Team Leadership and Performance: Combining the Roles of Direction and Contribution

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2017.2911

References

  • Adler PS, Mandelbaum A, Nguyen V, Schwerer E (1995) From project to process management: An empirically-based framework for analyzing product development time. Management Sci. 41(3):458–484.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Adler PS, Mandelbaum A, Nguyen V, Schwerer E (1996) Getting the most out of your product development process. Harvard Bus. Rev. 74(2):134–146.Google Scholar
  • Alchian AA, Demsetz H (1972) Production, information costs, and economic organization. Amer. Econom. Rev. 62(5):777–795.Google Scholar
  • Baumgartel H (1957) Leadership style as a variable in research administration. Admin. Sci. Quart. 2(3):344–360.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bhattacharyya S, Lafontaine F (1995) Double-sided moral hazard and the nature of share contracts. RAND J. Econom. 26(4):761–781.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bogue R (2005) Anatomy of a software development role: Development lead. Developer.com (May 26), http://www.developer.com/print/article.php/3507886.Google Scholar
  • Bonatti A, Hörner J (2011) Collaborating. Amer. Econ. Rev. 101(2):632–663.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brooks F (1995) The Mythical Man-Month: Essays on Software Engineering (Addison-Wesley, Boston).Google Scholar
  • Buzacott JA (2004) Modelling teams and workgroups in manufacturing. Ann. Oper. Res. 126(1–4):215–230.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cachon G, Netessine S (2003) Simchi-Levi D, Wu SD, Shen ZM, eds. Game Theory in Supply Chain Analysis, Supply Chain Analysis in the eBusiness Era, Chap. 2, Section 3 (Academic Publishers, Amsterdam).Google Scholar
  • Carpenter J, Bowles S, Gintis H, Hwang SH (2009) Strong reciprocity and team production: Theory and evidence. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 71(2):221–232.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chao RO, Kavadias S, Gaimon C (2009) Revenue driven resource allocation: Funding authority, incentives and npd portfolio management. Management Sci. 55(9):1556–1569.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dessein W (2007) Why a group needs a leader: Decision-making and debate in committees. CEPR Paper 6168, Center for Economic and Policy Research, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  • Dewhurst M, Guthridge M, Mohr E (2009) Motivating people: Getting beyond money. McKinsey Quart. (November), http://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/organization/our-insights/motivating-people-getting-beyond-money.Google Scholar
  • Edmondson AC (2012) Teaming: How Organizations Learn, Innovate, and Compete in the Knowledge Economy (John Wiley & Sons, San Francisco).Google Scholar
  • Eppinger SD, Browning TR (2012) Design Structure Matrix Methods and Applications (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Forsyth DR (2009) Group Dynamics, 5th ed. (Wadsworth Cengage Learning, Belmont, CA).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fu R, Subramanian A, Venkateswarm A (2016) Project characteristics, incentives, and team production. Management Sci. 62(3):785–801.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Fudenberg D, Tirole J (1991) Game Theory (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Garen J (1985) Worker heterogeneity, job screening, and firm size. J. Political Econom. 93(4):715–739.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Georgiadis G (2014) Projects and team dynamics. Rev. Econom. Stud. 82(1):187–218.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Georgiadis G, Lippman SA, Tang CS (2014) Project design with limited commitment and teams. RAND J. Econom. 45(3):598–623.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hackman JR, Vidmar N (1970) Effects of size and task type on group performance and member reactions. Sociometry 33(1):37–54.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hardy G, Littlewood JE, Polya G (1952) Inequalities, 2nd ed. (Cambridge University Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • Harsanyi JC, Selten R (1992) A General Theory of Equilibrium Selection in Games, 2nd ed. (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Hermalin BE (1998) Toward and economic theory of leadership: Leading by example. Amer. Econom. Rev. 88(5):1188–1206.Google Scholar
  • Heywood JS, Jirjahn U (2009) Profit sharing and firm size: The role of team production. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 71(2):246–258.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hill LA, Lineback KL (2011) Being the Boss: The 3 Imperatives for Becoming a Great Leader (Harvard Business Press, Boston).Google Scholar
  • Holmström B (1982) Moral hazard in teams. Bell J. Econom. 13(2):324–340.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hörner J, Skrzypacz A (2017) Learning, experimentation, and information design. Honoré B, Pakes A, Piazzesi M, Samuelson L, eds. Advances in Economics and Econometrics: Eleventh World Congress, Econometric Society Monographs (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 63–98.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • House RJ, Baetz ML (1979) Leadership: Some empirical generalizations and new research directions. Res. Organ. Behav. Greenwich 1(1):341–423.Google Scholar
  • Hutchison-Krupat J, Kavadias S (2015) Strategic resource allocation processes: Top-down, bottom-up, and the value of strategic buckets. Management Sci. 61(2):391–412.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kahai S, Sosik J, Avolio B (2004) Effects of participative and directive leadership in electronic groups. Groups Organ. Management 29(1):67–105.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kandel E, Lazear EP (1992) Peer pressure and partnerships. J. Political Econom. 100(4):801–817.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Keller G, Rady S (2010) Strategic experimentation with poisson bandits. Theoret. Econom. 5(1):275–311.Google Scholar
  • Keller G, Rady S, Cripps M (2005) Strategic experimentation with exponential bandits. Econometrica 73(1):39–68.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kolbjørnsrud V, Amico R, Thomas RJ (2016) How artificial intelligence will redefine management? Harvard. Bus. Rev. (November 2), https://hbr.org/2016/11/how-artificial-intelligence-will-redefine-management.Google Scholar
  • Kraut RE, Streeter LA (1995) Coordination in software development. Comm. ACM. 38(3):69–81.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kremer M (1993) The O-ring theory of economic development. Quart. J. Econom. 108(3):551–575.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Krishnan V, Ulrich KT (2001) Product development decisions: A review of the literature. Management Sci. 47(1):1–21.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kua P (2014) Talking with Tech Leads (Lean Publication, Lexington, KY).Google Scholar
  • Kua P (2015) 5 tips for being an effective tech lead. ThoughtWorks (June 16), https://www.thoughtworks.com/insights/blog/5-tips-being-effective-tech-lead.Google Scholar
  • Kwon HD, Lippman SA, Tang CS (2010) Optimal time-based and cost-based coordinated project contracts with unobservable work rates. Internat. J. Production Econom. 126(1):247–254.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lewin K, Lippit R, White R (1939) Patterns of aggressive behavior in experimentally created social climates. J. Soc. Psych. 10(1):271–301.Google Scholar
  • Messenger S (2014) Roles and responsibilities. The DSDM Agile Project Framework, Chap. 7 (Agile Business Consortium, Kent, UK).Google Scholar
  • Mihm J (2010) Incentives in new product development projects and the role of target costing. Management Sci. 56(8):1324–1344.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Mihm J, Loch CH, Willkinson D, Huberman BA (2010) Hierarchical structure and search in complex organizations. Management Sci. 56(5):831–848.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Mollick E (2011) Why middle managers may be the most important people in your company. Knowledge@Wharton (May 25), http://knowledge.wharton.upenn.edu/article/why-middle-managers-may-be-the-most-important-people-in-your-company/.Google Scholar
  • Mollick E (2012) People and process, suits, and innovators: The role of individuals in firm performance. Strategic Management J. 33(1):1001–1015.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ozkan FG, Gaimon Ch, Kavadias U (2015) Dynamic knowledge transfer and knowledge development for product and process design teams. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 17(2):177–190.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rahmani M, Roels G, Karmarkar US (2017) Collaborative work dynamics in project with co-production. Production Oper. Management 4(26):686–703.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ringelmann M (1913) Research on animate sources of power: The work of man. Ann. de l’Institut Natl. Agronomique 12(2):1–40.Google Scholar
  • Roels G (2014) Optimal design of co-productive services: Interaction and work allocation. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 16(4):578–594.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Roels G, Karmarkar US, Carr S (2010) Contracting for collaborative services. Management Sci. 56(5):849–863.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rotemberg JJ (1994) Human relations in the workplace. J. Political Econom. 102(4):684–717.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rotemberg JJ, Saloner G (1993) Leadership style and incentives. Management Sci. 39(11):1299–1318.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Siemsen E, Balasubramanian S, Roth AV (2007) Incentives that induce task-related effort, helping, and knowledge sharing in workgroups. Management Sci. 53(10):1533–1550.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Steiner ID (1972) Group Process and Productivity (Academic Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • Terwiesch C, Loch CH (2004) Collaborative prototyping and pricing of custom-designed products. Management Sci. 50(2):145–158.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Thompson JD (1967) Organization in Action (McGraw Hill, Chicago).Google Scholar
  • Van De Ven AH, Delbecq AL, Koenig D (1976) Determinants of coordination modes within organizations. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 41(2):322–338.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wernerfelt B (2007) Delegation, committees and managers. J. Econom. Management Strategy 16(1):35–51.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wu Y, Loch CH, Van der Heyden L (2008) A model of fair process and its limits. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 14(4):637–653.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Wu Y, Ramachandran K, Krishnan V (2014) Managing cost salience and procrastination in projects: Compensation and team composition. Production Oper. Management 23(8):1299–1311.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yun S, Faraj S, Sims HP Jr (2005) Should I be directive or empowering? Contingent leadership in high risk and high reliability situations. J. Appl. Psych. 90(6):1288–1296.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zhang J (2016) Deadlines in product development. Management Sci. 62(11):3310–3326.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Zwilling M (2012) 8 ways leaders can motivate employees beyond money. Forbes (January 10), https://www.forbes.com/sites/martinzwilling/2012/01/10/8-ways-leaders-can-motivate-employees-beyond-money/#51b7ddaa26f4.Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.