The Effect of Discretion on Procurement Performance

References

• Albano GL, Bianchi M, Spagnolo G (2006) Bid average methods in procurement. Rivista di Politica Economica 96(1):41–62.Google Scholar
• Al-Ubaydli O, List JA (2015) On the generalizability of experimental results in economics. Frèchette GR, Schotter A, eds. Handbook of Experimental Economic Methodology (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 420–462.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Angrist JD (2006) Instrumental variables methods in experimental criminological research: What, why, and how. J. Experiment. Criminology 2(1):23–44.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Angrist JD, Lavy V (1999) Using Maimonides rule to estimate the effect of class size on the scholastic achievement. Quart. J. Econom. 114(2):533–575.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bajari P, Tadelis S (2001) Incentives versus transaction costs: A theory of procurement contracts. RAND J. Econom. 32(3):387–407.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bajari P, McMillan R, Tadelis S (2009) Auctions versus negotiations in procurement: An empirical analysis. J. Law, Econom., Organ. 25(2):372–399.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bandiera O, Prat A, Valletti T (2009) Active and passive waste in government spending: Evidence from a policy experiment. Amer. Econom. Rev. 99(4):1278–1308.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Banerjee AV, Duflo E (2000) Reputation effects and the limits of contracting: A study of the Indian software industry. Quart. J. Econom. 115(3):989–1017.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Banfield EC (1975) Corruption as a feature of governmental organization. J. Law Econom. 18(3):587–605.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Branzoli N, Decarolis F (2015) Entry and subcontracting in public procurement auctions. Management Sci. 61(12):2945–2962.Link, Google Scholar
• Brunell TL, DiNardo J (2004) A propensity score reweighting approach to estimating the partisan effects of full turnout in American presidential elections. Political Anal. 12(1):28–45.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bulow J, Klemperer P (1996) Auctions versus negotiations. Amer. Econom. Rev. 86(1):180–194.Google Scholar
• Bulow J, Klemperer P (2009) Why do sellers (usually) prefer auctions? Amer. Econom. Rev. 99(4):1544–1575.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Calzolari G, Spagnolo G (2009) Relational contracts and competitive screening. CEPR Discussion Paper 7434, Centre for Economic Policy Research, London.Google Scholar
• Chang WS, Chen B, Salmon TC (2015) An investigation of the average bid mechanism for procurement auctions. Management Sci. 61(6):1237–1254.Link, Google Scholar
• Chever L, Moore J (2012) When more discretionary power improves public procurement efficiency: An empirical analysis of French negotiated procedures. Working paper, IAE Paris, Paris.Google Scholar
• Chever L, Saussier S, Yvrande-Billon A (2017) The law of small numbers: Investigating the benefits of restricted auctions for public procurement. Appl. Econom. 49(42):4241–4260.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Conley T, Decarolis F (2015) Detecting bidders groups in collusive auctions. Amer. Econom. J.: Microeconomics 8(2):1–38.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coviello D, Gagliarducci S (2017) Tenure in office and public procurement. Amer. Econom. J.: Econom. Policy 9(3):59–105.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coviello D, Mariniello M (2014) Publicity requirements in public procurement: Evidence from a regression discontinuity design. J. Public Econom. 109(January):76–100.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Decarolis F (2014) Awarding price, contract performance, and bids screening: Evidence from procurement auctions. Amer. Econom. J.: Appl. Econom. 6(1):108–132.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DiNardo J, Fortin NM, Lemieux T (1996) Labor market institutions and the distribution of wages, 1973–1992: A semiparametric approach. Econometrica 64(5):1001–1044.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Doni N (2006) The importance of reputation in awarding public contracts. Ann. Public Cooperative Econom. 77(4):401–429.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Duflo E, Greenstone M, Pande R, Ryan N (2014) The value of regulatory discretion: Estimates from environmental inspections in India. NBER Working Paper 20590, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Feir D, Lemieux T, Marmer V (2016) Weak identification in fuzzy regression discontinuity designs. J. Bus. Econom. Statist. 34(2):185–196.