Privacy Protection, Personalized Medicine, and Genetic Testing

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2017.2858

References

  • Adjerid I, Acquisti A, Telang R, Padman R, Adler-Milstein J (2016) The impact of privacy regulation and technology incentives: The case of health information exchanges. Management Sci. 62(4):1042–1063.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Allard J (2016) How gene testing forced me to reveal my private health information. Tonic (May 27), http://www.vice.com/read/how-gene-testing-forced-me-to-reveal-my-private-health-information.Google Scholar
  • Apse KA (2002) Concerns About Genetic Discrimination: Origins and Effects (Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore).Google Scholar
  • Armstrong K, Weber B, FitzGerald G, Hershey JC, Pauly MV, Lemaire J, Subramanian K, Asch DA (2003) Life insurance and breast cancer risk assessment: Adverse selection, genetic testing decisions, and discrimination. Amer. J. Medical Genetics Part A 120(3):359–364.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Aronson SJ, Rehm HL (2015) Building the foundation for genomics in precision medicine. Nature 526(7573):336–342.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Aziz A, Telang R (2016) What is a digital cookie worth? Technical report, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh.Google Scholar
  • Bailey MJ (2006) More power to the pill: The impact of contraceptive freedom on women’s life cycle labor supply. Quart. J. Econom. 121(1):289–320.Google Scholar
  • Baker LC (2001) Managed care and technology adoption in health care: Evidence from magnetic resonance imaging. J. Health Econom. 20(3):395–421.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baker LC, Phibbs CS (2002) Managed care, technology adoption, and health care: The adoption of neonatal intensive care. RAND J. Econom. 33(3):524–548.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Berry RM (1997) The genetic revolution and the physician’s duty of confidentiality. J. Legal Medicine 18(4):401–441.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brandimarte L, Acquisti A, Loewenstein G (2013) Misplaced confidences: Privacy and the control paradox. Soc. Psych. Personality Sci. 4(3):340–347.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ciliberto F (2006) Does organizational form affect investment decisions? J. Indust. Econom. 54(1):63–93.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Collier R (2012) The downside of genetic screening. Canadian Medical Assoc. J. 184(8):862–864.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dusheck J (2016) Stanford Medicine, Google team up to harness power of data science for health care. Stanford Medicine (August 8), http://med.stanford.edu/news/all-news/2016/08/stanford-medicine-google-team-up-to-harness-power-of-data-science.html.Google Scholar
  • Fukuda H, Imanaka Y, Kobuse H, Hayashida K, Murakami G (2009) The subjective incremental cost of informed consent and documentation in hospital care: A multicentre questionnaire survey in Japan. J. Evaluation in Clinical Practice 15(2):234–241.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Funk C, Huff TF (2001) Americans welcome scientific advancements with caution. VCU News (October 4), https://news.vcu.edu/article/Americans_welcome_scientific_advancements_with_caution.Google Scholar
  • Gardner E (2014) Gene swipe: Few DNA labs know whether chromosomes are yours or if you stole them. ABA Journal, http://www.abajournal.com/magazine/article/gene_swipe_few_dna_labs_know_whether_chromosomes_are_yours_or_if_you_stole_/on 10/18/2016.Google Scholar
  • Genetics and Public Policy Center (2007) U.S. public opinion on uses of genetic information and genetic discrimination. Report, Pew Charitable Trusts, http://www.pewtrusts.org/en/research-and-analysis/reports/2007/04/24/us-public-opinion-on-uses-of-genetic-information-and-genetic-discrimination.Google Scholar
  • Goldfarb A, Tucker C (2011a) Privacy regulation and online advertising. Management Sci. 57(1):57–71.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Goldfarb A, Tucker C (2012a) Privacy and innovation. Innovation Policy Econom. 12(1):65–90.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goldfarb A, Tucker C (2012b) Shifts in privacy concerns. Amer. Econom. Rev.: Papers Proc. 102(3):349–353.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goldfarb A, Tucker CE (2011b) Privacy regulation and online advertising. Management Sci. 57(1):57–71.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gostin L (1991) Genetic discrimination: The use of genetically based diagnostic and prognostic tests by employers and insurers. Amer. J. Law Medicine 17(1–2):109–144.Google Scholar
  • Green RC, Annas GJ (2008) The genetic privacy of presidential candidates. New England J. Medicine 359(21):2192–2193.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hartmann LC, Sellers TA, Schaid DJ, Frank TS, Soderberg CL, Sitta DL, Frost MHet al. (2001) Efficacy of bilateral prophylactic mastectomy in BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutation carriers. J. National Cancer Inst. 93(21):1633–1637.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hoadley CM, Xu H, Lee JJ, Rosson MB (2010) Privacy as information access and illusory control: The case of the Facebook news feed privacy outcry. Electronic Commerce Res. Appl. 9(1):50–60.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jolls C (2007) Employment law. Polinsky AM, Shavell S, eds. Handbook of Law and Economics 1st ed., Vol. 2, Chap. 17 (North-Holland, Amsterdam), 1349–1386.Google Scholar
  • King M-C, Wieand S, Hale K, Lee M, Walsh T, Owens K, Tait Jet al. (2001) Tamoxifen and breast cancer incidence among women with inherited mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2: National surgical adjuvant breast and bowel project (nsabp-p1) breast cancer prevention trial. J. Amer. Medical Assoc. 286(18):2251–2256.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Komarova T, Nekipelov D, Yakovlev E (2013) Estimation of treatment effects from combined data: Identification versus data security. Economics of Digitization (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
