Complementarity of Signals in Early-Stage Equity Investment Decisions: Evidence from a Randomized Field Experiment

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2017.2833

References

  • Aral S, Walker D (2014) Tie strength, embeddedness, and social influence: A large-scale networked experiment. Management Sci. 60(6):1352–1370.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ahlers GC, Cumming D, Günther C, Schweizer D (2015) Signaling in equity crowdfunding. Entrepreneurship Theory Practice 39(4):955–980.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Asch SE (1956) Studies of independence and conformity: I. A minority of one against a unanimous majority. Psych. Monographs General Appl. 70(9):1–70.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Azoulay P, Stuart T, Wang Y (2014) Matthew: Effect or fable? Management Sci. 60(1):92–109.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bapna R, Ramaprasad J, Shmueli G, Umyarov A (2016) One-way mirrors in online dating: A randomized field experiment. Management Sci. 62(11):3100–3122.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Barnett C (2013) Top 10 crowdfunding sites for fundraising. Forbes (May 8), https://www.forbes.com/sites/chancebarnett/2013/05/08/top-10-crowdfunding-sites-for-fundraising/#1610cdf23850.Google Scholar
  • Benjamin BA, Podolny JM (1999) Status, quality, and social order in the California wine industry. Admin. Sci. Quart. 44(3):563–589.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bernstein S, Korteweg A, Laws K (2017) Attracting early-stage investors: Evidence from a randomized field experiment. J. Finance 72(2):509–538.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bikhchandani S, Hirshleifer D, Welch I (1998) Learning from the behavior of others: Conformity, fads, and informational cascades. J. Econom. Perspect. 12(3):151–170.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bouquet C, Birkinshaw J (2008) Weight versus voice: How foreign subsidiaries gain attention from corporate headquarters. Acad. Management J. 51(3):577–601.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brynjolfsson E, Saunders A (2009) Wired for Innovation: How Information Technology Is Reshaping the Economy (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bruton G, Khavul S, Siegel D, Wright M (2015) New financial alternatives in seeding entrepreneurship: Microfinance, crowdfunding, and peer-to-peer innovations. Entrepreneurship Theory Practice 39(1):9–26.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burtch G, Ghose A, Wattal S (2013) An empirical examination of the antecedents and consequences of contribution patterns in crowd-funded markets. Inform. Systems Res., 24(3):499–519.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Burtch G, Ghose A, Wattal S (2014) Cultural differences and geography as determinants of online pro-social lending. MIS Quart. 38(3):773–794.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burtch G, Ghose A, Wattal S (2015) The hidden cost of accommodating crowdfunder privacy preferences: A randomized field experiment. Management Sci. 61(5):949–962.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chambers JM, Cleveland WS, Kleiner B, Tukey PA (1983) Graphical Methods for Data Analysis. (Wadsworth & Brooks/Cole, Pacific Grove, CA).Google Scholar
  • Chen Y, Wang Q, Xie J (2011) Online social interactions: A natural experiment on word of mouth versus observational learning. J. Marketing Res. 48(2):238–254.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chen XP, Yao X, Kotha S (2009) Entrepreneur passion and preparedness in business plan presentations: A persuasion analysis of venture capitalists’ funding decisions. Acad. Management J. 52(1):199–214.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Colombo MG, Franzoni C, Rossi-Lamastra C (2014) Internal social capital and the attraction of early contributions in crowdfunding. Entrepreneurship Theory Practice 39(1):75–100.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Connelly BL, Certo ST, Ireland RD, Reutzel CR (2011) Signaling theory: A review and assessment. J. Management 37(1):39–67.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Davison AC, Hinkley DV (1997) Bootstrap Methods and Their Application, Vol. 1 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • De Clercq D, Fried VH, Lehtonen O, Sapienza HJ (2006) An entrepreneur’s guide to the venture capital galaxy. Acad. Management Perspect. 20(3):90–112.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Federal Aviation Administration (2015) Fact Sheet—Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS). (February 15), https://www.faa.gov/news/fact_sheets/news_story.cfm?newsId=18297.Google Scholar
  • Fried VH, Hisrich RD (1994) Toward a model of venture capital investment decision making. Financial Management 23(3):28–37.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gerber AS, Rogers T (2009) Descriptive social norms and motivation to vote: Everybody’s voting and so should you. J. Politics 71(1):178–191.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goldstein NJ, Cialdini RB, Griskevicius V (2008) A room with a viewpoint: Using social norms to motivate environmental conservation in hotels. J. Consumer Res. 35(3):472–482.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Griskevicius V, Goldstein NJ, Mortensen CR, Cialdini RB, Kenrick DT (2006) Going along versus going alone: When fundamental motives facilitate strategic (non)conformity. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 91(2):281–294.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Haunschild PR (1994) How much is that company worth? Interorganizational relationships, uncertainty, and acquisition premiums. Admin. Sci. Quart. 39(3):391–411.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Haunschild PR, Miner AS (1997) Modes of interorganizational imitation: The effects of outcome salience and uncertainty. Admin. Sci. Quart. 42(3):472–500.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hayes-Roth B (1977) Evolution of cognitive structures and processes. Psych. Rev. 84(3):260–278.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Higgins MC, Gulati R (2006) Stacking the deck: The effects of top management backgrounds on investor decisions. Strategic Management J. 27(1):1–25.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Higgins MJ, Stephan PE, Thursby JG (2011) Conveying quality and value in emerging industries: Star scientists and the role of signals in biotechnology. Res. Policy 40(4):605–617.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jones EE, Nisbett RE (1971) The actor and the observer: Divergent perceptions of the causes of behavior. Jones EE, Nisbett RE, eds. Attribution: Perceiving the Causes of Behavior (General Learning Press, Morristown, NJ), 79–94.Google Scholar
  • King AA, Lenox MJ, Terlaak A (2005) The strategic use of decentralized institutions: Exploring certification with the ISO 14001 management standard. Acad. Management J. 48(6):1091–1106.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kirsch D, Goldfarb B, Gera A (2009) Form or substance: The role of business plans in venture capital decision making. Strategic Management J. 30(5):487–515.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lin M, Viswanathan S (2015) Home bias in online investments: An empirical study of an online crowdfunding market. Management Sci. 62(5):1393–1414.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Liu D, Brass D, Lu Y, Chen D (2015) Friendships in online peer-to-peer lending: Pipes, prisms, and relational herding. MIS Quart. 39(3):729–742.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • MacMillan IC, Siegel R, Narasimha PS (1985) Criteria used by venture capitalists to evaluate new venture proposals. J. Bus. Venturing 1(1):119–128.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • MacMillan IC, Zemann L, Subbanarasimha PN (1987) Criteria distinguishing successful from unsuccessful ventures in the venture screening process. J. Bus. Venturing 2(2):123–137.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Manzi J (2012) Uncontrolled: The Surprising Payoff of Trial-and-Error for Business, Politics, and Society (Basic Books. New York).Google Scholar
  • Massolution (2015) 2015CF Crowdfunding industry report. Accessed June 2015, http://reports.crowdsourcing.org/index.php?route=product/product&product_id=54.Google Scholar
  • Mason CM, Harrison RT (2003) “Auditioning for money” what do technology investors look for at the initial screening stage? J. Private Equity 6(2):29–42.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mollick E (2014) The dynamics of crowdfunding: An exploratory study. J. Bus. Venturing 29(1):1–16.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mollick ER, Nanda R (2016) Wisdom or madness? Comparing crowds with expert evaluation in funding the arts. Management Sci. 62(6):1533–1553.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Moreau CP, Lehmann DR, Markman AB (2001) Entrenched knowledge structures and consumer response to new products. J. Marketing Res. 38(1):14–29.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Novick LR (1988) Analogical transfer, problem similarity, and expertise. J. Experiment. Psych. Learn. Memory Cognition 14(3):510–520.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Petty JS, Gruber M (2011) “In pursuit of the real deal”: A longitudinal study of VC decision making. J. Bus. Venturing 26(2):172–188.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Plummer LA, Allison TH, Connelly BL (2015) Better together? Signaling interactions in new venture pursuit of initial external capital. Acad. Management J. 59(5):1585–1604.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Podolny J (1993) A status-based model of market competition. Amer. J. Sociol. 98(4):829–872.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Podolny JM, Scott Morton FM (1999) Social status, entry and predation: The case of British shipping cartels 1879–1929. J. Indust. Econom. 47(1):41–67.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Podolny JM, Stuart TE (1995) A role-based ecology of technological change. Amer. J. Sociol. 100(5):1224–1260.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rindova VP, Williamson IO, Petkova AP, Sever JM (2005) Being good or being known: An empirical examination of the dimensions, antecedents, and consequences of organizational reputation. Acad. Management J. 48(6):1033–1049.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Salganik MJ, Watts DJ (2008) Leading the herd astray: An experimental study of self-fulfilling prophecies in an artificial cultural market. Soc. Psych. Quart. 71(4):338–355.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schwenk CR (1984) Cognitive simplification processes in strategic decision making. Strategic Management J. 5(2):111–128.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Spence M (1974) Market Signaling (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Stern I, Dukerich JM, Zajac E (2014) Unmixed signals: How reputation and status affect alliance formation. Strategic Management J. 35(4):512–531.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stuart TE (2000) Interorganizational alliances and the performance of firms: A study of growth and innovation rates in a high-technology industry. Strategic Management J. 21(8):791–811.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stuart TE, Hoang H, Hybels RC (1999) Interorganizational endorsements and the performance of entrepreneurial ventures. Admin. Sci. Quart. 44(2):315–349.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Terlaak A, King AA (2006) The effect of certification with the ISO 9000 quality management standard: A signaling approach. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 60(4):579–602.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Timmons JA, Spinelli S (2003) New Venture Creation: Entrepreneurship for the 21st Century. 6th ed. (McGraw-Hill/Irwin, New York).Google Scholar
  • Timmons JA, Muzyka DF, Stevenson HH, Bygrave WD (1987) Opportunity recognition: The core of entrepreneurship. Frontiers Entrepreneurship Res. 7(2):109–123.Google Scholar
  • Tyebjee TT, Bruno AV (1984) A model of venture capitalist investment activity. Management Sci. 30(9):1051–1066.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Zacharakis AL, Meyer GD (1998) A lack of insight: Do venture capitalists really understand their own decision process? J. Bus. Venturing 13(1):57–76.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zieffler AS, Harring JR, Long JD (2011) Comparing Groups: Randomization and Bootstrap Methods Using R (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zhang J (2010) The sound of silence: Observational learning in the US kidney market. Marketing Sci. 29(2):315–335.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Zhang J, Liu P (2012) Rational herding in microloan markets. Management Sci. 58(5):892–912.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Zott C, Huy QN (2007) How entrepreneurs use symbolic management to acquire resources. Admin. Sci. Quart. 52(1):70–105.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.