The Rich Domain of Ambiguity Explored

References

• Abdellaoui M, Kemel E (2014) Eliciting prospect theory when consequences are measured in time units: Time is not money. Management Sci. 60(7):1844–1859.Link, Google Scholar
• Abdellaoui M, Vossmann F, Weber M (2005) Choice-based elicitation and decomposition of decision weights for gains and losses under uncertainty. Management Sci. 51(9):1384–1399.Link, Google Scholar
• Abdellaoui M, Baillon A, Placido L, Wakker PP (2011) The rich domain of uncertainty: Source functions and their experimental implementation. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(2):695–723.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Abdellaoui M, Bleichrodt H, Kemel E, L’Haridon O (2017) Measuring beliefs under ambiguity. Working paper, HEC-Paris, Jouy-en-Josas, France.Google Scholar
• Abdellaoui M, Bleichrodt H, l’Haridon O, van Dolder D (2016) Measuring loss aversion under ambiguity: A method to make prospect theory completely observable. J. Risk Uncertainty 52(1):1–20.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ahn DS, Choi S, Gale D, Kariv S (2014) Estimating ambiguity aversion in a portfolio choice experiment. Quant. Econom. 5(2):195–223.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Armantier O, Treich N (2016) The rich domain of risk. Management Sci. 62(7):1954–1969.Link, Google Scholar
• Attema AE, Werner BFB, l’Haridon O (2013) Prospect theory in the health domain: A quantitative assessment. J. Health Econom. 32(6):1057–1065.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baillon A, Bleichrodt H (2015) Testing ambiguity models through the measurement of probabilities for gains and losses. Amer. Econom. J.: Microeconom. 7(2):77–100.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baillon A, Huang Z, Selim A, Wakker PP (2017) Measuring ambiguity attitudes for all (natural) events. Working paper, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands.Google Scholar
• Balcombe K, Fraser I (2015) Parametric preference functionals under risk in the gain domain: A Bayesian analysis. J. Risk Uncertainty 50(2):161–187.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baucells M, Borgonovo E (2014) Invariant probabilistic sensitivity analysis. Management Sci. 59(11):2536–2549.Link, Google Scholar
• Baucells M, Heukamp FH (2012) Probability and time trade-off. Management Sci. 58(4):831–842.Link, Google Scholar
• Baucells M, Villasís A (2015) Equal tails: A simple method to elicit utility under violations of expected utility. Decision Analysis 12(4):190–204.Link, Google Scholar
• Berns GS, Capra CM, Moore S, Noussair C (2007) A shocking experiment: New evidence on probability weighting and common ratio violations. Judgment Decision Making 2(3):234–242.Google Scholar
• Bleichrodt H, Pinto JL (2009) New evidence of preference reversals in health utility measurement. Health Econom. 18(6):713–726.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Borgonovo E, Marinacci M (2015) Decision analysis under ambiguity. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 244(3):823–836.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Camerer CF, Weber M (1992) Recent developments in modeling preferences: Uncertainty and ambiguity. J. Risk Uncertainty 5(4):325–370.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cerreia-Vioglio S, Dillenberger D, Ortoleva P (2015) Cautious expected utility and the certainty effect. Econometrica 83(2):693–728.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chateauneuf A, Eichberger J, Grant S (2007) Choice under uncertainty with the best and worst in mind: NEO-additive capacities. J. Econom. Theory 137(1):538–567.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chew SH, Sagi JS (2008) Small worlds: Modeling attitudes toward sources of uncertainty. J. Econom. Theory 139(1):1–24.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chew SH, Bin M, Zhong S (2017) Partial ambiguity. Econometrica 85(4):1239–1260.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chew SH, Richard PE, Zhong S (2012) Ambiguity aversion and familiarity bias: Evidence from behavioral and gene association studies. J. Risk Uncertainty 44(1):1–18.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chew SH, Li KK, Chark R, Zhong S (2008) Source preference and ambiguity aversion: Models and evidence from behavioral and neuroimaging experiments. Houser D, McGabe K, eds. Neuroeconomics: Advances in Health Economics and Health Services Research, Vol. 20 (JAI Press, Bingley, UK), 179–201.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Della SM, Gryglewicz S, Peter MK (2014) Willingness to wait under risk and ambiguity. Working paper, Erasmus School of Economics, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands.Google Scholar
• Dimmock SG, Kouwenberg R, Wakker PP (2016) Ambiguity attitudes in a large representative sample. Management Sci. 62(5):1363–1380.Link, Google Scholar
• Dimmock SG, Kouwenberg R, Olivia SM, Peijnenburg K (2015) Estimating ambiguity preferences and perceptions in multiple prior models: Evidence from the field. J. Risk Uncertainty 51(3):219–244.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dobbs IM (1991) A Bayesian approach to decision-making under ambiguity. Economica 58(232):417–440.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dow J, Werlang SRC (1992) Uncertainty aversion, risk aversion and the optimal choice of portfolio. Econometrica 60(1):197–204.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eliaz K, Ortoleva P (2016) Multidimensional Ellsberg. Management Sci. 62(8):2179–2197.Link, Google Scholar
• Ellsberg D (1961) Risk, ambiguity and the Savage axioms. Quart. J. Econom. 75(4):643–669.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ellsberg D (2001) Risk, Ambiguity and Decision (Garland Publishers, New York).Google Scholar
• Ellsberg D (2011) Introduction to the symposium issue: Notes on the origins of the Ellsberg urns. Econom. Theory 48(2/3):221–227.Google Scholar
