Overcoming Algorithm Aversion: People Will Use Imperfect Algorithms If They Can (Even Slightly) Modify Them
Published Online:4 Nov 2016https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2016.2643
References
- (1986) Computer aided diagnosis of acute abdominal pain: A multicentre study. British Medical J. 293(6550):800–804.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2011) Systematic analysis of breast cancer morphology uncovers stromal features associated with survival. Sci. Translational Medicine 3(108):108ra113.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2006) Advice taking and decision-making: An integrative literature review, and implications for the organizational sciences. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 101(2): 127–151.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1983) Comparing for different time series methods the value of technical expertise individualized analysis, and judgmental adjustment. Management Sci. 29(5):559–566.Link, Google Scholar
- (1971) A case study of graduate admissions: Application of three principles of human decision making. Amer. Psychologist 26(2):180–188.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1979) The robust beauty of improper linear models in decision making. Amer. Psychologist 34(7):571–582.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1989) Clinical versus actuarial judgment. Science 243(4899):1668–1674.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2015) Algorithm aversion: People erroneously avoid algorithms after seeing them err. J. Experiment. Psych.: General 144(1):114–126.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1986) Accepting error to make less error. J. Personality Assessment 50(3):387–395.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2007) Against your better judgment? How organizations can improve their use of management judgment in forecasting. Interfaces 37(6):570–576.Link, Google Scholar
- (2009) Effective forecasting and judgmental adjustments: An empirical evaluation and strategies for improvement in supply-chain planning. Internat. J. Forecasting 25(1):3–23.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2000) The affect heuristic in judgments of risks and benefits. J. Behav. Decision Making 13(1):1–17.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1999) Judgmental forecasts of time series affected by special events: Does providing a statistical forecast improve accuracy? J. Behav. Decision Making 12(1):37–53.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2000) Clinical versus mechanical prediction: A meta-analysis. Psych. Assessment 12(1):19–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2008) Stubborn reliance on intuition and subjectivity in employee selection. Indust. Organ. Psych. 1(3):333–342.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1981) Forecasting and planning: An evaluation. Management Sci. 27(2):115–138.Link, Google Scholar
- (2006) Judgmental forecasting: A review of progress over the last 25 years. Internat. J. Forecasting 22(3):493–518.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1995) Judgemental adjustment of initial forecasts: Its effectiveness and biases. J. Behav. Decision Making 8(3):149–168.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1954) Clinical versus Statistical Prediction: A Theoretical Analysis and Review of the Literature (University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis).Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2008) Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behav. Res. Methods 40(3):879–891.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2003) The efficacy of using judgmental versus quantitative forecasting methods in practice. Omega 31(6):511–522.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2000) Decision bias in the newsvendor problem with a known demand distribution: Experimental evidence. Management Sci. 46(3):404–420.Link, Google Scholar
- (1952) A validation of the Glueck Social Prediction Scale for proneness to delinquency. J. Criminal Law: Criminology Police Sci. 43(4):451–470.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2009) Survey on the use of clinical and mechanical prediction methods in clinical psychology. Professional Psych.: Res. Practice 40(5):525–531.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1991) The effect of graphical adjustment on forecast accuracy. Internat. J. Forecasting 7(2):151–154.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1984) The clinical and statistical prediction of recidivism. Criminal Justice Behav. 11(1):3–34.Crossref, Google Scholar

