Recover Overnight? Work Interruption and Worker Productivity

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2017.2792

References

  • Andersen S, Brandon A, Gneezy U, List JA (2014) Toward an understanding of reference-dependent labor supply: Theory and evidence from a field experiment. Technical report, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  • Bender S, Bloom N, Card D, Van Reenen J, Wolter S (2016) Management practices, workforce selection and productivity. NBER Working Paper 22101, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bertrand M, Duflo E, Mullainathan S (2004) How much should we trust differences-in-differences estimates? Quart. J. Econom. 119(1):249–275.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bloom N, Van Reenen J (2007) Measuring and explaining management practices across firms and countries. Quart. J. Econom. 122(4):1351–1408.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bloom N, Eifert B, Mahajan A, McKenzie D, Roberts J (2013) Does management matter? Evidence from India. Quart. J. Econom. 128(1):1–51.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Camerer C, Babcock L, Loewenstein G, Thaler R (1997) Labor supply of New York City cabdrivers: One day at a time. Quart. J. Econom. 112(2):407–441.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Card D, Dahl GB (2011) Family violence and football: The effect of unexpected emotional cues on violent behavior. Quart. J. Econom. 126(1):103–143.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Connolly M (2008) Here comes the rain again: Weather and the intertemporal substitution of leisure. J. Labor Econom. 26(1):73–100.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Coviello D, Ichino A, Persico N (2014) Time allocation and task juggling. Amer. Econom. Rev. 104(2):609–623.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Coviello D, Ichino A, Persico N (2015) The inefficiency of worker time use. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 13(5):906–947.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Crawford VP, Meng J (2011) New York City cab drivers’ labor supply revisited: Reference-dependent preferences with rational-expectations targets for hours and income. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(5):1912–1932.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Croson R, Gneezy U (2009) Gender differences in preferences. J. Econom. Literature 47(2):448–474.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • De Grip A, Sauermann J (2012) The effects of training on own and co-worker productivity: Evidence from a field experiment. Econom. J. 122(560):376–399.Google Scholar
  • Dohmen T, Falk A, Huffman D, Sunde U, Schupp J, Wagner GG (2011) Individual risk attitudes: Measurement, determinants, and behavioral consequences. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 9(3):522–550.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Farber HS (2005) Is tomorrow another day? The labor supply of New York City cabdrivers. J. Political Econom. 113(1):46–82.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Farber HS (2008) Reference-dependent preferences and labor supply: The case of New York City taxi drivers. Amer. Econom. Rev. 98(3):1069–1082.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fehr E, Goette L (2007) Do workers work more if wages are high? Evidence from a randomized field experiment. Amer. Econom. Rev. 97(1):298–317.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hall RE, Jones CI (1999) Why do some countries produce so much more output per worker than others? Quart. J. Econom. 114(1):83–116.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Herrmann MA, Rockoff JE (2012a) Does menstruation explain gender gaps in work absenteeism? J. Human Resources 47(2):493–508.Google Scholar
  • Herrmann MA, Rockoff JE (2012b) Worker absence and productivity: Evidence from teaching. J. Labor Econom. 30(4):749–782.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Herrmann MA, Rockoff JE (2013) Do menstrual problems explain gender gaps in absenteeism and earnings?: Evidence from the national health interview survey. Labour Econom. 24(October):12–22.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ichino A, Moretti E (2009) Biological gender differences, absenteeism, and the earnings gap. Amer. Econom. J. Appl. Econom. 1(1):183–218.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jett QR, George JM (2003) Work interrupted: A closer look at the role of interruptions in organizational life. Acad. Management Rev. 28(3):494–507.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kovalchik S, Camerer CF, Grether DM, Plott CR, Allman JM (2005) Aging and decision making: A comparison between neurologically healthy elderly and young individuals. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 58(1):79–94.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lee DS (2009) Training, wages, and sample selection: Estimating sharp bounds on treatment effects. Rev. Econom. Stud. 76(3):1071–1102.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Levitt SD, List JA (2009) Field experiments in economics: The past, the present, and the future. Eur. Econom. Rev. 53(1):1–18.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • List JA, Sadoff S, Wagner M (2011) So you want to run an experiment, now what? Some simple rules of thumb for optimal experimental design. Experiment. Econom. 14(4):439–457.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Loewenstein G (2000) Emotions in economic theory and economic behavior. Amer. Econom. Rev. 90(2):426–432.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mandler G (1990) Interruption (discrepancy) theory: Review and extensions. On the Move: The Psychology of Change and Transition (Wiley, Chichester, UK), 13–32.Google Scholar
  • Maniadis Z, Tufano F, List JA (2014) One swallow doesn’t make a summer: New evidence on anchoring effects. Amer. Econom. Rev. 104(1):277–290.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mas A (2006) Pay, reference points, and police performance. Quart. J. Econom. 121(3):783–821.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mas A, Moretti E (2009) Peers at work. Amer. Econom. Rev. 99(1):112–145.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ockenfels A, Sliwka D, Werner P (2015) Bonus payments and reference point violations. Management Sci. 61(7):1496–1513.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Oswald AJ, Proto E, Sgroi D (2015) Happiness and productivity. J. Labor Econom. 33(4):789–822.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Roy DF (1959) Banana time: Job satisfaction and informal interaction. Human Organ. 18(4):158–168.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Spira JB, Feintuch JB (2005) The Cost of Not Paying Attention: How Interruptions Impact Knowledge Worker Productivity (Basex, New York).Google Scholar
  • Syverson C (2011) What determines productivity? J. Econom. Literature 49(2):326–365.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zivin JG, Neidell M (2012) The impact of pollution on worker productivity. Amer. Econom. Rev. 102(7):3652–3673.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zivin JG, Neidell M (2014) Temperature and the allocation of time: Implications for climate change. J. Labor Econom. 32(1):1–26.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.