Endogenous Matching in University-Industry Collaboration: Theory and Empirical Evidence from the United Kingdom

References

• Agarwal R, Ohyama A (2013) Industry or academia, basic or applied? Career choices and earnings trajectories of scientists. Management Sci. 59(4):950–970.Link, Google Scholar
• Agrawal A, Henderson R (2002) Putting patents in context: Exploring knowledge transfer from MIT. Management Sci. 48(1):44–60.Link, Google Scholar
• Agrawal A, Kapur D, McHale J (2008) How do spatial and social proximity influence knowledge flows? Evidence from patent data. J. Urban Econom. 64(2):258–269.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Akkus O, Cookson JA, Hortaçsu A (2016) The determinants of bank mergers: A revealed preference analysis. Management Sci. 62(8):2241–2258.Link, Google Scholar
• Audretsch DB, Stephan P (1996) Company-scientist locational links: The case of biotechnology. Amer. Econom. Rev. 86(3):641–652.Google Scholar
• Azoulay P, Ding W, Stuart T (2009) The impact of academic patenting on the rate, quality and direction of (public) research output. J. Indust. Econom. 57(4):637–676.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Banal-Estañol A, Jofre-Bonet M, Meissner C (2015) The impact of industry collaboration on research: Evidence from engineering academics in the UK. Res. Policy 44(6):1160–1175.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Banal-Estañol A, Macho-Stadler I, Pérez-Castrillo D (2013) Research output from university-industry collaborative projects. Econom. Development Quart. 27(1):71–81.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Becker GS (1973) A theory of marriage: Part I. J. Political Econom. 81(4):813–846.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bercovitz J, Feldman M (2007) Fishing upstream: Firm strategic research alliances with universities. Res. Policy 36(7):930–948.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Caloghirou Y, Ioannides S, Vonortas NS (2003) Research joint ventures. J. Econom. Surveys 17(4):541–570.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carayol N (2003) Objectives, agreements and matching in science-industry collaborations: Reassembling the pieces of the puzzle. Res. Policy 32(6):887–908.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cassiman B, Veugelers R (2006) In search of complementarity in innovation strategy: Internal R&D and external knowledge acquisition. Management Sci. 52(1):68–82.Link, Google Scholar
• Cohen WM, Nelson RR, Walsh JP (2002) Links and impacts: The influence of public research on industrial R&D. Management Sci. 48(1):1–23.Link, Google Scholar
• Cockburn I, Henderson R (1998) Absorptive capacity, coauthoring behavior, and the organization of research in drug discovery. J. Indust. Econom. 46(2):157–182.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dahlin KB, Weingart LR, Hinds PJ (2005) Team diversity and information use. Acad. Management J. 48(6):1107–1123.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dasgupta P, David P (1994) Towards a new economics of science. Res. Policy 23(5):487–522.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fabrizio K, DiMinin A (2008) Commercializing the laboratory: Faculty patenting and the open science environment. Res. Policy 37(5):914–931.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Florida R, Cohen WM (1999) Engine or infrastructure? The university role in economic development. Branscomb LM, Kodama F, Florida R, eds. Industrializing Knowledge: University-Industry Linkages in Japan and the United States (MIT Press, London), 589–610.Google Scholar
• Fox J (2008) Estimating matching games with transfers. NBER Working Paper 14382, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Godin B (1996) The state of science and technology indicators in the OECD countries. Research paper, Statistics Canada, Ottawa, ON, Canada.Google Scholar
• Goldfarb B (2008) The effect of government contracting on academic research: Does the source of funding affect scientific output? Res. Policy 37(1):41–58.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gompers PA, Mukharlyamov V, Xuan Y (2016) The cost of friendship. J. Financial Econom. 119(3):622–644.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hamilton KS (2003) Subfield and level classification journals. CHI Report 2012-R, CHI Research, Cherry Hill, NJ.Google Scholar
• Hegde D, Tumlinson J (2014) Does social proximity enhance business partnership? Theory and evidence from ethnicity role in U.S. venture capital. Management Sci. 60(9):2355–2380.Link, Google Scholar
