Full-Stock-Payment Marginalization in Merger and Acquisition Transactions

References

• Aboody D, Kaznik R, Williams M (2000) Purchase versus pooling in stock-for-stock acquisitions: Why do firms care? J. Accounting Econom. 29(3):261–286.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ali A, Kravet T (2016) The effect of SFAS 141 and 142 on the likelihood and the form of financing corporate takeovers. Working paper, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson.Google Scholar
• Amel-Zadeh A, Meeks G, Meeks JG (2015) Historical perspectives on accounting for M&A. Working paper, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.Google Scholar
• Andrade G, Mitchell M, Stafford E (2001) New evidence and perspectives on mergers. J. Econom. Perspect. 15(2):103–210.Crossref, Google Scholar
• André P, Kooli M, L’Her J-F (2004) The long-run performance of mergers and acquisitions: Evidence from the Canadian stock market. Financial Management 33(4):27–43.Google Scholar
• Ayers B, Lefanowicz C, Robinson (2002) Do firms purchase the pooling method? Rev. Accounting Stud. 7(1):5–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Betton S, Eckbo BE, Thorburn K (2008) Corporate takeovers. Eckbo BE, ed. Corporate Takeovers in Handbook of Corporate Finance: Empirical Corporate Finance, Vol. 2 (Elsevier/North-Holland, Amsterdam).Google Scholar
• Boone A, Lie E, Liu Y (2014) Time trends and determinants of the method of payment in M&As. J. Corporate Finance 27:296–204.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cedergren M, Lev B, Zarowin P (2015) SFAS 142, conditional conservatism, and acquisition profitability and risk. Working paper, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
• Eckbo BE (1992) Mergers and the value of antitrust deterrence. J. Finance 47(3):1005–1029.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eckbo BE, Giammarino R, Heinkel R (1990) Asymmetric information and the medium of exchange in takeovers: Theory and tests. Rev. Financial Stud. 3(4):651–675.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eckbo B, Makaew T, Thorburn K (2017) Are stock-financed takeovers opportunistic? Working paper, Tuck School of Business at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH.Google Scholar
• Farrell E, Beechy T (2002) Advanced Financial Accounting, 4th ed. (Pearson Education, North York, Ontario).Google Scholar
• Fishman M (1989) Preemptive bidding and the role of the medium of exchange in acquisitions. J. Finance 44(1):41–57.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fuller K, Netter J, Stegemoller M (2002) What do returns to acquiring firms tell us? Evidence from firms that make many acquisitions. J. Finance 57(4):1763–1793.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Golubov A, Petmezas D, Travlos N. (2016) Do stock-financed acquisitions destroy value? New methods and evidence. Rev. Finance 20(1):161–200.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Golubov A, Yawson A, Zhang H (2015) Extraordinary acquirers. J. Financial Econom. 116(2):314–330.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Granger C, Newbold P (1974) Spurious regressions in econometrics. J. Econometrics 2(2):111–120.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greene W (2010) Testing hypotheses about interaction terms in nonlinear models. Econom. Lett. 107(2):291–296.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greene W (2011) Econometric Analysis, 7th ed. (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ).Google Scholar
• Hansen R (1987) A theory for the choice of exchange medium in the market for corporate control. J. Bus. 60(1):75–95.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harding D, Rovit S (2004) Building deals on bedrock. Harvard Bus. Rev. 82:121–128.Google Scholar
• Harford J, Li K (2007) Decoupling CEO wealth and firm performance: The case of acquiring CEOs. J. Finance 62(2):917–949.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harris M, Raviv A (1988) Corporate control contests and capital structure. J. Financial Econom. 20:55–86.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Healy P (1985) The impact of bonus schemes on the selection of accounting variables. J. Accounting Econom. 7(1–3):85–107.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jensen M (2005) Agency costs of overvalued equity. Financial Management 34(1):5–19.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kile Ch, Phillips M (2009) Using industry classification codes to sample high-technology firms: Analysis and recommendations. J. Accounting, Auditing Finance 24(1):35–58.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kolasinski A, Siegel A (2010) On the economic meaning of interaction term coefficients in non-linear binary response regression models. Working paper, Texas A&M University, College Station.Google Scholar
• Lys T, Vincent TL (1995) An analysis of value destruction in AT&T’s acquisition of NCR. J. Financial Econom. 39(2–3):353–378.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Martinez-Jerez F (2008) Governance and merger accounting: Evidence from stock price reactions to purchase versus pooling. Eur. Accounting Rev. 17(1):5–35.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moeller S, Schlingemann F, Stulz R (2004) Firm size and the gains from acquisitions. J. Financial Econom. 73(2):201–228.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moeller S, Schlingemann F, Stulz R (2005) Wealth destruction on a massive scale? A study of acquiring-firm returns in the recent merger wave. J. Finance 60(2):757–782.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Officer M, Poulsen A, Stegenmoller M (2009) Target-firm information asymmetry and acquirer returns. Rev. Finance 13(3):467–493.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reda JF (1999) What you need to know about pooling of interests accounting. J. Compensation Benefits 57(2):33–39.Google Scholar
• Rhodes-Kropf M, Viswanathan S (2004) Market valuation and merger waves. J. Finance 59(6):2685–2718.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roberts MR, Whited TM (2013) Endogeneity in empirical corporate finance. Constantinides G, Stulz R, Harris M, eds. Handbook of the Economics of Finance, Vol. 2 (Elsevier, Amsterdam),493–572.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shleifer A, Vishny RW (2003) Stock market driven acquisitions. J. Financial Econom. 70(3):295–311.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stulz R (1988) Managerial control of voting rights: Financing policies and the market for corporate control. J. Financial Econom. 20:25–54.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Travlos N (1987) Corporate takeover bids, method of payment, and bidding firms’ stock returns. J. Finance 42(4):943–963.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weber J (2004) Shareholder wealth effects of pooling-of-interests accounting: Evidence from the SEC’s restriction on share repurchases following pooling transactions J. Accounting Econom. 37(1):39–57.Crossref, Google Scholar