Information Sharing, Advice Provision, or Delegation: What Leads to Higher Trust and Trustworthiness?

References

• Aghion P, Tirole J (1997) Formal and real authority in organizations. J. Political Econom. 105(1):1–29.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alonso R, Matouschek N (2008) Optimal delegation. Rev. Econom. Stud. 75(1):259–293.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Amador M, Bagwell K (2013) The theory of optimal delegation with an application to tariff caps. Econometrica 81(4):1541–1599.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Angelova V, Regner T (2013) Do voluntary payments to advisors improve the quality of financial advice? An experimental deception game. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 93(September):205–218.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Armstrong M, Vickers J (2010) A model of delegated project choice. Econometrica 78(1):213–244.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aviv Y (2003) A time-series framework for supply-chain inventory management. Oper. Res. 51(2):210–227.Link, Google Scholar
• Bartling B, Fehr E, Herz H (2014) The intrinsic value of decision rights. Econometrica 82(6):2005–2039.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beer R, Ahn HS, Leider S (2016) Can trustworthiness in a supply chain be signaled? Working paper, Indiana University, Bloomington.Google Scholar
• Bhardwaj P (2001) Delegating pricing decisions. Marketing Sci. 20(2):143–169.Link, Google Scholar
• Blackhurst J, Craighead CW, Handfield RB (2005) Towards supply chain collaboration: An operations audit of VMI initiatives in the electronics industry. Internat. J. Integrated Supply Management 2(1-2):91–105.Google Scholar
• Bonaccio S, Dalal RS (2006) Advice taking and decision-making: An integrative literature review, and implications for the organizational sciences. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 101(2):127–151.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Braddock III CH, Edwards KA, Hasenberg NM, Laidley TL, Levinson W (1999) Informed decision making in outpatient practice: Time to get back to basics. J. Amer. Med. Assoc. 282(24):2313–2320.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brinkhoff A, Özer Ö, Sargut G (2015) All you need is trust? An examination of inter-organizational supply chain projects. Production Oper. Management 24(2):181–200.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brooks AW, Gino F, Schweitzer ME (2015) Smart people ask for (my) advice: Seeking advice boosts perceptions of competence. Management Sci. 61(6):1421–1435.Link, Google Scholar
• Cachon GP, Lariviere MA (2001) Contracting to assure supply: How to share demand forecasts in a supply chain. Management Sci. 47(5):629–646.Link, Google Scholar
• Cai H, Wang JT-Y (2006) Overcommunication in strategic information transmission games. Games Econom. Behav. 56(1):7–36.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Camerer CF, Dreber A, Forsell E, Ho T-H, Huber J, Johannesson M, Kirchler Met al. (2016) Evaluating replicability of laboratory experiments in economics. Science 351(6277):1433–1436.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cappelletti D, Güth W, Ploner M (2011) Being of two minds: Ultimatum offers under cognitive constraints. J. Econom. Perspect. 32(6):940–950.Google Scholar
• Chaiken S, Trope Y (1999) Dual-process Theories in Social Psychology (Guilford Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Chain Drug Review (2006) Retailers, suppliers strive for greater productivity. (November 20).Google Scholar
• Charness G, Cobo-Reyes R, Jiménez N, Lacomba JA, Lagos F (2012) The hidden advantage of delegation: Pareto improvements in a gift exchange game. Amer. Econom. Rev. 102(5):2358–2379.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen KY, Kaya M, Özer Ö (2008) Dual sales channel management with service competition. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 10(4):654–675.Link, Google Scholar
• Choi E, Özer Ö, Zheng Y (2016) Trust among executives. Working paper, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson.Google Scholar
• Claassen MJ, Van Weele AJ, Van Raaij EM (2008) Performance outcomes and success factors of vendor managed inventory (VMI). Supply Chain Management: Internat. J. 13(6):406–414.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Colgate-Palmolive (2004) Category management is here to stay. Presentation, Efficient Consumer Response Conference, Brussels, Belgium.Google Scholar
• Cornelissen G, Dewitte S, Warlop L (2011) Are social value orientations expressed automatically? Decision making in the dictator game. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 37(8):1080–1090.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crawford VP, Sobel J (1982) Strategic information transmission. Econometrica 50(6):1431–1451.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Croson R, Donohue K (2006) Behavioral causes of the bullwhip effect and the observed value of inventory information. Management Sci. 52(3):323–336.Link, Google Scholar
• Cui TH, Mallucci P (2016) Fairness ideals in distribution channels. J. Marketing Res. 53(6):969–987.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dana J, Weber RA, Kuang JX (2007) Exploiting moral wiggle room: Experiments demonstrating an illusory preference for fairness. Econom. Theory 33(1):67–80.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Danilov A, Biemann T, Kring T, Sliwka D (2013) The dark side of team incentives: Experimental evidence on advice quality from financial service professionals. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 93(September):266–272.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Desai PS (2000) Multiple messages to retain retailers: Signaling new product demand. Marketing Sci. 19(4):381–389.Link, Google Scholar
• Dessein W (2002) Authority and communication in organizations. Rev. Econom. Stud. 69(4):811–838.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edwards A, Elwyn G (2009) Shared Decision-Making in Health Care: Achieving Evidence-Based Patient Choice (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
• Emanuel EJ, Emanuel LL (1992) Four models of the physician-patient relationship. J. Amer. Med. Assoc. 267(16):2221–2226.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Erat S, Gneezy U (2012) White lies. Management Sci. 58(4):723–733.Link, Google Scholar
• Falk A, Kosfeld M (2006) The hidden costs of control. Amer. Econom. Rev. 96(5):1611–1630.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Falk A, Fehr E, Fischbacher U (2008) Testing theories of fairness—Intentions matter. Games Econom. Behav. 62(1):287–303.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Federal Trade Commission (2001) Report on the federal trade commission workshop on slotting allowances and other marketing practices in the grocery industry. Accessed June 27, 2014, http://www.ftc.gov/.Google Scholar
• Fehr E, Fischbacher U (2004) Third-party punishment and social norms. Evolution Human Behav. 25(2):63–87.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fehr E, Herz H, Wilkening T (2013) The lure of authority: Motivation and incentive effects of power. Amer. Econom. Rev. 103(4):1325–1359.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fehr E, Klein A, Schmidt KM (2007) Fairness and contract design. Econometrica 75(1):121–154.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fischbacher U (2007) z-tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments. Experiment. Econom. 10(2):171–178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frederick S (2005) Cognitive reflection and decision making. J. Econom. Perspect. 19(4):25–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gal-Or E, Geylani T, Dukes AJ (2008) Information sharing in a channel with partially informed retailers. Marketing Sci. 27(4):642–658.Link, Google Scholar
• Geyskens I, Steenkamp J-BE, Kumar N (1998) Generalizations about trust in marketing channel relationships using meta-analysis. Internat. J. Res. Marketing 15(3):223–248.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gino F, Ariely D (2012) The dark side of creativity: Original thinkers can be more dishonest. J. Personal. Soc. Psych. 102(3):445.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gneezy U (2005) Deception: The role of consequences. Amer. Econom. Rev. 95(1):384–394.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gooner RA, Morgan NA, Perreault Jr WD (2011) Is retail category management worth the effort (and does a category captain help or hinder)? J. Marketing 75(5):18–33.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gruen TW, Shah RH (2000) Determinants and outcomes of plan objectivity and implementation in category management relationships. J. Retailing 76(4):483–510.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gümüş M (2014) With or without forecast sharing: Competition and credibility under information asymmetry. Production Oper. Management 23(10):1732–1747.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guo L, Iyer G (2010) Information acquisition and sharing in a vertical relationship. Marketing Sci. 29(3):483–506.Link, Google Scholar
• Haisley EC, Weber RA (2010) Self-serving interpretations of ambiguity in other-regarding behavior. Games Econom. Behav. 68(2):614–625.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ho T-H, Zhang J (2008) Designing pricing contracts for boundedly rational customers: Does the framing of the fixed fee matter? Management Sci. 54(4):686–700.Link, Google Scholar
• Ho T-H, Lim N, Cui TH (2010) Reference dependence in multilocation newsvendor models: A structural analysis. Management Sci. 56(11):1891–1910.Link, Google Scholar
• Holmström BR (1977) On incentives and control in organizations. Unpublished dissertation, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
• Hyndman K, Kraiselburd S, Watson N (2013) Aligning capacity decisions in supply chains when demand forecasts are private information: Theory and experiment. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 15(1):102–117.Link, Google Scholar
• Inderfurth K, Sadrieh A, Voigt G (2013) The impact of information sharing on supply chain performance under asymmetric information. Production Oper. Management 22(2):410–425.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Inderst R, Ottaviani M (2009) Misselling through agents. Amer. Econom. Rev. 99(3):883–908.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ismayilov H, Potters J (2013) Disclosing advisor’s interests neither hurts nor helps. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 93(September):314–320.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jap SD, Anderson E (2003) Safeguarding interorganizational performance and continuity under ex post opportunism. Management Sci. 49(12):1684–1701.Link, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D (2011) Thinking, Fast and Slow (Macmillan, New York).Google Scholar
• Kalkanci B, Chen KY, Erhun F (2011) Contract complexity and performance under asymmetric demand information: An experimental evaluation. Management Sci. 57(4):689–704.Link, Google Scholar
• Katok E, Olsen T, Pavlov V (2014) Wholesale pricing under mild and privately known concerns for fairness. Production Oper. Management 23(2):285–302.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Konow J (2000) Fair shares: Accountability and cognitive dissonance in allocation decisions. Amer. Econom. Rev. 90(4):1072–1091.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kurtuluş M, Nakkas A (2011) Retail assortment planning under category captainship. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 13(1):124–142.Link, Google Scholar
• Kurtuluş M, Nakkas A, Ülkü S (2014) The value of category captainship in the presence of manufacturer competition. Production Oper. Management 23(3):420–430.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee Y-Y, Lin JL (2011) How much does trust really matter? A study of the longitudinal effects of trust and decision-making preferences on diabetic patient outcomes. Patient Ed. Counseling 85(3):406–412.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lim N, Ham SH (2014) Relationship organization and price delegation: An experimental study. Management Sci. 60(3):586–605.Link, Google Scholar
• Mayer RC, Davis JH, Schoorman FD (1995) An integrative model of organizational trust. Acad. Management Rev. 20(3):709–734.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mazar N, Amir O, Ariely D (2008) The dishonesty of honest people: A theory of self-concept maintenance. J. Marketing Res. 45(6):633–644.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mishra BK, Prasad A (2005) Delegating pricing decisions in competitive markets with symmetric and asymmetric information. Marketing Sci. 24(3):490–497.Link, Google Scholar
• Mittendorf B, Shin J, Yoon DH (2013) Manufacturer marketing initiatives and retailer information sharing. Quant. Marketing Econom. 11(2):263–287.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Morgan NA, Kaleka A, Gooner RA (2007) Focal supplier opportunism in supermarket retailer category management. J. Oper. Management 25(2):512–527.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Murnighan JK, Oesch JM, Pillutla M (2001) Player types and self-impression management in dictatorship games: Two experiments. Games Econom. Behav. 37(2):388–414.Crossref, Google Scholar
• North DC (1990) Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oshima Lee E, Emanuel EJ (2013) Shared decision making to improve care and reduce costs. New England J. Med. 368(1):6–8.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Owens D, Grossman Z, Fackler R (2014) The control premium: A preference for payoff autonomy. Amer. Econom. J.: Microeconomics 6(4):138–161.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Özer Ö, Wei W (2006) Strategic commitments for an optimal capacity decision under asymmetric forecast information. Management Sci. 52(8):1238–1257.Link, Google Scholar
• Özer Ö, Zheng Y (2017) Establishing trust and trustworthiness for supply chain information sharing. Ha A, Tang C, eds. Information Exchange in Supply Chain Management, Chap. 14 (Springer International Publishing, Cham, Switzerland), 287–312.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Özer Ö, Zheng Y, Chen K-Y (2011) Trust in forecast information sharing. Management Sci. 57(6):1111–1137.Link, Google Scholar
• Özer Ö, Zheng Y, Ren Y (2014) Trust, trustworthiness, and information sharing in supply chains bridging China and the United States. Management Sci. 60(10):2435–2460.Link, Google Scholar
• Petersen KJ, Ragatz GL, Monczka RM (2005) An examination of collaborative planning effectiveness and supply chain performance. J. Supply Chain Management 41(2):14–25.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Phillips R, Şimşek AS, Van Ryzin G (2015) The effectiveness of field price discretion: Empirical evidence from auto lending. Management Sci. 61(8):1741–1759.Link, Google Scholar
• Progressive Grocer (2006) Agents of change. Progressive Grocer 85(17):28–100.Google Scholar
• Rand DG, Greene JD, Nowak MA (2012) Spontaneous giving and calculated greed. Nature 489(7416):427–430.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rickert J (2015) What can patients do in the face of physician conflict of interest? Accessed April 2, 2016, http://healthaffairs.org/blog/2015/04/10/what-can-patients-do-in-the-face-of-physician-conflict-of-interest/.Google Scholar
• Sánchez-Pagés S, Vorsatz M (2007) An experimental study of truth-telling in a sender–receiver game. Games Econom. Behav. 61(1):86–112.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schulz JF, Fischbacher U, Thöni C, Utikal V (2014) Affect and fairness: Dictator games under cognitive load. J. Econom. Perspect. 41:77–87.Google Scholar
• Schweitzer ME, Hsee CK (2002) Stretching the truth: Elastic justification and motivated communication of uncertain information. J. Risk Uncertainty 25(2):185–201.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shalvi S, Dana J, Handgraaf MJ, De Dreu CK (2011) Justified ethicality: Observing desired counterfactuals modifies ethical perceptions and behavior. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 115(2):181–190.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shin H, Tunca TI (2010) Do firms invest in forecasting efficiently? The effect of competition on demand forecast investments and supply chain coordination. Oper. Res. 58(6):1592–1610.Link, Google Scholar
• Simester D, Zhang J (2014) Why do salespeople spend so much time lobbying for low prices? Marketing Sci. 33(6):796–808.Link, Google Scholar
• Sobel J (2013) Giving and receiving advice. Acemoglu D, Arellano M, Dekel E, eds. Advances in Economics and Econometrics: Tenth World Congress, Volume I: Economic Theory, Econometric Society Monographs, Chap. 10 (Cambridge University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Spiliotopoulou E, Donohue K, Gürbüz MÇ (2015) Information reliability in supply chains: The case of multiple retailers. Production Oper. Management 25(3):548–567.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Subramanian U, Raju JS, Dhar SK, Wang Y (2010) Competitive consequences of using a category captain. Management Sci. 56(10):1739–1765.Link, Google Scholar
• Tirole J (1988) The Theory of Industrial Organization (MIT press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Trachtenberg F, Dugan E, Hall M (2005) How patients’ trust relates to their involvement in medical care. J. Family Practice 54(4):344–352.Google Scholar
• Twyman M, Harvey N, Harries C (2008) Trust in motives, trust in competence: Separate factors determining the effectiveness of risk communication. Judgment Decision Making 3(1):111–120.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yaniv I (2004) Receiving other people’s advice: Influence and benefit. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 93(1):1–13.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zaki J, Mitchell JP (2013) Intuitive prosociality. Current Directions Psych. Sci. 22(6):466–470.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Donohue K, Cui T (2016) Contract preferences and performance for the loss-averse supplier: Buyback vs. revenue sharing. Management Sci. 62(6):1734–1754..Link, Google Scholar
• Zhong CB (2011) The ethical dangers of deliberative decision making. Admin. Sci. Quart. 56(1):1–25.Crossref, Google Scholar