Get in Line: Chapter 11 Restructuring in Crowded Bankruptcy Courts

References

• Agarwal S, Amromin G, Ben-David I, Chomsisengphet S, Piskorski T, Seru A (2017) Policy intervention in debt renegotiation: Evidence from the home affordable modification program. J. Political Econom. 125(3):654–712.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aghion P, Hart O, Moore J (1992) The economics of bankruptcy reform. J. Law, Econom., Organ. 8(3):523–546.Google Scholar
• Andrade G, Kaplan SN (1998) How costly is financial (not economic) distress? Evidence from highly leveraged transactions that became distressed. J. Finance 53(5):1443–1493.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baird DG (1986) The uneasy case for corporate reorganizations. J. Legal Stud. 15(1):127–147.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baird DG, Rasmussen RK (2002) The end of bankruptcy. Stanford Law Rev. 55(3):751–789.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Becker B, Stromberg P (2012) Fiduciary duties and equity-debtholder conflicts. Rev. Financial Stud. 25(6):1931–1969.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bermant G, Lombard PA, Wiggins EC (1991) A day in the life: The federal judicial center’s 1988–1989 bankruptcy court time study. Amer. Bankruptcy Law J. 65:491–524.Google Scholar
• Bernhardt D, Nosal E (2004) Near-sighted justice. J. Finance 59(6):2655–2685.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bernstein S, Colonnelli E, Iverson B (2017) Asset allocation in bankruptcy. Working paper, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bertrand M, Duflo E, Mullainathan S (2004) How much should we trust differences-in-differences estimates? Quart. J. Econom. 119(1):249–275.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bharath ST, Panchapegesan V, Werner IM (2010) The changing nature of Chapter 11. Working Paper Series 2008-4, Arizona State University, Tempe.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bolton P, Scharfstein DS (1996) Optimal debt structure and the number of creditors. J. Political Econom. 104(1):1–25.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bris A, Welch I, Zhu N (2006) The costs of bankruptcy: Chapter 7 liquidation versus Chapter 11 reorganization. J. Finance 61(3):1253–1303.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Campbell JY, Giglio S, Pathak P (2011) Forced sales and house prices. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(August):2108–2131.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chang T, Schoar A (2013) Judge specific differences in Chapter 11 and firm outcomes. Working paper, University of Southern California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
• Cohen L, Lou D (2012) Complicated firms. J. Financial Econom. 104(2):383–400.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coviello D, Ichino A, Persico N (2014) Time allocation and task juggling. Amer. Econom. Rev. 104(2):609–623.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisfeldt AL, Rampini Aa (2006) Capital reallocation and liquidity. J. Monetary Econom. 53(3):369–399.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Elkamhi R, Ericsson J, Parsons CA (2012) The cost and timing of financial distress. J. Financial Econom. 105(1):62–81.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fan W, White MJ (2003) Personal bankruptcy and the level of entrepreneurial activity. J. Law Econom. 46(October):543–567.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fich EM, Shivdasani A (2006) Are busy boards effective monitors? J. Finance 61(2):689–724.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Franks JR, Torous WN (1989) An empirical investigation of U.S. firms in reorganization. J. Finance 44(3):747–770.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Franks JR, Nyborg KG, Torous WN (1996) A comparison of US, UK and German insolvency codes. Financial Management 25(3):86–101.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Friendly HJ (1973) Averting the flood by lessening the flow. Cornell Law Rev. 59(4):634–657.Google Scholar
• Gennaioli N, Rossi S (2010) Judicial discretion in corporate bankruptcy. Rev. Financial Stud. 23(11):4078–4114.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gertner R, Scharfstein DS (1991) A theory of workouts and the effects of reorganization law. J. Finance 46(4):1189–1222.Google Scholar
• Gilson SC (1997) Transactions costs and capital structure choice: Evidence from financially distressed firms. J. Finance 52(1):161–196.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ginsburg RB (1983) Reflections on the independence, good behavior, and workload of federal judges. Univ. Colorado Law Rev. 55(1):1–20.Google Scholar
• Hart O (2000) Different approaches to bankruptcy. NBER Working Paper 7921, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hirshleifer D, Teoh SH (2003) Limited attention, information disclosure, and financial reporting. J. Accounting Econom. 36(1–3):337–386.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hong H, Stein JC (1999) A unified theory of underreaction, momentum trading, and overreaction in asset markets. J. Finance 54(6):2143–2184.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hotchkiss ES (1995) Postbankruptcy performance and management turnover. J. Finance 50(1):3–21.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hotchkiss ES, John K, Mooradian RM, Thorburn KS (2008) Bankruptcy and resolution of financial distress. Eckbo BE, ed. Handbook of Corporate Finance: Empirical Corporate Finance, Vol. 2, Chap. 14 (North-Holland, Amsterdam), 236–287.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huang BI (2011) Lightened scrutiny. Harvard Law Rev. 124(5):1109–1152.Google Scholar
• Ichino A, Polo M, Rettore E (2003) Are judges biased by labor market conditions? Eur. Econom. Rev. 47(5):913–944.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jex SM (1998) Stress and Job Performance: Theory, Research, and Implications for Managerial Practice (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• LoPucki LM (2005) Courting Failure: How Competition for Big Cases Is Corrupting the Bankruptcy Courts (The University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor).Crossref, Google Scholar
• LoPucki LM, Kalin SD (2001) The failure of public company bankruptcies in delaware and New York: Empirical evidence of a “race to the bottom.” Vanderbilt Law Rev. 54(2):231–282.Google Scholar
• Morrison ER (2007) Bankruptcy decision making: An empirical study of continuation bias in small-business bankruptcies. J. Law Econom. 50(2):381–419.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Petersen MA, Rajan RG (1994) The benefits of lending relationships: Evidence from small business data. J. Finance 49(1):3–37.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ponticelli J, Alencar L (2016) Court enforcement and firm productivity: Evidence from a bankruptcy reform in Brazil. Quart. J. Econom. 131(3):1365–1413.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pulvino TC (1998) Do asset fire sales exist? An empirical investigation of commercial aircraft transactions. J. Finance 53(3):939–978.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pulvino TC (1999) Effects of bankruptcy court protection on asset sales. J. Financial Econom. 52(2):151–186.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shleifer A, Vishny RW (1992) Liquidation values and debt capacity: A market equilibrium approach. J. Finance 47(4):1343–1366.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stromberg P (2000) Conflicts of interest and market illiquidity in bankruptcy auctions: Theory and tests. J. Finance 55(6):2641–2692.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thorburn KS (2000) Bankruptcy auctions: Costs, debt recovery, and firm survival. J. Financial Econom. 58(3):337–368.Crossref, Google Scholar
• United States Courts (2011) Bankruptcy basics. Last accessed August 12, 2017, http://www.uscourts.gov/services-forms/bankruptcy/bankruptcy-basics.Google Scholar
• U.S. Government Accountability Office (2008) Bankruptcy reform: Dollar costs associated with the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005. Report to Congressional requesters, GAO 08-697, U.S. Government Accountability Office, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Warner JB (1977) Bankruptcy costs: Some evidence. J. Finance 32(2):337–347.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weiss LA, Wruck KH (1998) Information problems, conflicts of interest, and asset stripping: Chapter 11’s failure in the case of Eastern Airlines. J. Financial Econom. 48(1):55–97.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wolf AR, Charles SK, Lees AB (2010) Recent developments in Bankruptcy Code Section 363. Rev. Banking Financial Services 26(8):77–86.Google Scholar