Once in the Door: Gender, Tryouts, and the Initial Salaries of Managers

References

• Aigner DJ, Cain GG (1977) Statistical theories of discrimination in labor markets. Indust. Labor Relations Rev. 30(2):175–187.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Allison PD (2002) Missing Data (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Altonji JG, Pierret CR (2001) Employer learning and statistical discrimination. Quart. J. Econom. 116(1):313–50.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Autor DH (2003) Outsourcing at will: The contribution of unjust dismissal doctrine to the growth of employment outsourcing. J. Labor Econom. 21(1):1–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Babcock L, Laschever S (2003) Women Don’t Ask: Negotiation and the Gender Divide (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baker JG (2002) The influx of women into legal professions: An economic analysis. Monthly Labor Rev. 125(8):1–25.Google Scholar
• Barbulescu R, Bidwell M (2013) Do women choose different jobs from men? Mechanisms of application segregation in the market for managerial workers. Organ. Sci. 24(3):737–756.Link, Google Scholar
• Barnett WP, Baron JN, Stuart TE (2000) Avenues of attainment: Occupational demography and organizational careers in the California Civil Service. Amer. J. Sociol. 106(1):88–144.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baron JN (2000) Comment to Cappelli, P. market-mediated employment; The historical context. Blair MM, Kochan TA, eds. The New Relationship: Human Capital in the American Corporation (Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DC), 90–99.Google Scholar
• Baron JN, Kreps DM (1999) Strategic Human Resources: Frameworks for General Managers (Wiley, New York).Google Scholar
• Becker GS (1957) The Economics of Discrimination (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Becker GS (1975) Human Capital (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Becker GS (1993) Nobel lecture: The economic way of looking at behavior. J. Political Econom. 101(3):385–409.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beenen G, Rousseau DM (2010) Getting the most from MBA Internships: Promoting intern learning and job acceptance. Human Resource Management 49(1):3–22.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Belliveau MA (2005) Blind ambition? The effects of social networks and institutional sex composition on the job search outcomes of elite coeducational and women’s college graduates. Organ. Sci. 16(2):134–150.Link, Google Scholar
• Bertrand M, Mullainathan S (2004) Are Emily and Greg more employable than Lakisha and Jamal? A field experiment on labor market discrimination. Amer. Econom. Rev. 94(4):991–1013.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bertrand M, Goldin C, Katz LF (2010) Dynamics of the gender gap for young professionals in the financial and corporate sectors. Amer. Econom. J. Appl. Econom. 2(3):228–255.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bidwell M, Briscoe F, Fernandez-Mateo I, Sterling A (2013) The employment relationship and inequality: How and why changes in employment practices are reshaping rewards in organizations. Acad. Management Ann. 7(1):61–121.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bielby WT (2000) Minimizing workplace gender and racial bias. Contemporary Sociol. 29(1):120–129.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bielby WT, Baron JN (1986) Men and women at work: Sex segregation and statistical discrimination. Amer. J. Sociol. 91(4):759–799.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bielby WT, Bielby DD (1992) Cumulative versus continuous disadvantage in an unstructured labor market: Gender differences in the careers of television writers. Work Occupations 19(4):366–386.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Black SE, Strahan PE (2001) The division of spoils: Rent-sharing and discrimination in a regulated industry. Amer. Econom. Rev. 91(4):814–831.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Booth A, Leigh A (2010) Do employers discriminate by gender? A field experiment in female-dominated occupations. Econom. Lett. 107(2):236–238.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bureau of Labor Statistics (2013) Occupational employment statistics. http://www.bls.gov/oes/.Google Scholar
• Callanan G, Benzing C (2004) Assessing the role of internships in the career-oriented employment of graduating college students. Education + Training 46(2):82–89.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cappelli P (1999) The New Deal at Work Managing the Market-Driven Workforce (Harvard Business School Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Castilla EJ (2008) Gender, race, and meritocracy in organizational careers. Amer. J. Sociol. 113(6):1479–1526.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Castilla EJ (2011) Bringing managers back in managerial influences on workplace inequality. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 76(5):667–694.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Castilla EJ (2015) Accounting for the gap: A firm study manipulating organizational accountability and transparency in pay decisions. Organ. Sci. 26(2):311–333.Link, Google Scholar
• Castilla EJ, Benard S (2010) The paradox of meritocracy in organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. 55(4):543–676.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Catalyst (2010) Pipeline’s broken promise. (February 1), http://www.catalyst.org/knowledge/pipelines-broken-promise.Google Scholar
• Chatman JA (1991) Matching people and organizations: Selection and socialization in public accounting firms. Admin. Sci. Quart. 36(3):459–484.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen PN, Huffman ML (2007) Working for the woman? Female managers and the gender wage gap. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 72(5):681–704.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Correll SJ (2001) Gender and the career choice Process: The role of biased self-assessments. Amer. J. Sociol. 106(6):1691–1730.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Curiale JL (2009) America’s new glass ceiling: Unpaid internships, the fair labor standards act, and the urgent need for change. Hastings Law J. 61:1531–1560.Google Scholar
• Dencker JC (2008) Corporate restructuring and sex differences in managerial promotion. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 73(3):455–476.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DiPrete TA, Eirich GM (2006) Cumulative advantage as a mechanism for inequality: A review of theoretical and empirical developments. Annual Rev. Sociol. 32:271–297.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Doeringer PB, Foster P, Manning S, Terkla D (2013) Four project-based industries and craft-like production structure, location and performance. Giarratani F, Hewings GLD, McCann P, eds. Handbook of Industry Studies and Economic Geography (Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK), 99–151.Google Scholar
• Dovidio JF, Brown CE, Heltmann K, Ellyson SL, Keating CF (1988) Power displays between women and men in discussions of gender-linked tasks: A multichannel study. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 55(4):580–587.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eagly AH, Karau SJ (2002) Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psych. Rev. 109(3):573–598.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Elliott JR, Smith RA (2004) Race, gender, and workplace power. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 69(3):365–386.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Elman C, O‘Rand AM (2004) The race is to the swift: Socioeconomic origins, adult education, and wage attainment. Amer. J. Sociol. 110(1):123–160.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Elvira MM, Graham ME (2002) Not just a formality: Pay system formalization and sex-related earnings effects. Organ. Sci. 13(6):601–617.Link, Google Scholar
• England P (1992) Comparable Worth: Theories and Evidence (Aldine De Gruyter, New York).Google Scholar
• Fernandez RM, Mors ML (2008) Competing for jobs: Labor queues and gender sorting in the hiring process. Soc. Sci. Res. 37(4):1061–1080.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fernandez RM, Sosa ML (2005) Gendering the job: Networks and recruitment at a call center. Amer. J. Sociol. 111(3):859–904.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fernandez RM, Greenberg J (2013) Race, network hiring, and statistical discrimination. Res. Sociol. Work 24:81–102.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fernandez RM, Castilla EJ, Moore P (2000) Social capital at work networks and employment at a phone center. Amer. J. Sociol. 105(5):1288–1356.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fernandez-Mateo I (2009) Cumulative gender disadvantage in contract employment. Amer. J. Sociol. 114(4):871–923.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fernandez-Mateo I, Fernandez RM (2016) Bending the pipeline? Executive search and gender inequality in hiring for top management jobs. Management Sci. 62(12):3636–3655.Link, Google Scholar
• Gerhart B (1990) Gender differences in current and starting salaries: The role of performance, college major, and job title. Indust. Labor Relations Rev. 43(4):418–433.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gomez-Mejia LR, Balkin DB, Milkovich GT (1990) Rethinking rewards for technical employees. Organ. Dynam. 18(4):62–75.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gorman EH (2005) Gender stereotypes, same-gender preferences, and organizational variation in the hiring of women: Evidence from law firms. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 70(4):702–728.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Granovetter MS (1981) Toward a sociological theory of income difference. Berg I, ed. Sociological Perspectives on Labor Markets (Academic Press, New York), 11–47.Google Scholar
• Greenberg J, Fernandez RM (2016) The strength of weak ties in MBA job search: A within-person test. Sociol. Sci. 3:296–316.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hagan J, Kay F (1995) Gender in Practice: A Study of Lawyers’ Lives (Oxford University Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Haveman HA, Beresford LS (2012) If you’re so smart, why aren’t you the boss? Explaining the persistent vertical gender gap in management. Ann. Amer. Acad. Political Soc. Sci. 639(1):114–130.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heilman ME (1995) Sex stereotypes and their effects in the workplace: What we know and what we don’t know. J. Soc. Behav. Personality 10(6):3–26.Google Scholar
• Heilman ME, Eagly AH (2008) Gender stereotypes are alive, well, and busy producing workplace discrimination. Indust. Organ. Psych. 1(4):393–398.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heilman ME, Haynes MC (2005) No credit where credit is due: Attributional rationalization of women’s success in male-female teams. J. Appl. Psych. 90(5):905–916.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hultin M, Szulkin R (1999) Wages and unequal access to organizational power: An empirical test of gender discrimination. Admin. Sci. Quart. 44(3):453–472.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jacobs JA (1992) Women’s entry into management: Trends in earnings, authority, and values among salaried managers. Admin. Sci. Quart. 37(2):282–301.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jovanovic B (1979) Job matching and the theory of turnover. J. Political Econom. 87(5):972–990.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kalev A (2009) Cracking the glass cages? Restructuring and ascriptive inequality at work. Amer. J. Sociol. 114(6):1591–1643.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kalev (2014) How you downsize is who you downsize: Biased formalization, accountability, and managerial diversity. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 79(1):109–135.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kalleberg AL (2000) Nonstandard employment relations: Part-time, temporary and contract work. Annual Rev. Sociol. 26:341–365.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kalleberg AL, Reskin BF, K Hudson (2000) Bad jobs in America: Standard and nonstandard employment relations and job quality in the United States. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 65(2):256–278.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kalleberg AL, Reynolds J, Marsden PV (2003) Externalizing employment: Flexible staffing arrangements in US organizations. Soc. Sci. Res. 32(4):525–552.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kitroeff N, Rodkin J (2014) Women’s career choices don’t explain the gender pay gap. Bloomberg Business Week (November 14), http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2014-11-14/women-make-less-than-men-even-when-they-are-equally-qualified-mbas.Google Scholar
• Kitroeff N, Rodkin J (2015) The real payoff from an MBA is different for men and women. Bloomberg Business Week (October 20), http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-10-20/the-real-cost-of-an-mba-is-different-for-men-and-women.Google Scholar
• Korenman S, Turner SC (1996) Employment contracts and minority-white wage differences. Indust. Relations 35(1):106–122.Google Scholar
• Kuhnen CM, Oyer P (2016) Exploration for human capital: Evidence from the MBA labor market. J. Labor Econom. 34(2):S255–S286.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lazear EP (1999) Personnel economics: Past lessons and future directions. J. Labor Econom. 17(2):199–236.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lips HM (2012) The gender pay gap: Challenging the rationalizations: Perceived equity, discrimination, and the limits of human capital models. Sex Roles 68:169–185.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lucas J (2003) Status processes and institutionalization of women as leaders. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 68(3):464–480.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lutter M (2015) Do women suffer from network closure? The moderating effect of social capital on gender inequality in a project-based labor market, 1929 to 2010. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 80(2):329–358.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Manwaring T (1984) The extended internal labour market. Cambridge J. Econom. 8(2):161–187.Google Scholar
• Merluzzi J, Phillips DJ (2016) The specialist discount negative returns for MBAs with focused profiles in investment banking. Admin. Sci. Quart. 61(1):87–124.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Montgomery JD (1992) Job search and network composition: Implications of the strength-of-weak-ties hypothesis. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 57(5):586–596.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moore G (1990) Determinants of men’s and women’s networks. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 55(5):726–735.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moss P, Tilly C (2001) Stories Employers Tell (Russell Sage, New York).Google Scholar
• Neumark D (2012) Detecting discrimination in audit and correspondence studies. J. Human Resources 47(4):1128–1157.Google Scholar
• Neumark D, Bank RJ, Van Nort KD (1996) Sex discrimination in restaurant hiring: An audit study. Quart. J. Econom. 111(3):915–941.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nieva VF, Gutek BA (1980) Sex effects on evaluation. Acad. Management Rev. 5(2):267–276.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nosek BA, Banaji MR, Greenwald AG (2002) Math = male, me = female, therefore math = me. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 83(1):44–59.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Olson JE (2013) Human capital models and the gender pay gap. Sex Roles 68(3–4):186–197.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Padavic I, Reskin BF (2002) Women and Men at Work (Pine Forge Press, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Pager D (2007) The use of field experiments for studies of employment discrimination: Contributions, critiques, and directions for the future. Ann. Amer. Acad. Political Soc. Sci. 609(1):104–133.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pager D, Karafin D (2009) Bayesian bigot? Statistical discrimination, stereotypes, and employer decision making. Ann. Amer. Acad. Political Soc. Sci. 621(1):70–93.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pallais A, Sands EG (2016) Why the referential treatment? Evidence from field experiments on referrals. J. Political Econom. 124(6):1793–1828.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pedulla DS (2016) Penalized or protected? Gender and the consequences of nonstandard and mismatched employment histories. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 81(2):262–289.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Petersen T, Morgan LA (1995) Separate and unequal: Occupation-establishment sex segregation and the gender wage gap. Amer. J. Sociol. 101(2):329–365.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Petersen T, Saporta I (2004) The opportunity structure for discrimination. Amer. J. Sociol. 109(4):852–901.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Petersen T, Saporta I, Seidel ML (2000) Offering a job: Meritocracy and social networks. Amer. J. Sociol. 106(3):763–816.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pfeffer J, Salancik GR (1974) Organizational decision making as a political process: The case of a university budget. Admin. Sci. Quart. 19(2):135–151.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Phelan JE, Moss-Racusin CA, Rudman LA (2008) Competent yet out in the cold: Shifting criteria for hiring reflect backlash toward agentic women. Psych. Women Quart. 32(4):406–413.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Phillips DJ (2001) The promotion paradox: Organizational mortality and employee promotion chances in Silicon Valley law firms, 1946–1996. Amer. J. Sociol. 106(4):1058–1098.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Phillips DJ (2005) Organizational genealogies and the persistence of gender inequality: The case of Silicon Valley law firms. Admin. Sci. Quart. 50(3):440–472.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reskin BF, McBrier DB (2000) Why not ascription? Organizations’ employment of male and female managers. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 65(2):210–233.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reskin BF, Roos PA (1990) Job Queues, Gender Queues: Explaining Women’s Inroads into Male Occupations (Temple University Press, Philadelphia).Google Scholar
• Reskin BF, McBrier DB, Kmec JA (1999) The determinants and consequences of workplace sex and race composition. Annual Rev. Sociol. 25:335–61.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Riach PA, Rich J (1987) Testing for sexual discrimination in the labor market. Australian Econom. Papers 26(49):165–178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Riach PA, Rich J (2002) Field experiments of discrimination in the market place. Econom. J. 112(483):480–518.Google Scholar
• Riach PA, Rich J (2006) An experimental investigation of sexual discrimination in hiring in the English labor market. Adv. Econom. Anal. Policy 6(2):1–20.Google Scholar
• Ridgeway C (1997) Interaction and the conservation of gender inequality: Considering employment. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 62(2):218–235.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rissing B, Castilla E (2014) House of green cards: Statistical or preference-based inequality in the employment of foreign nationals. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 79(6):1226–1255.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rivera LA (2011) Ivies, extracurriculars, and exclusion: Elite employers’ use of educational credentials. Res. Soc. Stratification Mobility 29(1):71–90.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rivera LA, Tilcsik A (2016) Class advantage, commitment penalty: The gendered effect of social class signals in an elite labor market. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 81(6):1097–1131.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosenfeld J, Denice P (2015) The power of transparency: Evidence from a British workplace survey. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 80(5):1045–1068.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roth A, Xing X (1994) Jumping the gun: Imperfections and institutions related to the timing of market transactions. Amer. Econom. Rev. 84(4):992–1044.Google Scholar
• Rubineau B, Fernandez RM (2013) Missing links: Referrer behavior and job segregation. Management Sci. 59(11):2470–2489.Link, Google Scholar
• Rubineau B, Fernandez RM (2015) Tipping points: The gender segregating and desegregating effects of network recruitment. Organ. Sci. 26(6):1646–1664.Link, Google Scholar
• Rubineau B, Kang Y (2012) Bias in white: A longitudinal natural experiment measuring changes in discrimination. Management Sci. 58(4):660–677.Link, Google Scholar
• Seidel MDL, Polzer JT, Stewart KJ (2000) Friends in high places: The effects of social networks on discrimination in salary negotiations. Admin. Sci. Quart. 45(1):1–24.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simon CJ, Warner JT (1992) Matchmaker, matchmaker: The effect of old boy networks on job match quality, earnings, and tenure. J. Labor Econom. 10(3):306–330.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sørensen J (2007) Organizational diversity, labor markets, and wage inequality. Amer. Behav. Scientist 50(5):659–676.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sorenson O, Dahl MS (2016) Geography, joint choices, and the reproduction of gender inequality. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 81(5):900–920.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Srivastava SB, Sherman EL (2015) Agents of change or cogs in the machine? Reexamining the influence of female managers on the gender wage gap. Amer. J. Sociol. 120(6):1778–1808.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stainback K, Tomaskovic-Devey D, Skaggs S (2010) Organizational approaches to inequality: Inertia, relative power, and environments. Annual Rev. Soc. 36(1):225–247.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sterling AD (2014) Friendships and search behavior in labor markets. Management Sci. 60(9):2341–2354.Link, Google Scholar
• Sterling AD (2015) Preentry contacts and the generation of nascent networks in organizations. Organ. Sci. 26(3):650–667.Link, Google Scholar
• Sterling AD (2017) Taking the longer route: Tryouts and the search behavior of structurally-disadvantaged job seekers. Working paper, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
• Stigler GJ (1961) The economics of information. J. Political Econom. 69(3):213–225.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stolzenberg RM (1978) Bringing the boss back in: Employer size, employee schooling, and socioeconomic achievement. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 43:813–28.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tomaskovic-Devey D, Thomas M, Johnson K (2005) Race and the accumulation of human capital across the career: A theoretical model and fixed effects application. Amer. J. Sociol. 111(1):58–89.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tosi HL, Einbender SW (1985) The effects of the type and amount of information in sex discrimination research: A meta-analysis. Acad. Management J. 28(3):712–723.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tufarolo MA (2016) You haven’t come a long way, baby: The courts’ inability to eliminate the gender gap fifty-two years after the passage of the equal pay act. J. Gender Soc. Policy Law 24(2):305–336.Google Scholar
• Turco CJ (2010) Cultural foundations of tokenism evidence from the leveraged buyout industry. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 75(6):894–913.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wagner DG, Ford RS, Ford TW (1986) Can gender inequalities be reduced? Amer. Sociol. Rev. 51(1):47–61.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weinberger CJ (2011) In search of the glass ceiling: Gender and earnings growth among U.S. college graduates in the 1990s. ILR Rev. 64(5):949–980.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wooldridge J (2002) Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• WorldatWork (2005) Bonus Program Practices (WorldatWork, Scottsdale, AZ).Google Scholar