Cognitive Hierarchy in Capacity Allocation Games

References

• Becker-Peth M, Katok E, Thonemann U (2013) Designing contracts for irrational but predictable newsvendors. Management Sci. 59(8):1800–1816.Link, Google Scholar
• Brown AL, Camerer CF, Lovallo D (2013) Estimating structural models of equilibrium and cognitive hierarchy thinking in the field: The case of withheld movie critic reviews. Management Sci. 59(3):733–747.Link, Google Scholar
• Cachon GP, Lariviere MA (1999a) An equilibrium analysis of linear, proportional and uniform allocation of scarce capacity. IIE Trans. 31(9):835–849.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cachon GP, Lariviere MA (1999b) Capacity allocation using past sales: When to turn-and-earn. Management Sci. 45(5):685–703.Link, Google Scholar
• Cachon GP, Lariviere MA (1999c) Capacity choice and allocation: Strategic behavior and supply chain performance. Management Sci. 45(8):1091–1108.Link, Google Scholar
• Cachon G, Netessine S (2004) Game theory in supply chain analysis. Simchi-Levi D, Wu SD, Shen Z-J, eds. Handbook of Quantitative Supply Chain Analysis (Springer, New York), 13–59.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Camerer CF (2003) Coordination. Behavioral Game Theory: Experiments on Strategic Interaction, Chap. 7 (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ), 336–405.Google Scholar
• Camerer CF, Ho TH (1999) Experience-weighted attraction learning in normal form games. Econometrica 67(4):827–874.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Camerer CF, Ho TH, Chong J-K (2004) A cognitive hierarchy model of games. Quart. J. Econom. 119(3):861–898.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carvalho D, Santos-Pinto L (2014) A cognitive hierarchy model of behavior in the action commitment game. Internat. J. Game Theory 43(3):551–577.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Cui TH (2013) The benefit of uniform price for branded variants. Marketing Sci. 32(1):36–50.Link, Google Scholar
• Chen F, Li J, Zhang H (2013) Managing downstream competition via capacity allocation. Production Oper. Management 22(2):426–446.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Su X, Zhao X (2012) Modeling bounded rationality in capacity allocation games with the quantal response equilibrium. Management Sci. 58(10):1952–1962.Link, Google Scholar
• Choi S (2012) A cognitive hierarchy model of learning in networks. Rev. Econom. Design 16(2):215–250.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cho S-H, Tang CS (2014) Technical note—Capacity allocation under retail competition: Uniform and competitive allocations. Oper. Res. 62(1):72–80.Link, Google Scholar
• Costa-Gomes MA, Crawford VP (2006) Cognition and behavior in two-person guessing games: An experimental study. Amer. Econom. Rev. 96(5):1737–1768.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Croson R (2002) Why and how to experiment: Methodologies from experimental economics. Univ. Illinois Law Rev. 2002(4):921–946.Google Scholar
• Cui TH, Mallucci P (2016) Fairness ideals in distribution channels. J. Marketing Res. 53(6):969–987.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cui TH, Xiao Z (2017) Competitive analysis of hierarchically strategic firms. Working paper, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.Google Scholar
• Cui TH, Raju JS, Zhang ZJ (2007) Fairness and channel coordination. Management Sci. 53(8):1303–1314.Link, Google Scholar
• Davis AM, Katok E, Kwasnica AM (2014) Should sellers prefer auctions? A laboratory comparison of auctions and sequential mechanisms. Management Sci. 60(4):990–1008.Link, Google Scholar
• Energy Daily (2011) FERC clarifies pipeline capacity bidding rules for affiliates. (April 12).Google Scholar
• Feng T, Zhang Y (2017) Modeling strategic behavior in the competitive newsvendor problem: An experiential investigation. Production Oper. Management 26(7):1383–1398.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fischbacher U (2007) z-tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments. Experiment. Econom. 10(2):171–178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goldfarb A, Xiao M (2011) Who thinks about the competition? Managerial ability and strategic entry in us local telephone markets. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(7):3130–3161.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goldfarb A, Yang B (2009) Are all managers created equal? J. Marketing Res. 46(5):612–622.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harvey N (1997) Confidence in judgment. Trends Cognitive Sci. 1(2):78–82.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ho T-H, Su X (2013) A dynamic level-k model in sequential games. Management Sci. 59(2):452–469.Link, Google Scholar
• Ho T-H, Camerer CF, Weigelt K (1998) Iterated dominance and iterated best-response in p-beauty contests. Amer. Econom. Rev. 88(4):947–969.Google Scholar
• Ho T-H, Lim N, Cui TH (2010) Reference dependence in multilocation newsvendor models: A structural analysis. Management Sci. 56(11):1891–1910.Link, Google Scholar
• Ho T-H, Su X, Wu Y (2014) Distributional and peer-induced fairness in supply chain contract design. Production Oper. Management 23(2):161–175.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoffrage U (2004) Overconfidence. Pohl RF, ed. Cognitive Illusions: A Handbook on Fallacies and Biases In Thinking, Judgement and Memory (Psychology Press, New York), 235–254.Google Scholar
• Hossain T, Morgan J (2013) When do markets tip? A cognitive hierarchy approach. Marketing Sci. 32(3):431–453.Link, Google Scholar
• Karabuk S, Wu SD (2005) Incentive schemes for semiconductor capacity allocation: A game theoretic analysis. Production Oper. Management 14(2):175–188.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liu Z (2012) Equilibrium analysis of capacity allocation with demand competition. Naval Res. Logist. 59(3–4):254–265.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lu L, Lariviere M (2012) Capacity allocation over a long horizon: The return on turn-and-earn. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 14(1):24–41.Link, Google Scholar
• Luce RD (1959) Individual Choice Behavior: A Theoretical Analysis (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Google Scholar
• McFadden D (1981) Econometric models of probabilistic choice. Manski CF, McFadden D, eds. Structural Analysis of Discrete Data with Econometric Applications (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA), 198–272.Google Scholar
• McKelvey RD, Palfrey TR (1995) Quantal response equilibria for normal form games. Games Econom. Behav. 10(1):6–38.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Morton R (2015) All the right answers. Material Handling and Logistics News (May 5), http://mhlnews.com/global-supply-chain/all-right-answers.Google Scholar
• Nagel R (1995) Unraveling in guessing games: An experimental study. Amer. Econom. Rev. 85(5):1313–1326.Google Scholar
• Ovchinnikov A, Mortiz B, Quiroga BF (2015) How to compete against a behavioral newsvendor. Production Oper. Management 24(11):1783–1793.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Özer Ö, Zheng Y, Chen K-Y (2011) Trust in forecast information sharing. Management Sci. 57(6):1111–1137.Link, Google Scholar
• Özer Ö, Zheng Y, Ren Y (2014) Trust, trustworthiness, and information sharing in supply chains bridging China and the United States. Management Sci. 60(10):2435–2460.Link, Google Scholar
• Reardon M (2011) Wireless spectrum shortage? What spectrum shortage? CNET (September 27), http://www.cnet.com/news/wireless-spectrum-shortage-what-spectrum-shortage/.Google Scholar
• Rogers BW, Palfrey TR, Camerer CF (2009) Heterogeneous quantal response equilibrium and cognitive hierarchies. J. Econom. Theory 144(4):1440–1467.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Su X (2008) Bounded rationality in newsvendor models. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 10(4):566–589.Link, Google Scholar
• Su X, Zhang F (2008) Strategic customer behavior, commitment, and supply chain performance. Management Sci. 54(10):1759–1773.Link, Google Scholar
• Su X, Zhang F (2009) On the value of commitment and availability guarantees when selling to strategic consumers. Management Sci. 55(5):713–726.Link, Google Scholar
• Trunick PA (2004) How to stay on target when offshoring. Logist. Today 45(4):23–29.Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Donohue K, Cui TH (2016) Contract preference and performance for the loss averse supplier: Buyback versus revenue sharing. Management Sci. 62(6):1734–1754.Link, Google Scholar