  • Matloff ET, Shappell H, Brierley K, Bernhardt BA, McKinnon W, Peshkin BN (2000) What would you do? Specialists’ perspectives on cancer genetic testing, prophylactic surgery, and insurance discrimination. J. Clinical Oncology 18(12):2484–2492.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McDonald AM, Cranor LF (2009) The cost of reading privacy policies. I/S: J. Law Policy Inform. Soc. 4(3):543–568.Google Scholar
  • McEwen JE, Reilly PR (1992) State legislative efforts to regulate use and potential misuse of genetic information. Amer. J. Human Genetics 51(3):637–647.Google Scholar
  • McEwen JE, McCarty K, Reilly PR (1993) A survey of medical directors of life insurance companies concerning use of genetic information. Amer. J. Human Genetics 53(1):33–45.Google Scholar
  • Miller AR, Tucker C (2009) Privacy protection and technology diffusion: The case of electronic medical records. Management Sci. 55(7):1077–1093.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Miller AR, Tucker CE (2011a) Can health care information technology save babies? J. Political Econom. 119(2):289–324.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Miller AR, Tucker CE (2011b) Encryption and the loss of patient data. J. Policy Anal. Management 30(3):534–556.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • National Partnership for Women and Families (2004) Faces of genetic discrimination: How genetic discrimination affects real people. Technical report, Coalition for Genetic Fairness, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  • National Research Council (2011) Toward precision medicine: Building a knowledge network for biomedical research and a new taxonomy of disease. Report, National Academies Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  • Natowicz MR, Alper JK, Alper JS (1992) Genetic discrimination and the law. Amer. J. Human Genetics 50(3):465–475.Google Scholar
  • Oster E, Shoulson I, Dorsey E (2013) Optimal expectations and limited medical testing: Evidence from Huntington disease. Amer. Econom. Rev. 103(2):804–830.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Oster E, Shoulson I, Quaid K, Dorsey ER (2010) Genetic adverse selection: Evidence from long-term care insurance and Huntington disease. J. Public Econom. 94(11–12):1041–1050.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ostrer H, Allen W, Crandall LA, Moseley RE, Dewar MA, Nye D, McCrary S (1993) Insurance and genetic testing: Where are we now? Amer. J. Human Genetics 52(3):565–577.Google Scholar
  • Pear R (1997) States pass laws to regulate uses of genetic testing. New York Times (October 18), http://www.nytimes.com/1997/10/18/us/states-pass-laws-to-regulate-uses-of-genetic-testing.html.Google Scholar
  • Phillips AM (2015) Think before you click ordering a genetic test online. Scitech Lawyer 11(2):8–11.Google Scholar
  • Pritts J, White PJ, Daniel J, Posnack S (2009) Privacy and security solutions for interoperable health information exchange: Report on state law requirements for patient permission to disclose health information. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD.Google Scholar
  • Raghupathi W, Raghupathi V (2014) Big data analytics in healthcare: Promise and potential. Health Inform. Sci. Systems 2(1):1–10.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Raphael J, Verma S, Hewitt P, Eisen A (2016) The impact of Angelina Jolie’s story on genetic referral and testing at an academic cancer centre in Canada. J. Genetic Counseling 25(6):1309–1316.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Savitz JB, Ramesar RS (2004) Genetic variants implicated in personality: A review of the more promising candidates. Amer. J. Medical Genetics Part B: Neuropsychiatric Genetics 131(1):20–32.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Strohmenger R, Wambach A (2000) Adverse selection and categorical discrimination in the health insurance markets: The effects of genetic tests. J. Health Econom. 19(2):197–218.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tabarrok A (1994) Genetic testing: An economic and contractarian analysis. J. Health Econom. 13(1):75–91.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tsai JY, Egelman S, Cranor L, Acquisti A (2011) The effect of online privacy information on purchasing behavior: An experimental study. Inform. Systems Res. 22(2):254–268.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • U.S. Department of Labor (1998) Genetic information and the workplace. Report, U.S. Department of Labor, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  • Vorhaus D (2011) Surreptitious genetic testing: A new bill in Texas and the Iowa straw poll. Genomics Law Report (August 12), https://www.genomicslawreport.com/index.php/2011/08/12/surreptitious-genetic-testing-a-new-bill-in-texas-and-the-iowa-straw-poll.Google Scholar
  • Wagner J, Vorhaus D (2012) The burden of enforcing GINA: EEOC v. Nestlé illustrates one challenge in pursuing genetic discrimination claims. Genomics Law Report (June 20), http://www.genomicslawreport.com/index.php/2012/06/20/the-burden-of-enforcing-gina-eeoc-v-nestle-illustrates-one-challenge-in-pursuing-genetic-discrimination-claims/.Google Scholar
  • Yesley MS (1998) Protecting genetic difference. Berkeley Tech. Law J. 13(2):653–665.Google Scholar
  • Zick CD, Smith KR, Mayer RN, Botkin JR (2000) Genetic testing, adverse selection, and the demand for life insurance. Amer. J. Medical Genetics 93(1):29–39.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zick CD, Mathews CJ, Roberts JS, Cook-Deegan R, Pokorski RJ, Green RC (2005) Genetic testing for Alzheimer’s disease and its impact on insurance purchasing behavior. Health Affairs 24(2):483–490.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.