Are Markets with Loss-Averse Consumers More Sensitive to Losses?

References

• Abdellaoui M, Bleichrodt H, Paraschiv C (2007) Loss aversion under prospect theory: A parameter-free measurement. Management Sci. 53(10):1659–1674.Link, Google Scholar
• Baucells M, Hwang W (2017) A model of mental accounting and reference price adaptation. Management Sci. 63(12):4201–4218.Link, Google Scholar
• Bell DR, Lattin JM (2000) Looking for loss aversion in scanner panel data: The confounding effect of price response heterogeneity. Marketing Sci. 19(2):185–200.Link, Google Scholar
• Camerer CF (1987) Do biases in probability judgment matter in markets? Experimental evidence. Amer. Econom. Rev. 77(5):981–997.Google Scholar
• Chang K, Siddarth S, Weinberg CB (1999) The impact of heterogeneity in purchase timing and price responsiveness on estimates of sticker shock effects. Marketing Sci. 18(2):178–192.Link, Google Scholar
• Chen X, Hu P, Hu Z (2017) Efficient algorithms for the dynamic pricing problem with reference price effect. Management Sci. 63(12):4389–4408.Link, Google Scholar
• Chen X, Hu P, Shum S, Zhang Y (2016) Dynamic stochastic inventory management with reference price effects. Oper. Res. 64(6):1529–1536.Link, Google Scholar
• Corless RM, Gonnet GH, Hare DE, Jeffrey DJ, Knuth DE (1996) On the Lambert W function. Adv. Comput. Math. 5(1):329–359.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Courty P, Nasiry J (2016) Loss aversion and the uniform pricing puzzle for media and entertainment products. Working paper, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada.Google Scholar
• Davis MS (1971) That’s interesting! Towards a phenomenology of sociology and a sociology of phenomenology. Philos. Soc. Sci. 1(4):309–344.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fibich G, Gavious A, Lowengart O (2003) Explicit solutions of optimization models and differential games with nonsmooth (asymmetric) reference-price effects. Oper. Res. 51(5):721–734.Link, Google Scholar
• Greenleaf E (1995) The impact of reference price effects on the profitability of price promotions. Marketing Sci. 14(1):82–104.Link, Google Scholar
• Heidhues P, Kőszegi B (2008) Competition and price variation when consumers are loss averse. Amer. Econom. Rev. 98(4):1245–1268.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ho T-H, Su X (2009) Peer-induced fairness in games. Amer. Econom. Rev. 99(5):2022–2049.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hu Z, Chen X, Hu P (2016) Dynamic pricing with gain-seeking reference price effects. Oper. Res. 64(1):150–157.Link, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Tversky A (1979) Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47(2):263–291.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kallio M, Halme M (2009) Redefining loss averse and gain seeking consumer price behavior based on demand response. Working paper, Helsinki School of Economics, Helsinki, Finland.Google Scholar
• Kalyanaram G, Winer RS (1995) Empirical generalizations from reference price research. Marketing Sci. 14(3):G161–G169.Link, Google Scholar
• Köbberling V, Wakker PP (2005) An index of loss aversion. J. Econom. Theory 122(1):119–131.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kopalle P, Rao A, Assuno J (1996) Asymmetric reference price effects and dynamic pricing policies. Marketing Sci. 15(1):60–85.Link, Google Scholar
• Kopalle PK, Kannan P, Boldt LB, Arora N (2012) The impact of household level heterogeneity in reference price effects on optimal retailer pricing policies. J. Retailing 88(1):102–114.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kőszegi B, Rabin M (2006) A model of reference-dependent preferences. Quart. J. Econom. 121(4):1133–1165.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krishnamurthi L, Mazumdar T, Raj SP (1992) Asymmetric response to price in consumer brand choice and purchase quantity decisions. J. Consumer Res. 19(3):387–400.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liu Q, Shum S (2013) Pricing and capacity rationing with customer disappointment aversion. Production Oper. Management 22(5):1269–1286.Google Scholar
• Mazumdar T, Raj SP, Sinha I (2005) Reference price research: Review and propositions. J. Marketing 69(4):84–102.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nasiry J, Popescu I (2011) Dynamic pricing with loss-averse consumers and peak-end anchoring. Oper. Res. 59(6):1361–1368.Link, Google Scholar
• Nasiry J, Popescu I (2012) Advance selling when consumers regret. Management Sci. 58(6):1160–1177.Link, Google Scholar
• Neslin SA, van Heerde HJ (2009) Promotion Dynamics (Now Publishers Inc., Boston).Google Scholar
• Niculescu C, Persson L-E (2006) Convex Functions and Their Applications: A Contemporary Approach (Springer Science and Business Media, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Popescu I, Wu Y (2007) Dynamic pricing strategies with reference effects. Oper. Res. 55(3):413–429.Link, Google Scholar
• Slonim R, Garbarino E (2009) Similarities and differences between stockpiling and reference effects. Managerial Decision Econom. 30(6):351–371.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stoker TM (1993) Empirical approaches to the problem of aggregation over individuals. J. Econom. Literature 31(4):1827–1874.Google Scholar
• Thaler R (1985) Mental accounting and consumer choice. Marketing Sci. 4(3):199–214.Link, Google Scholar
• Tversky A, Kahneman D (1992) Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. J. Risk Uncertainty 5(4):297–323.Crossref, Google Scholar