Financial Regulatory Reform After the Crisis: An Assessment

References

• Abad J, Aldasoro I, Aymanns C, D’Errico M, Fache Rousová L, Hoffmann P, Langfield S, Neychev M, Roukny T (2016) Shedding light on dark markets: First insights from the new EU-wide OTC derivatives data set. Occasional Paper Series 11, September. European Systemic Risk Board, Frankfurt, Germany.Google Scholar
• Adenbaum J, Hubbs D, Martin A, Selig I (2016) What’s up with GCF Repo®? Liberty Street Economics (May 2), http://libertystreeteconomics.newyorkfed.org/2016/05/whats-up-with-gcf-repo.html.Google Scholar
• Ambra-Verlaine J (2015) EU Bank-separation bill stalls as U.K. builds Vickers fence. Bloomberg (October 26), https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-10-26/eu-bank-separation-bill-stalls-as-u-k-builds-vickers-fence?cmpid=yhoo.headline.Google Scholar
• Andersen LBG, Duffie D, Song Y (2017) Funding value adjustments. Working paper, Graduate School of Business, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Armour J, Awrey D, Davies P, Enriques L, Gordon JN, Mayer C, Payne J (2016) Principles of Financial Regulation (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Asquith P, Covert T, Pathak P (2013) The effects of mandatory transparency in financial market design: Evidence from the corporate bond market. Working paper, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baklanova V, Copeland A, McCaughrin R (2015) Reference guide to U.S. repo and securities lending markets. Staff Report 740, Federal Reserve Bank of New York.Google Scholar
• Bank for International Settlements (2016) Statistical release, OTC derivatives statistics at end-December 2015. Monetary and Economic Department, http://www.bis.org/publ/otc_hy1605.pdf.Google Scholar
• Bank of England (2014a) The Bank of England’s sterling monetary framework, November (also known as “The Red Book”). Bank of England, London.Google Scholar
• Bank of England (2014b) The Bank of England’s supervision of financial market infrastructures. Annual report, March, Bank of England, London.Google Scholar
• Bank of England (2014c) The Financial Policy Committee’s review of the leverage ratio, October. Bank of England, London.Google Scholar
• Baranova Y, Liu Z, Noss J (2016) The role of collateral in supporting liquidity. Staff Working Paper 609, Bank of England, London.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (2013) RCAP—Analysis of risk-weighted assets for credit risk in the banking book, July.Google Scholar
• Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (2014) Basel III: The net stable funding ratio. Bank for International Settlements, October.Google Scholar
• Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (2015) Consultative document: TLAC holdings. Bank for International Settlements, November.Google Scholar
• Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (2016a) Explanatory note on the revised minimum capital requirements for market risk. Bank for International Settlements, January.Google Scholar
• Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (2016b) Tenth progress report on adoption of the basel regulatory framework. Bank for International Settlements, April.Google Scholar
• Begley T, Purnanandam A, Zheng K (2016) The strategic under-reporting of bank risk. Ross School of Business Working Paper 1260, Michigan University, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
• Bessembinder H, Maxwell W (2008) Markets: Transparency and the corporate bond market. J. Econom. Perspect. 22(2):217–234.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bessembinder H, Maxwell W, Venkataraman K (2006) Market transparency, liquidity externalities, and institutional trading costs in corporate bonds. J. Financial Econom. 82(2):251–288.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (2016) Notice of proposed rulemaking: Restrictions on qualified financial contracts of systemically important U.S. banking organizations and the U.S. operations of systemically important foreign banking organizations; revisions to the definition of qualifying master netting agreement and related definitions. Federal Reserve System, Washington, DC, May.Google Scholar
• Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System and Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (2016) Resolution plan assessment framework and firm determinations (2016). Federal Reserve System, Washington, DC, April.Google Scholar
• Board of the International Organization of Securities Commissions (2015) Peer review of regulation of money market funds. Final Report FR19/2015, September.Google Scholar
• Braithwaite J, Murphy D (2016) Got to be certain: The legal framework for CCP default management processes. Financial Stability Paper 37, Bank of England, London.Google Scholar
• Bucalossi A, Scalia A (2016) Leverage ratio, central bank operations and repo market. Bank of Italy Occasional Paper 347, https://ssrn.com/abstract=2863903.Google Scholar
