Designing Incentive Systems for Truthful Forecast Information Sharing Within a Firm

References

• Abdellaoui M, Bleichrodt H, Paraschiv C (2007) Loss aversion under prospect theory: A parameter-free measurement. Management Sci. 53(10):1659–1674.Link, Google Scholar
• Albers S (1996) Optimization models for salesforce compensation. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 89(1):1–17.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ashraf N, Bohnet I, Piankov N (2006) Decomposing trust and trustworthiness. Experiment. Econom. 9(3):193–208.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Balasubramanian S, Bhardwaj P (2004) When not all conflict is bad: Manufacturing-marketing conflict and strategic incentive design. Management Sci. 50(4):489–502.Link, Google Scholar
• Becker-Peth M, Katok E, Thonemann UW (2013) Designing buyback contracts for irrational but predictable newsvendors. Management Sci. 59(8):1800–1816.Link, Google Scholar
• Beer R, Ahn H-S, Leider S (2017) Can trustworthiness in a supply chain be signaled? Management Sci. ePub ahead of print September 13, https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2017.2817.Link, Google Scholar
• Bendoly E, Croson R, Goncalves P, Schultz K (2010) Bodies of knowledge for research in behavioral operations. Production Oper. Management 19(4):434–452.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bostian AA, Holt CA, Smith AM (2008) Newsvendor “pull-to-center” effect: Adaptive learning in a laboratory experiment. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 10(4):590–608.Link, Google Scholar
• Cachon GP (2003) Supply chain coordination with contracts. Graves S, de Kok T, eds. Supply Chain Management, Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science, Vol. 11 (Elsevier, Amsterdam), 229–339.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cachon GP, Larivière MA (2001) Contracting to assure supply: How to share demand forecasts in a supply chain. Management Sci. 47(5):629–646.Link, Google Scholar
• Camerer CF, Loewenstein G (2004) Behavioral economics: Past, present, future. Camerer CF, Loewenstein G, Rabin M, eds. Advances in Behavioral Economics (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ), 3–51.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Camerer C, Weber M (1992) Recent developments in modeling preferences: Uncertainty and ambiguity. J. Risk Uncertainty 5(4):325–370.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Celikbas M, Shanthikumar JG, Swaminathan JM (1999) Coordinating production quantities and demand forecasts through penalty schemes. IIE Trans. 31(9):851–864.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Charness G, Dufwenberg M (2006) Promises and partnership. Econometrica 74(6):1579–1601.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen F (2003) Information sharing and supply chain coordination. Supply Chain Management, Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science, Vol. 11 (Elsevier, Amsterdam),341–421.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen F (2005) Salesforce incentives, market information and production/inventory planning. Management Sci. 51(1):60–75.Link, Google Scholar
• Chen F, Lai G, Xiao W (2016) Provision of incentives for information acquisition: Forecast-based contracts vs. menus of linear contracts. Management Sci. 62(7):1899–1914.Link, Google Scholar
• Cohen MA, Ho TH, Ren ZJ, Terwiesch C (2003) Measuring imputed cost in the semiconductor equipment supply chain. Management Sci. 49(12):1653–1670.Link, Google Scholar
• Cooper DJ, Kagel JH (2016) Other regarding preferences: A selective survey of experimental results. Kagel JH, Roth AE, eds. Handbook of Experimental Economics, Vol. 2 (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ), 217–289.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crawford VP (2003) Lying for strategic advantage: Rational and boundedly rational misrepresentation of intentions. Amer. Econom. Rev. 93(1):133–149.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Croson R, Schultz K, Siemsen E, Yeo ML (2013) Behavioral operations: The state of the field. J. Oper. Management 31(1–2):1–5.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cui R, Allon G, Bassamboo A, Van Mieghem JA (2015) Information sharing in supply chains: An empirical and theoretical valuation. Management Sci. 61(11):2803–2824.Link, Google Scholar
• Cui TH, Raju JS, Zhang ZJ (2007) Fairness and channel coordination. Management Sci. 53(8):1303–1314.Link, Google Scholar
• Dershem B (2007) Financial incentives improve the supply chain: Heineken’s journey. J. Bus. Forecast. 26(1):32–37.Google Scholar
• Ebrahim-Khanjari N, Hopp W, Iravani SMR (2012) Trust and information sharing in supply chains. Production Oper. Management 21(3):444–464.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eichberger J, Kelsey D, Schipper BC (2008) Granny versus game theorist: Ambiguity in experimental games. Theory Decision 64(2–3):333–362.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eliashberg J, Steinberg R (1993) Marketing-production joint decision-making. Eliashberg J, Lilien GL, eds. Marketing, Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science, Vol. 5 (Elsevier, Amsterdam), 827–880.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ellsberg D (1961) Risk, ambiguity, and the savage axioms. Quart. J. Econom. 75(4):643–669.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Erat S, Gneezy U (2012) White lies. Management Sci. 58(4):723–733.Link, Google Scholar
• Fehr E, Falk A (2002) Psychological foundations of incentives. Eur. Econom. Rev. 46(4–5):687–724.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fudenberg D, Tirole J (1991) Game Theory (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Gaur V, Giloni A, Seshadri S (2005) Information sharing in a supply chain under ARMA demand. Management Sci. 51(6):961–969.Link, Google Scholar
• Gibbons R (2005) Incentives between firms (and within). Management Sci. 51(1):2–17.Link, Google Scholar
• Gino F, Pisano G (2008) Toward a theory of behavioral operations. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 10(4):676–691.Link, Google Scholar
• Gneezy U (2005) Deception: The role of consequences. Amer. Econom. Rev. 95(1):384–394.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gneezy U, Rockenbach B, Serra-Garcia M (2013) Measuring lying aversion. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 93:293–300.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gonik J (1978) Tie salesmen’s bonuses to their forecasts. Harvard Bus. Rev. 56(3):116–123.Google Scholar
• Gümüş M (2014) With or without forecast sharing: Competition and credibility under information asymmetry. Production Oper. Management 23(10):1732–1747.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heath C, Larrick RP, Wu G (1999) Goals as reference points. Cognitive Psychol. 38(1):79–109.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ho TH, Zhang J (2008) Designing pricing contracts for boundedly rational customers: Does the framing of the fixed fee matter? Management Sci. 54(4):686–700.Link, Google Scholar
• Ho TH, Lim N, Cui TH (2010) Reference dependence in multilocation newsvendor models: A structural analysis. Management Sci. 56(11):1891–1910.Link, Google Scholar
• Ho TH, Su X, Wu Y (2014) Distributional and peer-induced fairness in supply chain contract design. Production Oper. Management 23(2):161–175.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hurkens S, Kartik N (2009) Would I lie to you? On social preferences and lying aversion. Experiment. Econom. 12(2):180–192.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hyndman K, Kraiselburd S, Watson N (2013) Aligning capacity decisions in supply chains when demand forecasts are private information: Theory and experiment. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 15(1):102–117.Link, Google Scholar
• Inderfurth K, Sadrieh A, Voigt G (2013) The impact of information sharing on supply chain performance under asymmetric information. Production Oper. Management 22(2):410–425.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Tversky A (1979) Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47(2):263–291.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Knetsch JL, Thaler RH (1990) Experimental tests of the endowment effect and the Coase theorem. J. Political Econom. 98(6):1325–1348.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kartik N, Ottaviani M, Squintani F (2007) Credulity, lies, and costly talk. J. Econom. Theory 134(1):93–116.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Katok E (2011) Using laboratory experiments to build better operations management models. Foundations Trends Tech., Inform Oper. Management 5(1):1–86.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Katok E, Pavlov V (2013) Fairness in supply chain contracts: A laboratory study. J. Oper. Management 31(3):129–137.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Katok E, Wu DY (2009) Contracting in supply chains: A laboratory investigation. Management Sci. 55(12):1953–1968.Link, Google Scholar
• Katok E, Olsen T, Pavlov V (2014) Wholesale pricing under mild and privately known concerns for fairness. Production Oper. Management 23(2):285–302.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kelsey D, le Roux S (2015) An experimental study on the effect of ambiguity in a coordination game. Theory Decision 79(4):667–688.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kerr S (1975) On the folly of rewarding A, while hoping for B. Acad. Management J. 18(4):769–783.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kőszegi B, Rabin M (2006) A model of reference-dependent preferences. Quart. J. Econom. 121(4):1133–1165.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kremer M, Minner S, Van Wassenhove LN (2014) On the preference to avoid ex post inventory errors. Production Oper. Management 23(5):773–787.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lawrence M, O’Connor M (2005) Judgmental forecasting in the presence of loss functions. Internat. J. Forecast. 21(1):3–14.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lazear EP (2000) Performance pay and productivity. Amer. Econom. Rev. 90(5):1346–1361.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li L, Zhang H (2008) Confidentiality and information sharing in supply chain coordination. Management Sci. 54(8):1467–1481.Link, Google Scholar
• Lindstrom MJ, Bates D (1990) Nonlinear mixed effects models for repeated measures data. Biometrics 46(3):673–687.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Loch CH, Wu Y (2008) Social preferences and supply chain performance: An experimental study. Management Sci. 54(11):1835–1849.Link, Google Scholar
