The Wisdom of Crowds in Matters of Taste

References

• Analytis PP, Barkoczi D, Herzog SM (2015) You’re special, but it doesn’t matter if you’re a greenhorn: Social recommender strategies for mere mortals. Noelle DC, Dale R, Warlaumont AS, Yoshimi J, Matlock T, Jennings CD, Maglio PP, eds. Proc. 37th Annual Meeting Cognitive Sci. Soc. (Cognitive Science Society, Austin, TX), 1799–1804.Google Scholar
• Ansari A, Essegaier S, Kohli R (2000) Internet recommendation systems. J. Marketing Res. 37(3):363–375.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ariely D, Au WT, Bender RH, Budescu DV, Dietz CB, Gu H, Wallsten TS, Zauberman G (2000) The effects of averaging subjective probability estimates between and within judges. J. Experiment. Psych.: Appl. 6(2):130–147.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Armstrong JS (2001) Principles of Forecasting: A Handbook for Researchers and Practitioners (Springer, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bates JM, Granger CWJ (1969) The combination of forecasts. Oper. Res. Quart. 20(4):451–468.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Böckenholt U (2006) Thurstonian-based analyses: Past, present and future utilities. Psychometrika 71(4):615–629.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brooks AW, Gino F, Schweitzer ME (2015) Smart people ask for (my) advice: Seeking advice boosts perceptions of competence. Management Sci. 61(6):1421–1435.Link, Google Scholar
• Broomell SB, Budescu DV (2009) Why are experts correlated? Decomposing correlations between judges. Psychometrika 74(3):531–553.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Budescu DV, Chen E (2015) Identifying expertise to extract the wisdom of crowds. Management Sci. 61(2):267–280.Link, Google Scholar
• Clemen RT (1989) Combining forecasts: A review and annotated bibliography. Internat. J. Forecasting 5(4):559–583.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clemen RT, Winkler RL (1999) Combining probability distributions from experts in risk analysis. Risk Anal. 19(2):187–203.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davis-Stober CP, Budescu DV, Dana J, Broomell SB (2014) When is a crowd wise? Decision 1(2):79–101.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davison AC, Hinkley DV (1997) Bootstrap Methods and Their Application (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dawes RM (1979) The robust beauty of improper linear models in decision making. Amer. Psychologist 34(7):571–582.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deaton A (2008) Income, health, and well-being around the world: Evidence from the Gallup World Poll. J. Econom. Perspect. 22(2):53–72.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Diener E, Diener C (1996) Most people are happy. Psych. Sci. 7(3):181–185.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Einhorn HJ (1974) Expert judgment: Some necessary conditions and an example. J. Appl. Psych. 59(5):562–571.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Einhorn HJ, Hogarth RM, Klempner E (1977) Quality of group judgment. Psych. Bull. 84(1):158–172.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eggleston CM, Wilson TD, Lee M, Gilbert DT (2015) Predicting what we will like: Asking a stranger can be as good as asking a friend. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 128(May):1–10.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Galton F (1907) Vox populi. Nature 75(1949):450–451.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gigone D, Hastie R (1997) Proper analysis of the accuracy of group judgments. Psych. Bull. 121(1):149–167.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gilbert DT (2006) Stumbling on Happiness (Random House Publishing, New York).Google Scholar
• Gilbert DT, Wilson TD (2007) Prospection: Experiencing the future. Science 317(5843):1351–1354.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gilbert DT, Killingsworth MA, Eyre RN, Wilson TD (2009) The surprising power of neighborly advice. Science 323(5921):1617–1619.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gino F, Moore DA (2007) Effects of task difficulty on use of advice. J. Behavioral Decision Making 20(1):21–35.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gino F, Shang J, Croson R (2009) The impact of information from similar or different advisors on judgment. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 108(2):287–302.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goldstein DG, McAfee RP, Suri S (2014) The wisdom of smaller, smarter crowds. Proc. 15th ACM Conf. Electronic Commerce (EC ’14) (ACM, New York), 471–488.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hammond K, Stewart TR (2001) The Essential Brunswik: Beginnings, Explications, Application (Oxford University Press, London).Google Scholar
• Harrison JR, March JG (1984) Decision making and postdecision surprises. Admin. Sci. Quart. 29(1):26–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harvey N, Fischer I (1997) Taking advice: Accepting help, improving judgment, and sharing responsibility. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 70(2):117–133.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hertwig R (2012) Tapping into the wisdom of the crowd—With confidence. Science 336(6079):303–304.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Herzog SM, Hertwig R (2009) The wisdom of many in one mind: Improving individual judgments with dialectical bootstrapping. Psych. Sci. 20(2):231–237.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hogarth RM (1978) A note on aggregating opinions. Organ. Behav. Human Performance 21(1):40–46.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hong L, Page SE (2004) Groups of diverse problem solvers can outperform groups of high-ability problem solvers. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101(46):16385–16389.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jose VRR, Grushka-Cockayne Y, Lichtendahl KC Jr (2014) Trimmed opinion pools and the crowd’s calibration problem. Management Sci. 60(2):463–475.Link, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Snell J (1990) Predicting utility. Hogarth RM, ed. Insights in Decision Making (University of Chicago Press, Chicago), 295–310.Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Snell J (1992) Predicting a changing taste: Do people know what they will like? J. Behavioral Decision Making 5(3): 187–200.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Thaler R (2006) Anomalies: Utility maximization and experienced utility. J. Econom. Perspect. 20(1):221–234.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Wakker PP, Sarin R (1997) Back to Bentham? Explorations of experienced utility. Quart. J. Econom. 112(2):375–405.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Koren Y, Bell R (2011) Advances in collaborative filtering. Ricci F, Rokach L, Shapira B, eds. Recommender Systems Handbook (Springer, New York), 145–186.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Larrick RP, Soll JB (2006) Intuitions about combining opinions: Misappreciation of the averaging principle. Management Sci. 52(1):111–127.Link, Google Scholar
