When More Is Less: Field Evidence on Unintended Consequences of Multitasking

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2017.2763

References

  • Adler R, Benbunan-Fich R (2012) Juggling on a high wire: Multitasking effects on performance. Internat. J. Human-Comput. Stud. 70(2):156–168.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Aksin Z, Armory M, Mehrotra V (2007) The modern call center: A multi-disciplinary perspective on operations management research. Productions Oper. Management 16(6):665–688.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Anderson EW, Fornell C, Rust RT (1997) Customer satisfaction, productivity, and profitability: Differences between goods and services. Marketing Sci. 16(2):129–145.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Aral S, Brynjolfsson E, Van Alstyne M (2012) Information, technology and information worker productivity. Inform. Systems Res. 23(3):849–867.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bailey BP, Konstan JA (2006) On the need for attention-aware systems: Measuring effects of interruption on task performance, error rate, and affective state. Comput. Human Behav. 22(4):685–708.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bapna R, Goes P, Wei KK, Zhang Z (2011) A finite mixture logit model to segment and predict electronic payments system adoption. Inform. Systems Res. 22(1):118–133.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bavafa H, Hitt LM, Terwiesch C (2017) The impact of e-visits on visit frequencies and patient health: Evidence from primary care. Working paper, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2363705.Google Scholar
  • Brady MK, Cronin JJ (2001) Some new thoughts on conceptualizing perceived service quality: A hierarchical approach. J. Marketing 65(3):34–49.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cameron A-F, Webster J (2011) Relational outcomes of multicommunicating: integrating incivility and social exchange perspectives. Organ. Sci. 22(3):754–771.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cameron A-F, Webster J (2013) Multicommunicating: Juggling multiple conversations in the workplace. Inform. Systems Res. 24(2):352–371.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Campello F, Ingolfsson A, Shumsky RA (2017) Queueing models of case managers. Management Sci. 63(3):882–900.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Casado Díaz AB, Más Ruiz FJ (2002) The consumer’s reaction to delays in service. Internat. J. Service Indust. Management 13(2):118–140.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Charron S, Koechlin E (2010) Divided representation of concurrent goals in the human frontal lobes. Science 328(5976):360–363.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chebat J-C, Filiatrault P (1993) The impact of waiting in line on consumers. Internat. J. Bank Marketing 11(2):35–40.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Coviello D, Ichino A, Persico N (2014) Time allocation and task juggling. Amer. Econom. Rev. 104(2):609–623.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Czerwinski M, Horvitz E, Wilhite S (2004) A diary study of task switching and interruptions. Proc. ACM Conf. Human Factors Comput. Systems (CHI ’04) (ACM, New York), 175–182.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Demers A, Keshav S, Shenkar S (1989) Analysis and simulation of a fair queueing algorithm. ACM SIGCOMM Comput. Comm. Rev. 19(4):1–12.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dube-Rioux L, Schmitt BH, Leclerc F (1989) Consumers’ reactions to waiting: When delays affect the perception of service quality. Srull TK, eds. Advances in Consumer Research Vol. 16 (Association for Consumer Research, Provo, UT), 59–63.Google Scholar
  • Durrande-Moreau A (1999) Waiting for service: Ten years of empirical research. Internat. J. Service Indust. Management 10(2):171–194.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fornell C, Johnson MD, Anderson EW, Cha J, Bryant BE (1996) The American Customer Satisfaction Index: Nature, purpose, and findings. J. Marketing 60(4):7–18.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gow ID, Ormazabal G, Taylor DJ (2010) Correcting for cross-sectional and time-series dependence in accounting research. Accounting Rev. 85(2):483–512.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gupta S, Chintagunta PK (1994) On using demographic variables to determine segment membership in logit mixture model. J. Marketing Res. 31(1):128–136.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hall NG, Leung JY-T, Li C-L (2015) The effects of multitasking on operations scheduling. Production Oper. Management 24(8):1248–1265.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Heckman JJ (1979) Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica 47(1):153–161.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Human Capital Management Institute (2010) Managing an organization’s biggest cost: The workforce. White paper, Human Capital Management Institute, Marina Del Rey, CA.Google Scholar
  • KC DS (2013) Does multitasking improve performance? evidence from the emergency department. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 16(2):168–183.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Luo J, Zhang J (2013) Staffing and control of instant messaging contact centers. Oper. Res. 61(2):328–343.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Madjar N, Shalley CE (2008) Multiple tasks’ and multiple goals’ effect on creativity: Forced incubation or just a distraction? J. Management 34(4):786–805.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mark G, Gudith D, Klocke U (2008) The cost of interrupted work: more speed and stress. Proc. ACM Conf. Human Factors Comput. Systems (CHI ’08) (ACM, New York), 107–110.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mehrotha V, Ross K, Ryder F, Zhou Y-P (2012) Routing to manage resolution and waiting time in call centers with heterogeneous servers. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 14(1):66–81.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • O’Leary MB, Mortensen M, Woolley AW (2011) Multiple team membership: A theoretical model of its effects on productivity and learning for individuals and teams. Acad. Management Rev. 36(3):461–478.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Payne SJ, Duggan GB, Neth H (2007) Discretionary task interleaving: heuristics for time allocation in cognitive foraging. J. Experiment. Psych. 136(3):370–388.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pennebaker JW, Francis RJ, Booth ME (2001) Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC) (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Reinsch NL, Turner JW, Tinsley CH (2008) Multicommunicating: A practice whose time has come? Acad. Management Rev. 33(2):391–403.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rosenbaum PR (2002) Observational Studies (Springer, New York).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sun M, Zhu F (2013) Ad revenue and content commercialization: Evidence from blogs. Management Sci. 59(10):2314–2331.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Szymanski DM, Henard DH (2001) Customer satisfaction: A meta-analysis of the empirical evidence. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. 29(1):16–35.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tan TF, Netessine S (2014) When does the devil make work? An empirical study of the impact of workload on worker productivity. Management Sci. 60(6):1574–1593.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Tan Y, Mookerjee VS, Moinzadeh K (2005) Optimal processing policies for an e-commerce web server. INFORMS J. Comput. 17(1):99–110.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Tax SS, Brown SW, Chandrashekaran M (1998) Customer evaluations of service complaint experiences: Implications for relationship. Jour. Marketing 62(2):60–76.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Taylor S (1994) Waiting for service: The relationship between delays and evaluations of service. J. Marketing 58(2):56–69.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tekin E, Hopp WJ, Van Oyen MP (2009) Pooling strategies for call center agent cross-training. IIE Trans. 41(6):546–561.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • TELUS International (2011) Best practices: Online chat sales. TELUS International, Vancouver, Canada.Google Scholar
  • Tezcan T, Zhang J (2014) Routing and staffing in customer service chat systems with impatient customers. Oper. Res. 62(4):943–956.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Tom G, Lucey S (1995) Waiting time delays and customer satisfaction in supermarkets. J. Services Marketing 9(5):20–29.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wedel M, Kamakura WA (2000) Market Segmentation: Conceptual and Methodological Foundations, 2nd ed. (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zeithaml VA, Berry LL, Parasuraman A (1996) The behavioral consequences of service quality. J. Marketing 60(2):31–46.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.