Does Pay Activism Pay Off for Shareholders? Shareholder Democracy and Its Discontents

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2017.2854

References

  • Bainbridge S (2005) The case for limited shareholder voting rights. UCLA Law Rev. 601.Google Scholar
  • Bebchuk LA, Fried JM (2005) Pay without performance: Overview of the issues. J. Appl. Corporate Finance 17(4):8–23.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bertrand M, Mullainathan S (2003) Enjoying the quiet life? Corporate governance and managerial preferences. J. Political Econom. 111(5):1043–1075.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bolton P, Scheinkman J, Xiong W (2006) Pay for short-term performance: Executive compensation in speculative markets. NBER Working Paper 12107, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cai J, Walkling R (2011) Shareholders’ say on pay: Does it create value? J. Financial Quant. Anal. 46(2):299–339.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cai J, Garner JL, Walkling RA (2009) Electing directors. J. Finance 64(5):2389–2421.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cohn JB, Rajan U (2013) Optimal corporate governance in the presence of an activist investor. Rev. Financial Stud. 26(4):985–1020.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cyert RM, Kang S, Kumar P (2002) Corporate governance, takeovers, and top-management compensation: Theory and evidence. Management Sci. 48(4):453–469.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dasgupta S, Noe T (2017) Does pay activism pay off for shareholders? Shareholder democracy and its discontents. Working paper, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, http://ssrn.com/abstract=1960557.Google Scholar
  • De Angelis D, Grinstein Y (2012) Pay for the right performance. Johnson School Research Paper Series, No. 03-2011, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
  • Del Guercio D, Wallis L, Woidtke T (2008) Do boards pay attention when institutional investors “just vote no”? J. Financial Econom. 90(1):84–103.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eisfeldt AL, Rampini AA (2008) Managerial incentives, capital reallocation, and the business cycle. J. Financial Econom. 87(1):177–199.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ertimur Y, Ferri F, Oesch D (2013) Shareholder votes and proxy advisors: Evidence from say on pay. J. Accounting Res. 51(5):951–996.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ferri F, Maber DA (2013) Say on pay votes and CEO compensation: Evidence from the UK. Rev. Finance 17(2):527–563.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fischer PE, Gramlich JD, Miller BP, White HD (2009) Investor perceptions of board performance: Evidence from uncontested director elections. J. Accounting Econom. 48(2):172–189.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fisman R, Khurana R, Rhodes-Kropf M, Yim S (2014) Governance and CEO turnover: Do something or do the right thing? Management Sci. 60(2):319–337.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Grossman SJ, Perry M (1986) Perfect sequential equilibrium. J. Econom. Theory 39(1):97–119.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Harford J (2003) Takeover bids and target directors’ incentives: The impact of a bid on directors’ wealth and board seats. J. Financial Econom. 69(1):51–83.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Iliev P, Lowry M (2015) Are mutual funds active voters? Rev. Financial Stud. 28(2):446–485.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Iliev P, Lowry M, Lins KV, Miller DP, Roth L (2015) Shareholder voting and corporate governance around the world. Rev. Financial Stud. 28(8):2167–2202.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Inderst R, Mueller HM (2010) CEO replacement under private information. Rev. Financial Stud. 23(8):2935–2969.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jensen MC (1993) The modern industrial revolution, exit, and the failure of internal control systems. J. Finance 48(3):831–880.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Krugman P (2002) The outrage constraint. The New York Times (August 23), http://www.nytimes.com/2002/08/23/opinion/the-outrage-constraint.html.Google Scholar
  • Larcker D, McCall A, Ormazabal G (2015) Outsourcing shareholder voting to proxy advisory firms. J. Law Econom. 58(1):173–204.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Levit D, Malenko N (2016) The labor market for directors and externalities in corporate governance. J. Finance 71(2):775–808.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Murphy KJ (2002) Explaining executive compensation: Managerial power versus the perceived cost of stock options. Univ. Chicago Law Rev. 69(3):847–869.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Narayanan MP (1985) Managerial incentives for short-term results. J. Finance 40(5):1469–1484.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Song F, Thakor AV (2006) Information control, career concerns, and corporate governance. J. Finance 61(4):1845–1896.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stein JC (1988) Takeover threats and managerial myopia. J. Political Econom. 96(1):61–80.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Williamson OE (1964) The Economics of Discretionary Behavior: Managerial Objectives in a Theory of the Firm (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.