Risk Aversion and Son Preference: Experimental Evidence from Chinese Twin Parents

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2017.2779

References

  • Abdellaoui M, Baillon A, Placido L, Wakker P (2011) The rich domain of uncertainty: Source functions and their experimental implementation. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(2):695–723.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ahn N (1995) Measuring the value of children by sex and age using a dynamic programming model. Rev. Econom. Stud. 62(3):361–379.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Alesina AF, Giuliano P, Nunn N (2013) On the origins of gender roles: Women and the plough. Quart. J. Econom. 128(2):469–530.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Almond D, Edlund L (2008) Son-biased sex ratios in the 2000 United States Census. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105(15):5681–5682.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Almond D, Edlund L, Milligan K (2013) Son preference and the persistence of culture: Evidence from Asian immigrants to Canada. Population Development Rev. 39(1):75–95.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Angrist J (2002) How do sex ratios affect marriage and labor markets? Evidence from America’s second generation. Quart. J. Econom. 117(3):997–1038.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Behrman J, Taubman P (1976) Intergenerational transmission of income and wealth. Amer. Econom. Rev. 66(3):436–440.Google Scholar
  • Behrman J, Rosenzweig M (1999) Ability biases in schooling returns and twins: A test and new estimates. Econom. Ed. Rev. 18(2):159–167.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ben-Porath Y, Welch F (1976) Do sex preferences really matter? Quart. J. Econom. 90(2):285–307.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bethmann D, Kvasnicka M (2012) World war II, missing men and out of wedlock childbearing. Econom. J. 123(567):162–194.Google Scholar
  • Bound J, Solon G (1999) Double trouble: On the value of twins-based estimation of the return to schooling. Econom. Ed. Rev. 18(2):169–182.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bulte E, Tu Q, List J (2015) Battle of the sexes: How sex ratios affect female bargaining power. Econom. Development Cultural Change 64(1):143–161.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Camerer CF, Dreber A, Forsell E, Ho TH, Huber J, Johannesson M, Heikensten E (2016) Evaluating replicability of laboratory experiments in economics. Science 351(6280):1433–1436.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chew SH, Sagi JS (2008) Small worlds: Modeling attitudes toward sources of uncertainty. J. Econom. Theory 139(1):1–24.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chew S, Yi J, Zhang J, Zhong S (2016) Education and anomalies in decision making: Experimental evidence from Chinese adult twins. J. Risk Uncertainty 53(2–3):163–200.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chiappori PA, Fortin B, Lacroix G (2002) Marriage market, divorce legislation, and household labor supply. J. Political Econom. 110(1):37–72.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Coale AJ, Banister J (1994) Five decades of missing females in China. Demography 31(3):459–479.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Das Gupta M (2005) Explaining Asia’s “missing women”: A new look at the data. Population Development Rev. 31(3):529–535.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Das Gupta M, Ebenstein A, Sharygin J (2013) China’s marriage market and upcoming challenges for elderly men. Population Stud. 67(1):39–59.Google Scholar
  • Davies J, Zhang J (1995) Gender bias, investments in children and bequests. Internat. Econom. Rev. 36(3):795–818.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dahl GB, Moretti E (2008) The demand for sons. Rev. Econom. Stud. 75(4):1085–1120.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dimmock SG, Kouwenberg R, Wakker PP (2015) Ambiguity attitudes in a large representative sample. Management Sci. 62(5):1363–1380.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dohmen T, Falk A, Huffman D, Sunde U, Schupp J, Wagner GG (2011) Individual risk attitudes: Measurement, determinants, and behavioral consequences. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 9(3):522–550.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ebenstein A (2010) The “missing girls” of China and the unintended consequences of the one-child policy. J. Human Resources 45(1):87–115.Google Scholar
  • Ebenstein A (2011) Estimating a dynamic model of sex selection in China. Demography 48(2):783–811.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ebenstein A, Leung S (2010) Son preference and the missing market for social insurance: Evidence from China’s rural pension program. Population Development Rev. 36(1):47–70.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Edlund L (1999) Son preference, sex ratios, and marriage patterns. J. Political Econom. 107(6):1275–1304.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Edlund L, Li H, Yi J, Zhang J (2013) Sex ratios and crime: Evidence from China. Rev. Econom. Statist. 95(5):1520–1534.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gangadharan L, Maitra P (2003) Testing for son preference in South Africa. J. African Economies 12(3):371–416.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Griliches Z (1979) Sibling models and data in economics: Beginnings of survey. J. Political Econom. 87(5):37–64.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Holt A, Laury K (2002) Risk aversion and incentive effects. Amer. Econom. Rev. 92(5):1644–1655.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hu L, Schlosser A (2015) Prenatal sex selection and girls’ well-being: Evidence from India. Econom. J. 125(587):1227–1261.Google Scholar
