Sunk Cost Fallacy in Driving the World’s Costliest Cars

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2016.2651

References

  • Agarwal S, Qian W (2014) Consumption and debt response to unanticipated income shocks: Evidence from a natural experiment in Singapore. Amer. Econom. Rev. 104(12):4205–4230.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Arkes HR, Blumer C (1985) The psychology of sunk cost. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 35(1):124–140.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ashraf N, Berry J, Shapiro JS (2010) Can higher prices stimulate product use? Evidence from a field experiment in Zambia. Amer. Econom. Rev. 100(5):2382–2413.Google Scholar
  • Baliga S, Ely JC (2011) Mnemonomics: The sunk cost fallacy as a memory kludge. Amer. Econom. J.: Microeconomics 3(4):35–67.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Busse MR, Pope DG, Pope JC, Silva-Risso J (2015) The psychological effect of weather on car purchases. Quart. J. Econom. 130(1):371–414.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Camerer CF, Weber RA (1999) The econometrics and behavioral economics of escalation of commitment: A re-examination of Staw and Hoang’s NBA data. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 39(1):59–82.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cohen J, Dupas P (2010) Free distribution or cost-sharing? Evidence from a randomized malaria prevention experiment. Quart. J. Econom. 125(1):1–45.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eyster E (2002) Rationalizing the past: A taste for consistency. Working paper, Nuffield College, Oxford, UK. https://www.nuffield.ox.ac.uk/Users/Eyster/papers/rationalize.pdf.Google Scholar
  • Frederick S, Loewenstein G (1999) Hedonic adaptation. Kahneman D, Diener E, Schwarz N, eds. Well-Being: The Foundations of Hedonic Psychology, Chap. 16 (Russell Sage Foundation, New York).Google Scholar
  • Friedman D, Pommerenke K, Lukose R, Milam G, Huberman BA (2007) Searching for the sunk cost fallacy. Experiment. Econom. 10(1):79–104.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gabaix X, Laibson D (2006) Shrouded attributes, consumer myopia, and information suppression in competitive markets. Quart. J. Econom. 121(2):505–540.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Genesove D, Mayer C (2001) Loss aversion and seller behavior: Evidence from the housing market. Quart. J. Econom. 116(4):1233–1260.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gourville JT, Soman D (1998) Payment depreciation: The behavioral effects of temporally separating payments from consumption. J. Consumer Res. 25(September):160–174.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hastings J, Shapiro JM (2013) Fungibility and consumer choice: Evidence from commodity price shocks. Quart. J. Econom. 128(4):1449–1498.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Just DR, Wansink B (2011) The flat-rate pricing paradox: Conflicting effects of “all-you-can-eat” buffet pricing. Rev. Econom. Statist. 93(1):193–200.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kanodia C, Bushman R, Dickhaut J (1989) Escalation errors and the sunk cost effect: An explanation based on reputation and information asymmetries. J. Accounting Res. 27(1):59–77.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lew YD, Leong WY (2009) Managing congestion in Singapore—A behavioural economics perspective. Journeys (May):15–22.Google Scholar
  • List JA (2003) Does market experience eliminate market anomalies? Quart. J. Econom. 118(1):41–71.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • List JA (2004) Neoclassical theory versus prospect theory: Evidence from the marketplace. Econometrica 72(2):615–625.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McAfee RP, Mialon HM, Mialon SH (2010) Do sunk costs matter? Econom. Inquiry 48(2):323–336.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Phillips OR, Battalio RC, Kogut CA (1991) Sunk and opportunity costs in valuation and bidding. Southern Econom. J. 58(1):112–128.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Staw BM (1976) Knee-deep in the big muddy: A study of escalating commitment to a chosen course of action. Organ. Behav. Human Performance 16(1):27–44.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Staw BM, Hoang H (1995) Sunk costs in the NBA: Why draft order affects playing time and survival in professional basketball. Admin. Sci. Quart. 40(3):474–494.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Staw BM, Barsade SG, Koput KW (1997) Escalation at the credit window: A longitudinal study of bank executives’ recognition and write-off of problem loans. J. Appl. Psych. 82(1):130–142.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thaler R (1980) Towards a positive theory of consumer choice. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 1(1):39–60.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thaler R (1990) Anomalies: Saving, fungibility, and mental accounts. J. Econom. Perspect. 4(1):193–205.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thaler R (1999) Mental accounting matters. J. Behav. Decision Making 12(3):183–206.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yang N, Lim YL (2017) Temporary incentives change daily routines: Evidence from a field experimentation on Singapore’s subways. Management Sci., ePub ahead of print May 9, https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2017.2731.LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.