Effects of Recommendation Neutrality and Sponsorship Disclosure on Trust vs. Distrust in Online Recommendation Agents: Moderating Role of Explanations for Organic Recommendations

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2017.2906

References

  • Baron RM, Kenny DA (1986) The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 51(6):1173–1182.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Benamati JS, Serva MA, Fuller MA (2006) Are trust and distrust distinct constructs? An empirical study of the effects of trust and distrust among online banking users. Proc. 39th Annual Hawaii Internat. Conf. System Sci. (HICSS’06), Kauai, HI, 121b.Google Scholar
  • Bhattacherjee A, Sanford C (2006) Influence processes for information technology acceptance: An elaboration likelihood model. MIS Quart. 30(4):805–825.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Blohm I, Riedl C, Füller J, Leimeister JM (2016) Rate or trade? Identifying winning ideas in open idea sourcing. Inform. Systems Res. 27(1):27–48.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cacioppo JT, Berntson G (1994) Relationship between attitudes and evaluative space: A critical review, with emphasis on the separability of positive and negative substrates. Psych. Bull. 115(3):401–423.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cacioppo JT, Gardner WL, Berntson GG (1997) Beyond bipolar conceptualizations and measures: The case of attitudes and evaluative space. Personality Soc. Psych. Rev. 1(1):3–25.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Campbell MC, Kirmani (2000) A Consumer’s use of persuasion knowledge: The effects of accessibility and cognitive capacity on perceptions of an influence agent. J. Consumer Res. 27(1):69–83.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cavanaugh LA (2014) Because I (don’t) deserve it: How relationship reminders and deservingness influence consumer indulgence. J. Marketing Res. 51(2):218–232.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cheng HK, Bandyopadhyay S, Guo H (2011) The debate on net neutrality: A policy perspective. Inform. Systems Res. 22(1):60–82.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chin WW (1998) The partial least squares approach for structural equation modeling. Marcoulides GA, ed. Modern Methods for Business Research (Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ), 295–336.Google Scholar
  • Cho J (2006) The mechanism of trust and distrust formation and their relational outcomes. J. Retailing 82(1):25–35.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cohen J (1988) Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd ed. (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Connelly BL, Miller T, Devers CE (2012) Under a cloud of suspicion: Trust, distrust, and their interactive effect in interorganizational contracting. Strategic Management J. 33(7):820–833.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Darke PR, Ritchie RJB (2007) The defensive consumer: Advertising deception, defensive processing, and distrust. J. Marketing Res. 44(1):114–127.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dellaert BGC, Häubl G (2012) Searching in choice mode: Consumer decision processes in product search with recommendations. J. Marketing Res. 49(2):277–288.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dhar V, Ghose A (2010) A Sponsored search and market efficiency. Inform. Systems Res. 21(4):760–772.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dimoka A (2010) What does the brain tell us about trust and distrust? Evidence from a functional neuroimaging study. MIS Quart. 34(2):373–396.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dirks K, Skarlicki D (2004) Trust in leaders: Existing research and emerging issues. Kramer R, Cook K, eds. Trust and Distrust in Organizations: Dilemmas and Approaches (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA), 21–40.Google Scholar
  • Dou W, Lim K, Su C, Zhou N, Cui N (2010) Brand positioning strategy using search engine marketing. MIS Quart. 34(2):261–276.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Edelman B, Gilchrist DS (2012) Advertising disclosures: Measuring labeling alternatives in Internet search engines. Inform. Econom. Policy 24(1):75–89.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Estelami H (2016) Sources of consumer distrust of financial services marketing practices. Celebrating America’s Pastimes: Baseball, Hot Dogs, Apple Pie and Marketing? Developments in Marketing Science: Proceedings of the Academy of Marketing Science (Springer International, Cham, Switzerland), 119–120.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fallows D (2005) Search engine users: Internet searchers are confident, satisfied and trusting—But they are also unaware and naıve. Pew Research Center, Internet and American Life Project.Google Scholar
  • Fein S (1996) Effects of suspicion on attributional thinking and the correspondence bias. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 70(6):1164–1184.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fornell C, Larcker D (1981) Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Marketing Res. 18(3):39–50.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gefen D, Straub D (2005) A practical guide to factorial validity using PLS-graph: Tutorial and annotated example. Comm. Assoc. Inform. Systems 16:91–109.Google Scholar
  • Ghose A, Yang S (2009) An empirical analysis of search engine advertising: Sponsored search in electronic markets. Management Sci. 55(10):1605–1622.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Goo SK (2007) Marketers should pay to play—Search engine poses biggest threat yet to $100-billion classified ad industry. Wall Street Journal (February 6), D.2.Google Scholar
  • Green PE, Srinivasan V (1990) Conjoint analysis in marketing: New developments with implications for research and practice. J. Marketing 54(4):3–19.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Grimmelmann J (2010) Some skepticism about search neutrality. Szoka B, Marcus A, eds. The Next Digital Decade: Essays on the Future of the Internet (TechFreedom, Washington, DC), 435–459.Google Scholar
  • Guijarro L, Pla V, Vidal JR, aMartinez-Bauset J (2015) Search engine and content providers: Neutrality, competition and integration. Trans. Emerging Telecomm. Tech. 26(2):164–178.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hardin R (2004) Distrust: Manifestations and management. Hardin R, ed. Distrust (Russell Sage Foundation, New York),3–33.Google Scholar
  • Harvey F (2003) Paid searches find the route to online riches: Internet: Advertisers’ sponsorship of key words is becoming an important source of revenue for search engine providers. Financial Times (July 1), 14–14.Google Scholar
  • Häubl G, Murray KB (2006) Double agents: Assessing the role of electronic product-recommendation systems. MIT Sloan Management Rev. 47(3):8–12.Google Scholar
  • Hayes AF (2012) Process: A versatile computational tool for observed variable mediation, moderation, and conditional process modeling. White paper.Google Scholar
  • Hayes AF (2013) Introduction to Mediation, Moderation and Conditional Process Analysis (Guilford Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • Higgins ET, King G (1981) Accessibility of social constructs: Information processing consequences of individual and contextual variability. Cantor N, Kihlstrom JF, eds. Personality, Cognition, and Social Interaction (Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ), 69–121.Google Scholar
  • Humphreys A, Latour KA (2013) Framing the game: Assessing the impact of cultural representations on consumer perceptions of legitimacy. J. Consumer Res. 40(4):773–795.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jiang ZJ, Wang W, Tan BCY, Yu J (2016) The determinants and impacts of aesthetics in users’ first interaction with websites. J. Management Inform. Systems 33(1):229–259.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Johnson PE, Grazioli S, Jamal K (1993) Fraud detection: Intentionality and deception in cognition. Accounting Organ. Soc. 18(5):467–488.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kahneman D, Tversky (1979) A prospect theory: An analysis of decisions under risk. Econometrica 47:263–291.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Katona Z, Sarvary M (2010) The race for sponsored links: Bidding patterns for search advertising. Marketing Sci. 29(2):199–215.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kingshott RPJ, Pecotich A (2007) The impact of psychological contracts on trust and commitment in supplier-distributor relationships. Eur. J. Marketing 41(9/10):1053–1072.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Klein NM (1987) Assessing unacceptable attribute levels in conjoint analysis. Adv. Consumer Res. 14:154–158.Google Scholar
  • Komiak SYX, Benbasat I (2006) The effects of personalization and familiarity on trust and adoption of recommendation agents. MIS Quart. 30(4):941–960.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Komiak SYX, Benbasat I (2008) A two-process view of trust and distrust building in recommendation agents: A process-tracing study. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 9(12):727–747.Google Scholar
  • Kramer RM, Brewer MB, Hanna BA (1996) Collective trust and collective action: The decision to trust as a social decision. Kramer RM, Tyler TR, eds. Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA), 357–389.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kramer T (2007) The effect of measurement task transparency on preference construction and evaluations of personalized recommendations. J. Marketing Res. 44(2):224–233.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Krishnasamy S, Sen R, Oh S, Shakkottai S (2015) Detecting sponsored recommendations. ACM SIGMETRICS Performance Evaluation Rev. 43(1):445–446.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lee JD, See KA (2004) Trust in automation: Designing for appropriate reliance. Human Factors 46(1):50–80.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lee YE, Benbasat I (2011) The influence of trade-off difficulty caused by preference elicitation methods on user acceptance of recommendation agents across loss and gain conditions. Inform. Systems Res. 22(4):867–884.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lewicki RJ, Bunker BB (1995) Trust in relationships: A model of trust development and decline. Bunker BB, Rubin JZ, eds. Conflict, Cooperation, and Justice (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco), 133–173.Google Scholar
  • Lewicki RJ, Mcallister DJ, Bies RJ (1998) Trust and distrust: New relationships and realities. Acad. Management Rev. 23(3):438–458.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Liang BA, Mackey TK (2011) Prevalence and global health implications of social media in direct-to-consumer drug advertising. J. Medical Internet Res. 13(3):e64.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Luhmann N (1979) Trust and Power (Wiley, New York).Google Scholar
  • Malhotra NK, Kim SS, Patil A (2006) Common method variance in is research: A comparison of alternative approaches and a reanalysis of past research. Management Sci. 52(12):1865–1883.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Martin I, Levey AB (1978) Evaluative conditioning. Adv. Behav. Res. Therapy 1(2):57–101.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McKnight DH, Chervany NL (2001) Trust and distrust definitions: One bite at a time. Falcone R, Singh M, Tan Y-H, eds. Trust in Cyber-Societies: Integrating the Human and Artificial Perspectives (Springer, New York).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McKnight DH, Choudhury V (2006) Distrust and trust in B2C E-commerce: Do they differ? Proc. Eighth Internat. Conf. Electronic Commerce, Assoc. Comput. Machinery, 482–491.Google Scholar
  • McKnight DH, Choudhury V, Kacmar C (2002) Developing and validating trust measures for e-commerce: An integrative typology. Inform. Systems Res. 13(3):334–359.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • McKnight DH, Cummings LL, Chervany NL (1998) Initial trust formation in new organizational relationships. Acad. Management Rev. 23(3):473–490.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McKnight DH, Kacmar C, Choudhury V (2004) Dispositional trust and distrust distinctions in predicting high- and low-risk Internet expert advice site perceptions. e-Service J. 3(2):35–58.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mcsherry D (2005) Explanation in recommender systems. Artificial Intelligence Rev. 24(2):179–197.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Murray KB, Liang J, Häubl G (2010) Act 2.0: The next generation of assistive consumer technology research. Internet Res. 20(3):232–254.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nicholson S, Sierra T, Eseryel UY, Park J-H, Barkow P, Pozo EJ, Ward J (2006) How much of it is real? Analysis of paid placement in web search engine results. J. Amer. Soc. Inform. Sci. Tech. 57(4):448–461.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Niehoff B, Paul R (2001) The just workplace: Developing and maintaining effective psychological contracts. Bus. Rev. 22(1):5–8.Google Scholar
  • Nunnally JC, Bernstein IH (1994) Psychometric Theory (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
  • Ou CX, Sia CL (2010) Consumer trust and distrust: An issue of website design. Internat. J. Human-Comput. Stud. 68(12):913–934.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pavlou PA, Fygenson M (2006) Understanding and predicting electronic commerce adoption: An extension of the theory of planned behavior. MIS Quart. 30(1):115–143.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pavlou PA, Gefen D (2005) Psychological contract violation in online marketplaces: Antecedents, consequences, and moderating role. Inform. Systems Res. 16(4):372–399.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Pavlou PA, Liang H, Xue Y (2007) Understanding and mitigating uncertainty in online exchange relationships: A principal-agent perspective. MIS Quart. 31(1):105–136.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Lee J-Y, Podsakoff NP (2003) Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J. Appl. Psych. 88(5):879–903.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Poortinga W, Pidgeon NF (2003) Exploring the dimensionality of trust in risk regulation. Risk Anal. 23(5):961–972.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Preacher KJ, Hayes AF (2008a) Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behav. Res. Methods 40(3):879–891.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Preacher KJ, Hayes AF (2008b) Contemporary approaches to assessing mediation in communication research. Hayes AF, Slater MD, Snyder LB, eds. The Sage Sourcebook of Advanced Data Analysis Methods for Communication Research (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA), 13–54.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Preacher KJ, Rucker DD, Hayes AF (2007) Assessing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behav. Res. 42(1):185–227.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Qiu L, Benbasat I (2009) Evaluating anthropomorphic product recommendation agents: A social relationship perspective to designing information systems. J. Management Inform. Systems 25(4):145–181.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ransom D (2010) Seven ways to make pay-per-click pay. Wall Street Journal (March 2), http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704548604575098011190760930.html.Google Scholar
  • Robinson SL (1996) Trust and breach of the psychological contract. Admin. Sci. Quart. 41(4):574–599.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rousseau DM (1995) Psychological Contracts in Organizations (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
  • Rutz OJ, Trusov M, Bucklin RE (2011) Modeling indirect effects of paid search advertising: Which keywords lead to more future visits?. Marketing Sci. 30(4):646–665.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Schaupp LC, Bélanger F (2005) A conjoint analysis of online consumer satisfaction. J. Electronic Commerce Res. 6(2):95–111.Google Scholar
  • Schindler S, Reinhard M, Stahlberg D (2011) Repetition of educational aids advertising affects attitudes. Psych. Rep. 108(3):693–698.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Segal D (2011) The dirty little secrets of search. New York Times (February 12).Google Scholar
  • Sitkin SB, Roth NL (1993) Explaining the limited effectiveness of legalistic remedies for trust/distrust. Organ. Sci. 4(3):367–392.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Sobel ME (1982) Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. Sociol. Methodol. 13:290–312.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Song J, Jones D, Gudigantala N (2007) The effects of incorporating compensatory choice strategies in web-based consumer decision support systems. Decision Support Systems 43(2):359–374.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stanford J, Tauber ER, Fogg BJ, Marable L (2002) Experts vs. online consumers: A comparative credibility study of health and finance web sites. Report, Consumer Web Watch, http://consumersunion.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/expert-vs-online-consumers.pdf.Google Scholar
  • Sullivan D (2002) FTC recommends disclosure to search engines. searchenginewatch.com.Google Scholar
  • Sullivan D, Landau MJ, Rothschild ZK (2010) An existential function of enemyship: Evidence that people attribute influence to personal and political enemies to compensate for threats to control. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 98(3):434–449.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tam KY, Ho SY (2005) Web personalization as a persuasion strategy: An elaboration likelihood model perspective. Inform. Systems Res. 16(3):271–291.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Uhrich S (2011) Explaining non-linear customer density effects on shoppers’ emotions and behavioral intentions in a retail context: The mediating role of perceived control. J. Retailing Consumer Services 18(5):405–413.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vance A, Elie-Dit-Cosaque C, Straub DW (2008) Examining trust in information technology artifacts: The effects of system quality and culture. J. Management Inform. Systems 24(4):73–100.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wang W (2005) Design of trustworthy online recommendation agents: Explanation facilities and decision strategy support. PhD thesis, MIS Division, University of British Columbia, Vancouver).Google Scholar
  • Wang W, Benbasat I (2005) Trust in and adoption of online recommendation agents. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 6(3):72–101.Google Scholar
  • Wang W, Benbasat I (2007) Recommendation agents for electronic commerce: Effects of explanation facilities on trusting beliefs. J. Management Inform. Systems 23(4):217–246.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wang W, Benbasat I (2008) Attributions of trust in decision support technologies: A study of recommendation agents for e-commerce. J. Management Inform. Systems 24(4):249–273.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wang W, Benbasat I (2009) Interactive decision aids for consumer decision making in e-commerce: The influence of perceived strategy restrictiveness. MIS Quart. 33(2):293–320.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wang W, Benbasat I (2013) A contingency approach to investigating the effects of user-system interaction modes of online decision aids. Inform. Systems Res. 24(3):861–876.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Wang W, Benbasat I (2016) An empirical assessment of alternative designs for enhancing different types of trusting beliefs in online recommendation agents. J. Management Inform. Systems 33(3):744–775.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wang W, Qiu L, Kim D, Benbasat I (2016) Effects of rational and social appeals of online recommendation agents on cognition- and affect-based trust. Decision Support Systems 86:48–60.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wang W, Zhao Y, Qiu L, Zhu Y (2014) Effects of emoticons on the acceptance of negative feedback in computer-mediated communication. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 15(8):454–483.Google Scholar
  • Whelan J, Dawar N (2016) Attributions of blame following a product-harm crisis depend on consumers’ attachment styles. Marketing Lett. 27(2):285–294.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Winder D (2011) Can you trust Google sponsored results? PC Pro.Google Scholar
  • Xiao B, Benbasat I (2007) E-commerce product recommendation agents: Use, characteristics, and impact. MIS Quart. 31(1):137–209.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Xiao B, Benbasat I (2011) Product-related deception in e-commerce: A theoretical perspective. MIS Quart. 35(1):169–196.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Xiao B, Benbasat I (2014) Research on use, characteristics, and impact of e-commerce product recommendation agents: A review and update for 2007–2012. Research Handbook on EBusiness Strategic Management, Martínez-López FJ, ed. (Springer, Berlin),403–431.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Xiao B, Benbasat I (2015) Designing warning messages for detecting biased online product recommendations: An empirical investigation. Inform. Systems Res. 26(4):793–811.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Xu JD, Benbasat I, Cenfetelli RT (2011) The effects of service and consumer product knowledge on online customer loyalty. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 12(11):741–766.Google Scholar
  • Xu JD, Benbasat I, Cenfetelli RT (2013) Integrating service quality with system and information quality: An empirical test in the e-service context. MIS Quart. 37(3):777–794.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Xu JD, Benbasat I, Cenfetelli RT (2014) The nature and consequences of trade-off transparency in the context of recommendation agents. MIS Quart. 38(2):379–406.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yang S, Ghose A (2010) Analyzing the relationship between organic and sponsored search advertising: Positive, negative, or zero interdependence? Management Sci. 29(4):602–623.AbstractGoogle Scholar
  • Yao S, Mela CF (2011) A dynamic model of sponsored search advertising. Marketing Sci. 30(3):447–468.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Zhang P, Sun H (2009) The complexity of different types of attitudes in initial and continued ICT use. J. Amer. Soc. Inform. Sci. Tech. 60(10):2048–2063.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zucker LG (1986) Production of trust: Institutional sources of economic structure, 1840–1920. Res. Organ. Behav. 8:53–111.Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.