Incentives for Prosocial Behavior: The Role of Reputations

References

• Abeler J, Falk A, Goette L, Huffman D (2011) Reference points and effort provision. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(2):470–492.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ai C, Norton EC (2003) Interaction terms in logit and probit models. Econom. Lett. 80(1):123–129.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Andreoni J (2006) Philanthropy. Kolm S-C, Ythier JM, eds. Handbook on the Economics of Giving, Reciprocity and Altruism, Vol. 2 (North-Holland, Amsterdam), 1201–1269.Google Scholar
• Andreoni J, Bernheim BD (2009) Social image and the 50–50 norm: A theoretical and experimental analysis of audience effects. Econometrica 77(5):1607–1636.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Andreoni J, Petrie R (2004) Public goods experiments without confidentiality: A glimpse into fund-raising. J. Public Econom. 88(7–8):1605–1623.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Andreoni J, Vesterlund L (2001) Which is the fair sex? Gender differences in altruism. Quart. J. Econom. 116(1):293–312.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ariely D, Bracha A, Meier S (2009) Doing good or doing well? Image motivation and monetary incentives in behaving prosocially. Amer. Econom. Rev. 99(1):544–555.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ashaaf N, Bandiera O, Jack K (2014) No margin, no mission? A field experiment on incentives for pro-social tasks. J. Public Econom. 120:1–17.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bénabou R, Tirole J (2003) Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. Rev. Econom. Stud. 70(3):489–520.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bénabou R, Tirole J (2006) Incentives and prosocial behavior. Amer. Econom. Rev. 96(5):1652–1678.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bracha A, Vesterlund L (2013) How low can you go? Charity reporting when donations signal income and generosity. Working Paper 13-11, Federal Reserve Bank of Boston, Boston.Google Scholar
• Carpenter J, Myers CK (2010) Why volunteer? Evidence on the role of altruism, image, and incentives. J. Public Economics 94(11–12):911–920.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Croson R, Gneezy U (2009) Gender differences in preferences. J. Econom. Literature 47(2):448–474.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DellaVigna S, List JA, Malmendier U, Rao G (2013) The importance of being marginal: Gender differences in generosity. Amer. Econom. Rev.: Papers Proc. 103(3):586–590.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Exley CL (2016) Excusing selfishness in charitable giving: The role of risk. Rev. Econom. Stud. 83(2):587–628.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Exley CL, Terry SJ (2016) Wage elasticities in working and volunteering: The role of reference points in a laboratory study. HBS Working Paper 16-062, Harvard Business School, Boston.Google Scholar
• Frey BS, Jergen R (2001) Motivation of crowding theory. J. Econom. Surveys 15(5):589–611.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frey BS, Oberholzer-Gee F (1997) The cost of price incentives: An empirical analysis of motivation crowding-out. Amer. Econom. Rev. 87(4):746–755.Google Scholar
• Gneezy A, Imas A, Brown A, Nelson LD, Norton MI (2012) Paying to be nice: Consistency and costly prosocial behavior. Management Sci. 58(1):179–187.Link, Google Scholar
• Gneezy U (2005) Deception: The role of consequences. Amer. Econom. Rev. 95(1):384–394.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gneezy U, Rustichini A (2000) Pay enough or don’t pay at all. Quart. J. Econom. 115(3):791–810.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goette LF, Stutzer A (2008) Blood donations and incentives: Evidence from a field experiment. Working Paper 08-3, Federal Reserve Bank of Boston, Boston.Google Scholar
• Harbaugh WT (1998a) The prestige motive for making charitable transfers. Amer. Econom. Rev. 88(2):277–282.Google Scholar
• Harbaugh WT (1998b) What do donations buy?: A model of philanthropy based on prestige and warm glow. J. Public Econom. 67(2):269–284.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Horton JJ, Rand DG, Zeckhauser RJ (2011) The online laboratory: Conducting experiments in a real labor market. Experiment. Econom. 14(3):399–425.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Iajya V, Lacetera N, Macis M, Slonim R (2013) The effects of information, social and economic incentives on voluntary undirected blood donations: Evidence from a randomized controlled trial in Argentina. Soc. Sci. Medicine 98:214–233.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Imas A (2013) Working for the “warm glow”: On the benefits and limits of prosocial incentives. J. Public Econom. 114(June):14–18.Google Scholar
• Jones D, Linardi S (2014) Wallflowers doing good: Field and lab evidence of heterogeneity in reputation concerns. Management Sci. 60(7):1757–1771.Link, Google Scholar
• Karlan D, List JA (2007) Does price matter in charitable giving? Evidence from a large-scale natural field experiment. Amer. Econom. Rev. 97(5):1774–1793.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Karlan D, Wood DH (2017) The effect of effectiveness: Donor response to aid effectiveness in a direct mail fundraising experiment. J. Behav. Experiment. Econom. 66:1–8.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lacetera N, Macis M (2010a) Do all material incentives for pro-social activities backfire? The response to cash and non-cash incentives for blood donations. J. Econom. Psych. 31(4):738–748.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lacetera N, Macis M (2010b) Social image concerns and prosocial behavior: Field evidence from a nonlinear incentive scheme. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 76(2):225–237.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lacetera N, Macis M, Slonim R (2012) Will there be blood? Incentives and displacement effects in pro-social behavior. Amer. Econom. J. Econom. Policy 4(1):186–223.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lacetera N, Macis M, Slonim R (2014) Rewarding volunteers: A field experiment. Management Sci. 60(5):1–23.Link, Google Scholar
• Meier S, Stutzer A (2008) Is volunteering rewarding in itself? Economica 75(297):39–59.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mellström C, Johannesson M (2008) Crowding out in blood donation: Was Titmuss right? J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 6(4):845–863.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Niessen-Ruenzi A, Weber M, Becker DM (2016) Do direct cash payments increase whole blood supply? Working paper, University of Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2738726.Google Scholar
• Paolacci G, Chandler J, Ipeirotis PG (2010) Running experiments on Amazon Mechanical Turk. Judgment Decision Making 5(5):411–419.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Titmuss RM (1970) The Gift Relationship (Allen and Unwin, London).Google Scholar
• Warfield SJ (2013) New federal report finds 1 in 4 Americans volunteer. Press release, December 16, Corporation for National and Community Service, Washington, DC.Google Scholar