Overcoming Salience Bias: How Real-Time Feedback Fosters Resource Conservation

References

• Abrahamse W, Steg L, Vlek C, Rothengatter T (2005) A review of intervention studies aimed at household energy conservation. J. Environ. Psych. 25(3):273–291.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ajzen I, Fishbein M (1980) Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
• Allcott H (2011) Social norms and energy conservation. J. Public Econom. 95(9–10):1082–1095.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Allcott H, Mullainathan S (2010) Behavior and energy policy. Science 327(5970):1204–1205.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Allcott H, Rogers T (2014) The short-run and long-run effects of behavioral interventions: Experimental evidence from energy conservation. Amer. Econom. Rev. 104(10):3003–3037.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Allcott H, Wozny N (2013) Gasoline prices, fuel economy, and the energy paradox. Rev. Econom. Statist. 96(5):779–795.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Asensio OI, Delmas MA (2015) Nonprice incentives and energy conservation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 112(6):E510–E515.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Attari SZ (2014) Perceptions of water use. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111(14):5129–5134.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Attari SZ, DeKay ML, Davidson CI, de Bruin WB (2010) Public perceptions of energy consumption and savings. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107(37):16054–16059.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Azevedo IML, Morgan MG, Lave L (2011) Residential and regional electricity consumption in the U.S. and EU: How much will higher prices reduce CO2 emissions? Electricity J. 24(1):21–29.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ball J (2009) Under pressure: Bathers duck weak shower heads. Wall Street Journal (July 21), http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB125807041772846273.Google Scholar
• Bearden WO, Etzel MJ (1982) Reference group influence on product and brand purchase decisions. J. Consumer Res. 9(2):183–194.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bernedo M, Ferraro PJ, Price M (2014) The persistent impacts of norm-based messaging and their implications for water conservation. J. Consumer Policy 37(3):437–452.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bolderdijk JW, Steg L, Geller ES, Lehman PK, Postmes T (2013) Comparing the effectiveness of monetary versus moral motives in environmental campaigning. Nature Climate Change 3(4):413–416.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bollinger B, Leslie P, Sorensen A (2011) Calorie posting in chain restaurants. Amer. Econom. J.: Econom. Policy 3(1):91–128.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bordalo P, Gennaioli N, Shleifer A (2012) Salience theory of choice under risk. Quart. J. Econom. 127(3):1243–1285.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brent DA, Cook JH, Olsen S (2015) Social comparisons, household water use, and participation in utility conservation programs: Evidence from three randomized trials. J. Assoc. Environ. Resource Economists 2(4):597–627.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Buchanan K, Russo R, Anderson B (2015) The question of energy reduction: The problem(s) with feedback. Energy Policy 77(February):89–96.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Costa DL, Kahn ME (2013) Energy conservation “nudges” and environmentalist ideology: Evidence from a randomized residential electricity field experiment. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 11(3):680–702.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dai H, Milkman KL, Riis J (2014) The fresh start effect: Temporal landmarks motivate aspirational behavior. Management Sci. 60(10):2563–2582.Link, Google Scholar
• Degen K, Efferson C, Frei F, Goette L, Lalive R (2013) Smart Metering, Beratung oder sozialer Vergleich: Was beeinflusst den Elektrizitätsverbrauch? Final report to the Swiss Federal Office of Energy, Ittigen, Switzerland. http://www.bfe.admin.ch/php/modules/enet/streamfile.php?file=000000011088.pdf&name=000000290850.Google Scholar
• DellaVigna S, List JA, Malmendier U (2012) Testing for altruism and social pressure in charitable giving. Quart. J. Econom. 127(1):1–56.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Delmas MA, Lessem N (2014) Saving power to conserve your reputation? The effectiveness of private versus public information. J. Environ. Econom. Management 67(3):353–370.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Diekmann A, Meyer R, Mühlemann C, Diem A (2009) Schweizer Umweltsurvey 2007—Analysen und Ergebnisse (Swiss environmental survey—Analyses and results). Report to the Swiss Federal Statistical Office (BFS) and to the Federal Office for the Environment (BAFU). Technical report, ETH Zurich, Zurich. http://www.socio.ethz.ch/content/dam/ethz/special-interest/gess/chair-of-sociology-dam/documents/research/umweltsurvey/2007/reports/UWS07AnalysenErgebnisseBerichtBFSBAFU.pdf.Google Scholar
• European Commission (2011) Special Eurobarometer 359—Attitudes on data protection and electronic identity in the European Union. Accessed September 20, 2015, http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/eb_special_359_340_en.htm.Google Scholar
• European Environment Agency (2015) Final energy consumption by sector and fuel. Accessed February 16, 2016, http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/final-energy-consumption-by-sector-9/assessment.Google Scholar
• Evans L (1979) Driver behavior effects on fuel consumption in urban driving. Human Factors 21(4):389–398.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ferraro PJ, Price MK (2013) Using nonpecuniary strategies to influence behavior: Evidence from a large-scale field experiment. Rev. Econom. Statist. 95(1):64–73.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fishbein M, Ajzen I (1975) Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA).Google Scholar
• Frank RH, Glass AJ (1991) Microeconomics and Behavior (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
• Gabaix X, Laibson D (2006) Shrouded attributes, consumer myopia, and information suppression in competitive markets. Quart. J. Econom. 121(2):505–540.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gardner GT, Stern PC (2008) The short list: The most effective actions U.S. households can take to curb climate change. Environment 50(September/October):12–23.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gatersleben B, Steg L, Vlek C (2002) Measurement and determinants of environmentally significant consumer behavior. Environment Behav. 34(3):335–362.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gerber AS, Green DP, Larimer CW (2008) Social pressure and voter turnout: Evidence from a large-scale field experiment. Amer. Political Sci. Rev. 102(1):33–48.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gerber AS, Green DP, Larimer CW (2010) An experiment testing the relative effectiveness of encouraging voter participation by inducing feelings of pride or shame. Political Behav. 32(3):409–422.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gneezy A, Gneezy U, Nelson LD, Brown A (2010) Shared social responsibility: A field experiment in pay-what-you-want pricing and charitable giving. Science 329(5989):325–327.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gneezy A, Gneezy U, Riener G, Nelson LD (2012) Pay-what-you-want, identity, and self-signaling in markets. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109(19):7236–7240.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gromet DM, Kunreuther H, Larrick RP (2013) Political ideology affects energy-efficiency attitudes and choices. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110(23):9314–9319.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gutsell JN, Inzlicht M (2013) A neuroaffective perspective on why people fail to live a sustainable lifestyle. Van Trijp HCM, eds. Encouraging Sustainable Behavior: Psychology and the Environment (Psychology Press, New York), 137–154.Google Scholar
• Harrison GW, List JA (2004) Field experiments. J. Econom. Literature 42(4):1009–1055.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hirsh JB (2010) Personality and environmental concern. J. Environmen. Psych. 30(2):245–248.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hirshleifer D (2008) Psychological bias as a driver of financial regulation. Eur. Financial Management 14(5):856–874.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hirshleifer D, Lim SS, Teoh SH (2009) Driven to distraction: Extraneous events and underreaction to earnings news. J. Finance 64(5):2289–2325.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hirshleifer D, Lim SS, Teoh SH (2011) Limited investor attention and stock market misreactions to accounting information. Rev. Asset Pricing Stud. 1(1):35–73.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jessoe K, Rapson D (2014) Knowledge is (less) power: Experimental evidence from residential energy use. Amer. Econom. Rev. 104(4):1417–1438.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Slovic P, Tversky A (1982) Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Karlin B, Zinger JF, Ford R (2015) The effects of feedback on energy conservation: A meta-analysis. Psych. Bull. 141(6):1205–1227.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kehr F (2016) Feeling and thinking: On the role of intuitive processes in shaping decisions about privacy. Doctoral dissertation, University of St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland. http://www1.unisg.ch/www/edis.nsf/vEDISBySubjectDE/49AD0B112ABC363FC1257E5B003FC787.Google Scholar
• Kehr F, Kowatsch T, Wentzel D, Fleisch E (2015) Blissfully ignorant: the effects of general privacy concerns, general institutional trust, and affect in the privacy calculus. Inform. Systems J. 25(6):607–635.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kleiminger W, Santini S, Mattern F (2014) Smart heating control with occupancy prediction: How much can one save? UbiComp ’14: Proc. 2014 ACM Internat. Joint Conf. Pervasive Ubiquitous Comput. (ACM, New York), 947–954.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kluger AN, DeNisi A (1996) Feedback intervention theory. Psych. Bull. 119(2):254–284.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kollmuss A, Agyeman J (2002) Mind the Gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environ. Ed. Res. 8(3):239–260.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kolstad CD (2010) Environmental Economics, 2nd ed. (Oxford University Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Lapillonne B, Pollier K, Samci N (2015) Energy efficiency trends for households in the EU. Report, ODYSSEE-MURE, ADEME, Angers, France. http://www.odyssee-mure.eu/publications/efficiency-by-sector/household/household-eu.pdf.Google Scholar
• Lee K, Ashton MC (2004) Psychometric properties of the HEXACO Personality Inventory. Multivariate Behav. Res. 39(2):329–358.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levitt SD, List JA (2009) Field experiments in economics: The past, the present, and the future. Eur. Econom. Rev. 53(1):1–18.Crossref, Google Scholar
• List JA (2011) Why economists should conduct field experiments and 14 tips for pulling one off. J. Econom. Perspect. 25(3):3–15.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Loewenstein G (1996) Out of control: Visceral influences on behavior. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 65(3):272–292.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Loock C, Landwehr J, Staake T, Fleisch E, Pentland A (2012) The influence of reference frame and population density on the effectiveness of social normative feedback on electricity consumption. Huang M-H, Piccoli G, Sambamurthy V, eds. Proc. 33rd Internat. Conf. Information Systems (ICIS 2012), Orlando, FL, 1–17. http://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2012/proceedings/GreenIS/7/.Google Scholar
• McKerracher C, Torriti J (2013) Energy consumption feedback in perspective: Integrating Australian data to meta-analyses on in-home displays. Energy Efficiency 6(2):387–405.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McKinsey & Company (2009) Pathways to a low-carbon economy: Version 2 of the global greenhouse gas abatement cost curve. Technical report, McKinsey & Company, Chicago.Google Scholar
• Michel A, Attali S, Bush E (2015) Energy efficiency of white goods in Europe: Monitoring the market with sales data. Technical report, Topten International Services, Zürich. http://www.topten.eu/uploads/File/WhiteGoods_in_Europe_June15.pdf.Google Scholar
• Milfont TL, Sibley CG (2012) The big five personality traits and environmental engagement: Associations at the individual and societal level. J. Environmen. Psych. 32(2):187–195.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Milkman KL, Rogers T, Bazerman MH (2008) Harnessing our inner angels and demons: What we have learned about want/should conflicts and how that knowledge can help us reduce short-sighted decision making. Perspect. Psych. Sci. 3(4):324–338.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mitchell DL, Chesnutt TW (2013) Evaluation of East Bay Municipal Utility District’s pilot of WaterSmart home water reports. Technical report, California Water Foundation, Sacramento. http://waterfoundation.net/wp-content/uploads/PDF/1389391749-Watersmart_evaluation_report_FINAL_12-12-13(00238356).pdf.Google Scholar
• Naderi I (2011) Green behavior: Concern for the self or others? AMA Summer Educators’ Conf. Proc., Vol. 22 (American Marketing Association, Chicago), 163–164.Google Scholar
• Norcross JC, Vangarelli DJ (1988) The resolution solution: Longitudinal examination of New Year’s change attempts. J. Substance Abuse 1(2):127–134.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Packer DJ, Fujita K, Herman K (2013) Rebels with a cause: A goal conflict approach to understanding when conscientious people dissent. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 49(5):927–932.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Poldin O, Valeeva D, Yudkevich M (2016) Which peers matter: How social ties affect peer-group effects. Res. Higher Ed. 57(4):448–468.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Power S (2011) A water fight over luxury showers. Wall Street Journal (July 21), http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052748704913304575371462611463490.Google Scholar
• Prognos AG (2015) Analyse des schweizerischen Energieverbrauchs 2000–2014 nach Verwendungszwecken. Final report to the Swiss Federal Office of Energy, Federal Office of Energy, Bern, Switzerland. http://www.bfe.admin.ch/themen/00526/00541/00542/02167/index.html?lang=de&dossier_id=02169.Google Scholar
• Schleich J, Klobasa M, Goelz S, Brunner M (2013) Effects of feedback on residential electricity demand—Findings from a field trial in Austria. Energy Policy 61(2):1097–1106.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schultz PW, Nolan JM, Cialdini RB, Goldstein NJ, Griskevicius V (2007) The constructive, destructive, and reconstructive power of social norms. Psych. Sci. 18(5):429–434.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schultz PW, Messina A, Tronu G, Limas EF, Gupta R, Estrada M (2016) Personalized normative feedback and the moderating role of personal norms: A field experiment to reduce residential water consumption. Environment Behav. 48(5):686–710.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Swan M (2013) The quantified self: Fundamental disruption in big data science and biological discovery. Big Data 1(2):85–99.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Swiss Federal Office for the Environment (2013) Environment Switzerland 2013. Technical report, Swiss Federal Office for the Environment, Bern, Switzerland. http://www.bafu.admin.ch/ud-1070-e.Google Scholar
• Tiefenbeck V, Tasic V, Schoeb S, Staake T (2013) Mechatronics to drive environmental sustainability: Measuring, visualizing and transforming consumer patterns on a large scale. Proc. 39th Annual Conf. IEEE Indust. Electronics Soc. (IECON 2013) (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ), 4768–4773.Crossref, Google Scholar
• U.S. Energy Information Administration (2013) Heating and cooling no longer majority of U.S. home energy use. Technical report, U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, DC. http://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.cfm?id=10271.Google Scholar
• Wolak FA (2011) Do residential customers respond to hourly prices? Evidence from a dynamic pricing experiment. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(3):83–87.Crossref, Google Scholar
• World Economic Forum (2015) Deep shift: Technology tipping points and societal impact. Technical report, World Economic Forum, Geneva. https://www.weforum.org/reports/deep-shift-technology-tipping-points-and-societal-impact/.Google Scholar
• Young MS, Birrell SA, Stanton NA (2011) Safe driving in a green world: A review of driver performance benchmarks and technologies to support “smart” driving. Appl. Ergonomics 42(4):533–539.Crossref, Google Scholar