Do Consumers Take Advantage of Common Pricing Standards? An Experimental Investigation

References

• Adams JK, Adams PA (1961) Realism of confidence judgments. Psych. Rev. 68(1):33–45.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barber BM, Odean T (2001) Boys will be boys: Gender, overconfidence, and common stock investment. Quart. J. Econom. 116(1):261–292.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brandstätter E, Gigerenzer G, Hertwig R (2006) The priority heuristic? Making choices without trade-offs. Psych. Rev. 113(2):409–432.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Camerer C, Lovallo D (1999) Overconfidence and excess entry: An experimental approach. Amer. Econom. Rev. 89(1):306–318.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crosetto P, Gaudeul A (2012) Do consumers prefer offers that are easy to compare? An experimental investigation. Jena Economic Research Paper 2011-044, Max Planck Institute for Economics, Jena, Germany. http://pubdb.wiwi.uni-jena.de/pdf/wp_2011_044.pdf.Google Scholar
• Diamond PA (1971) A model of price adjustment. J. Econom. Theory 3(2):156–168.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eliaz K, Spiegler R (2011) Consideration sets and competitive marketing. Rev. Econom. Stud. 78(1):235–262.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eliaz K, Richter M, Rubinstein A (2011) Choosing the two finalists. Econom. Theory 46(2):211–219.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ellison G (2005) A model of add-on pricing. Quart. J. Econom. 120(2):585–637.Google Scholar
• Ellison G, Ellison SF (2009) Search, obfuscation, and price elasticities on the Internet. Econometrica 77(2):427–452.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fischbacher U (2007) z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments. Experiment. Econom. 10(2):171–178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gabaix X, Laibson D (2006) Shrouded attributes, consumer myopia, and information suppression in competitive markets. Quart. J. Econom. 121(2):505–540.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gaudeul A, Sugden R (2012) Spurious complexity and common standards in markets for consumer goods. Economica 79(314):209–225.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goldstein DG, Gigerenzer G (2002) Models of ecological rationality: The recognition heuristic. Psych. Rev. 109(1):75–90.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hauser JR (2014) Consideration-set heuristics. J. Bus. Res. 67(8):1688–1699.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hauser JR, Wernerfelt B (1990) An evaluation cost model of consideration sets. J. Consumer Res. 16(4):393–408.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huber J, Payne JW, Puto C (1982) Adding asymmetrically dominated alternatives? Violations of regularity and the similarity hypothesis. J. Consumer Res. 9(1):90–98.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huck S, Zhou J, Duke C, London Economics (2011) Consumer behavioral biases in competition: A survey. Final Report OFT1324, Office of Fair Trading, London.Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Tversky A (1979) Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47(2):263–292.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lichtenstein S, Fischhoff B (1977) Do those who know more also know more about how much they know? Organ. Behav. Human Performance 20(2):159–183.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Malmendier U, Tate G (2005) CEO overconfidence and corporate investment. J. Finance 60(6):2661–2700.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Manzini P, Mariotti M (2007) Sequentially rationalizable choice. Amer. Econom. Rev. 97(5):1824–1839.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Menger C (1892) On the origins of money. Econom. J. 2(6):239–255.Google Scholar
• Oskamp S (1965) Overconfidence in case-study judgments. J. Consulting Psych. 29(3):261–265.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Payne JW (1976) Task complexity and contingent processing in decision making: An information search and protocol analysis. Organ. Behav. Human Performance 16(2):366–387.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rubinstein A (1988) Similarity and decision-making under risk (is there a utility theory resolution to the Allais paradox?). J. Econom. Theory 46(1):145–153.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Salop S, Stiglitz J (1977) Bargains and ripoffs: A model of monopolistically competitive price dispersion. Rev. Econom. Stud. 44(3):493–510.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schotter A (1981) The Economic Theory of Social Institutions (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shafir E, Simonson I, Tversky A (1993) Reason-based choice. Cognition 49(1–2):11–36.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simon HA (1956) Rational choice and the structure of the environment. Psych. Rev. 63(2):129–138.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Spiegler R (2006) Competition over agents with boundedly rational expectations. Theor. Econom. 1(2):207–231.Google Scholar
• Sugden R (2004) The Economics of Rights, Co-Operation and Welfare, 2nd ed. (Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, UK).Google Scholar
• Tversky A (1969) Intransitivity of preferences. Psych. Rev. 76(1):31–48.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A (1972) Elimination by aspects: A theory of choice. Psych. Rev. 79(4):281–299.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wilson CM, Waddams Price C (2010) Do consumers switch to the best supplier? Oxford Econom. Papers 62(4):647–668.Crossref, Google Scholar