Decentralized Clearing in Financial Networks

References

• Acemoglu D, Ozdaglar A, Tahbaz-Salehi A (2015) Systemic risk and stability in financial networks. Amer. Econom. Rev. 105(2):564–608.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Balinski ML, Young HP (1975) The quota method of apportionment. Amer. Math. Monthly 82(7):701–730.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Balinski ML, Young HP (2010) Fair Representation: Meeting the Ideal of One Man, One Vote (Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
• Biró P, Kóczy LÁ, Balázs S (2015) Fair apportionment in the view of the Venice commission’s recommendation. Math. Soc. Sci. 77(September):32–41.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bjørndal E, Jörnsten K (2010) Flow sharing and bankruptcy games. Internat. J. Game Theory 39(1–2):11–28.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown JR (1979) The sharing problem. Oper. Res. 27(2):324–340.Link, Google Scholar
• Capponi A, Chen P-C, Yao DD (2016) Liability concentration and systemic losses in financial networks. Oper. Res. 64(5):1121–1134.Link, Google Scholar
• Chen S (2015) Systematic favorability in claims problems with indivisibilities. Soc. Choice Welfare 44(2):283–300.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen C, Iyengar G, Moallemi CC (2013) An axiomatic approach to systemic risk. Management Sci. 59(6):1373–1388.Link, Google Scholar
• Cifuentes R, Ferrucci G, Shin HS (2005) Liquidity risk and contagion. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 3(2/3):556–566.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Csóka P, Herings PJ-J (2017) An axiomatization of the proportional rule in financial networks. GSBE Research Memorandum 17/001, Graduate School of Business and Economics, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.Google Scholar
• Demange G (2018) Contagion in financial networks: A threat index. Management Sci. 64(2):955–970.Link, Google Scholar
• Dur UM, Ünver MU (2016) Two-sided matching via balanced exchange: Tuition and worker exchanges. Working paper, North Carolina State University, Raleigh.Google Scholar
• Eisenberg L, Noe TH (2001) Systemic risk in financial systems. Management Sci. 47(2):236–249.Link, Google Scholar
• Elliott M, Golub B, Jackson MO (2014) Financial networks and contagion. Amer. Econom. Rev. 104(10):3115–3153.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Elsinger H, Lehar A, Summer M (2006) Risk assessment for banking systems. Management Sci. 52(9):1301–1314.Link, Google Scholar
• Franken SM (2014) Cross-border insolvency law: A comparative institutional analysis. Oxford J. Legal Stud. 34(1):97–131.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gai P, Kapadia S (2010) Contagion in financial networks. Proc. Roy. Soc. London A: Math. Phys. Engrg. Sci. 466(2120):2401–2423.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Glasserman P, Young HP (2015) How likely is contagion in financial networks? J. Banking Finance 50(January):383–399.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grimmett GR (2012) European apportionment via the Cambridge compromise. Math. Soc. Sci. 63(2):68–73.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Groote Schaarsberg M, Reijnierse H, Borm P (2013) On solving liability problems. CentER Discussion Paper 2013-033, Center for Economic Research, Tilburg University, Tilburg, Netherlands.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Herrero C, Martínez R (2008) Balanced allocation methods for claims problems with indivisibilities. Soc. Choice Welfare 30(4):603–617.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kaminski MM (2000) “Hydraulic” rationing. Math. Soc. Sci. 40(2):131–155.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Luss H (2012) Equitable Resource Allocation: Models, Algorithms and Applications (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Malhotra N, Raso C (2007) Racial representation and U.S. Senate apportionment. Soc. Sci. Quart. 88(4):1038–1048.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moulin H (2000) Priority rules and other asymmetric rationing methods. Econometrica 68(3):643–684.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moulin H, Sethuraman J (2013) The bipartite rationing problem. Oper. Res. 61(5):1087–1100.Link, Google Scholar
• Moulin H, Stong R (2002) Fair queuing and other probabilistic allocation methods. Math. Oper. Res. 27(1):1–30.Link, Google Scholar
• O’Neill B (1982) A problem of rights arbitration from the Talmud. Math. Soc. Sci. 2(4):345–371.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pukelsheim F (2014) Proportional Representation: Apportionment Methods and Their Applications (Springer, Berlin).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rogers LCG, Veraart LAM (2013) Failure and rescue in an interbank network. Management Sci. 59(4):882–898.Link, Google Scholar
• Shin HS (2008) Risk and liquidity in a system context. J. Financial Intermediation 17(3):315–329.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tarski A (1955) A lattice-theoretical fixpoint theorem and its applications. Pacific J. Math. 5(2):285–309.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thomson W (2003) Axiomatic and game-theoretic analysis of bankruptcy and taxation problems: A survey. Math. Soc. Sci. 45(3):249–297.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thomson W (2013) Game-theoretic analysis of bankruptcy and taxation problems: Recent advances. Internat. Game Theory Rev. 15(3):1–14.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thomson W (2015) Axiomatic and game-theoretic analysis of bankruptcy and taxation problems: An update. Math. Soc. Sci. 74(March):41–59.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Young HP (1994) Equity: Theory and Practice (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar