Understanding Team Knowledge Production: The Interrelated Roles of Technology and Expertise

References

• Acemoglu D (2012) Diversity and technological progress. Lerner J, Stern S, eds. The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity Revisited (National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA), 319–356.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aghion P, Dewatripont M, Stein JC (2008) Academic freedom, private-sector focus, and the process of innovation. RAND J. Econom. 39(3):617–635.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Agrawal A, Goldfarb A, Teodoridis F (2016) Understanding the changing structure of scientific inquiry. Amer. Econom. J.: Appl. Econom. 8(1):100–128.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Astebro T, Elhedhli S (2006) The effectiveness of simple decision heuristics: Forecasting commercial success for early-stage ventures. Management Sci. 52(3):395–409.Link, Google Scholar
• Baccara M, Yariv L (2013) Homophily in peer groups. Amer. Econom. J.: Microeconomics 5(3):69–96.Crossref, Google Scholar
• BBC News (2010) Kinect hacked days after release. (November 12), http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-11742236.Google Scholar
• Becker GS, Murphy KM (1992) The division of labor, coordination costs, and knowledge. Quart. J. Econom. 107(4):1137–1160.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bikard M, Murray F, Gans J (2015) Exploring trade-offs in the organization of scientific work: Collaboration and scientific reward. Management Sci. 61(7):1473–1495.Link, Google Scholar
• Boudreau KJ, Guinan EC, Lakhani KR, Riedl C (2016) Looking across and looking beyond the knowledge frontier: Intellectual distance, novelty, and resource allocation in science. Management Sci. 62(10):2765–2783.Link, Google Scholar
• Burt RS (1992) Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cockburn MI, Henderson MR (1998) Absorptive capacity, coauthoring behavior, and the organization of research in drug discovery. J. Indust. Econom. 46(2):157–182.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen WM, Levinthal DA (1990) Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(1):128–152.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ding W, Sharon GL, Stephan P, Winkler EA (2010) The impact of information technology on scientists’ productivity, quality and collaboration patterns. Management Sci. 56(9):1439–1461.Link, Google Scholar
• Ferreira D, Sah RK (2012) Who gets to the top? Generalists versus specialists in managerial organizations. RAND J. Econom. 43(4):577–601.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Franzoni C, Sauermann H (2014) Crowd science: The organization of scientific research in open collaborative projects. Res. Policy 43(1):1–20.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Franzoni C, Scelatto G, Stephan P (2011) Changing incentives to publish. Science 333(6043):702–703.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Freeman RB, Huang W (2015) Collaborating with people like me: Ethnic co-authorship within the US. J. Labor Econom. 33(3):289–318.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Freeman RB, Ganguli I, Murciano-Goroff R (2015) Why and wherefore of increased scientific collaboration. Jaffe A, Jones B, eds. The Changing Frontier: Rethinking Science and Innovation Policy (National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA),17–48.Google Scholar
• Furman J, Stern S (2011) Climbing atop the shoulders of giants: The impact of institutions on cumulative knowledge production. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(5):1933–1963.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Garicano L (2000) Hierarchies and the organization of knowledge in production. J. Political Econom. 108(5):874–904.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gates B (2011) The power of the natural user interface. GatesNotes (blog) (October 28), http://www.thegatesnotes.com/Personal/The-Power-of-the-Natural-User-Interface.Google Scholar
• Grossman G, Helpman E (1991) Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Hallen BL (2008) The causes and consequences of the initial network positions of new organizations: From whom do entrepreneurs receive investments? Admin. Sci. Quart. 53(4):685–718.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hargadon A, Sutton RI (1997) Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm. Admin. Sci. Quart. 42(4):716–749.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Iacus SM, King G, Porro G (2011) Multivariate matching methods that are monotonic imbalance bounding. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 106(493):345–361.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Iacus SM, King G, Porro G (2012) Causal inference without balance checking: Coarsened exact matching. Political Anal. 20(1):1–24.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jones B (2009) The burden of knowledge and the death of the renaissance man: Is innovation getting harder? Rev. Econom. Stud. 76(1):253–281.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jones B (2010) As science evolves, how can science policy? NBER Innovation Policy Econom. 11:103–131.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jones B (2011) The knowledge trap: Human capital and development, reconsidered. Working Paper 14138, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Jones C (1995) R&D based models of economic growth. J. Political Econom. 103(4):739–784.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee JC (2011) Windows drivers for Kinect, finally! Procrastineering (blog) (February 21), http://procrastineering.blogspot.nl/2011/02/windows-drivers-for-kinect.html.Google Scholar
• Mokyr J (2002) The Gifts of Athena (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
• Murray F, Stern S (2007) Do formal intellectual property rights hinder the free flow of scientific knowledge? An empirical test of the anti-commons hypothesis. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 63(4):648–687.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Murray F, Aghion P, Dewatripont M, Kolev J, Stern S (2016) Of mice and academics: Examining the effect of openness on innovation. Amer. Econom. J.: Econom. Policy 8(1):212–252.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nelson RR (1982) The role of knowledge in R&D efficiency. Quart. J. Econom. 97(3):453–470.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nielsen M (2011) Reinventing Discovery: The New Era of Networked Science (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
• Owen-Smith J, Powell WW (2004) Knowledge networks as channels and conduits: The effects of spillovers in the Boston biotechnology community. Organ. Sci. 15(1):5–21.Link, Google Scholar
• Reagans R, Zuckerman E (2001) Network, diversity and performance: The social capital of R&D units. Organ. Sci. 12(4):502–517.Link, Google Scholar
• Romer PM (1990) Endogenous technological change. J. Political Econom. 98(5):71–102.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Singh J, Fleming L (2010) Lone inventors as sources of technological breakthroughs: Myth or reality? Management Sci. 56(1):41–56.Link, Google Scholar
• Smith A (1776) The Wealth of Nations (W. Strahan and T. Cadell, London).Google Scholar
• Smith MD, Telang R (2016) Streaming, Sharing, Stealing: Big Data and the Future of Entertainment (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Solow RM (1956) A contribution to the theory of economic growth. Quart. J. Econom. 70(1):65–94.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stephan P (2012) How Economics Shapes Science (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Terdiman D (2010) Bounty offered for open-source Kinect driver. CNET News (November 4), http://news.cnet.com/8301-13772_3-20021836-52.html.Google Scholar
• Weitzman M (1998) Recombinant growth. Quart. J. Econom. 113(2):331–360.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williams HL (2013) Intellectual property rights and innovation: Evidence from the human genome. J. Political Econom. 121(1):1–27.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wuchty S, Jones B, Uzzi B (2007) The increasing dominance of teams in the production of knowledge. Science 316(5827):1036–1039.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Uzzi B, Mukherjee S, Stringer M, Jones B (2013) Atypical combinations and scientific impact. Science 342(6157):468–472.Crossref, Google Scholar