Job Mission as a Substitute for Monetary Incentives: Benefits and Limits

References

• Andreoni J (1989) Giving with impure altruism: Applications to charity and Ricardian equivalence. J. Political Econom. 97(6):1447–1458.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Andreoni J (1990) Impure altruism and donations to public goods: A theory of warm-glow giving. Econom. J. 100(401):464–477.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bartling B, Fehr E, Herz H (2014) The intrinsic value of decision rights. Econometrica 82(6):2005–2039.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Besley T, Ghatak M (2005) Competition and incentives with motivated agents. Amer. Econom. Rev. 95(3):616–636.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carpenter J, Gong E (2016) Motivating agents: How much does the mission matter? J. Labor Econom. 34(1):211–236.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cassar L (2016) Optimal contracting with endogenous project mission. CESifo Working Paper 6181, https://ssrn.com/abstract=2887278.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Charness G, Cobo-Reyes R, Sanchez A (2016) The effect of charitable giving on workers performance. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 131(part A):61–74.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Delfgaauw J, Dur R (2007) Signaling and screening of workers’ motivation. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 62(4):605–624.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Delfgaauw J, Dur R (2008) Incentives and workers’ motivation in the public sector. Econom. J. 118(525):171–191.Google Scholar
• DellaVigna S, Pope D (2018) What motivates effort? Evidence and expert forecasts. Rev. Econom. Stud. 85(2):1029–1069.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Drichoutis AC, Lusk JL, Nayga RM (2015) The veil of experimental currency units in second price auctions. J. Econom. Sci. Assoc. 1(2):182–196.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fehr E, Herz H, Wilkening T (2013) The lure of authority: Motivation and incentive effects of power. Amer. Econom. Rev. 103(4):1325–1359.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fehrler S, Kosfeld M (2014) Pro-social missions and worker motivation: An experimental study. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 100:99–110.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fischbacher U (2007) z-tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments. Experiment. Econom. 10:171–178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gerhards L (2015) The incentive effects of missions—Evidence from experiments with NGO employees and students. Eur. Econom. Rev. 79:252–262.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greiner B (2015) Subject pool recruitment procedures: Organizing experiments with ORSEE. J. Econom. Sci. Assoc. 1(1):114–125.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Imas A (2014) Working for the “warm glow”: On the benefits and limits of prosocial incentives. J. Public Econom. 114:14–18.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Karlan D, List JA (2007) Does price matter in charitable giving? Evidence from a large-scale natural field experiment. Amer. Econom. Rev. 97(5):1774–1793.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kube S, Marechal MA, Puppe C (2012, June) The currency of reciprocity: Gift exchange in the workplace. Amer. Econom. Rev. 102(4):1644–1662.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meier S (2007) Do subsidies increase charitable giving in the long run? Matching donations in a field experiment. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 5(6):1203–1222.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Null C (2011) Warm glow, information, and inefficient charitable giving. J. Public Econom. 95(5):455–465.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Prendergast C (2007) The motivation and bias of bureaucrats. Amer. Econom. Rev. 97(1):180–196.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Prendergast C (2008) Intrinsic motivation and incentives. Amer. Econom. Rev. 98(2):201–205.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reinstein D (2007) Substitution between (and motivations for) charitable contributions: An experimental study. Working paper, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.Google Scholar
• Tonin M, Vlassopoulos M (2015) Corporate philanthropy and productivity: Evidence from an online real effort experiment. Management Sci. 61(8):1795–1811.Link, Google Scholar