When Waiting to See a Doctor Is Less Irritating: Understanding Patient Preferences and Choice Behavior in Appointment Scheduling

References

• Anand KS, Pac MF, Veeraraghavan S (2011) Quality–speed conundrum: Trade-offs in customer-intensive services. Management Sci. 57(1):40–56.Link, Google Scholar
• Ang E, Kwasnick S, Bayati M, Plambeck EL, Aratow M (2016) Accurate emergency department wait time prediction. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 18(1):141–156.Link, Google Scholar
• Asch DA, Jedrziewski MK, Christakis NA (1997) Response rates to mail surveys published in medical journals. J. Clinical Epidemiology 50(10):1129–1136.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bachrach D, Frohlich J, Garcimonde A, Nevitt K (2015) The value proposition of retail clinics. Research report, Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
• Baron RM, Kenny DA (1986) The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 51(6):1173–1182.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bell SJ, Auh S, Smalley K (2005) Customer relationship dynamics: Service quality and customer loyalty in the context of varying levels of customer expertise and switching costs. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. 33(2):169–183.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ben-Akiva ME, Lerman SR (1985) Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Bernstein F, Kök AG, Xie L (2015) Dynamic assortment customization with limited inventories. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 17(4):538–553.Link, Google Scholar
• Bertakis KD, Azari R, Helms LJ, Callahan EJ, Robbins JA (2000) Gender differences in the utilization of health care services. J. Family Practice 49(2):147–147.Google Scholar
• Bettinger E, Slonim R (2007) Patience among children. J. Public Econom. 91(1):343–363.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blais A-R, Weber EU (2006) A domain-specific risk-taking (DOSPERT) scale for adult populations. Judgment Decision Making 1(1):33–47.Google Scholar
• Brown DS, Johnson FR, Poulos C, Messonnier ML (2010) Mothers’ preferences and willingness to pay for vaccinating daughters against human papillomavirus. Vaccine 28(7):1702–1708.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Buhrmester M, Kwang T, Gosling SD (2011) Amazon’s Mechanical Turk a new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspect. Psych. Sci. 6(1):3–5.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Byrnes JP, Miller DC, Schafer WD (1999) Gender differences in risk taking: A meta-analysis. Psych. Bull. 125(3):367–383.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cayirli T, Veral E (2003) Outpatient scheduling in health care: A review of literature. Production Oper. Management 12(4):519–549.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cheraghi-Sohi S, Hole AR, Mead N, McDonald R, Whalley D, Bower P, Roland M (2008) What patients want from primary care consultations: A discrete choice experiment to identify patients’ priorities. Ann. Family Medicine 6(2):107–115.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Christakis DA, Mell L, Koepsell TD, Zimmerman FJ, Connell FA (2001) Association of lower continuity of care with greater risk of emergency department use and hospitalization in children. Pediatrics 107(3):524–529.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Commonwealth Fund (2008) Why not the best? Results from the national scorecard on U.S. health system performance, 2008. Report, Commonwealth Fund, New York.Google Scholar
• Cook RI, Render M, Woods DD (2000) Gaps in the continuity of care and progress on patient safety. British Medical J. 320(7237):791–794.Crossref, Google Scholar
• de Bekker-Grob EW, Ryan M, Gerard K (2012) Discrete choice experiments in health economics: A review of the literature. Health Econom. 21(2):145–172.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dorrance KA, Ramchandani S, LaRochelle J, Mael F, Lynch S, Grundy P (2013) Protecting the culture of a patient-centered medical home. Military Medicine 178 (2):153–158.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Einhorn HJ (1974) Expert judgment: Some necessary conditions and an example. J. Appl. Psych. 59(5):562–571.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ettner SL (1999) The relationship between continuity of care and the health behaviors of patients: Does having a usual physician make a difference? Medical Care 37(6):547–555.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feldman J, Liu N, Topaloglu H, Ziya S (2014) Appointment scheduling under patient preference and no-show behavior. Oper. Res. 62(4):794–811.Link, Google Scholar
• Finkelstein SR, Fishbach A (2012) Tell me what I did wrong: Experts seek and respond to negative feedback. J. Consumer Res. 39(1):22–38.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Finkelstein SR, Liu N, Rosenthal D, Poghosyan L (2017) When open access might not work: Understanding patient attitudes in appointment scheduling. Health Care Management Rev., ePub ahead of print January 25, http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/HMR.0000000000000150.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fishbach A, Koo M, Finkelstein SR (2014) Motivation resulting from completed and missing actions. Adv. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 50:257–307.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fishburn PC (1988) Nonlinear Preferences and Utility Theory (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore).Google Scholar
• Frei FX, Kalakota R, Leone AJ, Marx LM (1999) Process variation as a determinant of bank performance: Evidence from the retail banking study. Management Sci. 45(9):1210–1220.Link, Google Scholar
