Corporate Innovation Along the Supply Chain

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2017.2924

References

  • Acharya VV, Subramanian KV (2009) Bankruptcy codes and innovation. Rev. Financial Stud. 22(12):4949–4988.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Acharya VV, Baghai RP, Subramanian KV (2013) Labor laws and innovation. J. Law Econom. 56(4):997–1037.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Acharya VV, Baghai RP, Subramanian KV (2014) Wrongful discharge laws and innovation. Rev. Financial Stud. 27(1):301–346.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Adams JD, Jaffe AB (1996) Bounding the effects of R&D: An investigation using matched establishment-firm data. RAND J. Econom. 27(4):700–721.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ahern K, Harford J (2014) The importance of industry links in merger waves. J. Finance 69(2):527–576.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Alam ZS, Chen MA, Ciccotello CS, Ryan HE (2014) Does the location of directors matter? Information acquisition and board decisions. J. Financial Quant. Anal. 49(1):131–164.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Azoulay P, Graff Zivin JS, Manso G (2011) Incentives and creativity: Evidence from the academic life sciences. RAND J. Econom. 42(3):527–554.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Banerjee S, Dasgupta S, Kim Y (2008) Buyer–supplier relationships and the stakeholder theory of capital structure. J. Finance 63(5):2507–2552.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baranchuk N, Kieschnick R, Moussawi R (2014) Motivating innovation in newly public firms. J. Financial Econom. 111(3):578–588.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barrot JN, Sauvagnat J (2016) Input specificity and the propagation of idiosyncratic shocks in production networks. Quart. J. Econom. 131(3):1543–1592.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bena J, Li K (2014) Corporate innovations and mergers and acquisitions. J. Finance 69(5):1923–1960.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bloom N, Schankerman M, Van Reenen J (2013) Identifying technology spillovers and product market rivalry. Econometrica 81(4):1347–1393.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bradley D, Kim I, Tian X (2017) Do unions affect innovation? Management Sci. 63(7):2251–2271.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Brav A, Jiang W, Ma S, Tian X (2018) How does hedge fund activism reshape corporate innovation? J. Financial Econom. 130(2):237–264.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Catalini C, Fons-Rosen C, Gaulé P (2016) Did cheaper flights change the geography of scientific collaboration? MIT Sloan Research Paper 5172-16, MIT Sloan School of Management, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  • Cen L, Dasgupta S, Sen R (2015b) Discipline or disruption? Stakeholder relationships and the effect of takeover threat. Management Sci. 62(10):2820–2841.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cen L, Dasgupta S, Elkamhi R, Pungaliya RS (2015a) Reputation and loan contract terms: The role of principal customers. Rev. Finance 20(2):501–533.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chang X, Fu K, Low A, Zhang W (2015) Non-executive employee stock options and corporate innovation. J. Financial Econom. 115(1):168–188.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chemmanur TJ, Tian X (2018) Do anti-takeover provisions spur corporate innovation? J. Financial Quant. Anal. 53(3):1163–1194.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chemmanur TJ, Loutskina E, Tian X (2014) Corporate venture capital, value creation, and innovation. Rev. Financial Stud. 27(8): 2434–2473.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chesbrough HW (2006) Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology (Harvard Business School Press, Boston).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chu Y (2012) Optimal capital structure, bargaining, and the supplier market structure. J. Financial Econom. 106(2):411–426.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cornaggia J, Mao Y, Tian X, Wolfe B (2015) Does banking competition affect innovation? J. Financial Econom. 115(1):189–209.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dasgupta S, Zhang K, Zhu C (2015) Innovation, social connections, and the boundary of the firm. Working paper, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • d’Aspremont C, Jacquemin A (1988) Cooperative and noncooperative R&D in duopoly with spillovers. Amer. Econom. Rev. 78(5): 1133–1137.Google Scholar
  • Eaton J, Kortum S (1996) Trade in ideas patenting and productivity in the OECD. J. Internat. Econom. 40(3):251–278.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ederer F, Manso G (2013) Is pay for performance detrimental to innovation? Management Sci. 59(7):1496–1513.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Fang VW, Tian X, Tice S (2014) Does stock liquidity enhance or impede firm innovation? J. Finance 69(5):2085–2125.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fee CE, Thomas S (2004) Sources of gains in horizontal mergers: Evidence from customer, supplier, and rival firms. J. Financial Econom. 74(3):423–460.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fee CE, Hadlock CJ, Thomas S (2006) Corporate equity ownership and the governance of product market relationships. J. Finance 61(3):1217–1251.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ferreira D, Manso G, Silva AC (2014) Incentives to innovate and the decision to go public or private. Rev. Financial Stud. 27(1):256–300.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Giroud X (2013) Proximity and investment: Evidence from plant-level data. Quart. J. Econom. 128(2):861–915.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hall BH, Jaffe AB, Trajtenberg M (2001) The NBER patent citation data file: Lessons, insights and methodological tools. NBER Working Paper 8498, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  • He JJ, Tian X (2013) The dark side of analyst coverage: The case of innovation. J. Financial Econom. 109(3):856–878.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hertzel MG, Li Z, Officer MS, Rodgers KJ (2008) Inter-firm linkages and the wealth effects of financial distress along the supply chain. J. Financial Econom. 87(2):374–387.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hirshleifer D, Hsu PH, Li D (2013) Innovative efficiency and stock returns. J. Financial Econom. 107(3):632–654.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hsu PH, Tian X, Xu Y (2014) Financial development and innovation: Cross-country evidence. J. Financial Econom. 112(1):116–135.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jaffe A (1986) Technological opportunity and spillovers of R&D: Evidence from firms’ patents, profits, and market value. Amer. Econom. Rev. 76(5):984–1001.Google Scholar
  • Kale J, Shahrur H (2007) Corporate capital structure and the characteristics of suppliers and customers. J. Financial Econom. 83(2): 321–365.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kale J, Kedia S, Williams R (2011) The effect of CEO risk-taking incentives on relationship-specific investments by customers and suppliers. Working paper, Northeastern University, Boston.Google Scholar
  • Kamien MI, Muller E, Zang I (1992) Research joint ventures and R&D cartels. Amer. Econom. Rev. 82(5):1293–1306.Google Scholar
  • Keller W (2002) Geographic localization of international technology diffusion. Amer. Econom. Rev. 92(1):120–142.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Knyazeva A, Knyazeva D, Masulis RW (2013) The supply of corporate directors and board independence. Rev. Financial Stud. 26(6):1561–1605.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Leahy D, Neary JP (1997) Public policy towards R&D in oligopolistic industries. Amer. Econom. Rev. 87(4):642–662.Google Scholar
  • Lychagin S, Pinkse J, Slade ME, Reenen JV (2016) Spillovers in space: Does geography matter? J. Indust. Econom. 64(2):295–335.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Malloy CJ (2005) The geography of equity analysis. J. Finance 60(2): 719–755.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Manso G (2011) Motivating innovation. J. Finance 66(5):1823–1869.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Orlando MJ (2004) Measuring spillovers from industrial R&D: On the importance of geographic and technological proximity. RAND J. Econom. 35(4):777–786.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Petersen MA, Rajan RG (2002) Does distance still matter? The information revolution in small business lending. J. Finance 57(6): 2533–2570.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pirinsky C, Wang Q (2006) Does corporate headquarters location matter for stock returns? J. Finance 61(4):1991–2015.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Porter M (1992) Capital disadvantage: America’s failing capital investment system. Harvard Bus. Rev. 19(4):65–82.Google Scholar
  • Prahalad CK, Ramaswamy V (2013) The Future of Competition: Co-Creating Unique Value with Customers (Harvard Business School Press, Boston).Google Scholar
  • Roberts MR, Whited TM (2013) Endogeneity in empirical corporate finance. Handbook Econom. Finance 2(Part A):493–572.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Seru A (2014) Firm boundaries matter: Evidence from conglomerates and R&D activity. J. Financial Econom. 111(2):381–405.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shahrur H (2005) Industry structure and horizontal takeovers: Analysis of wealth effects on rivals, suppliers, and corporate customers. J. Financial Econom. 76(1):61–98.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tian X (2011) The causes and consequences of venture capital stage financing. J. Financial Econom. 101(1):132–159.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tian X, Wang TY (2014) Tolerance for failure and corporate innovation. Rev. Financial Stud. 27(1):211–255.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Von Hippel E (2005) Democratizing innovation: The evolving phenomenon of user innovation. J. Für Betriebswirtschaft 55(1):63–78.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.