Strategic Behavior of Suppliers in the Face of Production Disruptions

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2016.2626

References

  • Agrawal N, Nahmias S (1997) Rationalization of the supplier base in the presence of yield uncertainty. Production Oper. Management 6(3):291–308.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Anupindi R, Akella R (1993) Diversification under supply uncertainty. Management Sci. 39(8):944–963.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Arreola-Risa A, DeCroix GA (1998) Inventory management under random supply disruptions and partial backorders. Naval Res. Logist. 45(7):687–703.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Babich V, Burnetas AN, Ritchken P (2007) Competition and diversification effects in supply chains with supplier default risk. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 9(2):123–146.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Berg M, Posner MJM, Zhao H (1994) Production-inventory systems with unreliable machines. Oper. Res. 42(1):111–118.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bielecki T, Kumar PR (1988) Optimality of zero-inventory policies for unreliable manufacturing systems. Oper. Res. 36(4):532–541.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Boyle MD (2000) Business to business marketplace for freight transportation. Ph.D. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  • Dai T, Cho S-H, Zhang F (2016) Contracting for on-time delivery in the U.S. influenza vaccine supply chain. Maufacturing Service Oper. Management 18(3):332–346.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dong L, Tomlin B (2012) Managing disruption risk: The interplay between operations and insurance. Management Sci. 58(10):1898–1915.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Elmaghraby WJ (2000) Supply contract competition and sourcing policies. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 2(4):350–371.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Federgruen A, Yang N (2009) Optimal supply diversification under general supply risks. Oper. Res. 57(6):1451–1468.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gerchak Y, Parlar M (1990) Yield randomness, cost trade-offs and diversification in the EOQ model. Naval Res. Logist. 37(3):341–354.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gupta D (1996) The {Q, r) inventory system with an unreliable supplier. INFOR: Inform. Systems Oper. Res. 34(2):59–76.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gurler U, Parlar M (1997) An inventory problem with two randomly available suppliers. Oper. Res. 45(6):904–918.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gurnani H, Shi M (2006) A bargaining model for a first-time interaction under asymmetric beliefs of supply reliability. Management Sci. 52(6):865–880.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gurnani H, Akella R, Lehoczky J (2000) Supply management in assembly systems with random yield and random demand. IIE Trans. 32(8):701–714.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hendricks KB, Singhal VR (2005) An empirical analysis of the effect of supply chain disruptions on long-run stock price performance and equity risk of the firm. Production Oper. Management 14(1):35–52.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hopp WJ, Spearman ML (1991) Throughput of a constant work in process manufacturing line subject to failures. Internat. J. Production Res. 29(3):635–655.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kaplan RS (1970) A dynamic inventory model with stochastic lead times. Management Sci. 16(7):491–507.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Martha J, Subbakrishna S (2002) Targeting a just-in-case supply chain for the inevitable next disaster. Supply Chain Management Rev. 6(5):18–23.Google Scholar
  • Meyer RR, Rothkopf MH, Smith SA (1979) Reliability and inventory in a production-storage system. Management Sci. 25(8):799–807.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Minner S (2003) Multiple-supplier inventory models in supply chain management: A review. Internat. J. Production Econom. 81(82):265–279.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Parlar M (1997) Continuous-review inventory problem with random supply interruptions. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 99(2):366–385.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Parlar M, Perry D (1995) Optimal (Q, r, T) policies in deterministic and random yield models with uncertain future supply. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 84(2):431–443.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Parlar M, Perry D (1996) Inventory models of future supply uncertainty with single and multiple suppliers. Naval Res. Logist. 43(2):191–210.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Serpa JC, Krishnan H (2017) The strategic role of business insurance. Management Sci. 63(2):384–404.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Sheffi Y (2005) Building a resilient supply chain. Harvard Bus. Rev. 1(8):1–4.Google Scholar
  • Song JS, Zipkin PH (1996) Inventory control with information about supply conditions. Management Sci. 42(10):1409–1419.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Stecke KE, Kumar S (2009) Sources of supply chain disruptions, factors that breed vulnerability, and mitigating strategies. J. Marketing Channels 16(3):193–226.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sting FJ, Huchzermeier A (2010) Ensuring responsive capacity: How to contract with backup suppliers. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 207(2):725–735.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tang CS (2006) Robust strategies for mitigating supply chain disruptions. Internat. J. Logist. 9(1):33–45.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tang SY, Kouvelis P (2011) Supplier diversification strategies in the presence of yield uncertainty and buyer competition. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 13(4):439–451.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Tomlin B (2006) On the value of mitigation and contingency strategies for managing supply chain disruption risks. Management Sci. 52(5):639–657.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Tomlin B (2009a) Disruption-management strategies for short life-cycle products. Naval Res. Logist. 56(4):318–347.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tomlin B (2009b) Impact of supply learning when suppliers are unreliable. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 11(2):192–209.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Wan Z, Beil DR (2014) Bid-taker power and supply base diversification. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 16(2):300–314.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Yang ZB, Aydin G, Babich V, Beil DR (2009) Supply disruptions, asymmetric information, and a backup production option. Management Sci. 55(2):192–209.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Yano CA (1991) Impact of quality and pricing on the market shares of two competing suppliers in a simple procurement model. Technical Report 91-30, Department of Industrial and Operations Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
  • Yano CA, Lee HL (1995) Lot sizing with random yields: A review. Oper. Res. 43(2):311–334.LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.