• Etchart N (2004) Is probability weighting sensitive to the magnitude of consequences? An experimental investigation on losses. J. Risk Uncertainty 28(3):217–235.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Erev I, Ert E, Alvin ER, Haruvy E, Stefan MH, Hau R, Hertwig R, Stewart T, West R, Lebiere C (2010) A choice prediction competition: Choices from experience and from description. J. Behav. Decision Making 23(1):15–47.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fehr-Duda H, Bruhin A, Epper T, Schubert R (2010) Rationality on the rise: Why relative risk aversion increases with stake size. J. Risk Uncertainty 40(2):147–180.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Festjens A, Bruyneel S, Diecidue E, Dewitte S (2015) Time-based versus money-based decision making under risk: An experimental investigation. J. Econom. Psych. 50(1):52–72.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fox CR, Tversky A (1998) A belief-based account of decision under uncertainty. Management Sci. 44(7):879–895.Link, Google Scholar
• Fox CR, Weber M (2002) Ambiguity aversion, comparative ignorance, and decision context. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 88(1):476–498.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fox CR, Brett AR, Tversky A (1996) Options traders exhibit subadditive decision weights. J. Risk Uncertainty 13(1):5–17.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ghirardato P, Marinacci M (2001) Risk, ambiguity, and the separation of utility and beliefs. Math. Oper. Res. 26(4):864–890.Link, Google Scholar
• Ghirardato P, Maccheroni F, Marinacci M (2004) Differentiating ambiguity and ambiguity attitude. J. Econom. Theory 118(2):133–173.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gilboa I (1987) Expected utility with purely subjective non-additive probabilities. J. Math. Econom. 16(1):65–88.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gilboa I, Marinacci M (2013) Ambiguity and the Bayesian paradigm. Acemoglu D, Arellano M, Dekel E, eds. Advances in Economics and Econometrics: Theory and Applications, Tenth World Congress of the Econometric Society, Vol. 1, Chap. 7 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gold MR, Joanna ES, Louise BR, Milton CW (1996) Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine (Oxford University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goldstein WM, Einhorn HJ (1987) Expression theory and the preference reversal phenomena. Psych. Rev. 94(2):236–254.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heath C, Tversky A (1991) Preference and belief: Ambiguity and competence in choice under uncertainty. J. Risk Uncertainty 4(1):5–28.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hertwig R, Barron G, Elke UW, Erev I (2004) Decisions from experience and the effect of rare events in risky choice. Psych. Sci. 15(8):534–539.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hey JD, Lotito G, Maffioletti A (2010) The descriptive and predictive adequacy of theories of decision making under uncertainty/ambiguity. J. Risk Uncertainty 41(2):81–111.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Tversky A (1975) Value theory: An analysis of choices under risk. Paper presented at the ISRACON conference on public economics, Jerusalem.Google Scholar
• Kemel E, Paraschiv C (2013) Prospect theory for joint time and money consequences in risk and ambiguity. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 50(October):81–95.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kemel E, Travers M (2016) Comparing attitudes towards time and money in experience-based decisions. Theory Decision 80(1):71–100.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klibanoff P, Marinacci M, Mukerji S (2005) A smooth model of decision making under ambiguity. Econometrica 73(6):849–1892.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kothiyal A, Spinu V, Wakker PP (2014) An experimental test of prospect theory for predicting choice under ambiguity. J. Risk Uncertainty 48(1):1–17.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li C (2017) Are the poor worse at dealing with ambiguity? J. Risk Uncertainty. 54(3):239–268.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Machina MJ, Siniscalchi M (2014) Ambiguity and ambiguity aversion. Machina MJ, Viscusi WK, eds. Handbook of the Economics of Risk and Uncertainty, Vol. 1 (North-Holland, Amsterdam),729–807.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McFadden DL (2010) Sociality, rationality, and the ecology of choice. Hess S, Daly A, eds. Choice Modelling: The State-of-the-Art and the State-of-Practice: Proc. Inaugural Internat. Choice Modeling Conf. (Emerald Group Publishing, Bingley, UK), 1–17.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miao J, Wang N (2011) Risk, uncertainty, and option exercise. J. Econom. Dynamics Control 35(4):442–461.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Neilson WS (2010) A simplified axiomatic approach to ambiguity aversion. J. Risk Uncertainty 41(2):113–124.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nishimura KG, Ozaki H (2007) Irreversible investment and Knightian uncertainty. J. Econom. Theory 136(1):668–694.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Prelec D (1998) The probability weighting function. Econometrica 66(3):497–527.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Riedel F (2009) Optimal stopping with multiple priors. Econometrica 77(3):857–908.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rottenstreich Y, Hsee CK (2001) Money, kisses, and electric shocks: On the affective psychology of risk. Psych. Sci. 12(3):185–190.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schmeidler D (1989) Subjective probability and expected utility without additivity. Econometrica 57(3):571–587.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Trautmann ST, van de Kuilen G (2015) Ambiguity attitudes. Keren G, Wu G, eds. The Wiley Blackwell Handbook of Judgment and Decision Making (Blackwell, Oxford, UK), 89–116.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A, Fox CR (1995) Weighing risk and uncertainty. Psych. Rev. 102(2):269–283.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A, Kahneman D (1992) Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. J. Risk Uncertainty 5(4):297–323.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wakker PP (2010) Prospect Theory: For Risk and Ambiguity (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar