To Be or Not to Be Linked: Online Social Networks and Job Search by Unemployed Workforce

References

• Angst CM, Agarwal R, Sambamurthy V, Kelley K (2010) Social contagion and information technology diffusion: The adoption of electronic medical records in U.S. hospitals. Management Sci. 56(8):1219–1241.Link, Google Scholar
• Aral S, Van Alstyne M (2011) The diversity-bandwidth trade-off. Amer. J. Sociol. 117(1):90–171.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aral S, Muchnik L, Sundararajan A (2009) Distinguishing influence-based contagion from homophily-driven diffusion in dynamic networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106(51):21544–21549.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Autor DH (2001) Wiring the labor market. J. Econom. Perspect. 15(1):25–40.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bapna R, Umyarov A (2015) Do your online friends make you pay? A randomized field experiment on peer influence in online social networks. Management Sci. 61(8):1902–1920.Link, Google Scholar
• Bian Y (1997) Bringing strong ties back in: Indirect ties, network bridges, and job searches in China. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 62(3):366–385.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blau DM, Robins PK (1990) Job search outcomes for the employed and unemployed. J. Political Econom. 98(3):637–655.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bloemen HG (2005) Job search, search intensity, and labor market transitions an empirical analysis. J. Human Resources 40(1):231–269.Google Scholar
• Bortnick S, Ports M (1992) Job search methods and results: Tracking the unemployed. Monthly Labor Rev. 115(12):29–35.Google Scholar
• Boyd DM, Ellison NB (2007) Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. J. Comput.-Mediated Comm. 13(1):210–230.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bradshaw T (1973) Jobseeking methods used by unemployed workers. Monthly Labor Rev. 96(2):35–40.Google Scholar
• Burdett K (1977) A dynamic theory of individual labor supply. Discussion Paper 394-77, Institute for Research on Poverty, Madison, WI.Google Scholar
• Burt RS (1995) Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Calvó-Armengol A, Jackson MO (2004) The effects of social networks on employment and inequality. Amer. Econom. Rev. 94(3):426–454.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Calvó-Armengol A, Zenou Y (2005) Job matching, social network and word-of-mouth communication. J. Urban Econom. 57(3):500–522.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Conner C (2014) New research: 2014 LinkedIn user trends (and 10 top surprises). Forbes (May 4), http://www.forbes.com/sites/cherylsnappconner/2014/05/04/new-research-2014-linkedin-user-trends-and-10-top-surprises/.Google Scholar
• Dellarocas C (2003) The digitization of word of mouth: Promise and challenges of online feedback mechanisms. Management Sci. 49(10):1407–1424.Link, Google Scholar
• DellaVigna S, Paserman MD (2004) Job search and impatience. NBER Working Paper 10837, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• de Matos MG, Ferreira P, Smith MD, Telang R (2016) Culling the herd: Using real-world randomized experiments to measure social bias with known costly goods. Management Sci. 62(9):2563–2580.Link, Google Scholar
• De Meo P, Ferrara E, Fiumara G, Provetti A (2014) On Facebook, most ties are weak. Commun. ACM 57(11):78–84.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Duggan M, Smith A (2013) Demographics of key social networking platforms. Report, December 30, Pew Research Center: Internet & Techology, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Dunbar R (2010) How Many Friends Does One Person Need?: Dunbar’s Number and Other Evolutionary Quirks (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Eriksson S, Rooth D-O (2014) Do employers use unemployment as a sorting criterion when hiring? Evidence from a field experiment. Amer. Econom. Rev. 104(3):1014–39.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feldman DC, Klaas BS (2002) Internet job hunting: A field study of applicant experiences with on-line recruiting. Human Resource Management 41(2):175–192.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feldstein M, Poterba J (1984) Unemployment insurance and reservation wages. J. Public Econom. 23(1–2):141–167.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Garg R, Smith MD, Telang R (2011) Measuring information diffusion in an online community. J. Management Inform. Systems 28(2):11–38.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ghose A, Han SP (2011) An empirical analysis of user content generation and usage behavior on the mobile Internet. Management Sci. 57(9):1671–1691.Link, Google Scholar
• Godes D, Mayzlin D (2004) Using online conversations to study word-of-mouth communication. Marketing Sci. 23(4):545–560.Link, Google Scholar
• Granovetter M (1973) The strength of weak ties. Amer. J. Sociology 78(6):1360–1380.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Granovetter M (1985) Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. Amer. J. Sociology 91(3):481–510.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Granovetter M (1995) Getting a Job: A Study of Contacts and Careers (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Granovetter M (2005) The impact of social structure on economic outcomes. J. Econom. Perspect. 19(1):33–50.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hempel J (2010) How LinkedIn will fire up your career. Fortune (March 25), http://archive.fortune.com/2010/03/24/technology/linkedin_social_networking.fortune/index.htm.Google Scholar
• Holzer HJ (1988) Search method use by unemployed youth. J. Labor Econom. 6(1):1–20.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jobvite (2014) Social recruiting survey results 2014, https://www.jobvite.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/Jobvite_SocialRecruiting_Survey2014.pdf.Google Scholar
• Korpi T (2001) Good friends in bad times? Social networks and job search among the unemployed in Sweden. Acta Sociologica 44(2):157–170.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krackhardt D (1992) The strength of strong ties: The importance of philos in organizations. Nohria N, Eccles RG, eds. Networks and Organizations: Structure, Form, and Action (Harvard Business School Press, Boston), 216–239.Google Scholar
• Krackhardt D (1998) Endogenous preferences: A structural approach. Halpern JJ, Stern RN, eds. Debating Rationality: Nonrational Aspects of Organizational Decision Making (Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY), 239–247.Google Scholar
• Kroft K, Lange F, Notowidigdo MJ (2013) Duration dependence and labor market conditions: Evidence from a field experiment. Quart. J. Econom. 128(3):1123–1167.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krueger AB, Mueller A (2010) Job search and unemployment insurance: New evidence from time use data. J. Public Econom. 94(3–4):298–307.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kuhn P, Skuterud M (2004) Internet job search and unemployment durations. Amer. Econom. Rev. 94(1):218–232.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee Y-J, Hosanagar K, Tan Y (2015) Do I follow my friends or the crowd? Information cascades in online movie ratings. Management Sci. 61(9):2241–2258.Link, Google Scholar
• Lin N (1999) Social networks and status attainment. Annual Rev. Sociol. 25(1):467–487.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marsden PV, Gorman EH (2001) Social networks, job changes, and recruitment. Berg I, Kalleberg AL, eds. Sourcebook of Labor Markets (Springer-Science+Business Media, New York), 467–502.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McDonald S, Lin N, Ao D (2009) Networks of opportunity: Gender, race, and job leads. Soc. Problems 56(3):385–402.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Montgomery JD (1991) Social networks and labor-market outcomes: Toward an economic analysis. Amer. Econom. Rev. 81(5):1408–1418.Google Scholar
• Montgomery JD (1992) Job search and network composition: Implications of the strength-of-weak-ties hypothesis. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 57(5):586–596.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mortensen DT (1986) Job search and labor market analysis. Ashenfelter O, Card D, eds. Handbook of Labor Economics, Vol. 2 (North-Holland, Amsterdam), 849–919.Google Scholar
• Mouw T (2003) Social capital and finding a job: Do contacts matter?. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 68(6):868–898.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Murray SO, Rankin JH, Magill DW (1981) Strong ties and job information. Work Occupations 8(1):119–136.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Obukhova E (2012) Motivation vs. relevance: Using strong ties to find a job in urban China. Soc. Sci. Res. 41(3):570–580.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Obukhova E, Lan G (2013) Do job seekers benefit from contacts? A direct test with contemporaneous searches. Management Sci. 59(10):2204–2216.Link, Google Scholar
• Pénard T, Poussing N (2010) Internet use and social capital: The strength of virtual ties. J. Econom. Issues 44(3):569–595.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Petersen T, Saporta I, Seidel ML (2000) Offering a job: Meritocracy and social networks. Amer. J. Sociol. 106(3):763–816.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reagans R, McEvily B (2003) Network structure and knowledge transfer: The effects of cohesion and range. Admin. Sci. Quart. 48(2):240–267.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schwartz ND (2013) In hiring, a friend in need is a prospect, indeed. New York Times (January 2), http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/28/business/employers-increasingly-rely-on-internal-referrals-in-hiring.html.Google Scholar
• Stadd A (2013) 55% of recruiters turn to Twitter, compared to Facebook’s 65% and LinkedIn’s 94%. Adweek (September 10), http://www.adweek.com/socialtimes/recruiters-twitter/490440.Google Scholar
• Stevenson B (2008) The Internet and job search. NBER Working Paper 13886, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tucker C (2008) Identifying formal and informal influence in technology adoption with network externalities. Management Sci. 54(12):2024–2038.Link, Google Scholar
• Verbrugge LM (1979) Multiplexity in adult friendships. Soc. Forces 57(4):1286–1309.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wanberg CR, Kanfer R, Hamann DJ, Zhang Z (2016) Age and reemployment success after job loss: An integrative model and meta-analysis. Psych. Bull. 142(4):400–426.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yakubovich V (2005) Weak ties, information, and influence: How workers find jobs in a local Russian labor market. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 70(3):408–421.Crossref, Google Scholar