Collaborative Consumption: Strategic and Economic Implications of Product Sharing

References

• Adams WJ, Yellen JL (1976) Commodity bundling and the burden of monopoly. Quart. J. Econom. 90(3):475–498.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Agrawal VV, Ferguson M, Toktay LB, Thomas VM (2012) Is leasing greener than selling? Management Sci. 58(3):523–533.Link, Google Scholar
• Anderson SP, Ginsburgh VA (1994) Price discrimination via second-hand markets. Eur. Econom. Rev. 38(1):23–44.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bakos Y, Brynjolfsson E (1999) Bundling information goods: Pricing, profits, and efficiency. Management Sci. 45(12):1613–1630.Link, Google Scholar
• Bakos Y, Brynjolfsson E, Lichtman D (1999) Shared information goods. J. Law Econom. 42(1):117–155.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Besen SM, Kirby SN (1989) Private copying, appropriability, and optimal copying royalties. J. Law Econom. 32(2):255–280.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Botsman R, Rogers R (2010) What’s Mine Is Yours: The Rise of Collaborative Consumption (Harper Business, New York).Google Scholar
• Bulow JI (1982) Durable goods monopolists. J. Political Econom. 90(2):314–332.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bulow JI (1986) An economic theory of planned obsolescence. Quart. J. Econom. 101(4):729–749.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen J, Esteban S, Shum M (2013) Why do secondary markets harm firms. Amer. Econom. Rev. 103(7):2911–2934.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chevalier J, Goolsbee A (2009) Are durable goods consumers forward-looking? Evidence from college textbooks. Quart. J. Econom. 124(4):1853–1884.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coase RH (1972) Durability and monopoly. J. Law Econom. 15(1):143–149.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Conner KR, Rumelt RP (1991) Software piracy: An analysis of protection strategies. Management Sci. 37(2):125–139.Link, Google Scholar
• Desai P (1999) Competition in durable goods markets: The strategic consequences of leasing and selling. Marketing Sci. 18(1):42–58.Link, Google Scholar
• Desai P, Purohit D (1998) Leasing and selling: Optimal marketing strategies for a durable goods firm. Management Sci. 44(11):19–34.Link, Google Scholar
• Fishman A, Rob R (2000) Product innovation by a durable-good monopoly. RAND J. Econom. 31(2):237–252.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fudenberg D, Tirole J (1998) Upgrades, trade-ins, and buybacks. RAND J. Econom. 29(2):235–258.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Galbreth MR, Ghosh B, Shor M (2012) Social sharing of information goods: Implications for pricing and profits. Marketing Sci. 31(4):603–620.Link, Google Scholar
• General Motors (2012) RelayRides and OnStar: Baby, you can rent my car. Press release (July 17), General Motors, Detroit. http://media.gm.com/media/us/en/gm/news.detail.html/content/Pages/news/us/en/2012/Jul/0717_onstar.html.Google Scholar
• Hendel I, Lizzeri A (1999) Interfering with secondary markets. RAND J. Econom. 30(1):1–21.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hendel I, Lizzeri A (2002) The role of leasing under adverse selection. J. Political Econom. 110(1):113–143.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huang S, Yang Y, Anderson K (2001) A theory of finitely durable goods monopoly with used-goods market and transaction costs. Management Sci. 47(11):1515–1532.Link, Google Scholar
• Jain S (2008) Digital piracy: A competitive analysis. Marketing Sci. 28(3):610–626.Link, Google Scholar
• Jiang B, Tian L (2016) Effects of consumer-to-consumer product sharing on distribution channel. Working paper, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis.Google Scholar
• Johnson WR (1985) The economics of copying. J. Political Econom. 93(1):158–174.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johnson JP (2011) Secondary markets with changing preferences. RAND J. Econom. 42(3):555–574.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johnson JP, Waldman M (2003) Leasing, lemons, and buybacks. RAND J. Econom. 34(2):247–265.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lahiri A, Dey D (2013) Effects of piracy on quality of information goods. Management Sci. 59(1):245–264.Link, Google Scholar
• Liebowitz SJ (1985) Copying and indirect appropriability: Photocopying of journals. J. Political Econom. 93(5):945–957.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Loizos C (2016) BMW just jumped into the U.S. car-sharing biz, with the help of YC alum RideCell. Tech Crunch (April 8), https://techcrunch.com/2016/04/08/bmw-just-jumped-into-the-u-s-car-sharing-biz-with-the-help-of-yc-alum-ridecell/.Google Scholar
• Miller HLJ (1974) On killing off the market for used textbooks and the relationship between markets for new and secondhand goods. J. Political Econom. 82(3):612–619.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mussa M, Rosen S (1978) Monopoly and product quality. J. Econom. Theory 18(2):301–317.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Novos IE, Waldman M (1984) The effects of increased copyright protection: An analytic approach. J. Political Econom. 92(2):236–246.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rust J (1986) When is it optimal to kill off the market for used durable goods? Econometrica 54(1):65–86.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schmalensee RL (1984) Gaussian demand and commodity bundling. J. Bus. 57(1):211–230.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shulman JD, Coughlan AT (2007) Used goods, not used bads: Profitable secondary market sales for a durable goods channel. Quant. Marketing Econom. 5(2):191–210.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Takeyama LN (1994) The welfare implications of unauthorized reproduction of intellectual property in the presence of demand externalities. J. Indust. Econom. 42(2):155–166.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Varian HR (2005) Copying and copyright. J. Econom. Perspect. 19(2):121–138.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Waldman M (1993) A new perspective on planned obsolescence. Quart. J. Econom. 108(1):273–283.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Waldman M (1996a) Durable goods and pricing when quality matters. J. Bus. 69(4):489–510.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Waldman M (1996b) Planned obsolescence and the R&D decision. RAND J. Econom. 27(3):583–595.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Waldman M (1997) Eliminating the market for secondhand goods: An alternative explanation for leasing. J. Law Econom. 40(1):61–92.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Waldman M (2003) Durable goods theory for real world markets. J. Econom. Perspect. 17(1):131–154.Crossref, Google Scholar