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gelman A, Imbens GW (2014) Why high-order polynomials should not be used in regression discontinuity designs. NBER Working Paper 20405, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gil R, Marion J (2013) Self-enforcing agreements and relational contracting: Evidence from California highway procurement. J. Law, Econom., Organ. 29(2):239–277.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Golden MA, Picci L (2005) Proposal for a new measure of corruption, illustrated with Italian data. Econom. Politics 17(1):37–75.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guasch JL, Laffont JJ, Straub S (2008) Renegotiation of concession contracts in Latin America. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 26(2):421–442.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guiso L, Sapienza P, Zingales L (2004) The role of social capital in financial development. Amer. Econom. Rev. 94(3):526–556.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hahn J, Todd P, Van der Klaauw W (2001) Identification and estimation of treatment effects with a regression-discontinuity design. Econometrica 69(1):201–209.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Imbens GW, Kalyanaraman K (2012) Optimal bandwidth choice for the regression discontinuity estimator. Rev. Econom. Stud. 79(3):933–959.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Imbens GW, Lemieux T (2008) Regression discontinuity designs: A guide to practice. J. Econometrics 142(2):615–635.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kang K, Miller RA (2015) Winning by default: Why is there so little competition in government procurement? Working paper, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh.Google Scholar
• Kelman S (1990) Procurement and Public Management (AEI Press, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
• Kim IG (1998) A model of selective tendering: Does bidding competition deter opportunism by contractors? Quart. Rev. Econom. Finance 38(4):907–925.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Konkurrensverket (2015) Public procurement thresholds and data in Sweden. Report UPPDRAGSFORSKNINGSRAPPORT 2015:3, Konkurrensverket, Stockholm.Google Scholar
• Lalive R, Schmutzler A (2011) Auctions vs. negotiations in public procurement evidence from railway market. Working paper, University of Zurich, Zurich.Google Scholar
• Lee DS (2008) Randomized experiment from non-random selection in U.S. House elections. J. Econometrics 142(2):675–697.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee DS, Lemieux T (2010) Regression discontinuity designs in economics. J. Econom. Literature 48(June):281–355.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levitt SD, List JA (2009) Field experiments in economics: The past, the present, and the future. Eur. Econom. Rev. 53(1):1–18.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lewis G, Bajari P (2011) Procurement contracting with time incentives: Theory and evidence. Quart. J. Econom. 126(3):1173–1211.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lewis G, Bajari P (2014) Moral hazard, incentive contracts and risk: Evidence from procurement. Rev. Econom. Stud. 81(3):1201–1228.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Malcomson JM (2013) Relational incentive contracts. Gibbon R, Roberts J, eds. Handbook of Organizational Economics (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ), 1014–1065.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Manelli AM, Vincent DR (1995) Optimal procurement mechanisms. Econometrica 63(3):591–620.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McCrary J (2008) Manipulation of the running variable in the regression discontinuity design: A density test. J. Econometrics 142(2):698–714.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Molander P (2014) Public procurement in the European Union: The case for national threshold values. J. Public Procurement 14(2):181–214.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum PR, Rubin DB (1983) The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika 70(1):41–55.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Spagnolo G (2012) Reputation, competition and entry in procurement. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 30(3):291–296.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Spulber DF (1990) Auctions and contract enforcement. J. Law, Econom. Organ. 6(2):325–344.Google Scholar
• van der Klaauw W (2002) Estimating the effect of financial aid offers on college enrollment: A regression-discontinuity approach. Internat. Econom. Rev. 43(4):1249–1287.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vickrey W (1961) Counterspeculation, auctions, and competitive sealed tenders. J. Finance 16(1):8–37.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yukins CR (2008) Are IDIQs inefficient? Sharing lessons with the European framework contracting. Public Contracts Law J. 37(3):545–568.Google Scholar