• Center for Economic Policy Studies Task Force (2016) European bank resolution: Making it work. Interim report of the CEPS Task Force on Implementing Financial Sector Resolution, January.Google Scholar
• Claessens S, Kodres L (2014) The regulatory responses to the global financial crisis: Some uncomfortable questions. Working Paper WP14/46, International Monetary Fund, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Cœuré B (2016) Towards a macroprudential framework for central counterparties. Introductory remarks at the ESRB International Conference on Macroprudential Margins and Haircuts, Frankfurt am Main, June 6. European Central Bank, Frankfurt, Germany.Google Scholar
• Colliard J-E (2014) Strategic selection of risk models and bank capital regulation. Working paper series, European Central Bank, HEC Paris.Google Scholar
• Committee on Payment and Settlement Systems, Board of the International Organization of Securities Commissions (2012a) Principles for financial market infrastructures, Bank for International Settlements, April 2012.Google Scholar
• Committee on Payment and Settlement Systems, Board of the International Organization of Securities Commissions (2012b) Recovery and resolution of financial market infrastructures. Consultative report, July. Comments at http://www.bis.org/publ/cpss103/comments.htm.Google Scholar
• Committee on Payment and Settlement Systems, Board of the International Organization of Securities Commissions (2014) Recovery of financial market infrastructures. Consultative report, October.Google Scholar
• Commodity Futures Trading Commission (2013) Final rule—Core principles and other requirements for swap execution facilities. 78 Fed. Reg. 33476, 33553-54, June. http://www.cftc.gov/idc/groups/public/@newsroom/documents/file/federalregister051613b.pdf.Google Scholar
• Cripps MW, Swinkels JM (2006) Efficiency of large double auctions. Econometrica 74(1):47–92.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Declercq P, Van de Graaff S (2016) Looks like another test case for EU Bank Resolution Law, Law 360, February.Google Scholar
• Duffie D (2011) On the clearing of foreign exchange derivatives. A response to the request for comments stated in the April 2011 proposed ruling of the U.S. Treasury, Determination of Foreign Exchange Swaps and Foreign Exchange Forwards Under the Commodity Exchange Act, May, Graduate School of Business, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
• Duffie D (2012) Market making under the proposed Volcker rule. A report to the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association and a submission to the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, and the Securities and Exchange Commission, January, Graduate School of Business, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
• Duffie D (2016) Resolution of failing central counterparties. Scott K, Taylor JE, eds. Making Failure Feasible: How Bankruptcy Reform Can End “Too Big to Fail” (Hoover Institution Press, Stanford, CA),87–109.Google Scholar
• Duffie D, Skeel D (2012) A dialogue on the costs and benefits of automatic stays for derivatives and repurchase agreements. Scott KE, Taylor JB, eds. Bankruptcy Not Bailout: A Special Chapter 14 (Hoover Institution Press, Stanford, CA), 133–174.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Duffie D, Zhu H (2011) Does a central clearing counterparty reduce counterparty risk? Rev. Asset Pricing Stud. 1(1):74–95.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Duffie D, Dworczak P, Zhu H (2017) Benchmarks in search markets. J. Finance. 72(5):1983–2044.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Duffie D, Scheicher M, Vuillemey G (2015) Central clearing and collateral demand. J. Financial Econom. 116(2):237–256.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ebner A, Fecht F, Schulz A (2016) How central is central counterparty clearing? A deep dive into a european repo market during the crisis. Discussion Paper 14/2016, Deutsche Bundesbank, Frankfurt, Germany.Google Scholar
• Edwards AK, Harris LE, Piwowar MS (2007) Corporate bond transaction costs and transparency. J. Finance 62(3):1421–1451.Crossref, Google Scholar
• European Banking Authority (2012) Report on risks and vulnerabilities of the European banking system. European Banking Authority, London, July.Google Scholar
• European Banking Authority (2015a) Risk dashboard? Data as of Q3 2015. European Banking Authority, London, September.Google Scholar
• European Banking Authority (2015b) EU-wide stress test 2016: Draft methodological note. European Banking Authority, London, November.Google Scholar
• European Central Bank (2016) Interview with Risk Magazine—Interview with Benoît Cœuré, member of the Executive Board of the ECB and chairman of the Committee on Payments and Market Infrastructures (CPMI), conducted by Cécile Sourbes on May 10 and published on May 19, 2016. https://www.ecb.europa.eu/press/inter/date/2016/html/sp160519.en.html.Google Scholar
