Board Structure Mandates: Consequences for Director Location and Financial Reporting

References

• Adams R, Ferreira D (2007) A theory of friendly boards. J. Finance 62(1):217–250.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alam Z, Chen M, Ciccotello C, Ryan H (2014) Does the location of directors matter? Information acquisition and board decisions. J. Financial Quant. Anal. 49(1):131–164.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bartov E, Cohen D (2009) The “numbers game” in the pre- and post-Sarbanes-Oxley eras. J. Accounting, Auditing Finance 24(4):505–534.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bartov E, Givoly D, Hayn C (2002) The rewards to meeting or beating earnings expectations. J. Accounting Econom. 33(2):173–204.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bergstresser D, Philippon T (2006) CEO incentives and earnings management. J. Financial Econom. 80(3):511–529.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boone A, Field L, Karpoff J, Raheja C (2007) The determinants of corporate board size and composition: An empirical analysis. J. Financial Econom. 85(1):66–101.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burns N, Kedia S (2006) The impact of performance-based compensation on misreporting. J. Financial Econom. 79(1):35–67.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen D, Dey A, Lys T (2008) Real and accrual-based earnings management in the pre- and post-Sarbanes Oxley periods. Accounting Rev. 83(3):757–787.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coles J, Daniel N, Naveen L (2008) Boards: Does one size fit all? J. Financial Econom. 87(2):329–356.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cornett M, Marcus A, Tehranian H (2008) Corporate governance and pay-for-performance: The impact of earnings management. J. Financial Econom. 87(2):357–373.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coval J, Moskowitz T (1999) Home bias at home: Local equity preference in domestic portfolios. J. Finance 54(6):2045–2073.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coval J, Moskowitz T (2001) The geography of investment: Informed trading and asset prices. J. Political Econom. 109(4):811–841.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cummings J, Schroeder M (2002) Leading the news: Lesser known candidates head list for SEC chief. Wall Street Journal (November 15), A3.Google Scholar
• Das S, Kim K, Patro S (2011) An analysis of managerial use and market consequences of earnings management and expectation management. Accounting Rev. 86(6):1935–1967.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Degeorge F, Patel J, Zeckhauser R (1999) Earnings management to exceed thresholds. J. Bus. 72(1):1–33.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Doyle J, Ge W, McVay S (2007) Determinants of weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting. J. Accounting Econom. 44(1–2):193–223.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Duchin R, Matsusaka J, Ozbas O (2010) When are outside directors effective? J. Financial Econom. 96(2):195–214.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dunham K (2002) Reforms turn search for directors into a long, tedious task. Wall Street Journal (August 29).Google Scholar
• Engel E, Hayes R, Wang X (2007) The Sarbanes–Oxley Act and firms’ going-private decisions. J. Accounting Econom. 44(1–2):116–145.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fahlenbrach R, Low A, Stulz R (2010) Why do firms appoint CEOs as outside directors? J. Financial Econom. 97(1):12–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fich E, Shivdasani A (2006) Are busy boards effective monitors? J. Finance 61(2):689–724.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frankel R, Johnson M, Nelson K (2002) The relation between auditors’ fees for nonaudit services and earnings management. Accounting Rev. 77(Supplement):71–105.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gormley T, Matsa D (2014) Common errors: How to (and not to) control for unobserved heterogeneity. Rev. Financial Stud. 27(2):617–661.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Graham J, Harvey C, Rajgopal S (2005) The economic implications of corporate financial reporting. J. Accounting Econom. 40(1–3):3–73.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guner B, Malmendier U, Tate G (2008) Financial expertise of directors. J. Financial Econom. 88(2):323–354.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harris M, Raviv A (2008) A theory of board control and size. Rev. Financial Stud. 21(4):1797–1832.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hazarika S, Karpoff J, Nahata R (2012) Internal corporate governance, CEO turnover, and earnings management. J. Financial Econom. 104(1):44–69.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Healy P (1985) The effect of bonus schemes on accounting decisions. J. Accounting Econom. 7(1–3):85–107.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holthausen R, Larcker D, Sloan R (1995) Annual bonus schemes and the manipulation of earnings. J. Accounting Econom. 19(1):29–74.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Iliev P (2010) The effect of SOX Section 404: Costs, earnings quality, and stock prices. J. Finance 65(3):1163–1196.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jain P, Kim J, Razaee Z (2008) The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and market liquidity. Financial Rev. 43(3):361–382.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jiang J, Petroni K, Wang I (2010) CFOs and CEOs: Who have the most influence on earnings management? J. Financial Econom. 96(3):513–526.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jones J (1991) Earnings management during import relief investigations. J. Accounting Res. 29(2):193–228.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kedia S, Rajgopal S (2011) Do the SEC’s enforcement preferences affect corporate misconduct? J. Accounting Econom. 51(3):259–278.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Knyazeva A, Knyazeva D, Masulis R (2013) The supply of corporate directors and board independence. Rev. Financial Stud. 26(6):1561–1605.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leuz C, Nanda D, Wysocki P (2003) Earnings management and investor protection: An international comparison. J. Financial Econom. 69(3):505–527.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leuz C, Triantis A, Wang T (2008) Why do firms go dark? Causes and economic consequences of voluntary SEC deregistrations. J. Accounting Econom. 45(2–3):181–208.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li H, Pincus M, Rego S (2008) Market reaction to events surrounding the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and earnings management. J. Law Econom. 51(1):111–134.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Linck JS, Netter JM, Yang T (2008) The determinants of board structure. J. Financial Econom. 87(2):308–328.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Linck J, Netter J, Yang T (2009) The effects and unintended consequences of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act on the supply and demand for directors. Rev. Financial Stud. 22(8):3287–3328.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Malloy C (2005) The geography of equity analysis. J. Finance 60(2):719–755.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Matsumoto D (2002) Management incentives to avoid negative earnings surprises. Accounting Rev. 77(3):483–514.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McGee S (2005) The great American corporate director hunt. Institutional Investor 39:32–38.Google Scholar
• Pietroski JJ Jr (2002) Pietroski to Katz, November 22. Comments of Maine Bankers Association on S7-40-02, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, Washington, DC. https://www.sec.gov/rules/proposed/s74002/jjpietroski1.htm.Google Scholar
• Raheja CG (2005) Determinants of board size and composition: A theory of corporate boards. J. Financial Quant. Anal. 40(2):283–306.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roberts MR, Whited TM (2013) Endogeneity in empirical corporate finance. Constantinides GM, Harris M, Stulz RM, eds. Handbook of the Economics of Finance: Corporate Finance Vol. 2A (Elsevier, Oxford, UK), 493–572.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Romano R (2005) The Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the making of quack corporate governance. Yale Law Rev. 114(7):1521–1610.Google Scholar
• Schroeder M (2003) Corporate reform: The first year: Cleaner living, no easy riches; critics say Sarbanes-Oxley law hobbles stock, chills risk taking but upshot is far less dramatic. Wall Street Journal (July 22) C1.Google Scholar
• Wooldridge J (2002) Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data, 2nd ed. (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar