Revisiting the Trade-off Between Risk and Incentives: The Shocking Effect of Random Shocks?

References

• Abeler J, Falk A, Goette L, Huffman D (2011) Reference points and effort provision. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(2):470–492.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Adams C (2005) Agent discretion, adverse selection and the risk-incentive trade-off. Working paper, Federal Trade Commission, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Alchian A, Demsetz H (1972) Production, information costs, and economic organization. Amer. Econom. Rev. 62(5):777–795.Google Scholar
• Al-Ubaydli O, Andersen S, Gneezy U, List JA (2015) Carrots that look like sticks: Toward an understanding of multitasking incentive schemes. Southern Econom. J. 81(3):538–561.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Armantier O, Boly A (2015) Framing of incentives and effort provision. Internat. Econom. Rev. 56(3)917–938.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baillon A, Bleichrodt H, Spinu V (2016) Searching for the reference point. Working paper, Erasmus School of Economics, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, Netherlands.Google Scholar
• Baker G, Jorgensen B (2003) Volatility, noise, and incentives. Working paper, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Baker GP, Gibbons R, Murphy K (1994) Subjective performance measures in optimal incentive contracts. Quart. J. Econom. 109(4):1125–1156.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bartling B, Fehr E, Marechal M, Schunk D (2009) Egalitarianism and competitiveness. Amer. Econom. Rev. 99(2):93–98.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berger J, Pope D (2011) Can losing lead to winning. Management Sci. 57(5):817–827.Link, Google Scholar
• Bernheim D, Whinston M (1998) Incomplete contracts and strategic ambiguity. Amer. Econom. Rev. 88(4):902–932.Google Scholar
• Besanko D, Dranove D, Schaefter S, Shanley M (2012) The Economics of Strategy, 6th ed. (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Google Scholar
• Bolton P, Dewatripont M (2005) Contract Theory (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Brink A, Rankin F (2013) The effects of risk preference and loss aversion on individual behavior under bonus, penalty, and combined contract frames. Behav. Res. Accounting 25(2):145–170.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Camerer C, Weber R (2012) Experimental organizational economics. Gibbons R, Roberts J, eds. Handbook of Organizational Economics (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ), 213–262.Google Scholar
• Camerer C, Babcock L, Loewenstein G, Thaler R (1997) Labor supply of New York City cabdrivers: One day at a time. Quart. J. Econom. 112(2):407–441.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cameron AC, Miller D (2011) Robust inference with clustered data. Ullah A, Giles DEA, eds. Handbook of Empirical Economics and Finance (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL), 1–28.Google Scholar
• Charness G, Kuhn P (2011) Lab labor: What can labor economists learn from the lab? Ashenfelter O, Card D, eds. Handbook of Labor Economics, Vol. 4 (Elsevier, Utrecht, Netherlands), 229–330.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Charness G, Rabin M (2002) Understanding social preferences with simple tests. Quart. J. Econom. 117(3):817–869.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Charness N, Campbell JID (1988) Acquiring skill at mental calculation in adulthood: A task decomposition. J. Experiment. Psych.: General 117(2):115–129.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Corgnet B, Gómez-Miñambres J, Hernan-Gonzalez R (2015a) Goal setting and monetary incentives: When large stakes are not enough. Management Sci. 61(12):2926–2944.Link, Google Scholar
• Corgnet B, Hernan-Gonzalez R, Rassenti S (2015b) Firing threats: Incentive effects and impression management. Games Econom. Behav. 91:97–113.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Corgnet B, Hernan-Gonzalez R, Rassenti S (2015c) Peer pressure and moral hazard in teams: Experimental evidence. Rev. Behav. Econom. 2(4):379–403.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Corgnet B, Hernan-Gonzalez R, Schniter E (2015d) Why real leisure really matters: Incentive effects on real effort in the laboratory. Experiment. Econom. 18(2):284–301.Crossref, Google Scholar
• de Quidt J (2018) Your loss is my gain: A recruitment experiment with framed incentives. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 16(2):522–559.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DeVaro J, Kurtulus F (2010) An empirical analysis of risk, incentives, and the delegation of worker authority. Indust. Labor Relations Rev. 63(4):637–657.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dohmen T, Falk A (2011) Performance pay and multi-dimensional sorting: Productivity, preferences and gender. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(2):556–590.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ederer F, Holden R, Meyer M (2014) Gaming and strategic opacity in incentive provision. Law-Econ Research Paper 13–01, UCLA School of Law, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
• Edmans A, Gabaix X (2011) The effect of risk on the CEO market. Rev. Financial Stud. 24(8):2822–2863.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eriksson T, Poulsen A, Villeval MC (2009) Feedback and incentives: Experimental evidence. Labour Econom. 16(6):679–688.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Falk A, Fehr E (2003) Why labour market experiments? Labour Econom. 10(4):399–406.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fehr E, Goette L (2007) Do workers work more if wages are high? Evidence from a randomized field experiment. Amer. Econom. Rev. 97(1):298–317.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fehr E, Schmidt K (1999) A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation. Quart J. Econom. 114(3):817–868.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fehr E, Goette L, Lienhard M (2013) Loss aversion and effort: Evidence from a field experiment. Mimeo, University of Zurich, Zurich.Google Scholar
• Fryer R, Levitt S, List J, Sadoff S (2012) Enhancing the efficacy of teacher incentives through loss aversion: A field experiment. NBER Working Paper 18237, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gächter S, Johnson E, Herrmann A (2010) Individual-level loss aversion in riskless and risky choices. CEDEX Discussion Paper 2010–20, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.Google Scholar
• Garen JE (1994) Executive compensation and principal-agent theory. J. Political Econom. 102(6):1175–1199.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gibbons R, Roberts J (2013) Economic theories of incentives in organizations. Handbook of Organizational Economics (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ), 56–99.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gneezy U, Goette L, Sprenger C, Zimmermann F (2017) The limits of expectations-based reference dependence. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 15(4):861–876.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ghosh M, John G (2000) Experimental evidence for agency models of salesforce compensation. Marketing Sci. 19(4):348–365.Link, Google Scholar
• Grosse S, Rockenbach B, Putterman L (2011) Monitoring in teams: A model and experiment on the central monitor hypothesis. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 9(4):785–816.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hannan RL, Hoffman VB, Moser DV (2005) Bonus versus penalty: Does contract frame affect employee effort? Experimental Business Research (Springer, New York), 151–169.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hart O (1995) Firms, Contracts, and Financial Structure (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hart O, Holmström B (1986) The theory of contracts. Mimeo, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• He Z, Li S, Wei B, Yu J (2014) Uncertainty, risk, and incentives: Theory and evidence. Management Sci. 60(1):206–226.Link, Google Scholar
• Heath C, Larrick RP, Wu G (1999) Goals as reference points. Cognitive Psych. 38(1):79–109.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holmström B (1979) Moral hazard and observability. Bell J. Econom. 10(1):74–91.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holmström B, Milgrom P (1991) Multitask principal-agent analyses: Incentive contracts, asset ownership, and job design. J. Law, Econom., Organ. 7:24–52.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holt CA, Laury SK (2002) Risk aversion and incentive effects. Amer. Econom. Rev. 92(5):1644–1655.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hossain T, List J (2012) The behavioralist visits the factory: Increasing productivity using simple framing manipulations. Management Sci. 58(12):2151–2167.Link, Google Scholar
• Imas A, Sadoff S, Samek A (2017) Do people anticipate loss aversion? Management Sci. 63(5):1271–1284.Link, Google Scholar
• Jehiel P (2014) On transparency in organizations. Mimeo, Paris School of Economics, Paris.Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Tversky A (1979) Prospect theory: An analysis of decisions under risk. Econometrica 47(2):313–327.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Tversky A (2000) Choices, Values, and Frames (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kaur S, Kremer M, Mullainathan S (2015) Self-control at work. J. Political Econom. 123(6):1227–1277.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klein B, Crawford R, Alchian A (1978) Vertical integration, appropriable rents, and the competitive contracting process. J. Law Econom. 21:279–326.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kőszegi B, Rabin M (2006) A model of reference-dependent preferences. Quart. J. Econom. 121(4):1133–1166.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Laffont JJ, Martimort D (2002) The Theory of Incentives: The Principal-Agent Model (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lazear E, Oyer P (2013) Personnel economics. Gibbons R, Roberts DJ, eds. Handbook of Organizational Economics (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ), 479–519.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee D (2009) Training, wages, and sample selection: Estimating sharp bounds on treatment effects. Rev. Econom. Stud. 76(3):1071–1102.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leland H (1968) Saving and uncertainty: The precautionary demand for saving. Quart. J. Econom 82(3):465–473.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levitt SD, List JA, Neckermann S, Sadoff S (2012) The behavioralist goes to school: Leveraging behavioral economics to improve educational performance. NBER Working Paper 18165, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Luft J (1994) Bonus and penalty incentives contract choice by employees. J. Accounting Econom. 18(2):181–206.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Milgrom P, Roberts J (1992) Economics, Organization and Management (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ).Google Scholar
• Miller G, Whitford A (2002) Trust and incentives in principal-Agent negotiations the “insurance/incentive trade-off.” J. Theoretical Politics 14(2):231–267.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Murphy KJ, Oyer P (2003) Discretion in executive incentive contracts. Mimeo, Marshall School of Business, University of Southern California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
• Niederle M, Vesterlund L (2007) Do women shy away from competition? Do men compete too much? Quart. J. Econom. 3(8):1067–1101.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oyer P, Schaefer S (2011) Personnel economics: Hiring and incentives. Card D, Ashenfelter O, eds. Handbook of Labor Economics, Vol. 4 (Elsevier, Utrecht, Netherlands), 1769–1823.Google Scholar
• Paarsch H, Shearer B (1999) The response of worker effort to piece rates: Evidence from the British Columbia tree-planting industry. J. Human Resources 34(4):643–667.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pokorny K (2008) Pay but do not pay too much. An experimental study on the impact of incentives. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 66(2):251–264.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Prendergast C (2002) The tenuous trade-off between risk and incentives. J. Political Econom. 110(5):1071–1102.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Raith M (2008) Specific knowledge and performance measurement. RAND J. Econom. 39(4):1059–1079.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rubin J, Sheremeta R (2016) Principal-agent settings with random shocks. Management Sci. 62(4):985–999.Link, Google Scholar
• Rubin J, Samek A, Sheremeta R (2018) Loss aversion and the quantity–quality tradeoff. Experiment. Econom. 21(2):292–315.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sloof R, van Praag C (2010) The effect of noise in a performance measure on work motivation: A real effort laboratory experiment. Labour Econom. 17(5):751–765.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sloof R, Sonnemans J, Oosterbeek H (2004) Specific investments, holdup, and the outside option principle. Eur. Econom. Rev. 48(6):1399–1410.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sloof R, Oosterbeek H, Sonnemans J (2007) Does making specific investments unobservable boost investment incentives? J. Econom. Management Strat. 16(4):911–942.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith V (1976) Experimental economics: Induced value theory. Amer. Econom. Rev. 66(2):274–279.Google Scholar
• Sonnemans J, Oosterbeek H, Sloof R (2001) On the relation between asset ownership and specific investments. Econom. J. 111(474): 791–820.Google Scholar
• Stiglitz J (1974) Incentives and risk sharing in sharecropping. Rev. Econom. Stud. 41(2):219–55.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Varian HR (1992) Microeconomic Analysis, 3rd ed. (W. Norton & Company, New York).Google Scholar
• Vroom V (1964) Work and Motivation (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA).Google Scholar
• Zabojnik J (1996) Pay-performance sensitivity and production uncertainty. Econom. Lett. 53(3):291–296.Crossref, Google Scholar