Does Pay Activism Pay Off for Shareholders? Shareholder Democracy and Its Discontents
Published Online:26 Oct 2017https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2017.2854
References
- (2005) The case for limited shareholder voting rights. UCLA Law Rev. 601.Google Scholar
- (2005) Pay without performance: Overview of the issues. J. Appl. Corporate Finance 17(4):8–23.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2003) Enjoying the quiet life? Corporate governance and managerial preferences. J. Political Econom. 111(5):1043–1075.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2006) Pay for short-term performance: Executive compensation in speculative markets. NBER Working Paper 12107, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2011) Shareholders’ say on pay: Does it create value? J. Financial Quant. Anal. 46(2):299–339.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2009) Electing directors. J. Finance 64(5):2389–2421.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2013) Optimal corporate governance in the presence of an activist investor. Rev. Financial Stud. 26(4):985–1020.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2002) Corporate governance, takeovers, and top-management compensation: Theory and evidence. Management Sci. 48(4):453–469.Link, Google Scholar
- (2017) Does pay activism pay off for shareholders? Shareholder democracy and its discontents. Working paper, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, http://ssrn.com/abstract=1960557.Google Scholar
- (2012) Pay for the right performance. Johnson School Research Paper Series, No. 03-2011, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
- (2008) Do boards pay attention when institutional investors “just vote no”? J. Financial Econom. 90(1):84–103.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2008) Managerial incentives, capital reallocation, and the business cycle. J. Financial Econom. 87(1):177–199.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2013) Shareholder votes and proxy advisors: Evidence from say on pay. J. Accounting Res. 51(5):951–996.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2013) Say on pay votes and CEO compensation: Evidence from the UK. Rev. Finance 17(2):527–563.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2009) Investor perceptions of board performance: Evidence from uncontested director elections. J. Accounting Econom. 48(2):172–189.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2014) Governance and CEO turnover: Do something or do the right thing? Management Sci. 60(2):319–337.Link, Google Scholar
- (1986) Perfect sequential equilibrium. J. Econom. Theory 39(1):97–119.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2003) Takeover bids and target directors’ incentives: The impact of a bid on directors’ wealth and board seats. J. Financial Econom. 69(1):51–83.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2015) Are mutual funds active voters? Rev. Financial Stud. 28(2):446–485.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2015) Shareholder voting and corporate governance around the world. Rev. Financial Stud. 28(8):2167–2202.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2010) CEO replacement under private information. Rev. Financial Stud. 23(8):2935–2969.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1993) The modern industrial revolution, exit, and the failure of internal control systems. J. Finance 48(3):831–880.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2002) The outrage constraint. The New York Times (August 23), http://www.nytimes.com/2002/08/23/opinion/the-outrage-constraint.html.Google Scholar
- (2015) Outsourcing shareholder voting to proxy advisory firms. J. Law Econom. 58(1):173–204.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2016) The labor market for directors and externalities in corporate governance. J. Finance 71(2):775–808.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2002) Explaining executive compensation: Managerial power versus the perceived cost of stock options. Univ. Chicago Law Rev. 69(3):847–869.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1985) Managerial incentives for short-term results. J. Finance 40(5):1469–1484.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2006) Information control, career concerns, and corporate governance. J. Finance 61(4):1845–1896.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1988) Takeover threats and managerial myopia. J. Political Econom. 96(1):61–80.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1964) The Economics of Discretionary Behavior: Managerial Objectives in a Theory of the Firm (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar

