Can Prospect Theory Explain the Disposition Effect? A New Perspective on Reference Points

References

• Abeler J, Falk A, Lorenz G, Huffman D (2011) Reference points and effort provision. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(2):470–492.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arkes HR, Hirshleifer D, Jiang D, Lim S (2008) Reference point adaptation: Tests in the domain of security trading. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 105(1):67–81.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barberis N, Huang M (2001) Mental accounting, loss aversion, and individual stock returns. J. Finance 56(4):1247–1292.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barberis N, Xiong W (2006) What drives the disposition effect? An analysis of a long-standing preference-based explanation. Working paper, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Barberis N, Xiong W (2009) What drives the disposition effect? An analysis of a long-standing preference-based explanation. J. Finance 64(2):751–784.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barberis N, Xiong W (2012) Realization utility. J. Financial Econom. 104(2):251–271.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barberis N, Huang M, Santos T (2001) Prospect theory and asset prices. Quart. J. Econom. 116(1):1–53.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barberis N, Huang M, Thaler RH (2006) Individual preferences, monetary gambles, and stock market participation: A case for narrow framing. Amer. Econom. Rev. 96(4):1069–1090.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baucells M, Weber M, Welfens F (2011) Reference point formation and updating. Management Sci. 57(3):506–519.Link, Google Scholar
• Bell DE (1985) Disappointment in decision making under uncertainty. Oper. Res. 33(1):1–27.Link, Google Scholar
• Benartzi S, Thaler RH (1995) Myopic loss aversion and the equity premium puzzle. Quart. J. Econom. 110(1):73–92.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ben-David I, Hirshleifer D (2012) Are investors really reluctant to realize their losses? Trading responses to past returns and the disposition effect. Rev. Financial Stud. 25(8):2485–2532.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Camerer CF, Babcock L, Loewenstein G, Thaler RH (1997) Labor supply of New York city cabdrivers: One day at a time. Quart. J. Econom. 112(2):407–441.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chang T, Solomon DH, Westerfield MM (2016) Looking for someone to blame: Delegation, cognitive dissonance and the disposition effect. J. Finance 71(1):267–302.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cox J, Huang C (1989) Optimal consumption and portfolio policies when asset prices follow a diffusion process. J. Econom. Theory 49(1):33–83.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crawford VP, Meng J (2011) New York city cabdrivers’ labor supply revisited: Reference-dependent preferences with rational-expectations targets for hours and income. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(5):1912–1932.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Da Costa Jr N, Goulart M, Cupertino C, Macedo Jr J, Da Silva S (2013) The disposition effect and investor experience. J. Banking Finance 37(5):1669–1675.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DellaVigna S, Lindner A, Reizer B, Schmieder J (2017) Reference-dependent job search: Evidence from Hungary. Quart. J. Econom. 132(4):1969–2018.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ericson KMM, Fuster A (2011) Expectations as endowments: Evidence on reference-dependent preferences from exchange and valuation experiments. Quart. J. Econom. 126(4):1879–1907.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feng L, Seasholes MS (2005) Do investor sophistication and trading experience eliminate behavioral biases in financial markets? Rev. Finance 9(3):305–352.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frydman C, Camerer CF (2016) Neural evidence of regret and its implications for investor behavior. Accepted Rev. Financial Stud. 29(11):3108–3139.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gill D, Prowse V (2012) A structural analysis of disappointment aversion in a real effort competition. Amer. Econom. Rev. 102(1):469–530.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gul F (1991) A theory of disappointment aversion. Econometrica 59(3):667–686.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Health C, Huddart S, Lang M (1999) Psychological factors and stock option exercise. Quart. J. Econom. 114(2):601–627.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heffetz O, List JA (2014) Is the endowment effect an expectations effect? J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 12(5):1396–1422.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hens T, Vlcek M (2011) Does prospect theory explain the disposition effect? J. Behav. Finance 12(3):141–157.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ingersoll J, Jin L (2012) Realization utility with reference-dependent preferences. Rev. Financial Stud. 26(3):723–767.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Tversky A (1979) Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47(2):263–292.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kaustia M (2010) Prospect theory and the disposition effect. J. Financial Quant. Anal. 45(3):791–812.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Köszegi B, Rabin M (2006) A model of reference-dependent preferences. Quart. J. Econom. 121(4):1133–1165.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Köszegi B, Rabin M (2007) Reference-dependent risk attitudes. Amer. Econom. Rev. 97(4):1047–1073.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Köszegi B, Rabin M (2009) Reference-dependent consumption plans. Amer. Econom. Rev. 99(3):909–936.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li Y, Yang L (2013) Prospect theory, the disposition effect, and asset prices. J. Financial Econom. 107(3):715–739.Crossref, Google Scholar
• List JA (2003) Does market experience eliminate market anomalies? Quart. J. Econom. 118(1):41–71.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Loomes G, Sugden R (1986) Disappointment and dynamic consistency in choice under uncertainty. Rev. Econom. Stud. 53(2):271–282.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Masatlioglu Y, Raymond C (2016) A behavioral analysis of stochastic reference dependence. Amer. Econom. Rev. 106(9):2760–2782.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McQueen G, Vorkink K (2004) Whence GARCH? A preference-based explanation for conditional volatility. Rev. Financial Stud. 17(4):915–950.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Odean T (1998) Are investors reluctant to realize their losses? J. Finance 53(5):1775–1798.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pagel M (2016) Expectations-based reference-dependent preferences and asset pricing. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 14(2):468–514.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Post T, van den Assem MJ, Baltussen G, Thaler RH (2008) Deal or no deal? Decision making under risk in a large-payoff game show. Amer. Econom. Rev. 98(1):38–71.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rabin M (2000) Risk aversion and expected-utility theory: A calibration theorem. Econometrica 68(1):1281–1292.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shefrin H, Statman M (1985) The disposition to sell winners too early and ride losers too long: Theory and evidence. J. Finance 40(3):777–790.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Song C (2016) An experiment on reference points and expectations. Working paper, National University of Singapore, Singapore.Google Scholar
• Sprenger C (2015) An endowment effect for risk: Experimental tests of stochastic reference points. J. Political Econom. 123(6):1456–1499.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Strahilevitz M, Odean T, Barber B (2011) Once burned, twice shy: How naive learning, counterfactuals, and regret affect the repurchase of stocks previously sold. J. Marketing Res. 48(SPL):S102–S120.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A, Kahneman D (1992) Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. J. Risk Uncertainty 5(4):297–323.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weber M, Camerer CF (1998) The disposition effect in securities trading: An experimental analysis. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 33(2):167–184.Crossref, Google Scholar