Machine Learning and Portfolio Optimization

References

• Acerbi C, Tasche D (2002) Expected shortfall: A natural coherent alternative to value at risk. Econom. Notes 31(2):379–388.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ahmadi AA, Olshevsky A, Parrilo PA, Tsitsiklis JN (2013) NP-hardness of deciding convexity of quartic polynomials and related problems. Math. Programming 137(1–2):453–476.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ban G-Y, Chen CJ (2016) Portfolio optimization in high dimensions: Aggregate then optimize. Working paper, London Business School, London.Google Scholar
• Belloni A, Chernozhukov V (2013) Least squares after model selection in high-dimensional sparse models. Bernoulli 19(2): 521–547.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ben-Tal A, El Ghaoui L, Nemirovski A (2009) Robust Optimization (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Best MJ, Grauer RR (1991) On the sensitivity of mean-variance-efficient portfolios to changes in asset means: some analytical and computational results. Rev. Financial Stud. 4(2):315–342.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boyd SP, Vandenberghe L (2004) Convex Optimization (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Broadie M (1993) Computing efficient frontiers using estimated parameters. Ann. Oper. Res. 45(1):21–58.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Candes E, Tao T (2007) The dantzig selector: Statistical estimation when p is much larger than n. Ann. Statist. 35(6):2313–2351.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chopra VK (1993) Improving optimization. J. Investing 2(3):51–59.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chopra VK, Ziemba WT (1993) The effect of errors in means, variances, and covariances on optimal portfolio choice. J. Portfolio Management 19(2):6–11.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Delage E, Ye Y (2010) Distributionally robust optimization under moment uncertainty with application to data-driven problems. Oper. Res. 58(3):595–612.Link, Google Scholar
• DeMiguel V, Garlappi L, Uppal R (2009a) Optimal versus naive diversification: How inefficient is the 1/n portfolio strategy? Rev. Financial Stud. 22(5):1915–1953.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DeMiguel V, Nogales FJ, Uppal R (2014) Stock return serial dependence and out-of-sample portfolio performance. Rev. Financial Stud. 27(4):1031–1073.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DeMiguel V, Garlappi L, Nogales FJ, Uppal R (2009b) A generalized approach to portfolio optimization: Improving performance by constraining portfolio norms. Management Sci. 55(5):798–812.Link, Google Scholar
• El Karoui N (2010) High-dimensionality effects in the Markowitz problem and other quadratic programs with linear constraints: Risk underestimation. Ann. Statist. 38(6):3487–3566.Crossref, Google Scholar
• El Karoui N (2013) On the realized risk of high-dimensional Markowitz portfolios. SIAM J. Financial Math. 4(1):737–783.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fisher RA (1922) On the mathematical foundations of theoretical statistics. Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. London, Ser. A 222:309–368.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fisher RA (1925) Theory of statistical estimation. Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 22(5):700–725.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frankfurter GM, Phillips HE, Seagle JP (1971) Portfolio selection: The effects of uncertain means, variances and covariances. J. Financial Quant. Anal. 6(5):1251–1262.Crossref, Google Scholar
• French KR (2015) Data library. Accessed August 20, 2015, http://mba.tuck.dartmouth.edu/pages/faculty/ken.french/data_library.html.Google Scholar
• Frost PA, Savarino JE (1986) An empirical bayes approach to efficient portfolio selection. J. Financial Quant. Anal. 21(3):293–305.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frost PA, Savarino JE (1988) For better performance: Constrain portfolio weights. J. Portfolio Management 15(1):29–34.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goldfarb D, Iyengar G (2003) Robust portfolio selection problems. Math. Oper. Res. 28(1):1–38.Link, Google Scholar
• Gotoh JY, Takeda A (2010) On the role of norm constraints in portfolio selection. Comput. Management Sci. 8:323–353.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gotoh J, Kim MJ, Lim AEB (2015) Robust empirical optimization is almost the same as mean-variance optimization. Working paper, Chuo University, Tokyo.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grant M, Boyd S (2008) Graph implementations for nonsmooth convex programs. Blondel V, Boyd S, Kimura H, eds. Recent Advances in Learning and Control, Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences, Vol. 371 (Springer-Verlag, London), 95–110. http://stanford.edu/∼boyd/graph_dcp.html.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grant M, Boyd S (2013) CVX: Matlab software for disciplined convex programming, version 2.1. Accessed June 24, 2013, http://cvxr.com/cvx.Google Scholar
• Haff L (1980) Empirical Bayes estimation of the multivariate normal covariance matrix. Ann. Statist. 8(3):586–597.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hastie T, Tibshirani R, Friedman J (2009) The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction, 2nd ed. (Springer-Verlag, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huber PJ (1967) The behavior of maximum likelihood estimates under nonstandard conditions. Proc. Fifth Berkeley Sympos. Math. Statist. Probab., Vol. 1 (University of California Press, Berkeley), 221–233.Google Scholar
• Ivanov VK (1962) On linear problems which are not well-posed. Soviet Math. Dokl. 145(2):981–983.Google Scholar
• Jagannathan R, Ma T (2003) Risk reduction in large portfolios: Why imposing the wrong constraints helps. J. Finance 58(4): 1651–1684.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jegadeesh N, Titman S (1993) Returns to buying winners and selling losers: Implications for stock market efficiency. J. Finance 48(1):65–91.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jobson JD, Korkie B (1980) Estimation for Markowitz efficient portfolios. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 75(371):544–554.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jorion P (1985) International portfolio diversification with estimation risk. J. Bus. 58(3):259–278.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ledoit O, Wolf M (2004) A well-conditioned estimator for large-dimensional covariance matrices. J. Multivariate Anal. 88(2): 365–411.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lim AEB, Shanthikumar JG, Vahn G-Y (2011) Conditional value-at-risk in portfolio optimization: Coherent but fragile. Oper. Res. Lett. 39(3):163–171.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lo AW, MacKinlay AC (1990) When are contrarian profits due to stock market overreaction? Rev. Financial Stud. 3(2):175–205.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Markowitz H (1952) Portfolio selection. J. Finance 7(1):77–91.Google Scholar
• Merton RC (1980) On estimating the expected return on the market: An exploratory investigation. J. Financial Econom. 8(4):323–361.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Michaud R (1989) The Markowitz optimization enigma: Is optimized optimal? Financial Analysts J. 45(1):31–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Phillips DL (1962) A technique for the numerical solution of certain integral equations of the first kind. J. ACM 9(1):84–97.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rockafellar R, Uryasev S (2000) Optimization of conditional value-at-risk. J. Risk 2(3):21–41.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shapiro A, Dentcheva D, Ruszczyński A (2009) Lectures on Stochastic Programming: Modeling and Theory (Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tikhonov A (1963) Solution of incorrectly formulated problems and the regularization method. Soviet Math. Dokl. 5:1035–1038.Google Scholar
• van der Vaart A (2000) Asymptotic Statistics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
• Vapnik V (2000) The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory (Springer, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar