Catastrophe Aversion and Risk Equity in an Interdependent World

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2017.2859

References

  • Adler MD, Hammitt JK, Treich N (2014) The social value of mortality risk reduction: VSL versus the social welfare function approach. J. Health Econom. 35:82–93.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Beale N, Rand DG, Battey H, Croxson K, May RM, Nowak MA (2011) Individual versus systemic risk and the Regulator’s Dilemma. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108(31):12647–12652.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bernard C, Rüschendorf L, Vanduffel S, Yao J (2017) How robust is the value-at-risk of credit risk portfolios? Eur. J. Finance 23(6):507–534.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bommier A, Zuber S (2008) Can preferences for catastrophe avoidance reconcile social discounting with intergenerational equity? Soc. Choice Welfare 31(3):415–434.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bovens L, Fleurbaey M (2012) Evaluating life and deaths prospects. Econom. Philos. 28(2):217–249.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cox LA (2012) Why income inequality indexes do not apply to health risks. Risk Anal. 32(2):192–196.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Embrechts P, McNeil A, Straumann D (2002) Correlation and dependence in risk management: properties and pitfalls. Dempster M, ed. Risk Management: Value at Risk and Beyond (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 176–223.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Epstein LG, Tanny SM (1980) Increasing generalized correlation: A definition and some economic consequences. Can. J. Econom. 13(1):16–34.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fishburn PC (1984) Equity axioms for public risks. Oper. Res. 32(4):901–908.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Fishburn PC, Sarin RK (1991) Dispersive equity and social risk. Management Sci. 37(7):751–769.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Fishburn PC, Sarin RK (1994) Fairness and social risk I: Unaggregated analyses. Management Sci. 40(9):1174–1188.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Fishburn PC, Sarin RK (1997) Fairness and social risk II: Aggregated analyses. Management Sci. 43(1):15–26.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Fishburn PC, Straffin PD (1989) Equity considerations in public risks evaluation. Oper. Res. 37(2):229–239.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Fleurbaey M (2010) Assessing risky social situations. J. Political Econom. 118(4):649–680.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gajdos T, Weymark JA, Zoli C (2010) Shared destinies and the measurement of social risk. Ann. Oper. Res. 176(1):409–424.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hoeffding W (1956) On the distribution of the number of successes in independent trials. Ann. Math. Statist. 27(3):713–721.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Karlin S, Novikoff ABJ (1963) Generalized convex inequalities. Pacific J. Math. 13(4):1251–1279.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Keeney RL (1980) Equity and public risk. Oper. Res. 28(3):527–534.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Keeney RL, Winkler RL (1985) Evaluating decision strategies for equity of public risks. Oper. Res. 33(5):955–970.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Meilijson I, Nadas A (1979) Convex majorization with an application to the length of critical paths. J. Appl. Probab. 16(3):671–677.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Meyer M, Strulovici B (2012) Increasing interdependence of multivariate distributions. J. Econom. Theory 147(4):1460–1489.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Puccetti G, Rüschendorf L (2012) Computation of sharp bounds on the distribution of a function of dependent risks. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 236(7):1833–1840.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rheinberger CM, Treich N (2017) Attitudes toward catastrophe. Env. Res. Econom. 67(3):609–636.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rothschild M, Stiglitz JE (1970) Increasing risk I: A definition. J. Econom. Theory 2(3):225–243.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sarin RK (1985) Measuring equity in public risk. Oper. Res. 33(1):210–217.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Slovic P, Lichtenstein S, Fischhoff B (1984) Modeling the societal impact of fatal accidents. Management Sci. 30(4):464–474.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Tchen A (1980) Inequalities for distributions with given marginals. Ann. Probab. 8(4):814–827.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wright R (1987) Expectation dependence of random variables, with an application in portfolio theory. Theory Decision 22(2):111–124.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.