• Goldstein MS, Siegel JM, Boyer R (1984) Predicting changes in perceived health status. Amer. J. Public Health 74(6):611–614.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gould SJ (1989) Health consciousness and health behavior: The application of a new health consciousness scale. Amer. J. Preventive Medicine 6(4):228–237.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Green LV, Savin S, Lu Y (2013) Primary care physician shortages could be eliminated through use of teams, nonphysicians, and electronic communication. Health Affairs 32(1):11–19.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gupta D, Denton B (2008) Appointment scheduling in health care: Challenges and opportunities. IIE Trans. 40(9):800–819.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gupta D, Wang L (2008) Revenue management for a primary-care clinic in the presence of patient choice. Oper. Res. 56(3):576–592.Link, Google Scholar
• Halpern DF (1997) Sex differences in intelligence: Implications for education. Amer. Psychologist 52(10):1091–1102.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hensher DA, Greene WH (2003) The mixed logit model: The state of practice. Transportation 30(2):133–176.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hensher DA, Rose JM, Greene WH (2005) Applied Choice Analysis: A Primer (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hole AR (2008) Modelling heterogeneity in patients’ preferences for the attributes of a general practitioner appointment. J. Health Econom. 27(4):1078–1094.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hsiao CJ, Cherry DK, Beatty PC, Rechtsteiner EA (2010) National ambulatory medical care survey: 2007 summary. National Health Statistics Report 27, National Center for Health Statistics, Hyattsville, MD.Google Scholar
• Hunt SM, McKenna SP, McEwen J, Backett EM, Williams J, Papp E (1980) A quantitative approach to perceived health status: A validation study. J. Epidemiology Community Health 34(4):281–286.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johnson FR, Kanninen B, Bingham M, Özdemir S (2007) Experimental design for stated-choice studies. Kanninen BJ, ed. Valuing Environmental Amenities Using Stated Choice Studies (Springer, Dordrecht, Netherlands), 159–202.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahn BE, Meyer RJ (1991) Consumer multiattribute judgments under attribute-weight uncertainty. J. Consumer Res. 17(4):508–522.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Tversky A (1979) Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47(2):263–291.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keehan SP, Sisko AM, Truffer CJ, Poisal JA, Cuckler GA, Madison AJ, Lizonitz JM, Smith SD (2011) National health spending projections through 2020: Economic recovery and reform drive faster spending growth. Health Affairs 30(8):1594–1605.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klein DB, Laugesen MJ, Liu N (2013) The patient—Centered medical home: A future standard for American health care? Public Administration Rev. 73(s1):S82–S92.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kolstad JT, Chernew ME (2009) Quality and consumer decision making in the market for health insurance and health care services. Medical Care Res. Rev. 66(1 Suppl):28S–52S.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kuhfeld WF (1997) Efficient experimental designs using computerized searches. Research paper, SAS Institute, Cary, NC.Google Scholar
• Kuhfeld WF (2001) Multinomial logit, discrete choice modeling: An introduction to designing choice experiments, and collecting, processing, and analyzing choice data with SAS. Technical support document, SAS Institute, Cary, NC.Google Scholar
• Laine C, Davidoff F (1996) Patient-centered medicine. J. Amer. Medical Assoc. 275(2):152–156.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lancsar E, Louviere J (2006) Deleting “irrational” responses from discrete choice experiments: A case of investigating or imposing preferences? Health Econom. 15(8):797–811.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Larson RC (1987) OR forum—Perspectives on queues: Social justice and the psychology of queueing. Oper. Res. 35(6):895–905.Link, Google Scholar
• Leclerc F, Schmitt BH, Dube L (1995) Waiting time and decision making: Is time like money? J. Consumer Res. 22(1):110–119.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liu N, D’Aunno T (2012) The productivity and cost-efficiency of models for involving nurse practitioners in primary care: A perspective from queueing analysis. Health Services Res. 47(2):594–613.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liu N, Ziya S, Kulkarni VG (2010) Dynamic scheduling of outpatient appointments under patient no-shows and cancellations. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 12(2):347–364.Link, Google Scholar
• Louviere JJ (1988) Conjoint analysis modelling of stated preferences: A review of theory, methods, recent developments and external validity. J. Transport Econom. Policy 22(1):93–119.Google Scholar
• Love MM, Mainous AG (1999) Commitment to a regular physician: How long will patients wait to see their own physician for acute illness? J. Family Practice 48(3):202–207.Google Scholar
• Luo J, Kulkarni VG, Ziya S (2014) A tandem queueing model for an appointment-based service system. Queueing Systems 79(1):53–85.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McFadden D (1974) The measurement of urban travel demand. J. Public Econom. 3(4):303–328.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mehrotra A, Lave JR (2012) Visits to retail clinics grew fourfold from 2007 to 2009, although their share of overall outpatient visits remains low. Health Affairs 31(9):2123–2129.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mercado F, Mercado M, Myers N, Hewit M, Haller NA (2012) Patient preferences in choosing a primary care physician. J. Primary Care Community Health 3(2):125–131.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Murray MM, Tantau C (2000) Same-day appointments: Exploding the access paradigm. Family Practice Management 7(8):45–50.Google Scholar
• Osadchiy N, KC D (2017) Are patients patient? The role of time to appointment in patient flow. Production Oper. Management 26(3):469–490.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Paolacci G, Chandler J, Ipeirotis P (2010) Running experiments on Amazon Mechanical Turk. Judgment Decision Making 5(5):411–419.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Penchansky R, Thomas JW (1981) The concept of access: Definition and relationship to consumer satisfaction. Medical Care 19(2):127–140.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Polsky D, Richards M, Basseyn S, Wissoker D, Kenney GM, Zuckerman S, Rhodes KV (2015) Appointment availability after increases in Medicaid payments for primary care. New England J. Medicine 372(6):537–545.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Preacher KJ, Rucker DD, Hayes AF (2007) Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behav. Res. 42(1):185–227.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rau J (2011) Medicare to begin basing hospital payments on patient-satisfaction scores. Kaiser Health News (April 28): https://khn.org/news/medicare-hospital-patient-satisfaction/.Google Scholar
• Razzouk N, Seitz V, Webb JM (2004) What’s important in choosing a primary care physician: An analysis of consumer response. Internat. J. Health Care Quality Assurance 17(4):205–211.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Revelt D, Train K (1998) Mixed logit with repeated choices: Households’ choices of appliance efficiency level. Rev. Econom. Statist. 80(4):647–657.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rubin G, Bate A, George A, Shackley P, Hall N (2006) Preferences for access to the GP: A discrete choice experiment. British J. General Practice 56(531):743–748.Google Scholar
• Sampson F, Pickin M, O’Cathain A, Goodall S, Salisbury C (2008) Impact of same-day appointments on patient satisfaction with general practice appointment systems. British J. General Practice 58(554):641–643.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sapienza P, Zingales L, Maestripieri D (2009) Gender differences in financial risk aversion and career choices are affected by testosterone. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106(36):15268–15273.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Saultz JW (2003) Defining and measuring interpersonal continuity of care. Ann. Family Medicine 1(3):134–143.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Scott A (2002) Identifying and analysing dominant preferences in discrete choice experiments: An application in health care. J. Econom. Psych. 23(3):383–398.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Scott A, Watson MS, Ross S (2003) Eliciting preferences of the community for out of hours care provided by general practitioners: A stated preference discrete choice experiment. Soc. Sci. medicine 56(4):803–814.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shen ZJM, Su X (2007) Customer behavior modeling in revenue management and auctions: A review and new research opportunities. Production Oper. management 16(6):713–728.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shiloh S, Koren S, Zakay D (2001) Individual differences in compensatory decision-making style and need for closure as correlates of subjective decision complexity and difficulty. Personality Individual Differences 30(4):699–710.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Slovic P, Kraus NN, Lappe H, Letzel H, Malmfors T (1989) Risk perception of prescription drugs: Report on a survey in Sweden. Horisberger B, Dinkel R, eds. The Perception and Management of Drug Safety Risks (Springer-Verlag, Berlin), 90–111.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stidham S (2010) Optimal Design of Queueing Systems (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL).Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (2014) VA access audit and wait times fact sheet. Report, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, Boca Raton, FL.Google Scholar
• Viney R, Lancsar E, Louviere J (2002) Discrete choice experiments to measure consumer preferences for health and healthcare. Expert Rev. Pharmacoeconomics Outcomes Res. 2(4):319–326.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang WY, Gupta D (2011) Adaptive appointment systems with patient preferences. Manufacturing & Service Oper. Management 13(3):373–389.Link, Google Scholar
• Weber EU, Milliman RA (1997) Perceived risk attitudes: Relating risk perception to risky choice. Management Sci. 43(2):123–144.Link, Google Scholar
• Weber EU, Blais A-R, Betz NE (2002) A domain-specific risk-attitude scale: Measuring risk perceptions and risk behaviors. J. Behav. Decision Making 15(4):263–290.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wensing M, Jung HP, Mainz J, Olesen F, Grol R (1998) A systematic review of the literature on patient priorities for general practice care. Part 1: Description of the research domain. Soc. Sci. Medicine 47(10):1573–1588.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zacharias C, Armony M (2017) Joint panel sizing and appointment scheduling in outpatient care. Management Sci. 63(11):3978–3997.Link, Google Scholar