Wage Elasticities in Working and Volunteering: The Role of Reference Points in a Laboratory Study

References

• Abeler J, Nosenzo D (2015) Self-selection into laboratory experiments: Pro-social motives versus monetary incentives. Experiment. Econom. 18(2):195–214.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Abeler J, Falk A, Goette L, Huffman D (2011) Reference points and effort provision. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(2):470–492.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Allen EJ, Dechow P (2013) The “rationality” of the long distance runner: Prospect theory and the marathon. Working paper, University of Southern California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
• Allen EJ, Dechow PM, Pope DG, Wu G (2017) Reference-dependent preferences: Evidence from marathon runners. Management Sci. 63(6):1657–1672.Link, Google Scholar
• Andreoni J (1989) Giving with impure altruism: Applications to charity and ricardian equivalence. J. Political Econom. 97(6): 1447–1458.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Andreoni J (1990) Impure altruism and donations to public goods: A theory of warm-glow giving. Econom. J. 100(401):464–477.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Andreoni J, Bernheim BD (2009) Social image and the 50–50 norm: A theoretical and experimental analysis of audience effects. Econometrica 77(5):1607–1636.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ariely D, Bracha A, Meier S (2009) Doing good or doing well? Image motivation and monetary incentives in behaving prosocially. Amer. Econom. Rev. 99(1):544–555.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ashraf N, Bandiera O, Lee SS (2015) Do-gooders and go-getters: Career incentives, selection, and performance in public service delivery. Working paper, London School of Economics, London.Google Scholar
• Bell D (1985) Disappointment in decision making under uncertainty. Oper. Res. 33(1):1–27.Link, Google Scholar
• Bénabou R, Tirole J (2003) Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. Rev. Econom. Stud. 70(3):489–520.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bénabou R, Tirole J (2006) Incentives and prosocial behavior. Amer. Econom. Rev. 96(5):1652–1678.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bernheim BD (1994) A theory of conformity. J. Political Econom. 102(5):841–877.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bernheim BD, Exley CL (2015) Understanding conformity: An experimental investigation. Working paper, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
• Bracha A, Gneezy U, Loewenstein G (2015) Relative pay and labor supply. J. Labor Econom. 3(2):297–315.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown AL, Meer J, Williams JF (2018) Why do people volunteer? An experimental analysis of preferences for time donations. Management Sci., ePub ahead of print April 18, https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2017.2951.Link, Google Scholar
• Camerer C, Babcock L, Lowenstein G, Thaler R (1997) Labor supply of New York City cabdrivers: One day at a time. Quart. J. Econom. 112(2):407–441.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carpenter J, Myers CK (2010) Why volunteer? Evidence on the role of altruism, image, and incentives. J. Public Econom. 94(11–12): 911–920.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chou YK (2002) Testing alternative models of labour supply: Evidence from taxi drivers in Singapore. Singapore Econom. Rev. 41(1):17–47.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cleave BL, Nikiforakis N, Slonim R (2013) Is there selection bias in laboratory experiments? The case of social and risk preferences. Experiment. Econom. 16(3):372–382.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Craig AC, Garbarino E, Heger SA, Slonim R (2017) Waiting to give: Stated and revealed preferences. Management Sci. 63(11):3672–3690.Link, Google Scholar
• Crawford VP, Meng J (2011) New York City cab drivers’ labor supply revisited: Reference-dependent preferences with rational expectations targets for hours and income. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(5):1912–1932.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DellaVigna S, Lindner A, Reizer B, Schmieder J (2017) Reference-dependent job search: Evidence from Hungary. Quart. J. Econom. 132(4):1969–2018.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Doran K (2014) Are long-term wage elasticities of labor supply more negative than short-term ones? Econom. Lett. 122(2):208–210.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ericson KMM, Fuster A (2011) Evidence on reference-dependent preferences from exchange and valuation experiments. Quart. J. Econom. 126(4):1879–1907.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Exley CL (2015) Excusing selfishness in charitable giving: The role of risk. Rev. Econom. Stud. 83(2):587–628.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Exley C (2018) Incentives for prosocial behavior: The role of reputations. Management Sci. 64(5):2460–2471.Link, Google Scholar
• Exley CL, Kessler JB (2017) The better is the enemy of the good. Working paper, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Falk A, Ichino A (2006) Clean evidence on peer effects. J. Labor Econom. 24(1):39–57.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Farber HS (2005) Is tomorrow another day? The labor supply of New York City cabdrivers. J. Political Econom. 113(1):46–82.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Farber HS (2008) Reference-dependent preferences and labor supply: The case of New York City taxi drivers. Amer. Econom. Rev. 98(3):1069–1082.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Farber HS (2015) Why you can’t find a taxi in the rain and other labor supply lessons from cab drivers. Quart. J. Econom. 130(4):1975–2026.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fehr E, Goette L (2007) Do workers work more if wages are high? Evidence from a randomized field experiment. Amer. Econom. Rev. 97(1):298–317.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frey BS, Jergen R (2001) Motivaiton of crowding theory. J. Econom. Surveys 15(5):589–611.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frey BS, Oberholzer-Gee F (1997) The cost of price incentives: An empirical analysis of motivation crowding- out. Amer. Econom. Rev. 87(4):746–755.Google Scholar
• Gill D, Prowse V (2012) A structural analysis of disappointment aversion in a real effort competition. Amer. Econom. Rev. 102(1):469–503.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gneezy U, Rustichini A (2000) Pay enough or don’t pay at all. Quart. J. Econom. 115(3):791–810.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gneezy U, Meier S, Rey-Biel P (2011) When and why incentives (don’t) work to modify behavior. J. Econom. Perspect. 25(4):191–210.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gneezy U, Goette L, Sprenger C, Zimmermann F (2017) The limits of expectations-based reference dependence. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 15(4):861–876.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goette L (2004) Loss aversion and labor supply. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 2(2–3):216–228.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goette L, Stutzer A, Frey BM (2010) Prosocial motivation and blood donations: A survey of the empirical literature. Transfusion Medicine and Hemotherapy 37(3):149–154.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gregg P, Grout PA, Ratcliffe A, Smith S, Windmeijer F (2011) How important is pro-social behaviour in the delivery of public services? J. Public Econom. 95(7–8):758–766.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gul F (1991) A theory of disappointment aversion. Econometrica 59(3):667–686.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harbaugh WT (1998a) The prestige motive for making charitable transfers. Amer. Econom. Rev. 88(2):277–282.Google Scholar
• Harbaugh WT (1998b) What do donations buy? A model of philanthropy based on prestige and warm glow. J. Public Econom. 67(2):269–284.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Horton JJ, Rand DG, Zeckhauser RJ (2011) The online laboratory: Conducting experiments in a real labor market. Experiment. Econom. 14(3):399–425.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Imas A (2014) Working for the “warm glow”: On the benefits and limits of prosocial incentives. J. Public Econom. 114(June):14–18.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Karlan D, List JA (2007) Does price matter in charitable giving? Evidence from a large-scale natural field experiment. Amer. Econom. Rev. 97(5):1774–1793.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kőszegi B, Rabin M (2006) A model of reference-dependent preferences. Quart. J. Econom. 121(4):1133–1165.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lacetera N, Macis M, Slonim R (2012) Will there be blood? Incentives and displacement effects in pro-social behavior. Amer. Econom. J.: Econom. Policy 4(1):186–223.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lacetera N, Macis M, Slonim R (2014) Rewarding volunteers: A field experiment. Management Sci. 60(5):1107–1129.Link, Google Scholar
• Larkin I (2014) The cost of high-powered incentives: Employee gaming in enterprise software sales. J. Labor Econom. 32(2):199–227.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Loomes G, Sugden R (1986) Disappointment and dynamic consistency in choice under uncertainty. Rev. Econom. Stud. 53(2): 271–282.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Masatlioglu Y (2005) Rational choice with status quo bias. J. Econom. Theory 121(1):1–29.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meer J (2011) Brother, can you spare a dime? Peer pressure in charitable solicitation. J. Public Econom. 95(7):926–941.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meier S, Stutzer A (2008) Is volunteering rewarding in itself? Economica 75(297):39–59.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mellström C, Johannesson M (2008) Crowding out in blood donation: Was titmuss right? J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 6(4):845–863.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Musick MA, Wilson J (2007) What is volunteering? Volunteers: A Social Profile (Indiana University Press, Bloomington), 11–35.Google Scholar
• Null C (2011) Warm glow, information, and inefficient charitable giving. J. Public Econom. 95(5–6):455–465.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oyer P (1998) Fiscal year ends and nonlinear incentive contracts: The effect on business seasonality. Quart. J. Econom. 113(1):149–185.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Paolacci G, Chandler J, Ipeirotis PG (2010) Running experiments on amazon mechanical turk. Judgment Decision Making 5(5): 411–419.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pope DG, Schweitzer ME (2011) Is tiger woods loss averse? Persistent bias in the face of experience, competition, and high stakes. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(1):129–157.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sagi JS (2006) Anchored preference relations. J. Econom. Theory 130(1):283–295.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sawhill J, Williamson D (2001) Measuring what matters in nonprofits. McKinsey Quart. (May), https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/social-sector/our-insights/measuring-what-matters-in-nonprofits.Google Scholar
• Shalev J (2000) Loss aversion equilibrium. Internat. J. Game Theory 29(2):269–287.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sugden R (2003) Reference-dependent subjective expected utility. J. Econom. Theory 111(2):172–191.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Terry S (2017) The macro impact of short-termism. Working paper, Boston University, Boston.Google Scholar
• The Case Foundation (2015) 2015 Millenial impact report: Cause, influence, and the next generation workforce. The Case Foundation, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Titmuss RM (1970) The Gift Relationship (Allen and Unwin, London).Google Scholar