On Styles in Product Design: An Analysis of U.S. Design Patents

References

• Alexander C (1964) Notes on the Synthesis of Form (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Anderson P, Tushman ML (1990) Technological discontinuities and dominant designs: A cyclical model of technological change. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(4):604–633.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aral S, Walker D (2011) Creating social contagion through viral product design: A randomized trial of peer influence in networks. Management Sci. 57(9):1623–1639.Link, Google Scholar
• Armstrong JS, ed. (2001) Principles of Forecasting: A Handbook for Researchers and Practitioners (Springer Science & Business Media, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baldwin CY, Clark KB (2000) Design Rules: The Power of Modularity (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barlas Y (1996) Formal aspects of model validity and validation in system dynamics. System Dynamics Rev. 12(3):183–210.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bloch PH (1995) Seeking the ideal form: Product design and consumer response. J. Marketing 59(3):16–29.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bloch PH (2011) Product design and marketing: Reflections after fifteen years. J. Product Innovation Management 28(3):378–380.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bourgeois LJ III, Eisenhardt KM (1988) Strategic decision processes in high velocity environments: Four cases in the microcomputer industry. Management Sci. 34(7):816–835.Link, Google Scholar
• Brown T (2009) Change by Design: How Design Thinking Transforms Organizations and Inspires Innovation (Harper Collins, New York).Google Scholar
• Cachon GP, Randall T, Schmidt GM (2007) In search of the bullwhip effect. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 9(4):457–479.Link, Google Scholar
• Cameron AC, Trivedi PK (2009) Microeconometrics Using Stata (Stata Press, College Station, TX).Google Scholar
• Cappetta R, Cillo P, Ponti A (2006) Convergent designs in fine fashion: An evolutionary model for stylistic innovation. Res. Policy 35(9):1273–1290.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chan C-S (2000) Can style be measured? Design Stud. 21(3):277–291.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen DZ, Huang MH, Hsieh HC, Lin CP (2011) Identifying missing relevant patent citation links by using bibliographic coupling in LED illuminating technology. J. Informetrics 5(3):400–412.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chung F (1997) Spectral Graph Theory (American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI).Google Scholar
• Church RM, Guilhardi P (2005) A Turing test of a timing theory. Behav. Processes 69(1):45–58.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cillo P, Verona G (2008) Search styles in style searching: Exploring innovation strategies in fashion firms. Long Range Planning 41(6):650–671.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen J (1988) Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ).Google Scholar
• Dell’Era C, Marchesi A, Verganti R (2010) Mastering technologies in design-driven innovation. Res. Tech. Management 53(2):12–23.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dess GG, Beard DW (1984) Dimensions of organizational task environments. Admin. Sci. Quart. 29(1):52–73.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dougherty D (1990) Understanding new markets for new products. Strategic Management J. 11(Summer, Special Issue):59–78.Google Scholar
• Dougherty D (2001) Reimagining the differentiation and integration of work for sustained product innovation. Organ. Sci. 12(5):612–631.Link, Google Scholar
• Du Mont JJ, Janis MD (2013) The origins of American design protection. Indiana Law J. 88(3):11–18.Google Scholar
• Economist, The (2012) Apple v Samsung: iPhone, uCopy, iSue. (September 1), http://www.economist.com/node/21561888.Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt K (1989) Making fast strategic decisions in high-velocity environments. Acad. Management J. 32(3):543–576.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt KM, Tabrizi BN (1995) Accelerating adaptive processes: Product innovation in the global computer industry. Admin. Sci. Quart. 40(1):84–110.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenman M (2013) Understanding aesthetic innovation in the context of technological evolution. Acad. Management Rev. 38(3):332–351.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Erat S, Krishnan V (2012) Managing delegated search over design spaces. Management Sci. 58(3):606–623.Link, Google Scholar
• Ferguson CJ (2009) An effect size primer: A guide for clinicians and researchers. Professional Psych. Res. Practice 40(5):532–538.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fine CH (1998) Clockspeed: Winning Industry Control in the Age of Temporary Advantage (Basic Books, New York).Google Scholar
• Fleming L, Sorenson O (2004) Science as a map in technological search. Strategic Management J. 25(89):909–928.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Geman D, Geman S, Hallonquist N, Younes L (2015) Visual Turing test for computer vision systems. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 112(12):3618–3623.Google Scholar
• Godart F (2012) Unveiling Fashion: Business, Culture, and Identity in the Most Glamorous Industry (Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goldstone RL (1994) The role of similarity in categorization: Providing a groundwork. Cognition 52(2):125–157.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Granger CWJ (1969) Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica 37(3):424–438.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hall BH, Jaffe AB, Trajtenberg M (2005) Market value and patent citations. RAND J. Econom. 36(1):16–38.Google Scholar
• Hargadon AB, Douglas Y (2001) When innovations meet institutions: Edison and the design of the electric light. Admin. Sci. Quart. 46(3):476–501.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henderson R, Clark KB (1990) Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(1):9–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hildebrand C, Häubl G, Herrmann A, Landwehr JR (2013) When social media can be bad for you: Community feedback stifles consumer creativity and reduces satisfaction with self-designed products. Inform. Systems Res. 24(1):14–29.Link, Google Scholar
• Hoegg J, Alba JW (2011) Seeing is believing (too much): The influence of product form on perceptions of functional performance. J. Product Innovation Management 28(3):346–359.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holland JH, Holyoak KJ, Nisbett RE, Thagard PR (1986) Induction: Processes of Inference, Learning, and Discovery (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hölttä-Otto K, Tang V, Otto K (2008) Analyzing module commonality for platform design using dendrograms. Res. Engrg. Design 19(2–3):127–141.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jones BF (2009) The burden of knowledge and the “death of the renaissance man”: Is innovation getting harder? Rev. Econom. Stud. 76(1):283–317.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jupp J, Gero J (2006) Visual style: Qualitative and context-dependent categorization. Artificial Intelligence Engrg. Design Anal. Manufacturing 20(3):247–266.Google Scholar
• Kannan R, Vempala S, Vetta A (2004) On clusterings: Good, bad and spectral. J. ACM 51(3):497–515.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kessler MM (1963) Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers. Amer. Documentation 14(1):10–25.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kornish LJ, Ulrich KT (2011) Opportunity spaces in innovation: Empirical analysis of large samples of ideas. Management Sci. 57(1):107–128.Link, Google Scholar
• Kreuzbauer R, Malter AJ (2005) Embodied cognition and new product design: Changing product form to influence brand categorization. J. Product Innovation Management 22(2):165–176.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krippendorff K, Butter R (1993) Where meanings escape functions. Design Management J. 4(2):30–37.Google Scholar
• Landwehr JR, Labroo AA, Herrmann A (2011) Gut liking for the ordinary: Incorporating design fluency improves automobile sales forecasts. Marketing Sci. 30(3):416–429.Link, Google Scholar
• Landwehr JR, Wentzel D, Herrmann A (2013) Product design for the long run: Consumer responses to typical and atypical designs at different stages of exposure. J. Marketing 77(5):92–107.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li G-C, Lai R, D’Amour A, Doolin DM, Sun Y, Torvik VI, Yu AZ, Fleming L (2014) Disambiguation and co-authorship networks of the U.S. patent inventor database (1975–2010). Res. Policy 43(6):941–955.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Loch CH, Terwiesch C (1998) Communication and uncertainty in concurrent engineering. Management Sci. 44(8):1032–1048.Link, Google Scholar
• Maeda J (2015) Have designers killed the engineering star? Interview by Emily Chang. Bloomberg video, 3:07 (May 18), http://www.bloomberg.com/news/videos/2015-05-19/the-growing-importance-of-designers-in-silicon-valley.Google Scholar
• McCormack JP, Cagan J, Vogel CM (2004) Speaking the Buick language: Capturing, understanding, and exploring brand identity with shape grammars. Design Stud. 25(1):1–29.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McNamara G, Vaaler PM, Devers C (2003) Same as it ever was: The search for evidence of increasing hypercompetition. Strategic Management J. 24(3):261–278.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mendelson H, Pillai RR (1999) Industry clockspeed: Measurement and operational implications. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 1(1):1–20.Link, Google Scholar
• Mervis CB, Rosch E (1981) Categorization of natural objects. Annual Rev. Psych. 32:89–115.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miller CC, Ogilvie DT, Glick W (2006) Assessing the external environment: An enrichment of the archival tradition. Ketchen DJ, Bergh DD, eds. Research Methodology in Strategy and Management, Vol. 3 (Emerald Group Publishing, Bingley, UK), 97–122.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Molotch H (2003) Where Stuff Comes From: How Toasters, Toilets, Cars, Computers and Many Other Things Come to Be As They Are (Routledge, New York).Google Scholar
• Munro T (1946) Style in the arts: A method of stylistic analysis. J. Aesthet. Art Criticism 5(2):128–158.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nakagawa S, Cuthill IC (2007) Effect size, confidence interval and statistical significance: A practical guide for biologists. Biol. Rev. 82(4):591–605.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ng AY, Jordan MI, Weiss Y (2002) On spectral clustering: Analysis and an algorithm. Dietterich TG, Becker S, Ghahramani Z, eds. Adv. Neural Inform. Processing Systems 14, Vol. 2 (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA), 849–856.Google Scholar
• Noble CH (2011) On elevating strategic design research. J. Product Innovation Management 28(3):389–393.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oppy G, Dowe D (2016) The Turing test. Zalta EN, ed. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Spring 2016 ed. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2016/entries/turing-test.Google Scholar
• Orth UR, Malkewitz K (2008) Holistic package design and consumer brand impressions. J. Marketing 72(3):64–81.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Paolacci G, Chandler J, Ipeirotis PG (2010) Running experiments on Amazon Mechanical Turk. Judgment Decision Making 5(5):411–419.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Porac JF, Thomas H (1990) Taxonomic mental models in competitor definition. Acad. Management Rev. 15(2):224–240.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pugliese MJ, Cagan J (2002) Capturing a rebel: Modeling the Harley-Davidson brand through a motorcycle shape grammar. Res. Engrg. Design 13:139–156.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ravasi D, Lojacono G (2005) Managing design and designers for strategic renewal. Long Range Planning 38(1):51–77.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ravasz E, Barabási A-L (2003) Hierarchical organization in complex networks. Physical Rev. E 67(2):Article 026112.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rindova VP, Petkova AP (2007) When is a new thing a good thing? Technological change, product form design, and perceptions of value for product innovations. Organ. Sci. 18(2):217–232.Link, Google Scholar
• Rosch E (1978) Principles of categorization. Cognition and Categorization Rosch E, Lloyd BB, eds. (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ), 27–48.Google Scholar
• Rosch E, Mervis CB (1975) Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories. Cognitive Psych. 7(4):573–605.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rubera G, Droge C (2013) Technology versus design innovation’s effects on sales and Tobin’s Q: The moderating role of branding strategy. J. Product Innovation Management 30(3):448–464.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sargent RG (1999) Validation and verification of simulation models. Farrington PA, Nembhard HB, Sturrock DT, Evans GW, eds. Proc. 1999 Winter Simulation Conf. (Institute of Electric and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, NJ), 39–48.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sawyer AG, Ball AD (1981) Statistical power and effect size in marketing research. J. Marketing Res. 18(3):275–290.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shieber SM (2007) The Turing test as interactive proof. Nous 41(4):686–713.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simon HA (1969) The Sciences of the Artificial (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Solon G (1992) Intergenerational income mobility in the United States. Amer. Econom. Rev. 82(3):393–408.Google Scholar
• Stacey M (2006) Psychological challenges for the analysis of style. Artificial Intell. Engrg. Design Anal. Manufacturing 20(3):167–184.Google Scholar
• Stiny G (1980) Introduction to shape and shape grammars. Environment Planning B 7(3):343–351.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stock JH, Wright JH, Yogo M (2002) A survey of weak instruments and weak identification in generalized method of moments. J. Bus. Econom. Stat. 20(4):518–529.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sullivan LH (1896) The tall office building artistically considered. Lippincott’s Magazine 57(3):403–409.Google Scholar
• Teece DJ, Pisano G, Shuen A (1997) Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management J. 18(7):509–533.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Terwiesch C, Loch CH (2004) Collaborative prototyping and the pricing of custom-designed products. Management Sci. 50(2):145–158.Link, Google Scholar
• Terwiesch C, Ulrich KT (2009) Innovation Tournaments: Creating and Selecting Exceptional Opportunities (Harvard Business Press, Brighton, MA).Google Scholar
• Thomke SH (1998) Managing experimentation in the design of new products. Management Sci. 44(6):743–762.Link, Google Scholar
• Turing AM (1950) Computing machinery and intelligence. Mind 59(236):433–460.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tushman ML, Anderson P (1986) Technological discontinuities and organizational environments. Admin. Sci. Quart. 31(3):439–465.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ulrich KT (2011) Design: Creation of Artifacts in Society (University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia).Google Scholar
• U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) (2005) Handbook of Classification (U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
• U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) (2006) Manual of Patent Examining Procedures, 8th ed., revision 5 (U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
• Utterback JM (1996) Mastering the Dynamics of Innovation (Harvard Business Press, Brighton, MA).Google Scholar
• Utterback JM, Abernathy WJ (1975) A dynamic model of process and product innovation. Omega 3(6):639–656.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van Horn RL (1971) Validation of simulation results. Management Sci. 17(5):247–258.Link, Google Scholar
• Verganti R (2006) Innovating through design. Harvard Bus. Rev. 84(12):114–122.Google Scholar
• Veryzer RW (2005) The roles of marketing and industrial design in discontinuous new product development. J. Product Innovation Management 22(1):22–41.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wooldridge J (2010) Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Xia Y, Singhal VR, Zhang GP (2016) Product design awards and the market value of the firm. Production Oper. Management 25(6):1038–1055.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ziliak ST, McCloskey DN (2004) Size matters: The standard error of regressions in the American Economic Review. J. Socio-Econom. 33(5):527–546.Crossref, Google Scholar