• European Commission (2014) Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on structural measures improving the resilience of EU credit institutions. European Commission, Brussels, January.Google Scholar
• European Securities and Markets Authority (2016) ESMA publishes results of EU central counterparties stress test. European Securities and Markets Authority, ESMA/2016/664, April.Google Scholar
• European Union (2012) High-level expert group on reforming the structure of the EU banking sector, chaired by Erkki Liikanen. Final report, Brussels, October.Google Scholar
• European Union (2014) Directive 2014/59/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 May 2014 establishing a framework for the recovery and resolution of credit institutions and investment firms (OJ L173, 12.6.2014, pp. 190–348).Google Scholar
• Federal Reserve Bank of New York Research and Statistics Group (2016) Quarterly trends for consolidated U.S. banking organizations, fourth quarter, 2015.Google Scholar
• Financial Stability Board (2014) Key Attributes of effective resolution regimes for financial institutions. Financial Stability Board, Basel, October.Google Scholar
• Financial Stability Board (2015a) Global shadow banking monitoring report 2015. Financial Stability Board, Basel, November.Google Scholar
• Financial Stability Board (2015b) Implementation and effects of the G20 financial regulatory reforms. Report of the Financial Stability Board to G20 Leaders, Basel, November.Google Scholar
• Financial Stability Board (2015c) 2015 CCP Workplan, Chairs of the FSB, SRC, FSB ReSG, BCBS, CPMI, and IOSCO, April.Google Scholar
• Financial Stability Board (2015d) Progress report on the CCP workplan, September.Google Scholar
• Financial Stability Board (2016) Thematic review on the implementation of the FSB policy framework for shadow banking entities. Peer review report, Basel, May.Google Scholar
• Foreign Exchange Committee (2016) Semi-annual foreign exchange volume survey. Federal Reserve Bank of New York, October.Google Scholar
• Garbade K (2006) The evolution of repo contracting conventions in the 1980s. FRBNY Economic Policy Review, Federal Reserve Bank of New York, May.Google Scholar
• Ghamami S, Glasserman P (2016) Does OTC derivatives reform incentivize central clearing? Working Paper 16-07, Office of Financial Research, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Glasserman P, Kang W (2014) Design of risk weights. Oper. Res. 62(6):1204–1220.Link, Google Scholar
• Goldstein MA, Hotchkiss ES, Sirri ER (2007) Transparency and liquidity: A controlled experiment on corporate bonds. Rev. Financial Stud. 20(2):235–273.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goodhart C, Avgouleas E (2014) A critical evaluation of bail-in as a bank recapitalisation mechanism. Allen F, Carletti E, Gray J, eds. Bearing the Losses from Bank and Sovereign Default in the Eurozone (Wharton Financial Institutions Center, Philadelphia), 65–97.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gracie A (2016) Ending too big to fail: Getting the job done. Speech at Deloitte, Bank of England, London.Google Scholar
• Grind K, Glazer E (2016) Nuns with guns: The strange day-to-day struggles between bankers and regulators. Wall Street Journal (May 30), http://www.wsj.com/articles/nuns-with-guns-the-strange-day-to-day-struggles-between-bankers-and-regulators-1464627601?mod=e2tw.Google Scholar
• Hartmann P (2015) Financial reform in transition. Evanoff D, Haldane A, Kaufman G, eds. The New International Financial System: Analyzing the Cumulative Impact of Regulatory Reform (World Scientific, Singapore), 371–403.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hendershott T, Madhavan A (2015) Click or call? Auction versus search in the over-the-counter market. J. Finance 70(1):419–447.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Her Majesty’s Treasury (2014) Secondary legislation for non-bank resolution regimes. Consultation outcome, June.Google Scholar
• Hoffmann P (2016) Adverse selection, market access, and inter-market competition. J. Banking Finance 65(April):108–119.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ignatowski M, Korte J (2014) Wishful thinking or effective threat? Tightening bank resolution regimes and bank risk-taking. J. Financial Stability 15:264–281.Crossref, Google Scholar
• International Capital Markets Association (2016) European Repo Market Survey Number 30, conducted December 2015, February.Google Scholar
• International Capital Markets Association European Repo Council (2015) Perspectives from the eye of the storm: The current state and future evolution of the European repo market. An initiative of the ICMA European Repo Council, November.Google Scholar
• International Organization of Securities Commissions (2015) Task force on cross-border regulation. Final report, September.Google Scholar
• International Swaps and Derivatives Association (2015) The impact of compression on the interest rate derivatives market. Research note, July.Google Scholar
• International Swaps and Derivatives Association (2016a) Principles for US/EU trading platform recognition, February.Google Scholar
• International Swaps and Derivatives Association (2016b) SwapsInfo first quarter 2016 review, June.Google Scholar
• Jackson TH (2016) Building on bankruptcy: A revised Chapter 14 proposal for the recapitalization, reorganization, or liquidation of large financial institutions. Jackson TH, Scott KE, Taylor JB, eds. Making Failure Feasible (Hoover Institution Press, Stanford, CA), 15–58.Google Scholar
• Kashyap A, Tsomocos D, Vardoulakis A (2014) How does macroprudential regulation change bank credit supply? NBER Working Paper 20165, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kiema I, Jokivuolle E (2014) Does a leverage ratio requirement increase bank stability? J. Banking Finance 39(February):240–254.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim D, Santomero AM (1988) Risk in banking and capital regulation. J. Finance 43(5):1219–1233.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klingler S, Sundaresan S (2016) An explanation of negative swap spreads: Demand for duration from underfunded pension plans. Working paper, Columbia Business School, New York.Google Scholar
• Lane T (2013) Financial Stability in One Country (Bank of Canada, Weatherhead Center for International Affairs, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Lubben SJ (2015) Failure of the clearinghouse: Dodd–Frank’s fatal flaw. Virginia Law Rev. 10(1):127–160.Google Scholar
• Managed Funds Association (2015a) Too big to default: Policy and legal perspectives on current bank regulator initiatives to restrict end-users’ default rights against big banks. White paper, Managed Funds Association, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Managed Funds Association (2015b) Why eliminating post-trade name disclosure will improve the swaps market. Position paper, Managed Funds Association, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Martin A (2016) Reform, regulation, and changes in the U.S. repo market. Presentation, Federal Reserve Bank of New York,April.Google Scholar
• Mendicino C, Nikolov K, Suarez J (2017) Equity versus bail-in debt in banking: An agency perspective. Working Paper Series 50, European Systemic Risk Board (ESRB), European Central Bank, Frankfurt, Germany.Google Scholar
• Myers S (1977) Determinants of corporate borrowing. J. Financial Econom. 5(2):147–175.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nouy D (2016) Letter to Mr. Enrique Calvet Chambon, member of the European Parliament, Supervisory Board, European Central Bank, April 4.Google Scholar
• Powell J (2015) Speech at the Clearing House Annual Conference New York , November 17, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.Google Scholar
• Rochet J-C (2008) Why Are There So Many Banking Crises? The Politics and Policy of Bank Regulation (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
• Securities and Exchange Commission (2010) Regulation SBSR—Reporting and dissemination of security-based swap information. 75 Fed. Reg. 75208, 75224, December.Google Scholar
• Skeel D (2016) Financing systemically important financial institutions in bankruptcy. Jackson TH, Scott KE, Taylor JB, eds. Making Failure Feasible (Hoover Institution Press, Stanford, CA), 59–86.Google Scholar
• Smith RM (2016) Banks fear early rollout of EU margin rules for forex forwards. Risk.net (June 3), http://www.risk.net/derivatives/2459950/banks-fear-early-rollout-eu-margin-rules-forex-forwards.Google Scholar
• Staff of the IMF and the FSB Secretariat (2015) Sixth progress report on the implementation of the G-20 data gaps initiative. Financial Stability Board and International Monetary Fund, September.Google Scholar
• Steigerwald RS, DeCarlo DW (2016) Resolving central counterparties after Dodd–Frank: Are CCPs eligible for ‘orderly liquidation’? Working Paper PDP 2016-1, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, Chicago.Google Scholar
• Tucker P (2014) Regulatory reform, stability, and central banking. Report, January 16, Hutchins Center on Fiscal and Monetary Policy at Brookings Institution, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Tucker P (2016) Reform as a precondition for competition and innovation. Presentation, June Finance Watch Conference, Brussels.Google Scholar
• Young MD, Donley MA, Brandt P (2015) Reconciling regulatory requirements in cross-border derivatives takes center stage. Skadden (January), https://www.skadden.com/insights/publications/2015/01/reconciling-regulatory-requirements-in-crossborder.Google Scholar
• Zeng Y (2017) A dynamic theory of mutual fund runs and liquidity management. Working paper, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhu H (2012) Finding a good price in opaque over-the-counter markets. Rev. Financial Stud. 25(4):1255–1285.Crossref, Google Scholar