The Impact of Competition on “Make-or-Buy” Decisions: Evidence from the Spanish Local TV Industry

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2016.2633

References

  • Abraham KG, Taylor SK (1996) Firms’ use of outside contractors: Theory and evidence. J. Labor Econom. 14(3):394–424.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Acemoglu D, Aghion P, Griffith R, Zilibotti F (2010) Vertical integration and technology: Theory and evidence. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 8(5):989–1033.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Aghion P, Dewatripont M, Rey P (1997) Corporate governance, competition policy and industrial policy. Eur. Econom. Rev. 41(3–5):797–805.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Aghion P, Dewatripont M, Rey P (1999) Competition, financial discipline, and growth. Rev. Econom. Stud. 66(4):825–852.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Aghion P, Griffith R, Howitt P (2006a) Vertical integration and competition. Amer. Econom. Rev. 96(2):97–102.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Aghion P, Griffith R, Howitt P (2006b) U-shaped relationship between vertical integration and competition: Theory and evidence. Internat. J. Econom. Theory 2(3–4):353–365.Google Scholar
  • Athey S, Stern S (1998) An empirical framework for testing theories about complementarity in organizational design. NBER Working Paper 6600, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Badillo Á (2003) La Desregulación de la Televisión Local en España: El Caso de Castilla y León. Ph.D. Dissertation, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.Google Scholar
  • Badillo Á (2005a) La desregulación invisible: El caso de la televisión local por ondas en España. Revista de Econom´ia Pol´itica de las Tecnolog´ias de la Información y Comunicación 7(1).Google Scholar
  • Badillo Á (2005b) Pol´iticas públicas del audiovisual y la desregulación de la televisión local por ondas en España (1980–2004). Sphera Pública, Revista de Ciencias Sociales y de la Comunicación 5:201–228.Google Scholar
  • Badillo Á (2011) Modelos de clivaje público-privado de la televisión subnacional en España. adComunica. Revista de Estrategias, Tendencias e Innovación en Comunicación 1:63–81.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Badillo Á, Fuertes M (eds.) (2004) La televisión local del siglo XXI—Jornadas con motivo del XV aniversario de la creación de Televisión Segovia (Televisión Castilla y León, Valladolid).Google Scholar
  • Balakrishnan S, Wernerfelt B (1986) Technical change, competition and vertical integration. Strategic Management J. 7(4):347–359.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bloom N, Van Reenen J (2007) Measuring and explaining management practices across firms and countries. Quart. J. Econom. 122(4):1351–1408.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bloom N, Sadun R, Van Reenen J (2012) The organization of firms across countries. Quart. J. Econom. 127(4):1663–1705.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bresnahan TF, Levin JD (2013) Vertical integration and market structure. Gibbons R, Roberts DJ, eds. Handbook of Organizational Economics (Princeton University Press, New Jersey), 853–890.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bustamante (2002) Televisión: Errores y frenos en el camino digital. Comunicación y Cultura en la Era Digital. Industrias, Mercados y Diversidad en España (Gedisa, Barcelona), 213–264.Google Scholar
  • Cachon GP, Harker PT (2002) Competition and outsourcing with scale economies. Management Sci. 48(10):1314–1333.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Campa J, Goldberg LS (1997) The evolving external orientation of manufacturing industries: Evidence from four countries. Econom. Policy Rev. 3(2):53–81.Google Scholar
  • Cassiman B, Veugelers R (2006) In search of complementarity in innovation strategy: Internal R&D and external knowledge acquisition. Management Sci. 52(1):68–82.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chin MK, Hambrick DC, Treviño LK (2013) Political ideologies of CEOs: The influence of executives’ values on corporate social responsibility. Admin. Sci. Quart. 58(2):197–232.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Coase R (1937) The nature of the firm. Economica 4(16):386–405.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Conti R, Valentini G (2015) Super partes? Assessing the effect of judicial independence on entrepreneurship. Acad. Management Proc. 2015 (January, Meeting Abstract Supplement), DOI: 10.5465/AMBPP.2015.10607abstract.Google Scholar
  • David RJ, Han S-K (2004) A systematic assessment of the empirical support for transaction cost economics. Strategic Management J. 25(1):39–58.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Forbes S, Lederman M (2009) Adaptation and vertical integration in the airline industry. Amer. Econom. Rev. 99(5):1831–1849.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fosfuri A, Helmers C, Roux C (2012) Are joint patents collusive? Evidence from the U.S and Europe. Working paper, Bocconi University, Milan.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Galdon-Sanchez JE, Gil R, Bayo-Moriones A (2015) Outsourcing of peripheral services: Evidence from Spanish manufacturing plant-level data. Eur. Econom. Rev. 78:328–344.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Garcia JA (2005) Los contenidos en las televisiones locales. Comunicar 13(25), http://www.revistacomunicar.com/index.php?contenido=detalles&numero=25&articulo=25-2005-098.Google Scholar
  • Gibbons R (2005) Four formal(izable) theories of the firm? J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 58(2):200–245.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Grossman SJ, Hart OD (1986) The costs and benefits of ownership: A theory of vertical and lateral integration. J. Political Econom. 94(4):691–719.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Guadalupe M, Wulf J (2010) The flattening firm and product market competition: The effect of trade liberalization on corporate hierarchies. Amer. Econom. J.: Appl. Econom. 2(4):105–127.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Harrigan KR (1986) Matching vertical integration strategies to competitive conditions. Strategic Management J. 7(6):535–555.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Harrigan KR (2003) Vertical Integration, Outsourcing, and Corporate Strategy (Beard Books, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
  • Hart OD (1983) The market mechanism as an incentive scheme. Bell J. Econom. 14(2):366–382.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hart OD, Moore J (1990) Property rights and the nature of the firm. J. Political Econom. 98(6):1119–1158.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hart OD, Tirole J (1990) Vertical integration and market foreclosure. Brookings Papers on economic activity. Microeconomics 1990:205–286.Google Scholar
  • Holmström B, Roberts J (1998) The boundaries of the firm revisited. J. Econom. Perspect. 12(4):73–94.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Holmström B, Tirole J (1989) The theory of the firm. Schmalensee R, Willig R, eds. Handbook of Industrial Organization (North-Holland, Amsterdam), 61–131.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Iglesias Z (2005) La calidad de la programación de los noticiarios de producción propia en las emisoras locales de Castilla y León. Comunicar 13(25).Google Scholar
  • Kakabadse A, Kakabadse N (2002) Trends in outsourcing: Contrasting USA and Europe. Eur. Management J. 20(2):189–198.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lafontaine F, Slade M (2007) Vertical integration and firm boundaries: The evidence. J. Econom. Literature 45(3):631–687.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Levy DT (1985) The transactions cost approach to vertical integration: An empirical examination. Rev. Econom. Statist. 67(3):438–445.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Macher JT, Richman BD (2008) Transaction cost economics: An assessment of empirical research in the social sciences. Bus. Politics 10(1):335–361.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McLaren J (2000) “Globalization” and vertical structure. Amer. Econom. Rev. 90(5):1239–1254.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Milgrom P, Roberts J (1990) The economics of modern manufacturing: Technology, strategy, and organization. Amer. Econom. Rev. 80(3):511–528.Google Scholar
  • Monedero CR (2005) La televisión local pública: Plataforma para contenidos de servicio al ciudadano. Comunicar 13(25).Google Scholar
  • Mullainathan S, Scharfstein D (2001) Do firm boundaries matter? Amer. Econom. Rev. Papers Proc. 91(2):195–199.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nickerson JA, Vanden Bergh R (1999) Economizing in a context of strategizing: Governance mode choice in Cournot competition. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 40(1):1–15.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nickerson JA, Hamilton BH, Wada T (2001) Market position, resource profile, and governance: Linking Porter and Williamson in the context of international courier and small package services in Japan. Strategic Management J. 22(3):251–273.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pisano GP (1990) The R&D boundaries of the firm: An empirical analysis. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(1):153–176.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rey P, Tirole J (2007) A primer on foreclosure. Chapter 33 Armstrong M, Porter R, eds. Handbook of Industrial Organization, Vol. 3 (Elsevier, Amsterdam), 2145–2220.Google Scholar
  • Spiller PT (1985) On vertical mergers. J. Law, Econom., Organ. 1(2):285–312.Google Scholar
  • Syverson C (2011) What determines productivity? J. Econom. Literature 49(2):326–365.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tucker IB, Wilder RP (1977) Trends in vertical integration in the U.S. manufacturing sector. J. Indust. Econom. 26(1):81–94.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vives X (2008) Innovation and competitive pressure. J. Indust. Econom. 56(3):419–469.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vroom G (2006) Organizational design and the intensity of rivalry. Management Sci. 52(11):1689–1702.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Whittington R, Pettigrew A, Peck S, Fenton E, Conyon M (1999) Change and complementarities in the new competitive landscape: A European panel study, 1992–1996. Organ. Sci. 10(5):583–600.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Williamson O (1975). Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • Williamson O (1985) The Economic Institutions of Capitalism (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.