When Risk Is Weird: Unexplained Transaction Features Lower Valuations

References

• Andreoni J, Sprenger C (2011) Uncertainty equivalents: Testing the limits of the independence axiom. NBER Working Paper 17342, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Ariely D, Loewenstein G, Prelec D (2006) Tom Sawyer and the construction of value. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 60(1):1–10.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chow CC, Sarin RK (2001) Comparative ignorance and the Ellsberg paradox. J. Risk Uncertainty 22(2):129–139.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ellsberg D (1961) Risk, ambiguity, and the Savage axioms. Quart. J. Econom. 75(4):643–669.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fox CR, Tversky A (1995) Ambiguity aversion and comparative ignorance. Quart. J. Econom. 110(3):585–603.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fox CR, Weber M (2002) Ambiguity aversion, comparative ignorance, and decision context. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 88(1):476–498.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frisch D, Baron J (1988) Ambiguity and rationality. J. Behavioral Decision Making 1(3):149–157.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gneezy U, List J, Wu G (2006) The uncertainty effect: When a risky prospect is valued less than its worst possible outcome. Quart. J. Econom. 121(4):1283–1309.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goldsmith K, Amir O (2010) Can uncertainty improve promotions? J. Marketing Res. 47(6):1070–1077.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jung MH, Perfecto H, Nelson LD (2016) Anchoring in payment: Evaluating a judgmental heuristic in field experimental settings. J. Marketing Res. 53(3):354–368.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keren G, Gerritsen LEM (1999) On the robustness and possible accounts of ambiguity aversion. Acta Psychologica 103(1–2):149–172.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keren G, Willemsen MC (2009) Decision anomalies, experimenter assumptions, and participants’ comprehension: Revaluating the uncertainty effect. J. Behav. Decision Making 22(3):301–317.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lichtenstein S, Slovic P (2006) The Construction of Preference (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mazar N, Shampanier K, Ariely D (2017) When retailing and Las Vegas meet: Probabilistic free price promotions. Management Sci. 63(1):250–266.Link, Google Scholar
• McGraw AP, Shafir E, Todorov A (2010) Valuing money and things: Why a $20 item can be worth more and less than $20. Management Sci. 56(5):816–830.Link, Google Scholar
• Moon A, Nelson LD (2017) The uncertain value of uncertainty: When consumers are unwilling to pay for what they like. (March 1), https://ssrn.com/abstract=2676699.Google Scholar
• Newman GE, Mochon D (2012) Why are lotteries valued less? Multiple tests of a direct risk-aversion mechanism. Judgment Decision Making 7(1):19–24.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rottenstreich Y, Hsee CK (2001) Money, kisses, and electric shocks: On the affective psychology of risk. Psych. Sci. 12(3):185–190.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rydval O, Ortmann A, Prokosheva S, Hertwig R (2009) How certain is the uncertainty effect? Experiment. Econom. 12(4):473–487.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simonsohn U (2009) Direct risk aversion: Evidence from risky prospects valued below their worst outcome. Psych. Sci. 20(6):686–692.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Feng T, Keller LR (2013) A further exploration of the uncertainty effect. J. Risk Uncertainty 47(3):291–310.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yang Y, Vosgerau J, Loewenstein G (2013) Framing influences willingness to pay but not willingness to accept. J. Marketing Res. 50(6):725–738.Crossref, Google Scholar