Hidden Skewness: On the Difficulty of Multiplicative Compounding Under Random Shocks

References

• Abbink K, Rockenbach B (2006) Option pricing by students and professional traders: A behavioral investigation. Managerial Decision Econom. 27(6):497–510.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benartzi S, Thaler RH (1999) Risk aversion or myopia? Choices in repeated gambles and retirement investments. Management Sci. 45(3):364–381.Link, Google Scholar
• Brünner T, Levinsky R, Qiu J (2011) Preference for skewness: Evidence from a binary choice experiment. Eur. J. Finance 17(7):525–538.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen H, Rao AR (2007) When two plus two is not equal to four: Errors in processing multiple percentage changes. J. Consumer Res. 34(3):327–340.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Christandl F, Fetchenhauer D (2009) How laypeople and experts misperceive the effect of economic growth. J. Econom. Psych. 30(3):381–392.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cox JC, Ross SA, Rubinstein M (1979) Option pricing: A simplified approach. J. Financial Econom. 7(3):229–263.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deck C, Schlesinger H (2010) Exploring higher order risk effects. Rev. Econom. Stud. 77(4):1403–1420.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ebert S, Wiesen D (2011) Testing for prudence and skewness-seeking. Management Sci. 57(7):1334–1349.Link, Google Scholar
• Eckel CC, Grossman PJ (2015) Loving the long shot: Risk taking with skewed lotteries. J. Risk Uncertainty 51(3):195–217.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenstein EM, Hoch SJ (2005) Intuitive compounding: Framing, temporal perspective, and expertise. Working paper, Johnson Graduate School of Management, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
• Ensthaler L, Nottmeyer O, Weizsäcker G, Zankiewicz C (2013) Hidden skewness: On the difficulty of multiplicative compounding under random shocks. Working paper, Humboldt University, Berlin.Google Scholar
• Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (2009) FINRA Regulatory Note 09-31, Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Fischbacher U (2007) z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments. Experiment. Econom. 10(2):171–178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gneezy U (1996) Probability judgments in multi-stage problems: Experimental evidence of systematic biases. Acta Psychologica 93(1–3):59–68.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gneezy U, Potters J (1997) An experiment on risk taking and evaluation periods. Quart. J. Econom. 112(2):631–645.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kemp S (1984) Perception of changes in the cost of living. J. Econom. Psych. 5(4):313–323.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klos A, Weber EU, Weber M (2005) Investment decisions and time horizon: Risk perception and risk behavior in repeated gambles. Management Sci. 51(12):1777–1790.Link, Google Scholar
• Levy M, Tasoff J (2016) Exponential-growth bias and lifecycle consumption. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 14(3):545–583.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lusardi A, Mitchell OS (2011) Financial literacy and planning: Implications for retirement wellbeing. Working Paper 17078, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• McKenzie CRM, Liersch MJ (2011) Misunderstanding savings growth: Implications for retirement savings behavior. J. Marketing Res. 48(SPL):1–13.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Redelmeier DA, Tversky A (1992) On the framing of multiple prospects. Psych. Sci. 3(3):191–93.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Samuelson PA (1963) Risk and uncertainty: A fallacy of large numbers. Scientia 98(4):108–113.Google Scholar
• Stango V, Zinman J (2009) Exponential growth bias and household finance. J. Finance 64(6):2807–2849.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stutzer M, Grant S (2013) Misperceptions of long-term investment performance: Insights from an experiment. J. Behav. Finance Econom. 3(1):1–20.Google Scholar
• Wagenaar WA, Sagaria SD (1975) Misperception of exponential growth. Perception and Psychophysics 18(6):416–422.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wagenaar WA, Timmers H (1978) Extrapolation of exponential time series is not enhanced by having more data points. Perception and Psychophysics 24(2):182–184.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wagenaar WA, Timmers H (1979) The pond-and-duckweed problem: Three experiments on the misperception of exponential growth. Acta Psychologica 43(3):239–251.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wooldridge JM (2002) Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar