):31–48.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ubfal D (2016) How general are time preferences? Eliciting good-specific discount rates. J. Development Econom. 118(January):150–170.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Urminsky O, Zauberman G (2014) The psychology of intertemporal preferences. Keren G, Wu G, eds. The Wiley Blackwell Handbook of Judgment and Decision Making (John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK), 141–181.Google Scholar
• Van den Bergh B, Dewitte S, Warlop L (2008) Bikinis instigate generalized impatience in intertemporal choice. J. Consumer Res. 35(1):85–97.Crossref, Google Scholar