  • Huang C, Li H, Liu P, Zhang J (2009) Why does spousal education matter for incomes? Assortative mating and cross-productivity. J. Labor Econom. 27(4):633–652.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kahneman D, Tversky A (1979) Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47(2):263–291.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lawrence MS, Stojanov P, Polak P, Kryukov GV, Cibulskis K, Sivachenko A, Kiezun A (2013) Mutational heterogeneity in cancer and the search for new cancer-associated genes. Nature 499(7457):214–218.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Leung SF (1988) On tests for sex preferences. J. Population Econom. 1(2):95–114.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Leung SF (1991) A stochastic dynamic analysis of parental sex preferences and fertility. Quart. J. Econom. 106(4):1063–1088.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Levitt SD, List JA (2009) Field experiments in economics: The past, the present, and the future. Eur. Econom. Rev. 53(1):1–18.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Li H, Liu P, Zhang J (2012) Estimating returns to education using twins in urban China. J. Development Econom. 97(2):494–504.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Li H, Rosenzweig M, Zhang J (2010) Altruism, favoritism, and guilt in the allocation of family resources: Sophie’s choice in Mao’s mass send-down movement. J. Political Econom. 118(1):1–38.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Li H, Yi J, Zhang J (2011) Estimating the effect of the one-child policy on sex ratio imbalance in China: Identification based on the difference-in-differences. Demography 48(4):1535–1557.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Li H, Liu P, Zhang J, Ma N (2007) Economic returns to communist party membership: Evidence from urban Chinese twins. Econom. J. 117(523):1504–1520.Google Scholar
  • Lin MJ, Luoh MC (2008) Can hepatitis B mothers account for the number of missing women? Evidence from three million newborns in Taiwan. Amer. Econom. Rev. 98(5):2259–2273.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • List JA, Sadoff S, Wagner M (2011) So you want to run an experiment, now what? Some simple rules of thumb for optimal experimental design. Experiment. Econom. 14(4):439–457.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Maniadis Z, Tufano F, List JA (2014) One swallow doesn’t make a summer: New evidence on anchoring effects. Amer. Econom. Rev. 104(1):277–290.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Meng X (2012) Labor market outcomes and reforms in China. J. Econom. Perspect. 26(4):75–101.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • National Bureau of Statistics (2009) China Statistical Yearbook 2009 [2009 nian zhong guo tong ji nian jian] (China Statistics Press, Beijing).Google Scholar
  • Noussair CN, Trautmann ST, Van de Kuilen G (2014) Higher order risk attitudes, demographics, and financial decisions. Rev. Econom. Stud. 81(1):325–355.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Open Science Collaboration (2015) Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science 349(6251):aac4716.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Oster E (2005) Hepatitis B and the case of the missing women. J. Political Econom. 113(6):1163–1216.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Oster E, Chen G, Yu X, Lin W (2010) Hepatitis B does not explain male-biased sex ratios in China. Econom. Lett. 107(2):142–144.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Qian N (2008) Missing women and the price of tea in China. Quart. J. Econom. 123(3):1251–1285.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rao V (1993) The rising price of husbands: A hedonic analysis of dowry increases in rural India. J. Political Econom. 101(4):666–677.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rosenzweig M (1993) Women, insurance capital, and economic development in rural India. J. Human Resources 28(4):735–758.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rosenzweig M (1988a) Risk, private information, and the family. Amer. Econom. Rev. 78(2):245–250.Google Scholar
  • Rosenzweig M (1988b) Risk, implicit contracts and the family in rural areas of low-income countries. Econom. J. 98(393):1148–1170.Google Scholar
  • Rosenzweig M, Schultz T (1982) Market opportunities, genetic endowments, and intrafamily resource distribution: Child survival in rural India. Amer. Econom. Rev. 72(4):803–815.Google Scholar
  • Rosenzweig MR, Zhang J (2009) Do population control policies induce more human capital investment? Twins, birth weight and China’s “one-child” policy. Rev. Econom. Stud. 76(3):1149–1174.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sen A (2003) Missing women—Revisited: Reduction in female mortality has been counterbalanced by sex selective abortions. British Medical J. 327(7427):1297–1298.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Scharping T (2002) Birth Control in China 1949–2000: Population Policy and Demographic Development (Routledge, New York).Google Scholar
  • Sutter M, Kocher MG, Rützler M, Trautmann S (2013) Impatience and uncertainty: Experimental decisions predict adolescents’ field behavior. Amer. Econom. Rev. 103(1):510–531.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wei SJ, Zhang X (2011) The competitive saving motive: Evidence from rising sex ratios and saving rates in China. J. Political Econom. 119(3):511–564.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yi J (2018) Endogenous altruism: Theory and evidence from Chinese twins. J. Labor Econom. Forthcoming.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yi J, Heckman JJ, Zhang J, Conti G (2015) Early health shocks, intra-household resource allocation and child outcomes. Econom. J. 125(588):347–371.Google Scholar
  • Zhong S, Chew SH, Set E, Zhang J, Xue H, Sham PC, Ebstein RP, Israel S (2009) The heritability of attitude toward economic risk. Twin Res. Human Genetics 12(1):103–107.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.