• Jensen RA, Thursby MC (2001) Proofs and prototypes for sale: The licensing of university inventions. Amer. Econom. Rev. 91(1):240–259.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jensen R, Thursby J, Thursby M (2003) Disclosure and licensing of university inventions: The best we can do with the s**t we get to work with. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 21(9):1271–1300.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kamien M, Muller E, Zang I (1992) Research joint ventures and R&D cartels. Amer. Econom. Rev. 82(5):1293–1306.Google Scholar
• Katz JS, Martin BR (1997) What is research collaboration? Res. Policy 26(1):1–18.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee YS (2000) The sustainability of university-industry research collaboration: An empirical assessment. J. Tech. Transfer 25(2):111–133.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Legros P, Newman A (2002) Monotone matching in perfect and imperfect worlds. Rev. Econom. Stud. 69(4):925–942.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lindenlaub I (2014) Sorting multidimensional types: Theory and application. Working paper, European University Institute, San Domenico di Fiesole, Italy.Google Scholar
• Louis KS, Blumenthal D, Gluck ME, Stoto MA (1989) Entrepreneurs in academe: An exploration of behaviors among life scientists. Admin. Sci. Quart. 34(1):110–131.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mansfield E (1995) Academic research underlying industrial innovation: Sources, characteristics and financing. Rev. Econom. Statist. 77(1):55–65.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Manski CF (1975) Maximum score estimation of the stochastic utility model of choice. J. Econometrics 3(3):205–228.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Matzkin RL (1993) Nonparametric identification and estimation of polychotomous choice models. J. Econometrics 58(1–2):137–168.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mindruta D (2013) Value creation in university-firm research collaborations: A matching approach. Strategic Management J. 34(6):644–665.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mohnen P, Hoareau C (2003) What type of enterprise forges close links with universities and government labs? Evidence from CIS 2. Managerial Decision Econom. 24(2–3):133–145.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Narin F, Pinski G, Gee H (1976) Structure of the biomedical literature. J. Amer. Soc. Inform. Sci. 27(1):25–45.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pereira I (2007) Business-science research collaboration under moral hazard. Working paper, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.Google Scholar
• Perkmann M, Tartari V, McKelvey M, Autio E, Broström A, D’Este P, Fini R et al. (2013) Academic engagement and commercialization: A review of the literature on university-industry relations. Res. Policy 42(2):423–442.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roth A, Sotomayor M (1990) Two-Sided Matching: A Study in Game-Theoretic Modeling and Analysis (Cambridge University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Santiago D, Fox J (2008) A toolkit for matching maximum score estimation and point and set identified subsampling inference. Working paper, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Shapley LlS, Shubik M (1972) The assignment game I: The core. Internat. J. Game Theory 1(1):111–130.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Storn R, Price K (1997) Differential evolution: A simple and efficient heuristic for global optimization over continuous spaces. J. Global Optim. 11(4):341–359.Crossref, Google Scholar
• van Looy B, Callaert J, Debackere K (2006) Publication and patent behaviour of academic researchers: Conflicting, reinforcing or merely co-existing? Res. Policy 35(4):596–608.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Veugelers R, Cassiman B (2005) R&D cooperation between firms and universities. Some empirical evidence from Belgian manufacturing. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 23(5–6):355–379.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wagner CS, Leydesdorff L (2005) Network structure, self-organization, and the growth of international collaboration in science. Res. Policy 34(10):1608–1618.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yang Y, Shi M, Goldfarb A (2009) Estimating the value of brand alliances in professional team sports. Marketing Sci. 28(6):1095–1111.Link, Google Scholar
• Zucker L, Darby MR, Armstrong JS (2002) Commercializing knowledge: University science, knowledge capture, and firm performance in biotechnology. Management Sci. 48(1):138–153.Link, Google Scholar