• López-Pérez R, Spiegelman E (2013) Why do people tell the truth? Experimental evidence for pure lie aversion. Experiment. Econom. 16(3):233–247.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lundquist T, Ellingsen T, Gribbe E, Johannesson M (2009) The aversion to lying. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 70(1):81–92.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mailath GJ, von Thadden EL (2013) Incentive compatibility and differentiability: New results and classic applications. J. Econom. Theory 148(5):1841–1861.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mantrala LK, Raman K (1990) Analysis of a sales force incentive plan for accurate sales forecasting and performance. Internat. J. Res. Marketing 7(2):189–202.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McKenzie J (2011) Mean absolute percentage error and bias in economic forecasting. Econom. Lett. 113(3):259–262.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mishra BK, Raghunathan S, Yue X (2007) Information sharing in supply chains: Incentives for information distortion. IIE Trans. 39(9):863–877.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ockenfels A, Sliwka D, Werner P (2015) Bonus payments and reference point violations. Management Sci. 61(7):1496–1513.Link, Google Scholar
• Oliva R, Watson N (2009) Managing functional biases in organizational forecasts: A case study of consensus forecasting in supply chain planning. Production Oper. Management 18(2):138–151.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Özer Ö, Uncu O (2013) Competing on time: An integrated framework to optimize dynamic time-to-market and production decisions. Production Oper. Management 22(3):473–488.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Özer Ö, Wei W (2006) Strategic commitments for an optimal capacity decision under asymmetric forecast information. Management Sci. 52(8):1238–1257.Link, Google Scholar
• Özer Ö, Zheng Y (2017) Establishing trust and trustworthiness for supply chain information sharing. Ha AY, Tang CS, eds. Handbook of Information Exchange in Supply Chain Management, Springer Series in Supply Chain Management, Vol. 5 (Springer International Publishing, Cham, Switzerland), 287–312.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Özer Ö, Subramanian U, Wang Y (2018) Information sharing, advice provision, or delegation: What leads to higher trust and trustworthiness? Management Sci. 64(1):474–493.Link, Google Scholar
• Özer Ö, Zheng Y, Chen KY (2011) Trust in forecast information sharing. Management Sci. 57(6):1111–1137.Link, Google Scholar
• Özer Ö, Zheng Y, Ren Y (2014) Trust, trustworthiness, and information sharing in supply chains bridging China and the United States. Management Sci. 60(10):2435–2460.Link, Google Scholar
• Pinheiro J, Bates D (2000) Mixed-Effects Models in S and S-PLUS (Springer, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pinheiro J, Bates D, DebRoy S, Sarkar D, R Core Team (2017) nlme: Linear and nonlinear mixed effects models. R package version 3.1-131. Accessed March 12, 2017, https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=nlme.Google Scholar
• Prendergast C (1999) The provision of incentives in firms. J. Econom. Literature 37(1):7–63.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pulford BD, Colman AM (2007) Ambiguous games: Evidence for strategic ambiguity aversion. Quart. J. Experiment. Psychol. 60(8):1083–1100.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rabin M (1998) Psychology and economics. J. Econom. Literature 36(1):11–46.Google Scholar
• Reese S (2001) The human aspects of collaborative forecasting. J. Bus. Forecasting Methods Systems 19(4):3–9.Google Scholar
• Ren ZJ, Cohen MA, Ho TH, Terwiesch C (2010) Information sharing in a long-term supply chain relationship: The role of customer review strategy. Oper. Res. 58(1):81–93.Link, Google Scholar
• Schweitzer ME, Cachon GP (2000) Decision bias in the newsvendor problem with a known demand distribution: Experimental evidence. Management Sci. 46(3):404–420.Link, Google Scholar
• Shapiro BP (1977) Can marketing and manufacturing coexist? Harvard Bus. Rev. 55(5):104–114.Google Scholar
• Shin H, Tunca TI (2010) Do firms invest in forecasting efficiently? The effect of competition on demand forecast investments and supply chain coordination. Oper. Res. 58(6):1592–1610.Link, Google Scholar
• Sobel J (2009) Signaling games. Meyers RA, ed. Encyclopedia of Complexity and Systems Science (Springer, New York), 8125–8139.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Terwiesch C, Ren ZJ, Ho T-H, Cohen MA (2005) An empirical analysis of forecast sharing in the semiconductor equipment supply chain. Management Sci. 51(2):208–220.Link, Google Scholar
• Thaler RH (1985) Mental accounting and consumer choice. Marketing Sci. 4(3):199–214.Link, Google Scholar
• Thaler RH (1999) Mental accounting matters. J. Behav. Decision Making 12(3):183–206.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Turner R, Lasserre C, Beauchet P (2007) Innovation in field force bonuses: Enhancing motivation through a structured process-based approach. J. Medical Marketing 7(2):126–135.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vanberg C (2008) Why do people keep their promises? An experimental test of two explanations. Econometrica 76(6):1467–1480.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Voigt G, Inderfurth K (2012) Supply chain coordination with information sharing in the presence of trust and trustworthiness. IIE Trans. 44(8):637–654.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Donohue K, Cui TH (2016) Contract preferences and performance for the loss-averse supplier: Buyback vs. revenue sharing. Management Sci. 62(6):1734–1754.Link, Google Scholar