• Larrick RP, Mannes AE, Soll JB (2012) The social psychology of the wisdom of crowds. Krueger JI, ed. Frontiers of Social Psychology: Social Psychology and Decision Making (Psychology Press, New York), 227–242.Google Scholar
• Lee J, Yates JF (1992) How quantity judgment changes as the number of cues increases: An analytical framework and review. Psych. Bull. 112(2):363–377.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Linville PW, Fischer GW (2004) From basketball to business: Expertise, perceived covariation and social judgment. Yzerbyt V, Judd V, Corneille O, eds. The Psychology of Group Perception: Contributions to the Study of Homogeneity, Entitivity, and Essentialism (Psychological Press, London), 179–202.Google Scholar
• Loewenstein G, Schkade D (1999) Wouldn’t it be nice? Predicting future feelings. Diener E, Schwartz N, Kahneman D, eds. Well-Being: The Foundations of Hedonic Psychology (Russell Sage Foundation, New York), 85–105.Google Scholar
• Luce RD, Suppes P (1965) Preference, utility and subjective probability. Luce RD, Bush RR, Galanter E, eds. Handbook of Mathematical Psychology Vol. 3 (John Wiley & Sons, New York), 249–410.Google Scholar
• Makridakis S, Hibon M (2000) The M3-Competition: Results, conclusions and implications. Internat. J. Forecasting 16(4):451–476.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Makridakis S, Winkler RL (1983) Averages of forecasts: Some empirical results. Management Sci. 29(9):987–996.Link, Google Scholar
• Mannes AE (2009) Are we wise about the wisdom of crowds? The use of group judgments in belief revision. Management Sci. 55(8):1267–1279.Link, Google Scholar
• Mannes AE, Soll JB, Larrick RP (2014) The wisdom of select crowds. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 107(2):276–299.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Manski CF (1977) The structure of random utility models. Theory Decision 8(3):229–254.Crossref, Google Scholar
• March JG (1978) Bounded rationality, ambiguity, and the engineering of choice. Bell J. Econom. 9(2):587–608.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Morris PA (1986) [Combining probability distributions: A critique and an annotated bibliography]: Comment. Statist. Sci. 1(1):141–144.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Murphy AH (1988) Skill scores based on the mean square error and their relationships to the correlation coefficient. Monthly Weather Rev. 116(12):2417–2424.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roberts FS (1985) Measurement Theory with Applications to Decision Making, Utility and the Social Sciences (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
• Smith JE, Winkler RL (2006) The optimizer’s curse: Skepticism and postdecision surprise in decision analysis. Management Sci. 52(3):311–322.Link, Google Scholar
• Soll JB (1999) Intuitive theories of information: Beliefs about the value of redundancy. Cognitive Psych. 38(2):317–346.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Soll JB, Larrick RP (2009) Strategies for revising judgment: How (and how well) people use others’ opinions. J. Experiment. Psych.: Learn., Memory Cognition 35(3):780–805.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stevenson B, Wolfers J (2008) Economic growth and subjective well-being: Reassessing the Easterlin paradox. Brookings Papers Econom. Activity 39(1):1–87.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stewart TR (1990) A decomposition of the correlation coefficient and its use in analyzing forecasting skill. Weather Forecasting 5(4):661–666.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stewart TR (2001) Improving reliability of judgmental forecasts. Armstrong J, ed. Principles of Forecasting: A Handbook for Researchers and Practitioners (Springer, New York), 81–106.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Surowiecki J (2005) The Wisdom of Crowds (Doubleday, New York).Google Scholar
• Theil H (1966) Applied Economic Forecasting (North Holland, Amsterdam).Google Scholar
• Thurstone LL (1927) A law of comparative judgment. Psych. Rev. 34(4):273–286.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Timmermann A (2006) Forecast combinations. Elliott G, Granger CWJ, Timmermann A, eds. Handbook of Economic Forecasting, Vol. 1 (North Holland, Amsterdam), 135–196.Crossref, Google Scholar
• van den Bergh JC (2008) Optimal diversity: Increasing returns versus recombinant innovation. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 68(3–4):565–580.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wallsten TS, Diederich A (2001) Understanding pooled subjective probability estimates. Math. Soc. Sci. 41(1):1–18.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weiss DJ, Shanteau J (2003) The vice of consensus and the virtue of consistency. Shanteau J, Johnson P, Smith C, eds. Psychological Explorations of Competent Decision Making (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 226–240.Google Scholar
• Wilson TD, Gilbert DT (2005) Affective forecasting: Knowing what to want. Current Directions Psych. Sci. 14(3):131–134.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Winkler RL (1981) Combining probability distributions from dependent information sources. Management Sci. 27(4):479–488.Link, Google Scholar
• Winkler RL, Makridakis S (1983) The combination of forecasts. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. A (General) 146(2):150–157.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yaniv I (2004) The benefit of additional opinions. Current Directions Psych. Sci. 13(2):75–78.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yaniv I, Kleinberger E (2000) Advice taking in decision making: Egocentric discounting and reputation formation. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 83(2):260–281.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yaniv I, Milyavsky M (2007) Using advice from multiple sources to revise and improve judgment. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 103(1):104–120.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yaniv I, Choshen-Hillel S, Milyavsky M (2011) Receiving advice on matters of taste: Similarity, majority influence, and taste discrimination. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 115(1):111–120.Crossref, Google Scholar